On Sunday’s Face the Nation on CBS, host Bob Schieffer talked about John McCain’s latest campaign ads with Republican strategist Karl Rove and quoted previous guest Tim Kaine, the Democratic Governor of Virginia: "But what about John McCain? At this point, as Governor Kaine said, Obama's running positive ads and John McCain is running ads about...Paris Hilton and that sort of thing...What he called the same old Karl Rove ads...Can you get elected president that way?"
In response, Rove argued that Obama started the negative trend: "I would make the argument that part of the reason why Senator Obama is in the shape he is in today is because he's failed to run a positive campaign. He's run a negative campaign." Schieffer immediately brushed that charge aside: "What do you think John McCain ought to do -- I want to get back to my question, can you get elected when the thrust of your campaign seems to be comparing the other guy to sort of an empty suit, Paris Hilton-type celebrity? Doesn't it have to go beyond that?"
Schieffer began the segment by turning flattening poll numbers for Barack Obama into bad news for McCain: "Democrats are worried that Barack Obama's not doing better, that he ought to be doing better than he is. But the truth is, John McCain really hasn't caught fire either. I mean, our recent CBS News polls showed that only 17 percent of Republicans were, quote, "enthusiastic" about John McCain...Now, that has got to worry Republican strategists, it seems to me." Rove then cited a Pew Research poll that had Democrats hardly more excited for Obama: "Well, I think you ought to point out that only 24 percent of Democrats were similarly that -- had that same degree of enthusiastic -- enthusiasm for Obama." Schieffer replied: "Well, actually, in our poll it was much greater than that."
Schieffer went on to ask Rove: "Does he need to separate himself from your old boss, George Bush? Separate himself more?" When he turned to the Democrats, Schieffer focused on their chances of winning: "You have said yourself in the past that Obama probably should pick a red state governor, somebody just like Tim Kaine that we just heard just a minute ago from Virginia. Governor Kaine seems to think that Democrats really can carry Virginia this time. Do you think that state's going to be in play?"
Rove responded to that by clarifying: "Yeah. I think it's going to be in play, but let me clarify. I didn't say that I thought he ought to, I said that I thought he probably would pick a red state Democrat, because I think he's going to make an intensely political choice, not a governing choice...He's not going to be thinking big and broad about the responsibilities of president." Undeterred, Schieffer’s final question was again: "Do you think -- and we have about 30 seconds left here. Do you think that the Democrats do have a good chance of carrying Virginia, which they haven't done since Lyndon Johnson in '64?"
Here is the full transcript of the segment:
10:44AM SEGMENT:
BOB SCHIEFFER: And with us now from Florida, Republican strategist and former adviser to President Bush, Karl Rove. Karl Rove is for the McCain campaign, but he is not of the campaign. Well, Mr. Rove, you heard me say to Governor Kaine that a lot of Democrats are worried that Barack Obama's not doing better, that he ought to be doing better than he is. But the truth is, John McCain really hasn't caught fire either. I mean, our recent CBS News polls showed that only 17 percent of Republicans were, quote, "enthusiastic" about John McCain.
KARL ROVE: Yeah.
SCHIEFFER: Now, that has got to worry Republican strategists, it seems to me.
ROVE: Yeah. Well, I think you ought to point out that only 24 percent of Democrats were similarly that -- had that same degree of enthusiastic -- enthusiasm for Obama. You're right, there is-
SCHIEFFER: Well, actually, in our poll it was much greater than that.
ROVE: Yeah.
SCHIEFFER: You're talking about the Pew poll. But go ahead.
ROVE: Yeah, yeah. Look, two things. One is the race is closer than it ought to be. With a restive -- with a restive electorate, with an economy that's sort of chugging along, with a war in the background, at the end of eight years of Republican rule in the White House Obama should be way ahead. And yet, as you point out, Gallup shows it -- the last week, the average is 1.9 percent. If you look at the -- at the Web sites that average polls, pollster.com has it at a 2.4 percent race, fivethirtyeight.com has it at a 2 percent race. This is a race where Obama should be way ahead, and the fact that he isn't says that there are grave doubts about Senator Obama.
SCHIEFFER: But what about John McCain? At this point, as Governor Kaine said, Obama's running positive ads and John McCain is running ads about-
ROVE: You know-
SCHIEFFER: -Paris Hilton and that sort of thing.
