During Monday’s CBS Early Show, correspondent Bill Whitaker reported on the marriage of actor George Takei to his partner Brad Altman, following California’s legalization of gay marriage: "George Takei, Sulu on the original Star Trek, used to dream of a future where unimaginable things would happen. Well, his dream came true. Sunday, he legally married his partner of 21 years, Brad Altman." However, later in the segment, Whitaker warned: "But their marriage Knot could be undone by a ballot initiative to, once again, ban gay marriage." Whitaker then made a comparison: "As a child, during World War II, Takei and his family were forcibly removed to internment camps with tens of thousands of other Japanese-Americans. He held his wedding at L.A.'S Japanese-American National Museum to make a point."
Takei went on to explain to Whitaker: "We, as gay Americans, we've been stereotyped and characterized as something frightening and threatening, as Japanese-Americans were before the war." This is not the first time Takei’s comparison was featured on CBS, on June 16th’s Sunday Morning, a report by correspondent John Blackstone featured a quote from Takei: "I know that people can change because I grew up in -- behind the barbed wire fences of American internment camps. That was in my lifetime. And here I am now, a popular actor -- supported by many, many people throughout the country. America changes. America is made up of decent people, fair-minded people." Takei and Altman were also both quests on the Early Show on June 17 with co-host Julie Chen.
At the end of Whitaker’s report, co-host Harry Smith declared: "And no matter what your perspective, just listening to them and what their conversation had to say about their commitment to each other and the sense of family they have...Hard not to respect that." Co-host Maggie Rodriguez agreed: "Absolutely."
Later in the show, Smith interviewed wife of Vice President Dick Cheney, Lynne Cheney, on her latest children’s book, but still managed to work in a question about gay marriage. In reference to the Cheneys’ gay daughter, Smith asked: "Can I ask you another really personal question? Because we just ran the George Takei story. And because marriage is legal for gays in California now. Would you wish that for your daughter?" Cheney replied: "Well, I would wish my daughter to have happiness and freedom to make her own choices. The Vice President said in the debate with Joe Lieberman, ever so long ago in 2000, that freedom in this country ought to mean freedom for everyone."
Here is the full transcript of the segment:
8:01AM TEASER:
HARRY SMITH: And Mr. Sulu is beaming this morning.
DAVE PRICE: I would imagine.
SMITH: The 'Star Trek" reference. Mr. Sulu being-
RODRIGUEZ: I get it, I get it.
PRICE: Very good, Harry.
SMITH: You know, same sex marriage is now legal in California and he and his partner over the weekend tied the knot and we'll have a report on that.
DAVE PRICE: Congratulations to him.
8:19AM SEGMENT:
SMITH: 'Star Trek's' Mr. Sulu has agreed to live long and prosper with his longtime partner. CBS News correspondent Bill Whitaker has their story.
BILL WHITAKER: George Takei, Sulu on the original Star Trek, used to dream of a future where unimaginable things would happen. Well, his dream came true. Sunday, he legally married his partner of 21 years, Brad Altman.
GEORGE TAKEI: And I thought that I would never have marriage in my life.
BRAD ALTMAN: We want the responsibilities of marriage. We want the enjoyment of marriage.
WHITAKER: But, first, the frustration of wedding planning.
ALTMAN: That is a sore point you're bringing up, Bill. I'll talk about anything but don't ask me about the planning of a wedding. That's sensitive. We didn't get a wedding planner.
WHITAKER: Altman planned just about all of it. From the cake, to the fittings, to decorations, the rehearsal, and, yesterday, with two of Takei's 'Star Trek' co-stars Michelle Nichols and Walter Konig by their sides, Takei and Altman exchanged vows and rings. Spouses for life.
TAKEI: Cloud nine isn't high enough. Cloud 90, I think.
WHITAKER: Their relationship has been tested. When Takei's mother grew ill with Alzheimer's, work kept Takei so busy, Altman became her primary caregiver the last years of her life.
TAKEI: I mean, that was the test of his love and I am eternally grateful and my love for him is that much deeper.
