On Tuesday’s CBS Early Show, co-host Harry Smith interviewed John McCain about the recent collapse of Wall Street investment banks: " I want to make sure I have this straight now. Yesterday, on the campaign trail, you reiterated that you believe the fundamentals of the economy are strong. At the same time, we understand your campaign is issuing an ad that says the economy is in crisis. Which is it?" After McCain explained that he was referring to American workers, and that there is a crisis, Smith asked: "And the answer for which is what? Because throughout your campaign, you have said you are anti-regulation. Would not oversight have helped avert this crisis?"
Later, Smith asked: "Let me ask you this. Earlier this year on the campaign trail, you said -- or you admitted that you didn't know a lot about the economy. Why should voters trust you in these perilous times with the economy of the United States?" McCain responded: "You know, that's one of the interesting things about having long conversations. The point is, I was chairman of the Commerce Committee. Every part of America's economy, I oversighted. I have a long record, certainly far more extensive of being involved in our economy than Senator Obama does. I understand the economy. I know the issues-" At that point Smith interrupted: "Well, if that's the case, wouldn't you bear more responsibility for some of the crisis we're in then?"
Apparently Smith was skeptical of McCain having been the chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee for four years, from 1997 - 2001. As far as responsibility for the financial crisis, McCain had pointed out earlier in the interview: "Actually, a little -- two years ago, I warned that the oversight of Fannie and Freddie was, was terrible, that we were facing a crisis because of it, or certainly serious problems...But the influence that Fannie and Freddie had in the inside the beltway, old boy network, which led to this kind of corruption is unacceptable and I warned about it a couple of years ago." In fact, it was Democrats who blocked Bush administration proposals to reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in 2003.
Following Smith’s interview with McCain, co-host Maggie Rodriguez interviewed Democratic vice presidential nominee Joe Biden: "Senator McCain just named some of the same culprits that you and Senator Obama blamed for this crisis yesterday, Wall Street greed and excess. And he called for a restructuring of oversight and regulation. You seem to be on the same page." Biden replied: "Well, it seems like John's had an epiphany. 9:00 yesterday morning John thought the economy was going great guns and the Bush Administration is doing well, and today he thinks it's in crisis."
Rodriguez clarified McCain’s statements: "But he said that the American worker is what's strong. That's what he meant and that's what he believes will dig us out. Do you disagree?" Biden then declared: "The American worker is not strong." He quickly added: "The American worker is strong, they've been betrayed. They've been betrayed by a tax policy that absolutely screws them, that, in fact, gives the money to the very wealthiest among us." Rodriguez later challenged Biden: " I think that this morning, Senator, people don't want to look back, they want to look ahead to the next four years...Will you take this opportunity to say specifically and clearly what you and Senator Obama will do to fix this? Give me two or three solutions, I know you've been working on them."
Rodriguez even questioned Barack Obama’s experience in being able to handle an economic crisis: "Let me ask you, finally, Senator Biden, what do you say to voters who wonder if, given the severity of this crisis right now, whether it's the right time to put their faith in a president that has no executive experience and just a handful of years in the Senate?" Biden again lashed out: "I'd say take a look at who they put there -- who, in fact, has had their hand on the wheel the last eight years. Take a look at that. You want four more years of George W. Bush and the laissez faire policies of John McCain...Who got us in this hole? Whose policies? This has been a Republican philosophy of letting Wall Street do what they want and the middle class be dammed...If I sounds like I'm angry, I am fighting mad for the middle class people who have been the scapegoat of this economy because of the policies of the McCains and the Bushes."
Here is the full transcript of the segment:
7:00AM TEASER:
HARRY SMITH: McCain versus Biden. Both candidates are here to face off with their economic prescriptions.
7:01AM TEASER:
MAGGIE RODRIGUEZ: Ahead this morning we're going to talk to presidential candidate John McCain and vice presidential candidate for the Democrats, Joe Biden, about this and what they plan to do to fix it if elected.
7:04AM SEGMENT:
HARRY SMITH: The financial meltdown is now the big topic on the campaign trail. Joining us from Miami, Republican presidential nominee Senator John McCain. Senator, good morning.
JOHN MCCAIN: Good morning, Harry.
SMITH: I want to make sure I have this straight now. Yesterday, on the campaign trail, you reiterated that you believe the fundamentals of the economy are strong. At the same time, we understand your campaign is issuing an ad that says the economy is in crisis. Which is it?
