CBS ‘Early Show’ Focuses on Palin ‘Trooper-gate,’ Leaves Out Key Facts

Photo of Kyle Drennen.

Chip Reid, CBS At the top of the 8am hour of Wednesday’s CBS Early Show, co-host Maggie Rodriguez teased an upcoming segment on an ethics investigation into Sarah Palin’s firing of an Alaska public safety official: "Sarah Palin and troopergate – why the Alaska governor makes an about-face on this issue and why it could haunt her on the campaign trail." Later, correspondent Chip Reid remarked: "Palin may be back here in Ohio campaigning, but she's still being hounded by the so-called troopergate controversy back in Alaska."

Reid went on to describe the case: "Last July, Palin fired Alaska's public safety commissioner, Walt Monegan. He says he was fired because he refused to fire Palin's former brother-in-law, Mike Wooten, a state trooper who went through an ugly divorce with Palin's sister...At first, Palin said she welcomed the investigation, but now the McCain-Palin campaign claims it's being exploited by Democrats for political reasons and says it's now unlikely she will cooperate. And the campaign says Monegan's firing had nothing to do with Palin's brother-in-law." However, Reid never went further to explain that new email evidence corroborates Palin’s reason for firing Monegan or to describe the political motivations of those leading the investigation.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Meanwhile, at the beginning of the Wednesday 10am hour of FNC’s America’s Newsroom, co-anchor Megyn Kelly cited the new evidence: "...now we learn this morning that e-mails actually back up Palin's claim that Monegan was fired because of insubordination over budget issues and not having anything to do with that trooper issue." In a report that followed, correspondent Dan Springer explained: "Those e-mails are between the Palin budget director and her top cop, Walt Monegan. And they do seem to suggest that there were some problems brewing in this administration before Monegan was fired. Now the McCain-Palin camp is releasing those e-mails and making the case that Monegan was fired for insubordination, not because he refused to fire Palin's ex-brother-in-law."

In addition to leaving out the newly released emails, the Early Show segment also failed to describe any of the allegations against trooper Mike Wooten. On America’s Newsroom, Springer quoted McCain-Palin spokesperson Meg Stapleton: "This is a man who was out there, who has tasered his son, who's killed a moose illegally. Who's threatened to kill her father, who's abused her sister. She had the right to say, ‘I have concerns about a guy who still patrols my neighborhood.’" Reid did quote Stapleton in his report, but only a brief statement regarding Monegan’s firing.

Reid also failed to mention that one of the lead investigators in the case, Democratic State Senator Hollis French, remarked on the McCain campaign’s vetting of Palin: "If they had done their job they never would have picked her...Now they may have to deal with an October surprise."

Reid concluded his report by proclaiming: "An investigation 4,000 miles away that could turn out to be a minor irritant or a serious challenge to Sarah Palin's reputation as a reformer."

Here is the full transcript of the Early Show segment:

8:00AM TEASER:

MAGGIE RODRIGUEZ: Sarah Palin and troopergate – why the Alaska governor makes an about-face on this issue and why it could haunt her on the campaign trail.

8:02AM SEGMENT:

RUSS MITCHELL: There's new development in that investigation over whether vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin abused her power as governor of Alaska. Yesterday, the attorney general there said state employees will refuse to honor subpoenas in the case. CBS News Capitol Hill correspondent Chip Reid reports.

CHIP REID: After a few days home in Alaska, Governor Sarah Palin was back with John McCain in Ohio Tuesday, where they promised to clean up Wall Street and Washington.

SARAH PALIN: That's the reason we're going to D.C., we want to shake things up.

REID: Palin may be back here in Ohio campaigning, but she's still being hounded by the so-called troopergate controversy back in Alaska. Last July, Palin fired Alaska's public safety commissioner, Walt Monegan. He says he was fired because he refused to fire Palin's former brother-in-law, Mike Wooten, a state trooper who went through an ugly divorce with Palin's sister. The Alaska legislature launched a bi-partisan investigation to determine whether Palin acted improperly, using her office to settle a personal grudge. At first, Palin said she welcomed the investigation, but now the McCain-Palin campaign claims it's being exploited by Democrats for political reasons and says it's now unlikely she will cooperate. And the campaign says Monegan's firing had nothing to do with Palin's brother-in-law.

MEG STAPLETON: And everything to do with Commissioner Monegan's adamant refusal to join in Governor Palin's fiscal responsibility reform.

REID: Palin's husband, Todd, has also been subpoenaed in the case. So what does this all mean for her?

