Tuesday’s CBS Early Show devoted four separate segments to news that the teenage daughter of McCain running mate Sarah Palin is pregnant, with co-host Maggie Rodriguez declaring: "Private lives, pregnancy, and politics. A stunning start to the Republican convention, as delegates grapple with Sarah Palin's family life. I'm Maggie Rodriguez in St. Paul. The bombshell pregnancy announcement that's stolen John McCain's limelight and why some insiders say it may help him." Later, Rodriguez explained: "We've got a couple of storms brewing here in St. Paul, as well. The headline in the local paper calls day one of the Republican National Convention 'A Day of Distractions' for the GOP. The focus not on John McCain, but on Hurricane Gustav and on the political storm involving the presumptive vice presidential nominee, Sarah Palin, and the revelation that her teen daughter is pregnant."
In the first segment on the issue, in the 7am half hour, correspondent Jeff Glor announced: "Four days ago, hardly anybody knew anything about Alaska Governor Sarah Palin. Now they know a lot, including that news that her teenage daughter is indeed pregnant." Glor concluded his report by seeming to suggest that a planned address by Palin to the Republican convention was cancelled in the wake of the controversy: "Interesting to note that on the original schedule, Sarah Palin was scheduled to speak tonight. That will not happen." However, Glor never explained that while Palin was originally scheduled to give a prime time speech on Tuesday night of the convention, that speech was scheduled before she was named the vice presidential nominee, who traditionally accepts the party nomination on Wednesday, with McCain accepting the presidential nomination on Thursday.
In the 7:30am half hour, Rodriguez talked to Karen Rhoades, a personal friend of Sarah Palin, about Palin’s daughter and the vetting process. Rodriguez teased that segment this way: "Ahead this morning, we'll talk to an old friend of the Palins about the rumors, about the pregnancy, and about the woman who's still such a mystery to so many people." Most of the segment allowed Rhoades to give personal insight into Palin, but at one point Rodriguez asked: "There are questions this morning about how thoroughly she was vetted, how much they looked into her background. We haven't found anyone in Alaska who says that they were talked to about her background. Since the announcement has come that she's the nominee, have you heard of anyone there who was asked about Sarah Palin's background?" Considering the announcement was only made Friday, perhaps Rodriguez should give it a bit more time.
In the 8am half hour, Rodriguez talked to Democratic strategist Joe Trippi about the Palin vetting process: "Let's talk about the vetting process, because I know that you've been involved in the past in the running mate selection process when Walter Mondale chose Geraldine Ferraro. Do you get the sense that John McCain didn't know everything about her? Everything they were getting?" Trippi replied: "Yeah, absolutely. And I know what it's like when you're on the staff and you have that feeling that, 'boy, we didn't vet this person as much as we should have,' which is clearly the case with Governor Palin, and that's -- that's just a horrible feeling, because you never know what you don't know. You never know if another shoe's going to drop tomorrow, and you just want to stop the bleeding and get on to what you want to fight about, which is to lay down the differences between McCain and Obama. And this -- between the hurricane and Governor Palin, the McCain campaign hasn't been able to do that yet."
Despite Jeff Glor reporting earlier that the McCain campaign new about Palin’s daughter being pregnant, Rodriguez went on to ask Trippi: "How could they not know? How could they not thoroughly do their homework? How does that happen?" Trippi explained: "Well, what happens sometimes is the candidate and the campaign are going down one path...and you immediately move to another choice. And that choice -- and this happened in '84 with Geraldine Ferraro -- that choice turns out to be somebody that you just didn't have enough information on, and so you get in this predicament like has happened with Governor Palin." Rodriguez briefly mentioned at the very end of the segment: "And we should add that the McCain campaign insists that she was thoroughly vetted and there have been no surprises to them." Apparently that insistence was not enough for Rodriguez.
Finally, in the 8:30am half hour, Rodriguez talked to teen mother, Kaleigh Larrick, about the issue: "Kaleigh, here in Minnesota, here at the Republican National Convention, there's a lot of support for Sarah Palin, but other people are criticizing her. So, let me ask you, do you think that your parents should be held accountable for your actions?" Larrick replied: "No, because -- I think it was something I did, but I don't regret it."
—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
I see lots of Republicans
September 2, 2008 - 12:55 ET by BruzillaI see lots of Republicans donning the same blinders that Democrats wore in the 1990s to blind themselves to the problems with the Clintons, and the same ones the Dems are wearing today to blind themselves to Obama and Biden's problems. Rush Limbaugh... the guy who proclaimed to no longer be a water carrier for the Republicans is back toting the buckets. He said on Friday that Palin was a great choice because the Libs/MSM would be afraid to attack her and Dem women would vote for her. He damn sure was wrong on the first count, and more and more Dem women are coming out to say they would never vote for a woman like Palin. I wonder if Rush is aware of how his spinning for McCain and Palin are effecting his "right XX% of the time" standard?