MCCAIN: Well, the economy's in crisis. The fundamentals of our economy are the American worker. The American worker is still the most productive and the hardest working, most industrious worker in the world and I'm proud of them. They have been betrayed by Wall Street, by greed, by excess, and by corruption and they have been done a great disservice, but if someone disagrees that American workers aren't the best in the world, we just have a disagreement. Their the fundamentals of our -- the strength of America. But the point is greed, excess, corruption has betrayed them and now we are facing a crisis.
SMITH: And the answer for which is what? Because throughout your campaign, you have said you are anti-regulation. Would not oversight have helped avert this crisis?
MCCAIN: Actually, a little -- two years ago, I warned that the oversight of Fannie and Freddie was, was terrible, that we were facing a crisis because of it, or certainly serious problems, and the fact is that we saw a relationship between Fannie and Freddie and the Congress, as well as the administration, which caused the housing market, obviously, was a great contributor in the housing market collapsing as it has, which was a big factor in the problems we're having today. But the influence that Fannie and Freddie had in the inside the beltway, old boy network, which led to this kind of corruption is unacceptable and I warned about it a couple of years ago. Do I believe in excess government regulation? Yes. But this patchwork quilt of regulation -- regulating bodies is designed for the 1930s when they were invented.
SMITH: Let me ask you this. Earlier this year on the campaign trail, you said -- or you admitted that you didn't know a lot about the economy. Why should voters trust you in these perilous times with the economy of the United States?
MCCAIN: You know, that's one of the interesting things about having long conversations. The point is, I was chairman of the Commerce Committee. Every part of America's economy, I oversighted. I have a long record, certainly far more extensive of being involved in our economy than Senator Obama does. I understand the economy. I know the issues-
SMITH: Well, if that's the case, wouldn't you bear more responsibility for some of the crisis we're in then?
MCCAIN: I warned about it. I have said that this Fannie and Freddie thing was of the most grave importance. And the point also is that Senator Obama took -- he's the third highest recipient of contributions from Fannie and Freddie. But the real point is here that it's greed, excess, corruption. We're not going to stand for it. We need to make sure that every person who's bank deposit -- has made a bank deposit in a bank, is insured. We need to set up a 9/11 Commission in order to get to the bottom of this and get it fixed, and act to clean up this corruption.
SMITH: Alright.
MCCAIN: What they've done, Harry, is they've violated the social contract that capitalism and the citizen have, and we can't ever let this happen again. I'll make sure it never happens again.
SMITH: Alright, Senator McCain, we thank you so much for your time this morning. Do appreciate it.
MCCAIN: Thanks for having me on, Harry.
SMITH: Alright. Good to see you. Now here's Maggie.
MCCAIN: Joining us now from Washington is Senator Joe Biden, Barack Obama's running mate on the Democratic ticket. Good morning, Senator.
JOE BIDEN: Good morning, Maggie. How are you?
RODRIGUEZ: I'm fine, thank you. Senator McCain just named some of the same culprits that you and Senator Obama blamed for this crisis yesterday, Wall Street greed and excess. And he called for a restructuring of oversight and regulation. You seem to be on the same page.
BIDEN: Well, it seems like John's had an epiphany. 9:00 yesterday morning John thought the economy was going great guns and the Bush Administration is doing well, and today he thinks it's in crisis. And you know, I heard John say that the American people are strong. John ought to come to my old neighborhood and find out that foreclosures are sky high, find out gas and grocery prices are up, find out the middle class people made 2,000 bucks less over this term with the president than they did before he was president. Find out that, in fact, they're in real trouble in terms of their ability to stay in their homes. I mean, I don't understand this. I -- John, quite frankly, confuses me. He was-
RODRIGUEZ: But he said that the American worker is what's strong. That's what he meant and that's what he believes will dig us out. Do you disagree?
BIDEN: The American -- the American worker is not strong. The American worker is strong, they've been betrayed. They've been betrayed by a tax policy that absolutely screws them, that, in fact, gives the money to the very wealthiest among us. They've been betrayed by a policy of laissez faire here. That let the big do what they want, don't regulate them. They've been betrayed not only by Wall Street, but by this administration's policies and the policies John has supported. They've been betrayed-
RODRIGUEZ: I think that this morning, Senator, people don't want to look back, they want to look ahead to the next four years.
BIDEN: Sure they do.
RODRIGUEZ: Will you take this opportunity to say specifically and clearly what you and Senator Obama will do to fix this? Give me two or three solutions, I know you've been working on them.