KEN VOGEL: Troopergate is a fairly small-time scandal, as far as scandals go, but has the potential to really seriously undercut the premise of Sarah Palin's candidacy. That is, that she is a reformer, who's looking to rid government of corruption.

REID: An investigation 4,000 miles away that could turn out to be a minor irritant or a serious challenge to Sarah Palin's reputation as a reformer. Chip reid, CBS News, Vienna, Ohio.

 

Here is the full transcript of the America’s Newsroom segment:

10:02AM SEGMENT:

MEGYN KELLY: Well, new evidence emerging in this story involving Governor Sarah Palin and this state trooper in Alaska. Some refer to this as 'trooper-gate,' others say it's not any sort of 'gate.' Well, Palin, here's the deal, she fired this man shown here. He's the head of the state police, his name is Walt Monegan. And she said that this guy got fired because of budget concerns, not because he refused to fire the state trooper who was once married to Sarah Palin's sister, if you can follow that. In any event, now we learn this morning that e-mails actually back up Palin's claim that Monegan was fired because of insubordination over budget issues and not having anything to do with that trooper issue. Dan Springer live in Anchorage, Alaska to explain it all for us. Hi, Dan.

DAN SPRINGER: Yeah Megyn, it is an ongoing saga here in Anchorage. Those e-mails are between the Palin budget director and her top cop, Walt Monegan. And they do seem to suggest that there were some problems brewing in this administration before Monegan was fired. Now the McCain-Palin camp is releasing those e-mails and making the case that Monegan was fired for insubordination, not because he refused to fire Palin's ex-brother-in-law. Palin has signaled this week through her campaign that she will not cooperate with the legislative investigation, after initially saying that she welcomed the scrutiny. But in the legal motion filed this week to the state personnel board, which is also investigating this is as an ethics complaint, Palin says she fired Monegan for going around her back, lobbying for pet projects that she had already vetoed. Publicly, Palin seemed very supportive of Monegan, praising him for his program fighting domestic violence, but McCain staffers say it was a different picture behind the scenes.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN: Commissioner Monegan fought the Governor at every single opportunity that he had to try to fight her on budget matters. That's why he was removed from his position.

SPRINGER: Also in the motion, Palin's lawyer makes the argument that Palin had every right and duty to share her concerns about trooper Mike Wooten, who had divorced her sister. Wooten had already been suspended five days, but the governor clearly felt that was too lenient.

MEG STAPLETON: This is a man who was out there, who has tasered his son, who's killed a moose illegally. Who's threatened to kill her father, who's abused her sister. She had the right to say, 'I have concerns about a guy who still patrols my neighborhood.'

SPRINGER: And this whole investigation took another strange turn yesterday when five Republicans in the state legislature filed a lawsuit, trying to get this legislative investigation stopped until the entire legislature could vote on it. In Alaska, they have a part-time legislature and they set up this legislative council, which makes a lot of decisions when the full session is not happening. And so now these five lawmakers want to stop this entire process until the entire state legislature can have a vote as to whether they should move forward, Megyn.

KELLY: Dan Springer, thanks so much.

—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

insubordination over budget, and a dangerous trooper

Hi Kyle,

I think the media interest in this might stem from the fact that these emails about his insubordination are coming out late, after Palin already said she would not cooperate with the investigation and would not release emails. (And releasing a few just makes it look like there's more going on in the ones that she refuses to turn over to the investigation.)

Also, I just want to point out a problem in your logic. You say that (1) the evidence points to insubordination over the budget in Monegan, and then you say that (2) Trooper Wooten might have posed an authentic danger to her family.

But if you want to make the second argument you have to admit that she did pressure Monegan to fire Wooten (for good reason), whereas much of your first argument is based on denying that pressure ever existed.

Also, I just want to point

Also, I just want to point out a problem in your logic. You say that (1) the evidence points to insubordination over the budget in Monegan, and then you say that (2) Trooper Wooten might have posed an authentic danger to her family.

Couldn't #2 be the cherry on top?

Besides, you do agree that the MSM should still give us any facts pertaining to this, right?

Right?

“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)

"you can't do that, and you wouldn't want to" is another form

Hi Newsbusterbrown,

You can't claim "I didn't do that, and if I did it would be justified" because the second part of the argument undercuts the first. If you didn't do it, that's all that needs to be said.

And I totally agree that the MSM and the Palin administration should give us all the facts. (I wasn't in any way defending the MSM here--read my post again--I was just pointing out a slight flaw in the poster's logic.)