McCain is lying when he says she was vetted or that he had been considering her for months. She was never invited to any of his socials where all the other VP hopefulls were, and his only contact with her over the months was a 15-minute meeting at the Governor's Convention... where he probably had 15-minute meetings with all the Republican governors. He made as bad a decision as Obama, but most Republicans just can't admit that.
Who's being blind?
September 2, 2008 - 13:12 ET by CobraManWho's being blind, you or us? Palin is NOT running for the presidency. How can you, or anyone else for that matter, compare her to the Clintons or any other presidential candidate, past and present? It would be far more appropriate to compare her to any other VP candidate, like Biden.
Obama: My job is above my pay grade
The Bru has spoken...
September 2, 2008 - 13:12 ET by RackieFinally, someone with the inside scoop. I'll sleep better now.
For a self-proclaimed...
September 2, 2008 - 13:16 ET by ontheright...conservative Republican and "most of my family are Republicans" you consistently deride all things conservative and Republican and take every opportunity to throw "softballs" to and/or make excuses for the Dims.
I find that interesting on two points:
1. You don't propose the same intricate and obtrusive vetting process for the "ONE", who could become the actual PRESIDENT...not a VP.
2. Your liberal/Democrat blinders are keeping you from being objective in your observations..."and more and more Dem women are coming out to say they would never vote for a woman like Palin". Where are the facts that quantify this more and more statement? Oh, you mean you don't have facts to back up your drivel? Surprise, surprise - Repub you are not!
Not so strangely, the word "Troll" comes to mind.
Bring it on, Bruzer
September 2, 2008 - 13:22 ET by Dr_LibertyBruz,
Keep speaking truth to power. Speak it louder. I want you to spread the truth to everyone you know. And don't hold back. Let it all out.
The reason Palin is bringing out such vitriol in people like you is that you know that this is a person who is the epitome of all that America is and aspires to be.
<insert witty signature here>
Bruzilla, Anything the MSM can do to avoid covering the RNC
September 2, 2008 - 13:24 ET by upcountrywaterThey were hoping on Katrina to blow away the coverage, when gust-off pooped out ,now try the protesters, now kids having kids, any form of any "news' to keep these msm KOOKS from covering the RNC is fine with them.
If Mit was the choice we'd be back to old guys with teenage wifes.
Liberals62%
IranianUranium
Proof
September 2, 2008 - 13:31 ET by well99"McCain is lying when he says she was vetted or that he had been considering her for months."
You have real proof to back this up?This because I think it is true it must be really doesnt work.Try facts.It maybe a foreign concept but give it a shot.
bruzilla,
September 2, 2008 - 13:57 ET by larry on LIi think it is very naive of you to believe that any presidential candidate would expose his vetting of potential running mates.palin has been on the table for a long time, many conservative talk hosts have touted her early on. i became interested in her due to her success with the ng pipeline. i can't wait to see her in a debate with "plugs' biden,i think she will surprise a lot of viewers.
So, let me ask you, do
September 2, 2008 - 13:05 ET by bigtimerSo, let me ask you, do you think that your parents should be held accountable for your actions?" Larrick replied: "No, because -- I think it was something I did, but I don't regret it."
Take that and put it in your pipe and smoke it Rodriquez.
These talking head Obamakin women are embarrassing themselves.
Bet hey, they are going to gain us more votes the more these people keep this up...
Joe Trippi is a joke anyway...not going to bother with any more of a comment to him.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
Spare me.
September 2, 2008 - 13:07 ET by Texndoc"In the 8am half hour, Rodriguez talked to Democratic strategist Joe Trippi ..."
Joe Trippi created Howard Dean, who blew up (literally) before the primaries were even over. YeeeeeeeAhhhhhhh! I really care how he manages things.
Yep, we now know more about Sarah Palin in just a couple of day
September 2, 2008 - 13:18 ET by Queasythan we do about Barack Obama after a couple of years.
Amazing how that works...
Excellent point...
September 2, 2008 - 13:33 ET by ontheright...more in 3 days than in 2 years. And any sane, logically minded person who cannot see the partisanship and bias that is so blatantly spewed from the liberal, mainstream media has been completely duped by all the Messiah "glint and glimmer".
This one instance alone proves to me that the liberals and their ilk are wading at the shallow end of the gene pool.
Hilarious, the bias and pure, inadulterated hatred of anyone or anything that does not march in "lock-step" with the liberal, Dimocrat talking points.