ROVE: You know what?
SCHIEFFER: What he called the same old Karl Rove ads.
ROVE: Yeah. Well, with all due respect-
SCHIEFFER: Can you get elected president that way?
ROVE: With all due respect to Senator -- to Governor Kaine, he's wrong. Senator Obama is running an ad in which he attacks John McCain as being in the pocket of the oil companies, a charge that got The Washington Post this morning even to raise some editorial doubts. And he's offering up a populist energy proposal that even has The New York Times expressing editorial qualms this morning. And remember, Senator Obama is the person who over the course of the last month has been standing up, suggesting that Senator McCain and the Republicans are going to mount racist attacks, and just before he left on his vacation in Hawaii called Senator McCain ignorant. I don't think that's particularly a positive campaign. In fact, I would make the argument that part of the reason why Senator Obama is in the shape he is in today is because he's failed to run a positive campaign. He's run a negative campaign. He's claimed to be something new and different, and yet given these -- you know, it is really beyond the pale to sit there and insinuate that Senator McCain is somehow going to attack him for being black, which is what he did for over a month.
SCHIEFFER: What do you think John McCain ought to do -- I want to get back to my question, can you get elected when the thrust of your campaign seems to be comparing the other guy to sort of an empty suit, Paris Hilton-type celebrity? Doesn't it have to go beyond that?
ROVE: Yeah. Well, it does. But I got to tell you, I think Senator McCain was right by raising these doubts about Senator Obama. They're on the minds of the American people. That's why when he went on this big foreign trip, you know, Governor Kaine talks about judgment. What does it say about somebody's judgment that you can go to Iraq and not come out and credit the surge for the stabilization of Iraq and for putting us in a place -- in a place where we can win the conflict? It is because Senator Obama has demonstrated such appalling judgment. He goes to Europe and does a big rally in Germany as if he's running for president of the United States of Europe, not the United States of America. It's these kind of judgment questions that Senator McCain was right to raise, because they are judgment questions that are sitting on the minds of Americans. But it's not enough, I grant you that. He's got to do several other things. He's got to -- he's got to -- he's got to point out that there is no there there when it comes to Senator Obama's rhetoric. He's running on an empty -- you know, empty rhetoric. If Walter Mondale had not used up the slogan "Where's the beef?" it would be a good one for Senator McCain to raise. And -- but Senator McCain needs to do two positive things. One is he needs to use the 12 weeks that are left to lay out a bold agenda for domestic reform, and he also needs to talk more about his character. Now, he's doing part of the second. I mean, this energy debate has been positive for McCain because he says, 'Look, I'm in favor of drilling more, I'm in favor of nuclear, I'm in favor of renewables, and my opponent is in favor of taxing coal, taxing natural gas, and not building any nuclear plants,' and certainly, he's been opposed, until very recent, about drilling off the outer continental shelf. These things have worked to the advantage of Senator McCain. He needs to do more of those on issues like health and jobs and education.
SCHIEFFER: Does he need to separate himself from your old boss, George Bush? Separate himself more?
ROVE: You know, he needs to -- he needs to recognize that every election is about the future, and he needs to describe who he is. If he -- if Senator Obama has wisely attacked him saying, 'Third term of George Bush,' Senator McCain has responded badly to that. Rather than saying, 'You know what, here's who I am and here's what I'm about,' he's responded by saying, 'No, I'm not,' which is the wrong answer. If the question is who is not George Bush, Barack Obama is the answer. If the question is who are you and do you have a vision for the future, the answer could be Senator McCain. In fact, again, I would suggest that a weakness of Obama is that by harping so much about no third term for Bush, people have said, 'You know what? I--John McCain's not George Bush. He ran against him in 2000.' To the degree that McCain supplies more about who he is and ignores the question of third term, says 'Here's who I am and here's what my vision is,' the more he'll prosper and the worse Senator Obama will be.
SCHIEFFER: You have said yourself in the past that Obama probably should pick a red state governor, somebody just like Tim Kaine that we just heard just a minute ago from Virginia. Governor Kaine seems to think that Democrats really can carry Virginia this time. Do you think that state's going to be in play?