Tell me nicholas...are you

Tell me nicholas...are you ever happy with anything here...sure doesn't seem so...

...why do you stay here if all you do is detract every single thing.

You must have one miserable life, adding misery to yourself daily.

Poor baby.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

I may be wrong, BT, but he

I may be wrong, BT, but he seems to be more propagandist than someone willing to be intellectually honest. 

“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)

Hi Nbb... I agree. I am

Hi Nbb...

I agree.

I am just tired of it...I haven't ever said anything, but good golly enough is enough already.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

His overly polite and

His overly polite and deferential style is reminiscent of "Jer". By the way, what happened to Jer? I haven't seen his comments lately. Is he still commenting? 

McNotObama '08

Chris... Hmmmm...maybe

Chris...

Hmmmm...maybe it's a twin or kissin' cousin of Jer's now that you mention it...

...chuckle..chuckle...

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

That sickeningly polite

That sickeningly polite style, kind of like this: "Oh, excuse me, can I just make this point, if it's not too much trouble? Why didn't (insert poster's name) mention that (insert troll line from a liberal blog here)". It's even more annoying framed this way. 

McNotObama '08

whoa, nelly!

wait, wait boys--

first you say I'm a propagandist willing to twist the truth to fit my views--then you say I'm overly polite and deferential, which presumably means I'm willing to listen to other people's views. those two don't really fit together, so which is it?

in truth, to answer, bigtimer's questions, I'm not happy when I see people lie and mislead--which means I'm not happy when HuffPo takes out of context Carly Fiorina's statement that Palin and McCain are not qualified to run a company like Hewlett Packard

--it was a dumb statement, but her full context is that none of the candidates are qualified, that running a company is different from running a country--

and which means I'm not happy when NewsBusters twists the news they mean to set straight (for instance, do you remember Noel Sheppard's post on how Krauthammer "debunked" the attacks that Palin got the question wrong about the Bush Doctrine? That article was titled something like "Krauthammer debunks"--except if you read that article, you'd see that, yes, Krauthammer does attack Gibson, but he also says that Sarah Palin got the question wrong--hardly a slam dunk of a debunk, wouldn't you agree? And if you didn't have time to read the article--well, nobody lied to you, but maybe they might have misled you a bit.)

As for being polite, I don't know what to say--that's how I was raised.

Let me expand on that: I know coming here to point out failures in conservative logic will not win me any friends, and could easily devolve into a shouting match. Of course, I'm not here to win friends, but I'm not here to shout either. I'm here simply to point out failures in logic. 

For instance, do you remember the big outrage about Obama's lipstick remark? Well, later, McCain said that the comment wasn't about Palin, but that Obama should still have chosen his words better. Wait, a minute Johnny--he didn't insult her, but you still felt the need to defend her (in an ad that took a Couric line completely out of context), and you still claim that he should choose his words better, even though he wasn't insulting her with the words that he did choose?

nn... You always

nn...

You always complain.

Simple as that.

Boring.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

the Palin lynch mob with the pointy white democrat hoods...

never the less Palin is STILL BEING HOUNDED by allegations

the HOUNDING just won't stop!

where is ALL OF THIS HOUNDING coming from anyway?!?

hmmm

man, pick any democrat and stick em under this kind of microscope - oh the humanity

black people may still suffer discrimination and bigotry

BUT MAN IT'S ABSOLUTELY NOTHING LIKE BEING A RELIGIOUS OR POLITICAL CONSERVATIVE IN AMERICA THESE DAYS

swing low, sweet char-e-ott - comin for to carry me hooooome...!

Journalism is the opium of the liberals

TM... ...speaking of any

TM...

...speaking of any democrat...I see they have good ol' Rahm Emanuel out today on the talking head stump...that's when you know the dems are worried...very very worried.

I love it.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

where is ALL OF THIS

where is ALL OF THIS HOUNDING coming from anyway?!?

Dogs TM...lots and lots of hound dogs...

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

pit bulls, lynch mobs

pit bulls, lynch mobs and pointy white hoods

fits the msm/dnc to a T 

Journalism is the opium of the liberals

Nick Nick Nick

The media's interest stems from their need to attack Palin.Also Monegan was insubordinate twice.Maybe she felt she didnt own them it.Since it should of been done thru the personnel board.Now let bring up the trooper.He tased a 10 year old.That is child abuse in my state.Useing a taser he would be doing jail time.Now my brother is a cop in Cali.I going to email him to find out what the consequences would be for a cop where he is at.Taseing a 10 year old isnt like a smack across the butt.

wooten should've been fired if what we hear is true

hey well99,

oh, don't get me started about Wooten--by all accounts, Wooten should've been fired (at least). If Monegan was defending or shielding him after tasing a kid, then he probably should've been fired too.