BIDEN: Unlike the -- our opponents, there are clear solutions. One, do not keep this tax hemorrhaging going. Give the middle class taxpayers a tax break, like we're suggesting. Do not continue the Bush tax cuts that cause us to have to finance our debt through the Chinese to go buy Saudi oil, number one. Number two, invest in infrastructure immediately. Spend $70 billion out there, rebuilding bridges and infrastructure, roads and the rest. Put people to work, get jobs going. Three, change the way in which we have bankruptcy work, so that a bankruptcy judge can say to a creditor, you know what, we're going to renegotiate, we're going to restate the principal mortgagor, so this person can stay in their house. Give people a fighting chance, instead of the tax policy, and the spending policies, and the policies of this administration.
RODRIGUEZ: Let me ask you, finally, Senator Biden, what do you say to voters who wonder if, given the severity of this crisis right now, whether it's the right time to put their faith in a president that has no executive experience and just a handful of years in the Senate?
BIDEN: I'd say take a look at who they put there -- who, in fact, has had their hand on the wheel the last eight years. Take a look at that. You want four more years of George W. Bush and the laissez faire policies of John McCain, with no regulation over the very people he's now calling predators, then, in fact, continue it. My lord, take a look at what. Who got us in this hole? Whose policies? This has been a Republican philosophy of letting Wall Street do what they want and the middle class be dammed. It's about time we change it. If I sounds like I'm angry, I am fighting mad for the middle class people who have been the scapegoat of this economy because of the policies of the McCains and the Bushes.
RODRIGUEZ: Senator Joe Biden, thank you.
—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
McCain's Experience?
September 16, 2008 - 12:47 ET by JDWInteresting how the Messiah media is unwilling to confront McCain's leadership capabilities.
JDW
DAILY WAVE
Crossroads
September 16, 2008 - 12:50 ET by NotafraidJohn McCain knows how government works and how it not working. As a senator, John McCain has done as much as a senator can do to bring about reform. However, he was hampered by congressional Democrats and Republican and a president who, unfortunately, did not share this goal. As president, he will have the power to actually accomplish reform. One thing John McCain knows is that role of government is not to be the solution to our problems. The problem with government is not that it is too small -- government is too big. In fact, it is immensely too big. Barack Obama's approach will be to make government bigger. Not only is it going in the wrong direction, we can't afford it. Barack Obama says that almost everyone will have a lower tax bill and that everything will be financed by taxing the rich. Think about it. There aren't enough rich people to tap into (also, a third of households don't pay any taxes, although Obama would give them a "subsidy" too). The answer must be less government and making the economy bigger. It is a difference in approach that will considerably affect the future of all Americans.
more leftist dogma - we must DO SOMETHING
September 16, 2008 - 12:54 ET by wizardjrThey never tire of the idea that ultra human uber mensch will use their extraordinary mentat to "run" the economy. When they do, it is usually "ruin" the economy. Central Planning Committees worked so well for the good old USSR. Here in America the War On Poverty went so well, too. As did things like monopoly utilities and government set airline fares... NOT!
The best thing McLame can say is that his job is to guarantee a level playing field for entrepreneurs to come into the marketplace with innovative ideas and products and to see that no robber barons are getting special priveledges at the cost of others. End of statement.
Oh yeah... and if you're stupid enough to invest in perpetual motion machines, dilithium crystals, etc., you deserve what you get.
The American worker is NOT strong
September 16, 2008 - 13:42 ET by exLibeh, let's see if that gaff gets repeated ad nauseum.. not..
Biden/Obama
They are only strong if "We" Say they are strong.
so according to Joe "stand
September 16, 2008 - 14:50 ET by Snappyso according to Joe "stand up Chuck" Biden :
The american worker is Not strong, and yet he is strong,
The Bush tax cuts are responsible for the Chinese effectively owning the dollar and us buying Saudi oil
Because McCain chaired the Senate Comerce Committe from 97-2001 he is directly responsible for the markets tanking today.
I think Joe needs to slow down a little bit and pay attention to what he is saying. I also think the reason he is confused about McCains stance on these issues is because McCain might actually be thinking about the people and not taking the Washington insiders stance, which I firmly believe would be confusing to a man who has never held a private sector job but has always been on the publics payroll.
YOO, Snappy, How about
September 16, 2008 - 15:27 ET by upcountrywaterNov 12, 1999 Your pal, with the help of some RINOS pushed this DOG into law.