ROVE: Yeah. I think it's going to be in play, but let me clarify. I didn't say that I thought he ought to, I said that I thought he probably would pick a red state Democrat, because I think he's going to make an intensely political choice, not a governing choice. He's going to view this through the prism of a candidate, not through the prism of president; that is to say, he's going to pick somebody that he thinks will on the margin help him in a state like Indiana or Missouri or Virginia. He's not going to be thinking big and broad about the responsibilities of president. With all due respect again to Governor Kaine, he's been a governor for three years, he's been able but undistinguished. I don't think people could really name a big, important thing that he's done. He was mayor of the 105th largest city in America. And again, with all due respect to Richmond, Virginia, it's smaller than Chula Vista, California; Aurora, Colorado; Mesa or Gilbert, Arizona; north Las Vegas or Henderson, Nevada. It's not a big town. So if he were to pick Governor Kaine, it would be an intensely political choice where he said, 'You know what? I'm really not, first and foremost, concerned with, is this person capable of being President of the United States? What I'm concerned about is, can he bring me the electoral votes of the state of Virginia, the 13 electoral votes in Virginia?'
SCHIEFFER: Do you think -- and we have about 30 seconds left here. Do you think that the Democrats do have a good chance of carrying Virginia, which they haven't done since Lyndon Johnson in '64?
ROVE: I think at the end of the day Virginia will be in the Republican column. 1976, I actually was involved in Virginia helping run the Dole campaign and then came very close to winning then. I think, at the end of the day, McCain wins it this time. But it will be a battleground state in large measure because Obama's going to put the money and resources into it and Governor Kaine may have a special interest in trying to carry his -- the commonwealth.
SCHIEFFER: Alright, Karl Rove, we want to thank you for your insight this morning.
ROVE: You bet.
SCHIEFFER: We'll be back with a final word in just a minute.
—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Nasty boy
August 12, 2008 - 17:20 ET by nkviking75It doesn't get any nastier than trying to plant the idea in the public's heads that John McCain and his supporters are racists.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
My opponents are going to say "Did I mention he's black"
August 12, 2008 - 18:59 ET by Daniel BakerMore like his racist supporters say this to their friends to get race based support
John McCain 2008 Protect Traditional Marriage
Traditional Marriage is not "Divisive" Obama.
"Did I mention he's
August 13, 2008 - 05:38 ET by DontFeedTheTrolls"Did I mention he's black"
Did I mention he has a white mother, just like John McCain? So what's the problem?
D
Keep the ILLEGALS out, join NumbersUSA to send free faxes to your reps.
Hey Bob!
August 12, 2008 - 17:24 ET by Dr_LibertySchieffer immediately brushed that charge aside: "What do you think John McCain ought to do -- I want to get back to my question, can you get elected when the thrust of your campaign seems to be comparing the other guy to sort of an empty suit, Paris Hilton-type celebrity? Doesn't it have to go beyond that?"
Well, Obama has been very reluctant to engage in any debates with McCain, particularly "town hall format." So, yeah, I guess McCain has tried to go "beyond that," but the other candidate isn't working hard to meet him half way.
One should note that Paris Hilton has agreed to debate the beeeetches.
<insert witty signature here>
→ Well Mr.s Schieffer
August 12, 2008 - 17:29 ET by Cool ArrowW hat else can you say about an empty suit but "nice suit"
I ♣ my seal
Scheiffer immediately
August 12, 2008 - 18:16 ET by motherbeltScheiffer immediately brushed that aside, because he didn't want Rove saying negative things about Obama. He'd rather throw out negative things about McCain and challenge Rove to defend him.
I'm sorry, Bob, is it in poor taste to point out that your opponent is an empty suit? What's McCain supposed to say, He's a great guy, but I'm better?
And Bob, you have been around long enough to know the dirty little secret of politics: Negative ads work. That's why it upsets you so much.
Exactly mb.... Not only
August 12, 2008 - 18:27 ET by bigtimerExactly mb....
Not only does it upset good old Bob...it does all his leftist buddies.
I thought I'd heard about all the whining and crying about ads a few years back by the leftists....I have yet to see anything quite like this.
Obama has nothing to run on...so this becomes a main issue for months now, pretty pathetic just thinking what kind of wussified creature we would get in the WH.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
There is nothing negative...
August 12, 2008 - 17:27 ET by HeavyChevyAbout John McCain's ads. Its not racist, negative or anti-anything! His ads are just as "plain Jane" as every other political ad. The MSM would not know real racism if it bit them on the bottom!