ALTMAN: We're family.
WHITAKER: Their legal marriage became possible this year when the California supreme court overturned the state ban on gay marriage.
TAKEI: And when the news came down, I happened to have a mouthful of sandwich. It was lunch time. Suddenly, Brad dropped on his knees and he said-
ALTMAN: 'George, will you marry me?' And you said?
TAKEI: Darn it, you beat me to it!
WHITAKER: But their marriage Knot could be undone by a ballot initiative to, once again, ban gay marriage.
ALTMAN: On November 4th, California voters are going to decide whether our marriage remains legal or is null and void all of a sudden. And that's scary to me.
WHITAKER: As a child, during World War II, Takei and his family were forcibly removed to internment camps with tens of thousands of other Japanese-Americans. He held his wedding at L.A.'S Japanese-American National Museum to make a point.
TAKEI: We, as gay Americans, we've been stereotyped and characterized as something frightening and threatening, as Japanese-Americans were before the war.
WHITAKER: The nullification of their marriage, an unimaginable future. Their fervent wish?
TAKEI: Live longer and prosper.
WHITAKER: Bill Whitaker, CBS News, Los Angeles.
SMITH: And the couple will join us tomorrow morning for an exclusive live interview.
RODRIGUEZ: I remember last time they joined us right after the -- gay marriage was legalized, they were so ecstatic.
SMITH: So happy.
RODRIGUEZ: Remember that?
SMITH: And so interesting. And no matter what your perspective, just listening to them and what their conversation had to say about their commitment to each other and the sense of family they have.
RODRIGUEZ: Right.
SMITH: Hard not to respect that.
RODRIGUEZ: Absolutely.
—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Kyle... You just can't
September 15, 2008 - 15:39 ET by Clear thinkerKyle...
You just can't make this stuff up. I sometimes wonder if we all live on the same planet!
Gun Loving Fun
Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/
Clear
September 15, 2008 - 16:00 ET by BlondeConversation in Blonde's home this a.m.
Me: Hey look, George Takei got married.
Him: I thought Sulu was gay.
Me: He is...look at the picture...it's California.
Him: Oh.
This would be another good SNL skit. I'm still laughing at the Palin/Hillary one (Mine!!!!!!!!!!).
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
The argument off target
September 15, 2008 - 15:45 ET by KC MulvilleAll of Takei's arguments were about the equality and respect for gay people. Fine. Totally agree. In this day and age, I hope gay people are treated with respect as any other citizen.
But it is an extra argument to say that just because gay people are fine citizens, that their partnerships must be considered marriages.
Marriage is a specific relationship that carries certain assumptions. Marriage implies family. Marriage implies more than just the relationship between the partners, although that relation is at the heart of it. Because gay relationships can't transcend the relation between the partners with children into a family, we don't want it to be considered marriage.
And once again, a celebrity was permitted to make a point in the public discussion without being challenged. We had an earlier post about Chevy Chase being allowed to spout off, and now Takei. If you want to make public statements, be prepared to argue the case.
"respecting" homosexual
September 15, 2008 - 16:18 ET by TruthMonger"respecting" homosexual practitioners is fine
just like we treat any other mentally diseased people respectfully
but gay "marriage" is impossible - and conceding it's "legality" would be very disrespectful to the incapacitants involved - like giving in to driver's licenses for the legally blind
Journalism is the opium of the liberals
Not going there
September 15, 2008 - 17:30 ET by KC MulvilleI'm not sure we need to go there, TM. Frankly, I don't think they fall into that category. However, I agree that trying to make every gay relationship into a "marriage" does disrespect the relationships they already have.
take it up with management
September 15, 2008 - 18:21 ET by TruthMongertake it up with management then - that's where we've already always been, and always will be - I don't make the rules
Journalism is the opium of the liberals
Don't leave out the
September 15, 2008 - 18:26 ET by Clear thinkerDon't leave out the 'illegally blind'.
Gun Loving Fun
Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/
Ludicrous George Takei
September 15, 2008 - 15:50 ET by Lame CherryI would no more listen to George Takei on relationships than I would Hugh Hefner, because both of these people couch their entire lives defined by sex.