But if this is all true, then the Palin camp will have to admit to pressuring Monegan to fire him. They can't say, "Wooten was dangerous, and we never did a thing about it," right? (Also, I think we'll probably agree, pressuring someone to do the right thing is a fine thing and should probably be something the Palin camp admits to.)

And hopefully we'll learn all we need to know about their pasts, and move on to the policies both sides propose for the future.

Nick

Well that is the thing.No one has proved that Palin tried to influence Monegan.There were legit reasons to do so.This has become a politcal issue.Remember she did get the Republican state chair.How many buddies do you think he had.Plus all the Obama Dems.Which ever way you turn your in trouble.At least in the open Sara has a chance.

We agree Wooten should of been fired.His excuse is the kid asked him to.Dude definately needs help.Well the problem with the whole issue is politics has gotten into it.I trust a politician as far as I can toss a house. 

It doesn't take a genius

"Palin already said she would not cooperate with the investigation and would not release emails."

"In addition to leaving out the newly released emails"

It looks like those email's were released, correct?

It doesn't take a genius to understand that, since the Palin administration is releasing information pertaining to this investigation, not only to the investigators themselves but to the public at large, it's obvious that the Palin administration IS coroperating with the investigation.

Obama: My job is above my pay grade

not all the emails

Hi Cobraman,

The Palin administration is resisting subpoenas--that's not cooperating. And they did release emails, but again, I believe they are not releasing all of the emails that the investigator has requested. Again, there's also the issue of time--why did it take them this long to release only those emails?

For the record, I don't think Troopergate itself is a big deal (of course, I don't have all the facts), but I think the way the Palin administration is handling itself makes it look more guilty--probably makes it look worse than it is.

So you don't

consider it a big deal but ramble on about it in numerous posts.

Well if you feel they should release all of the emails....do you fell tht Obama should give up all of the information conerning his illegal land deals with TR? Do you feel he should explain why he pushed a measure to get a friend adn contractor the rebuilding deal in Chicagos slums and didn't push to find out why his friend only built a gazebo worht a few thousand dollars....when he was given a million.

Do  you feell all the info should be released by Obama about him illegally trying to make foreign policy with the Iraqi primeminister during his trip?

yes, I do think those things should be investigated

Hey BB,

I do agree with you, we should be looking into all those issue--there should be a lot more openness about these things, and a lot less attention paid by the MSM to distractions like who has a tanning bed or who used the word lipstick.

(Except, you know the Rezko issue is a non-starter--Obama was investigated and cleared, though he said it was stupid to do smething that looked bad--which is, hilariously, almost exactly what McCain said when he was cleared in the Keating Five scandal.)

I think you misunderstood when I said that it's not a big deal: what I think (again, I don't have all the evidence about the case) is that Palin did not break any major laws in firing Monegan. What is a bigger deal for me is that she's not cooperating with the investigation and has staff members refusing subpoenas--which makes it look like she's trying to cover something up.

NN

He was not cleared. It is on hold due to the campain and the ongoing case with TR. The judge in the case has put a silence rule on it. So Obama is not clear....amazingly the Liberal Judge stopped everyone from speaking about it.

Rezko is a non-story

BB,

On Rezko: this article gives the most extensive breakdown: http://www.politifac...

Summary: there's no proof that Obama did Rezko any favors, there's no proof that Rezko did Obama any favors, and there's no proof that they have any social or other connection at this time. (Seriously, read the article if you don't trust me.)

(As for the case with Rezko being "ongoing," he was found guilty on May 13, 2008 of wire fraud, mail fraud, corrupt solicitation, and money laundering; he does have some other court dates coming up--you're right about that--but they're mostly having to do with passing bad checks at Vegas casinos or selling property to himself at an inflated price. I hope you're not going to try to sell me a story about Rezko and Obama hitting the casinos and passing bad checks together.)

seriously, BB, where'd you

seriously, BB, where'd you get your information from on this one? If you paid for it, I'd ask for a refund.

seriously?..

You have your links, we have ours

what's the point?

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

thanks for the links MM

MM, BB claimed a) that the case was still open, b) that the judge put a gag rule on people so that they couldn't mention Obama.