"9 out of 10 doctors agree that flag burning is the number one killer of liberals."
The problem is that Rove
August 12, 2008 - 19:36 ET by docbused a small amount of truth and McCain'ads are flat out lies....Being from the south...this is as much racist as was hillery and Bill's innuendos in the primary ..Shamesless but it does appeal to the lowest common denominator! under ground bigots...McCain and clinton in the same black pot...
→ right docb
August 12, 2008 - 19:43 ET by Cool ArrowI suppose you're using John Edwards' measurement of "99% false".
You're going to have to be more specific as to how McCain's ads are lies. And while you're at it, show me how they're racist.
I ♣ my seal
docb, are you smoking crack? Again?
August 12, 2008 - 19:47 ET by R D HelmThere was nothing racist about McCain's ad. Nothing.
And if you think there was, then you are clearly incapable of defining the term.
-Dave.
We are not going to save this country by being polite to those who are working tirelessly (and succeeding right handily) at destroying it.
Awwww...po' little Lib got panties in a twist?
August 12, 2008 - 21:49 ET by UberconLet's get real...this is a conservative website...go away...or else you're going to get your feelings hurt while you get a whoopin'!Ubercon
under ground bigots...
August 12, 2008 - 21:54 ET by Clear thinkerI'm sure the left will have a wiki entry for this one. Under ground bigots???
45 Communist Goals for America http://www.nationmakers.com/com_goals.htm
simple equation
August 12, 2008 - 22:02 ET by candanceThere is a very simple reason for this behavior. It goes thusly:
Obama: Everyone repeat after me - McCain is racist.
Masses: McCain is racist. McCain is racist.
Obama: Now that we have that established, let's talk about racist things McCain will surely say in the future.
Thus setting the stage for paranoia to the end that any percieved insult is pored over for a racist angle.
I believe under ground is
August 12, 2008 - 23:52 ET by Captain RepusI believe under ground is correctly spelled underground. The space is only appropriate between your ears.
"Obama's running positive
August 12, 2008 - 17:28 ET by ThisnThat"Obama's running positive ads".
I've seen Obama's lastest "positive" ad. It trys to paint McCain as beholden to the oil companies. He uses the term "big oil" at least 4 times, and is one of the most negative ads I've seen. Last week I wrote to my congressman and told her to stop it with the "big oil" term -- it makes her look petty and mean.
Bob Schieffer is petty and mean. So is Obama.
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
No, no, TnT!! That's not
August 12, 2008 - 18:35 ET by motherbeltNo, no, TnT!! That's not negative! That's a hard-hitting ad! Hitting back! Stepping up the criticism! Holding McCain's feet to the fire!
McCain saying Obama is, like Paris Hilton, mostly famous for being famous, now that's negative!!
BTW, I don't have a problem with negative ads on either side, as lont as they are truthful.
Basically, all ads are negative, when you come down to it. Even pointing out one's own strengths implies that one's opponent is weak in those areas.
If McCain says "I have the experience!" isn't that a negative, saying that Obama lacks it? If Obama says "I believe we can do better!" isn't he saying that McCain is happy with the status quo?
Negative ads reveal the
August 12, 2008 - 20:50 ET by ThisnThatNegative ads reveal the character of the candidate. McCain's have been fairly funny and somewhat fun. Obama's have been biting, which serves to satisfy the base but tick everyone else off. But, that's the Dims for ya -- always with the negative attitude; and not so much on trying to entertain and entice. I hope they keep it up.
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
Liberals always want to paint telling the truth as 'negative'.
August 12, 2008 - 17:41 ET by c5thenObama is really just an empty suit. Comparing him with Paris Hilton, who is famous for being famous is PERFECT.
He claims to be "for the middle class" yet all his tax proposals would adversely impact the "middle class" (as well as all the other 'classes' as the liberals define them.
Here is the difference between them:
McCain is letting everyone know about Obama's flaws and short-comings.
Obama is flat out lying about McCain.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.
Boy that Kaine wants to be
August 12, 2008 - 17:43 ET by bigtimerBoy that Kaine wants to be named VP pretty bad now doesn't he?
What an Obama butt-kiss he is turning out to be...
I sure like among other things what Rove said here....