This narcissistic stage show by the left is truly embarrassing! I feel sorry for them.
The left is all over this
September 2, 2008 - 13:20 ET by mattmThe left is all over this because they misinterpret what the conservative viewpoint is. They see some alleged hypocrisy in a conservative and they pound it into the ground because they think it discredits conservatism. They're missing the point.
What should Sarah Palin do, encourage her daughter to have an abortion? If she did, that would be the hypocrisy, and it would diminish her credibility, but she is not doing that. She is remaining true to her belief in the sanctity of life.
The only story here is how the media and the left are blowing this out of proportion for strictly political reasons. There is no comparison with this to the Clinton sex scandals. Clinton was/is a whoremonger whose wife allowed him his trysts in exchange for political power.
This Palin thing is a family issue in which a 17 year old girl gets pregnant and plans to marry the father. It's night and day, and the libs are showing the double standards under which they operate.
Who are they trying to fool
September 2, 2008 - 13:30 ET by AtTheWaterCoolerThe two posts at Jeremiah Films are http://www.jeremiahf... About Palin supporting her teenager and http://www.jeremiahf... "Dakota Voice: Abortion Begins a Downward Spiral" about a family who did not ...
Lil Baby or Fetus ?
September 2, 2008 - 13:40 ET by BrownCowI'm thinking Bristol should just wait a few months and have a late term partial birth abortion... maybe even go dramatic with it and do the whole born alive scenario. Put the ummm... fetus in a closet to die. That would make the libs happy ! She would be a hero of womens choice and they would no longer be able to make hay of this.
Just a thought.....
In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem. -Ronald Reagan
The (R) after one's name
September 2, 2008 - 14:58 ET by Tim the EnchanterThe (R) after one's name means "damned if you do, and damned if you don't." She will NEVER win these people over. Remember when Bush #1 went along with the tax increase to curry favor with the dems? Did they praise him for that? No, they used it as a cudgel and beat him over the head with it every change they could.
Even Barrack said this is off limits.
September 2, 2008 - 13:51 ET by awffp1890The MSM but be giddy with excitement that they have found this "skeleton" in the closet of Sarah Palin. I wonder if the shoe was on the other foot, and this was Barrack's daughter, would the coverage be so aggressive, or would they began making excuses.
Barrack himself came out and said children were off limits. The MSM has hung onto his every word, why are they not listening to him now?
"Not for fame or reward, not for place or rank, not lured by ambition or goaded by necessity. But in simple obedience to duty." - From the barracks at Ft. Benning
Thanks Nancy Pelosi
September 2, 2008 - 14:09 ET by MSD6It sure seems as if Nancy Pelosi recognizes Sarah Palin's experience and accomplishments in this interview with the Ladies Home Journal from September 2008 (this month!)
LHJ: Do you think we'll have to wait as long again for another potential female president?
NP: No, I don't. First of all, Hillary Clinton is still here and young enough to run again in a number of years, but there are also women in the House, in the Congress, and in the governorships. It won't be long before it won't be unusual for us to have viable, strong women candidates for President of the United States. And I take great joy in that thought
LHJ: You are a mother of five and were a homemaker for many years before entering politics. You say in your book that the skills you honed doing those things were the same ones you needed when you got to Congress. How so?
NP: Absolutely, and this is what I want women to know, so they recognize the value of their own path, their unique experience. I've been in politics a while, over 20 years in the Congress of the United States, and this is a very rough-and-tumble.... I shouldn't say 'rough,' let me say a very challenging arena to be in. But as challenging as it is, nothing is as challenging as raising a family -- nothing. That experience forced me to be disciplined, diplomatic, focused, and successful, and I brought that discipline and focus to the Congress. Also, having a family keeps you focused on the future, which is the biggest inspiration in politics. In order to do what it takes to succeed in politics, you have to be inspired by your constituents, the power of your ideas, and the fact that you speak on behalf of children and their future, whether you have children of your own or not. It makes all the difference in the world.
LHJ: Women since the dawn of time have struggled to balance their careers with their families. What advice would you give to women who are trying to achieve that very elusive balance? Do you think it's possible?
NP: Yes, I think it is, and what I tell women is, you are doing the best you can, even if it's not the best you know how. You can't control every aspect, so don't worry about not measuring up. Just know that it's the best you can do, and know that if you succeed in being a mother, you can succeed in any arena. There's nothing to compare it to. And I always say know your power. That's how I got the title for my book. Mothers have so much power. They have the power to make a difference in the lives of these little people they're raising, and the power to make a difference in the world in which they will grow up and then live. That's a key message of my book. I want women to recognize the value of their unique experience. And in Congress, I've made it my special mission to be a voice for young working women.