The link you gave has, as its first evidence, a link to a Chicago Sun-Times article (http://www.suntimes....), which notes:

1) that the Chicago case is closed (proving BB wrong on claim (a)--though I do believe he's still up for the other cases), and;

2) that Judge Amy J. St. Eve "ruled that Obama references would be allowed into the trial" (which nicely takes care of his claim (b)).

So you see, MM, even your links agree with my argument against BB in this case.

 

What?

So you admit Obama, culpable per the links? Thanks for the confirmation... 

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

lol

That link was kinda cheesy

the hockey moms for truth!

Chessy? yes but pretty funny. This kind of stuff is funny in the light of past elections. We are seeing history in the making here!... there will be a woman as the vice President for the first time in history and she will be a conservative! The libs hate it but we should rejoice! :-) I just love that they hate it! Haha!! They lie, they don't believe in equal rights for women, the believe in equal rights for like minded women! So delicious!! They are so transparent! They want to control their Women! (uh.. like some other religions we know).

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

MM

At that link I just got the Might Mouse theme.No hockey moms.Is there another link?

you're not even trying

you're not even trying anymore, MM, are you?

He is taking a Bible verse

He is taking a Bible verse to heart when dealing with you.  The one that says dont throw pearls before swine.  You obviously dont want to understand the point so ... we are through throwing those pearls.  Or perhaps the one that says dont let the dust touch the heels of your sandals.

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.

also, the Hocky Moms against

also, the Hocky Moms against Palin video on the front page of that website is pretty hilarious--thanks for the link

Just proves...

...conservatives can take a joke. But liberals, like yourself will do nothing but kiss Obama arse! Nice nickey!!

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

nice try nic, couple problems with your thesis...

first off,  the point of Kyle's article is that key facts were left out of the CBS report, leaving a very bias, one-sided report.  (the site is called 'news-busters, exposing and combating liberal media bias')  If, in fact, they did leave out the emails because it looks as if Palin is only releasing them to undermine an investigation, then REPORT IT!  The MSM failed to report the emails even existed because they don't want to report anything that would show another side to the story.  The emails are not the only thing being left out of this story when it comes to the MSM.  Essentially everything possitive to Palin seems to dissapear when it comes time to smear the governor. 

Second, It is possible that this trooper had serious issues and needed to be fired, AND Monegan was fired because of insubordination over budget issues.  The two can co-exist.  It is not far from reason to believe that Monegan ignored serious problems among the troopers because he was far from clean himself.  Personally, she should be applauded for having the stones to fire people from her own party that refused to clean up their departments.  She is running as a maverick, remember?  Palin hasn't said that she never discussed the rougue trooper with Monegan, only that Monegan was not fired for refusing to do something about him.

The problem with CBS's coverage is that it is not telling the whole story.  That is what newsbusters is for.  Kyle didn't write the article to tell the whole story of 'trooper gate'.  He's simply exposing yet another example of the liberal MSM, giving an extremely one-sided view of a supposed 'scandal' that one could only reason is for the purpose of destroying a candidate's character.  You're defending CBS why?

needs more cowbell

no one is defending cbs here, i hope!

hi superdough,

yes, the MSM has some shoddy reporting, although a search of Lexis-Nexus shows that roughly half the print news stories on her have been positive. (The McCain campaign I think sent out a press release about her acceptance speech which contained quite a few glowing reviews of her performance there.)

anyway, you're right about CBS skipping this important bit of news, and I was not in any way challenging Kyle's account of that bias, or defending CBS. 

I merely pointed out that you can't claim that she didn't pressure Monegan to fire Wooten and claim that Wooten was a danger--because if W. was a danger, then you have to claim that she did pressure M. to fire him. (But again, we need to hear more proof about the circumstances of any alleged pressure.)

If you want, think of me as a troubleshooter--I find holes in NB arguments so that the people here can fix them.

I can't stand Chip

I can't stand Chip Reid.

“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)

Gosh Kyle...seems to me the

Gosh Kyle...seems to me the msm has the talking points on omission with this story...msnbc omitted these silly little important facts all morning long...not one mention of this piece of work Wooten and the tasering, the illegal killing of moose out of season or without tags, whichever be the case... the beating of her sister, his drinking on the job ect...let alone what she has released in the emails.

...gosh, no agenda here now is there?

Oh yeah...and this guy is still a cop in Ak. which trust me there are a lot of really bad cops in Ak. like everywhere else....they give the good cops a bad name...like everywhere else...seems to me he only got a five day suspension.

Plus there were other reasons why Monegan was let go, like going to DC for lobbying against Palin's wishes or knowledge ect.