Who in this Newsbuserters site every refers to themselves as a Straight American. WE are just Americans period. That is what is screwed up in these certain groups of people whose entire life is defined by the basests of confining actions.
I have noted before how ludicrous it would be to define people in how they voted by if their navel was in or out.
I'm in inny navel person and I refuse to vote for Barack Obama because he is not good for America!
That sounds absolutely nuts and it is, but Takei will rant on about the same things, including dishonoring his entire Japanese and American heritage which was built because Japanese peoples did not succumb to lusts of the flesh but adhered to a code which meant the survival of Japan was more important than base emotional actions.
I'm completely disappointed in Mr. Takei as I loved his character on Star Trek. He was from a period of time when people still loathed Japanese and made fun of the made in Japan logo. He has now because of his male appendage taken what was a moral cause of all races treating each other right and now changed it to an immoral cause of where ACTIONS are being his definition of what is acceptable.
Societal codes are in place to protect the male female bond for the purpose of teaching the offspring of that union, how to treat the other sex, build a secure environment where their children will continue on the family unit.
There is none of that in homosexual actions. It is selfish and burdens the rest of moral society to do the work Mr. Takei is stealing from the people putting in the lifetime of work so that a new generation of Americans will carry on this shining city on a hill.
Sex is an action. Sex is a choice. There are numerous people in this world who with God's assistance have overcome all sorts of horrid things they did not act out on to become productive in society building something for the future. Mr. Takei has now knowingly what he is doing wrong in taking from a future generation, attempting to pacify himself in a group lie that telling troubled kids it is ok to act out in sex, define themselves in sex and then die from a sexual disease.
If Mr. Takei wants to ruin himself like Liberace, then be like Liberace and do it in his own private life not destroying the basis of what will keep American society protecting it's children for another generation.
THAT IS the difference between the old homosexual group in some did not act out which is not a disgrace no more than it is wanting to fornicate, but not doing it.
There are more important things in life than defining oneself by sex act. Homsexuals have to come to terms in not acting out to destroy themselves in Christian counselling. I stipulate Christian as the American pyschiatric wing only enables these miserable people and does not seek to assist them in building productive lives.
To enable homosexuals as Mr. Takei has is to sentence a generation to death. It is reprehensible and Mr. Takei should remember the old Star Trek episode of the people who were black and white on different sides in how ludicrous their bigotry was. Mr. Takei is bigot to morals and just like those bigots in acting out is sentencing children to death.
God bless
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
Absolutely correct.
September 15, 2008 - 18:35 ET by cocodrieMarriage has had the same definition since the creation of man and should not be distorted or changed.
So, being denied the
September 15, 2008 - 15:53 ET by mattmSo, being denied the "right" to be married to another member of the same sex is the equivalent of having your property and civil rights violated and be imprisoned simply because or your race?
I don't think so.
The left has no arguments without exagerration
September 15, 2008 - 15:57 ET by exLibIt just goes to show you how weak liberal arguments are that they have to go to extremes in order to get people on their side.
Homsexuals are just "deprived" of a possible right by not being married, no, it has to be a comparison to slavery and now interment. These comparisons go far beyond hyperbole and into absurd. The really scary part is that it's working and more and more people are getting on the bandwagon or be considered "monters".
I work in a major college in New England and I rarely find a student that doesn't breathe the left's talking points verbatim and actually believe it. You try to inject some reason into the discussion and they just look at you funny. The left's strangle-hold on schools is deadly.
exLib... "The left's
September 15, 2008 - 18:32 ET by Clear thinkerexLib...
"The left's strangle-hold on schools is deadly."
And it's a large part of the reason why this country is so screwed up at times. Liberals don't know it but they are working for the communist's. See commie link below...