Congress passed the bipartisan measure November 5, opening the way
for a blossoming of financial "supermarkets" selling loans,
investments and insurance.
Glass Steagall act
No one really questioned the new fad of collateralizing bank mortgage
debt into different types of financial instruments and selling them
through a different arm of the same institution. They are now.
CLIMATE CRISIS
IranianUranium
Let's be very clear about
September 17, 2008 - 08:53 ET by dscottLet's be very clear about this, the reason why the institutions like Bears Sterns and Lehman Bros went down is the CDO valuations were based on soundness of Feddie Mac and Fannie Mae loans. Had the loans been sound, the CDO problem wouldn't exist. This is not the "greed" of the CEOs on Wall Street, this is purely the incompetence of liberal Democrats and their idiotic Equality of Outcome policy inappropriately extending home ownership to people who simply weren't able to handle that responsibility.
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.
Smith is covering up for
September 16, 2008 - 15:08 ET by dscottSmith is covering up for the Dems again and blameshifting from their failed policies. Give credit where credit is due, blame the Democrats for their equality of outcome incompetence.
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.
"Biden again lashed out:
September 16, 2008 - 15:10 ET by bsmarj"Biden again lashed out: "I'd say take a look at who they put there -- who, in fact, has had their hand on the wheel the last eight years. Take a look at that. You want four more years of George W. Bush and the laissez faire policies of John McCain...Who got us in this hole?"
YAWN!!!
But, would Harry Smith ask the same question of Bill Clinton?
September 16, 2008 - 15:15 ET by Gary HallUnderstanding that Harry Smith is obviously very much in favor of much more government regulation, as he sees all of this from a liberal/socialist point of view, the question is; from a media bias standpoint, would Harry Smith ask the same questions of Bill Clinton? Would he attempt to hold Bill Clinton, and other Democrats, to the same tests?
After all, the liberal economists have been pounding on Bill Clinton from the left for years, and still do, over these same issues. When a conservative expert attacks a conservative over an issue, the MSM gets in a rabid frenzy in the effort to allow them to do the bashing - but when a liberal expert attacks the Democrats, the MSM simply looks the other way - mum is the word:
The Legacy of the Clinton Bubble, Aug 2008, By Timothy A. Canova:
Bursting Bubbles, 2003 by Dean Baker.
Earlier in 2001, Dean Baker had refered the financial leadership under President Clinton as: "..the worst since Herbert Hoover."
Harry Smith? Are you hiding? Harry. You have the right to be on that side of the street on these issues, however, why don't you go after your own - first. And secondly, we'd like to hear you either challenge or substantiate that view that Sen. Obama is experienced on the economy.
PS - and what role did the Democratic congress have in pushing the lenders to make loans available to poor folks who could not afford the mortgages and really did not need to be invited - late to the party - in an overvalued housing bubble market. (;~/ gary
Freddie and Fannie
September 16, 2008 - 21:11 ET by Oscar GoldmanFreddie Mac and Fannie Mae are perfect examples of how government oversight would work if applied to the entire US financial market.
It seems Speaker Pelosi and Henry Waxman have announced an investigation into the Wall Street crisis. Can you say "9/11 Commission?" How else will the democrat party cover up Freddie Mac's and Fannie Mae's roles in bringing down Lehman Brothers and the political influence peddled to the democrat party to ignore the warning signals. This will be the untold story.
The last thing the US economy needs is Congress involved.
Oscar - it should get interesting.
September 16, 2008 - 21:55 ET by Gary HallWhat's amazing on this list, is how "Mr. I don't do that Junior Senator from Chicago" got to the number 2 slot on the list, so quickly? (;~> gary
From Open Secrets
I may be wrong, but it
September 16, 2008 - 15:20 ET by Hunter12I may be wrong, but it looks like the MSM is allowing the Democrats to rewrite history. Today they are blaming the loan industry problems on the Bush administration but last year, they didn't realize that loaning money to people without the wherewithall to repay a loan might be a bad idea.
"We've heard one heartbreaking story after another of borrowers with limited incomes being sold mortgages they could not afford," Senator Sherrod Brown, a Democrat from Ohio, said at a briefing on Capitol Hill.
In 2005 Senate Republicans tried to put stronger oversight in place, but the bill lack the support needed for passage, as it came out of committee on a party-line vote.
Despite having some "problems" with the portfolio language in the bill, Sen. Jim Bunning (R-Kentucky) urged the committee members to move the bill to the floor, where it would hopefully be passed and the measure would move to conference where, in the process of reconciling S. 190 with its House counterpart, H.R. 1461, "we can craft a bill that does what needs to be done."