Why we can't pesky little facts like this get in the way now can we...

This too will backfire on these msm talking head imbeciles.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

<blockquote>msnbc omitted

<blockquote>msnbc omitted these silly little important facts all morning long...not one mention of this piece of work Wooten and the tasering, the illegal killing of moose out of season or without tags, whichever be the case... the beating of her sister, his drinking on the job ect...let alone what she has released in the emails. </blockquote>

By the way these are all reason to be fired from a job especially if you are in lawenforcement. I am not sure what the problem is?

goon... He should be

goon...

He should be fired, but a lot of cops in small podunk towns that the msm likes to refer a lot of the towns I have lieved in are cops that have been let go because of various reasons, mostly because they have power hungry mental problems that they use on the people they arrest ect..I actually could talk all day about some examples, plus I am not even going to gt into the drug trade they have in some small towns, but you learn real quick if you work in the public service like waitressing/bat-tending whose who, whose connected, including a lot of shady lawyers ect....

Like all different vocations of work, there are bad and good... it is actually outrageous he is still on the job in my opinion, let alone giving interviews on CNN.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

No BT,

but they sure con ommit them can't they. Just like they keep ommiting Obama's connectionw ith Tony R.. And he's actually on trial....and Obamas is the actual Presidential nomination......not the VP...

 and unlike with the Palin story the media wouldn't have to speculate with the Obama/Rezko connection since it has already been prove as true....unlike the false reason for the firing of moonbat...er.. i mean moonman...i ....you know  his name

Exactly right BaB... Of

Exactly right BaB...

Of course with the msm it's Rezko who?

Mums the word.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

Dan Rather's motto used to be "false but accurate"

Now CBS seems to have updated their whole networ's motto to: "False and inaccurate, but really juicy anyway"

You want change? Give me a dollar.

lol

Aint that the truth.

LOL too

well thats the problem....it never is the truth

why anyone expect CBS to do

why anyone would expect CBS to do the right thing and invistigate both sides of the issue and then report fairly and impartially on it. remember Dan Rather and "memogate?"

 

They keep only the parts of

They keep only the parts of the story that will enhance the negative impact. They stress the kind of key words that make this sound like the kind of "scandals" they've used in the past to destroy others in the GOP:  words and terms like "Troopergate", "investigation", "abuse of power", "special investigator", "subpoenas", etc. The only thing they can't do is play ominous music while the report runs. I'm waiting for this special effect to be added soon...

McNotObama '08

Troopergate?

Troopergate should be renamed Tasergate

Another msm one sided slant...

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/pelosi-dems-bear-no-responsibility-for-economic-crisis-2008-09-16.html

 They talk to Pelosi and Mrs. Raise the Min wage for all employees but mine said the J. McCain didn't knw what he was talking about.

The media failed to point out to Mrs. Speaker of the House that the President doesn't legislate regulations, but rather Congress does. So McCain does have it right. And Mrs. Pelosi....regulation is the reason this whole mess is happening in the first place.

 If you don't want to bail out millionaires then stop bailing out the poor. Its the same either way......wrong. Welfare or Corporate bail outs.....they both mean the same thing.

Or

Smeargate, insubordinationgate, budgetgate, old entrenched boys gate or it will be MSMgate

McCain / Palin  '08

She will be hunted by

She will be hunted by "troopergate" by the ghosts called the MSM, and the Dems. They will haunt her with it. Otherwise it would go away.

Suffix

We should remove "-gate" from "troopergate" and instead put it up along the U.S.-Mexico border. It would make a hell of a lot more sense than to flood the nightly newscasts with it.

 

------------------------------------------------------------

"My morality is your morality."

A little too cozy

Why is nobody mentioning that the Dem Politician French, the supposed "independent investigator" Branchflower and the fired cop Monegan- all used to work together!

The whole thing reeks of partisanship setup.

Excellent point

Excellent point Bob.

...but we do why this point isn't mentioned...now don't we.

Of course if this was the opposite party we of been made sure to hear it...ad nauseum.

 

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

One thing (among many) that

One thing (among many) that I'm sick of is this obsession of the media to tag everything with "gate." Watergate, the media's crowning moment of bringing down a Republican president was over and done with almost 40 years ago. Please, stop flogging the dead Watergate horse and let him rest in peace.  You cannot bring back Watergate and relive the only jewel in your rusted crown.

Good thing the Watergate building wasnt called Waterputz or something as stupid.  Can you imagine "trooper-putz?"