45 Communist Goals for America http://www.nationmakers.com/com_goal
Gun Loving Fun
california gay marriage
September 15, 2008 - 16:21 ET by boozyPeople...first, marriage is a "religious" bond between a man and a woman...not man and man, or woman and woman...it was designed for procreation....I think you will find that most californians (of which I am one) are more jacked up with the liberal judge in San Fran Weirdo who overturned the will of a huge majority of Californians....we will change the constitution in California November 4th...Homosexuality is not something that should be forced down all throats...and should not be preached in our schools as a "normal" relationship..Has anyone noticed the morals of this country have spun into a very dark hole...well this is one of the reasons why...Keep traditional marriage just that...see you in the voting booth..
Who decides what a "normal"
September 15, 2008 - 20:43 ET by JesseJacksonIVWho decides what a "normal" relastionship is? If two consenting adults love each other, no matter what sex they are, they should be able to marry.
Have the gay marriages in California affected your life in any way?
The APA...
September 15, 2008 - 20:53 ET by Sergeant ROCK.. until they were taken over by militant homosexuals. You see, the APA called homosexuality a mental disorder up until 1973.
Love has nothing to do with it. There's nothing 'normal' about sex between two of the same gender. That's just commonsense.
PALIN/McCain 2008
Again, who decides what's
September 15, 2008 - 21:16 ET by JesseJacksonIVAgain, who decides what's "normal"? There have been many things that were considered "normal" in the past, but society's evolve.
Homosexuality has been around for a long, long time. Conservatives should stop being threatened by it and try to understand it.
GOD DECIDES
September 15, 2008 - 21:36 ET by cocodrieGenisis chapter 2 verse 23 -24: The man said, "this one at last is bone from my bones, flesh from my flesh! She shall be called woman for from man she was taken". That is why a man leaves his father and mother and attaches himself to his wife, and the two shall become one.
Murder's been around longer
September 15, 2008 - 21:39 ET by cocodrieMurder's been around longer than homosexuality but it's still wrong.
I wonder if our society
September 15, 2008 - 21:43 ET by Free StinkerI wonder if our society will evolve to the point where we are not "threatened" by murder the same way we used to be "threatened" by homosexuality?
/Sarcasm Off
The Bible says "If a man
September 15, 2008 - 21:51 ET by JesseJacksonIVThe Bible says "If a man has sex with another man, kill them both", do you go a long with that?
When it's some homosexual
September 15, 2008 - 21:59 ET by cocodrieWhen it's some homosexual raping a boy [as is common these days] definitely yes. For the homo not the boy.
But the Bible also says
September 15, 2008 - 22:09 ET by JesseJacksonIVBut the Bible also says Thou Shalt Not Kill. Hmmm, what to do?
Raping a boy has nothing to do with two adults wanting to marry. Heterosexuals have been known to rape 13 year old girls by the way.
C.S. Lewis
September 15, 2008 - 22:16 ET by Free StinkerUh, that is thou shalt not murder.
I'm pretty sure C.S. Lewis had someone like you in mind when he said (speaking of The Bible) "If you can't understan a book written for adults, then you shouldn't try discussing it."
Marriage has always been
September 15, 2008 - 22:15 ET by cocodrieMarriage has always been defined as a union between a man and a woman. The verse is properly translated "thou shall not murder".
But definitions can an
September 15, 2008 - 22:27 ET by JesseJacksonIVBut definitions can an change, simply by passing laws. The Bible discussion dosen't matter anyway, since we do not follow Bible law.
You can call a duck a
September 15, 2008 - 22:54 ET by cocodrieYou can call a duck a chicken all you want but it will always be a duck.
Just so you know, that
September 16, 2008 - 00:22 ET by Seabeach4348Just so you know, that "moral equivalent" routine just doesn't seem to set well here.
<<Heterosexuals have been known to rape 13 year old girls by the way. >> Yes, and fortunately he'll get a nice long jail sentence if he's caught. And if it were my 13-year old that he raped the scumbag had better hope that the police get to him before I do.
Ditto if a homo raped my son!
cherry-picking which laws to follow
September 16, 2008 - 00:35 ET by nicholas nicklebyYeah, the Bible also says not to eat pork. And it says that adulterers should be put to death--which would mean goodbye for John Edwards and John McCain both.