However, even before the vote, Bunning and other committee members both Republican and Democrat noted that S. 190's lack of bipartisan support will make the bill's movement an uphill battle.
"We came to this point last year, and we could not get a bipartisan consensus and no bill was put forward," said Bunning. "Unfortunately, I believe we will have the same result. I believe we will move a bill out of committee, but without bipartisan consensus the bill will again go nowhere, and we will not have the world-class regulator we need."
From Nancy Pelosi's website:
Housing targeted to struggling families: All Trust Fund monies must be used for low- and moderate-income families (below 80 percent of state or local median income). At least 75 percent of funds must go to extremely low-income families (below 30 percent of median income or national poverty level), with 30 percent of funds for families with incomes below the SSI income limit. On top of helping very low-income families, the bill reserves some trust fund money (10 percent) to families who earn from 50 percent to 80 percent of median income – helping families of nurses, teachers, firefighters, and police officers.
Funding from GSE Fees and Expansion of FHA Loans: The bill does not turn to taxpayers, but instead is funded through required fees (1.2% of their total outstanding mortgages each year) from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the House-passed GSE Affordable Housing Fund (H.R. 1427), FHA savings that result from larger number of loans generated from the enactment of the Expanding American Homeownership Act (HR 1852), and any other sources of funds subsequently identified. To ensure FHA efforts to expand homeownership, the bill strengthens protections against increases in FHA premiums and against diversion FHA funds for non-housing purposes.
Maybe I'm misinterpretting this legislation, but it appears to me to be a mandate from the Democrats to put loans into the hands of people who didn't repay them, fueling the crisis.
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." - Sir Winston Churchill
You are 100% correct
September 16, 2008 - 21:26 ET by Oscar GoldmanDemocrats pandered to low and moderate income families promoting mortgages that these borrowers lacked the creditworthiness or wherewithal to repay these loans. What Wall Street did was made this possible by packaging these loans into pools that were sold to investors thereby spreading risk. Had only a few loans gone bad, the loss would have been absorbed by many investors and offset by the "performing" loans -- hopefully for a net positive return. Lehman and other bankers kept lending even though there were signs of trouble. Can you imagine the loud chorus of democrats had the banks shut off the spigot? Bankers also did not want to stop earning all the fees and bonuses associated with making these loans. There was pressure not to heed the warnings. We all know how people get treated when they take contrary positions! No boss likes a spoil sport. When investors stopped buying the loans, the banks got stuck with them on their balance sheets. Hence, lenders were forced to write down these loans. Remember, these loans were made with borrowed money. When debts exceeds assets, the company is bankrupt.
The Forest for the Trees.
September 16, 2008 - 15:25 ET by Acts 2_38In this age of almost blanket bias, I can understand your consternation. However, just because the media is corrupt is no reason for yourselves to be as well. John McCain can tout his experience all he wants but it was HE who said that HE didn't know spit about the ECONOMY! So the questions that follow are "fair game". Just because they are asked by an insipid liberal is no excuse to ignore McCain's vulnerability on this issue. When you make a STOOPID (lol) conservative argument about the "fundamentals" of the economy being strong you have to take your medicine! Especially when John Q. Public sees banks being seized, the stock market nose diving and ALAN GREENSPAN saying these are the worst economic times of maybe the last ONE HUNDRED FREAKING YEARS! Your new wave conservative garbage about what "technically" constitutes a recession or what the "fundamentals" are up to, falls on deaf ears. Limbaugh can piss and moan about the liberals who regulated us into the housing crisis all he wants. But if you can't see that's a "forest for the trees" argument, you're pretty dim. John Q can't follow that line of nuanced reasoning and anyone who deals with the public should know that.