Jesse, people tend to pick and choose when they start reading the Bible. I don't know if it helps to point that out, but there it is.
Here we go again.
September 15, 2008 - 23:33 ET by JWFConservatism is about conserving the principles found in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.
Free markets. Free trade. Limited government. A strong national defense. Rugged individualism. Pride in your country.
And of course punching hippies.
Where in any of that is the word homosexual mentioned?
I decide what's normal around here. Homosexuals can do whatever they want behind closed doors. No one cares. They can have a civil union that has the same exact civil rights a marriage has.
Just don't call it marriage. THE NAME IS TAKEN!
The Declaration of
September 16, 2008 - 00:18 ET by JesseJacksonIVThe Declaration of Independence says "All Men Are Created Equal".
Doesn't say only heterosexuals, but ALL men.
Big man with the quotes aren't we?
September 16, 2008 - 01:13 ET by JWFThe bible says... The bible says... The bible says... The bible says... The bible says... The Declaration of Independence says... The voice in my head says...
I got one of my own. The rules says...
The rules says I responded to one of your posts. You want to respond to mine, understand my friggin point and possibly put your loopy leaps of logic somewhere near that point.
Who in the name of all that is fuzzy and holy said any breathing humanoid on the face of this godforsaken planet was not equal, you tiny tiny tiny little man?
If Gay people are equal,
September 16, 2008 - 01:56 ET by JesseJacksonIVIf Gay people are equal, shouldn't they then have the same rights has everyone else?
Gay mariage is not a religous issue, it's a legal one. Legally speaking, why should Homesexuals be allowed to marry.
You are confusing the terms.
September 16, 2008 - 08:23 ET by JWFYou are confusing the terms, rights and privileges.
Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness - rights
Driving, voting, getting married - privilege.
Gay people do have the sames rights as everyone else. They are free to work, live and play in the same sandbox as all.
Once again, your failure to read & understand history, social studies, and watch South Park tests my patience.
Mrs. Garrison:
They passed this law behind our back! We need to tell the governor and the world that gay marriage is not okay! That homosexuals cannot muddy our traditions! And there is only one way for us, all together, to make that messeage very clear! We need to round up three or four queers and beat the livin' hell out of them! [Everyone else falls silent. She steps out from behind the podium and crouches a bit] Come on, everybody! Let's get some queers, and some trucks, and have us a good old-fashioned fag drag!
Man 2:
Well uh, we were thinkin' we would, you know, just go appeal to the Governor.
Mrs. Garrison:
Appeal to the Governor? Oh,come on! Where's your balls?! Fag drag!
Man 3:
We don't "hate" homosexuals, we, we we just don't want them to be able to marry.
Man 4:
Yeah, we were just thinkin' o' goin' and askin' the Governor to veto the bill.
it is only a religious bond
September 18, 2008 - 15:38 ET by patmac49it is only a religious bond if people choose that path...but actually,no marriage has to be done in a religious manner to be valid
CBS is nothing but BS
September 15, 2008 - 17:01 ET by deerjerkydaveWhitaker: "But their marriage Knot could be undone by a ballot initiative to, once again, ban gay marriage."
FALSE. Gay marriages performed now in California will not be annulled if Proposition 8 passes in November. Gay marriages currently performed will not be undone. This was made possible by California's San Francisco based Supreme Court. They overturned the will of the people, disenfranchising the votes of millions of Californians, earlier this year and refused to stay their decision until the election this November. It is disgusting what the government here is ramming down the throats of citizens. The morality of the state is trumping the morality of the public on this issue. The government actually renamed the proposition on the ballot to read: "Eliminates the right of same-sex couples to marry." The liberal media sees no evil and hears no evil in any of this.
We are putting teh gay peoples in internment camps?
September 15, 2008 - 22:01 ET by JWFCool! Because frankly, they scare and frighten me. You know, that gayness is communicable and we can all catch it.
Now I can... Wait, we are not putting teh gay peoples...? Let me read that again. Ok, No? Wait...
Oh fudge.
Damn you Takei!