Perhaps you should stop bringing knives to gunfights! Why don't you try that? Obama makes a gaffe a minute, by my estimation the republicans have jumped on maybe THREE of them! His camps says McCain knows jack about computers, where's the corresponding ad showing the article from the paper in 2001 which chronicled McCain's inability to type on a COMPUTER as being from his torture by the Vietnamese? Just because that idiot Hannity spouts off about it means nothing, his audience is a mere pittance compared to what one t.v. spot would reach! Where's the t.v. spot which shows an onscreen comparison between the responsibilities of a MAYOR and a GOVENOR versus those of a "community organizer" and a first term senator who started running for the presidency four months after making a friggin' speech????? Half of the conservotards seem to have their heads so far up their butts that they have completely lost sight on how to fight in an unfair media environment! The stuff you think you know? Reduce it by NINETY PERCENT and you'll appreciate what filters down to John Q. That's why you have to ram stuff down their throats. You have to have your side, senators, congressmen etc, RIDICULING Obama's lack of experience in the same UNIFORMITY that you see the MSM touting someone's "gravitas" or lack thereof. Your message must be adhered to by your side with the same ferocity with which these idiots are now asserting that the Lord was a "community organizer" presumably to give Obama cover. Fortunately this stupid tact will only work with idiot liberals who know as little about Christ or the bible as Obama does! You seem to want the other side to be "fair" and to castigate "their" guys with the same intellectual honesty they have no problem mustering when one of "your" guys is caught with a "wide stance" or something. This betrays your naivete, to put it kindly. This shows that you NEVER really understood who liberals are or to whom they are in service. They lie when the truth would serve. They are in service to "untruth". Jesus of course said it best (john 8:44). Perhaps those of you expecting "comity" and "fairness" from people who revel in the "right" to slaughter babies and who desire to call sodomy sacred, should re-think who you are ultimately fighting and why your apathy will not serve you well in this war.
Greenspan
September 16, 2008 - 15:59 ET by concerned citizenSome good points, but I am getting quite tired of Greenspan being misquoted. He did not say this is the worst economy in 100 years. He said this is the worst financial crisis perhaps in the last 100 years. Thus far, the financial crisis has not noticebly spread to the economy at large, or perhaps you have some stats to back this up, especially the claim that this economy is the worst we've seen in 100 years, worse than the Great Depression!
Greenspan went on to say that we are more than 50% likely going into a recession. This does not sound like a man who believes this is the worst economy ever:
"I can’t believe we could have a once-in-a-century type of financial crisis without a significant impact on the real economy globally, and I think that indeed is what is in the process of happening."
"When asked if the chances of escaping a recession were greater than 50 percent, Greenspan responded 'no, I think it is less than 50 percent.'"
Once again, put the man's quotes in context.
Politicians to Blame for Housing Crisis
September 16, 2008 - 15:44 ET by deerjerkydaveGovernment politicians loosened lending practices to allow the poor access to home loans. This created an artificial influx of demand for housing which caused home prices to skyrocket and consumers to purchase homes at inflated prices. Inevitably the poor were unable to sustain expensive loans the housing market has tumbled. Thanks big brother. Those of us who can afford our overly expensive homes are left holding the bag.
At least Bush wanted to overhaul the housing industry to try to stablize it from future problems. The Democrats blocked it. Here's what the NY Times reported:
"'These two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- are not facing any kind of financial crisis,'' said Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee. ''The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.''
Representative Melvin L. Watt, Democrat of North Carolina, agreed.
''I don't see much other than a shell game going on here, moving something from one agency to another and in the process weakening the bargaining power of poorer families and their ability to get affordable housing,'' Mr. Watt said.
This should be plastered all over the news by the Republican party.
These are Biden's three items for the economy?
September 16, 2008 - 16:46 ET by adamuss1. " Do not continue the Bush tax cuts that cause us to have to finance our debt through the Chinese to go buy Saudi oil, number one." I thought Obama/Biden said they are lowering taxes.
2. "Number two, invest in infrastructure immediately. Spend $70 billion out there, rebuilding bridges and infrastructure, roads and the rest." Haven't Obaam/Biden been critical of these infrastructure budget items approved in the Senate for Alaska?
3. "Three, change the way in which we have bankruptcy work, so that a bankruptcy judge can say to a creditor, you know what, we're going to renegotiate, we're going to restate the principal mortgagor, so this person can stay in their house." This is really the dumbest thing I've heard today. Where has this team been the last few weeks. It's the losses in the mortgage debt structures that have caused total havoc world wide, and Obama/Biden are proposing more? MORE???
"News" man
September 17, 2008 - 00:08 ET by gordonWhy beat around the bush, lets just all chip in and buy Harry Smith an Obama t-shirt, bumper sticker and upsidedown flag pin? I hope McCain/Palin wins in a landslide and all the liberals spend thousands on psychiatrists and medication. I am totally fed up with these Obama media cheerleaders. Just like the libs in Hollywood, their opinions are not worth a bucket of warm spit. Is it just me or is Harry Smith looking more and more like Doctor Xavier on the X-Men?
Don't ever forget 9-11 because you can bet the terrorists won't.