With all due respect again to Governor Kaine, he's been a governor for three years, he's been able but undistinguished. I don't think people could really name a big, important thing that he's done.
Hey by the way, to top it off... I heard Kaine gave credit to Obama for the cease-fire in the Georgia/Russia situation. I am serious too.
Now if that is unbelievable arse kissing I don't know what it is...
...and I do mean UNBELIEVABLE.
What a simpleton this guy must be.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
"I heard Kaine gave credit
August 12, 2008 - 18:04 ET by celator"I heard Kaine gave credit to Obama for the cease-fire in the Georgia/Russia situation."
I heard the same thing on the radio today. Man, it takes not only gall, but a delusional view of what is really happening to have the nerve to distort reality like that. And to think that in this day and age, they think they will get away with it. These people live in their own very strange world, completely disconnected from the rest of the country.
The truth is (as we know) that McCain was the first out of the chute with strong condemnation about Russia's insane and criminal invasion. And he said it loud and clear.
Nothing from Fancy Nancy Pelosi.
Nothing from the cadaverous Harry Reid.
Obama's response was a WRITTEN STATEMENT read by someone else. I've not yet heard him personally speak out openly with confidence and credibility about Russia's attack on a free people. (Though I admit I might have missed it).
What the blue blazes were the Democrats thinking when they voted for this hot air balloon? Well, we know the answer, I think.
The major media report only half the news. Why are they surprised they have only half the potential audience?
Hi cel... I heard/saw
August 12, 2008 - 18:11 ET by bigtimerHi cel...
I heard/saw Obama give a statement this morning on television, it was absolutely namby-pamby pathetic, I do not know how else to describe it.
I tell ya, the sock-puppets strings aren't working anymore.
One thing that could be interesting, but I don't think will happen, is if his poll numbers really start tanking before the dem convention, it may be more fun to watch than it already will be for me.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
I missed that show, I
August 12, 2008 - 18:21 ET by celatorI missed that show, I reckon. But I could have guessed it would be namby pamby. Perhaps Obama's now whining about how he should have had tea and crumpets with Pukin' before the invasion. Then he could have saved the day! What a hero!!
On the poll numbers, he seems to be losing traction and more as more adults start focusing on the election. We can expect to see a rise in Sept/Oct as the college kids get back in class for their political re-education classes. Those post-'60's "perfessors" will do their best to brainwash the kids. But students don't vote in any significant numbers, so who knows what impact they will have.
I still keep my eye on the electoral votes. That's where the real test is. They give me cause for concern.
The major media report only half the news. Why are they surprised they have only half the potential audience?
"...they think they will
August 12, 2008 - 18:18 ET by Indiana Joe"...they think they will get away with it."
Sadly, they will with some people. A lot of people, in fact. Far too many people still get their info in sound-bites from the MSM, and are too easily swayed by empty rhetoric and outright lies. They don't want to be bothered with learning the facts. We have a lazy electorate.
Example? Try to explain to most people that Bill Clinton wasn't impeached for having sex with an intern. As you explain the import of a President committing perjury, you can see their eyes glaze over, and you'll probably get a "whatever" in reply.
"Far too many people still
August 12, 2008 - 18:35 ET by celator"Far too many people still get their info in sound-bites from the MSM"
Yep, they do. I read recently that something like 70-80 percent of the 15-30 year olds get their "news" (what little news they do get) from John Stewart and Stephen Colbert. These two "comedians" resource MSM sound-bites for their bits. So to these kids and young adults, if "news" isn't funny, then it's not really news.
When I catch them (occasionally) I am reminded of one of the important rules of Saul Alinsky's revolutionary tactics: "Use derision to mock those who oppose the revolution."
Both of these characters have, basically, one form of "humor"--a mocking cynicism of the political opponents of the Left. And they aren't all that good at it, either.
The major media report only half the news. Why are they surprised they have only half the potential audience?
In defense
August 12, 2008 - 21:59 ET by serfer62In defense of young people getting their news from standups, thats OK since a huge amount do not vote.
Doesn't it have to go beyond that?
August 12, 2008 - 17:48 ET by KC MulvilleSure. So does reporting. Reporting has to go beyond describing Obama as a rock star, talking about how exciting he is, and whether he "looks presidential" because he smiles and nods when a foreign leader shakes his hand on a completely photo-opped foreign trip to bolster his "gravitas." McCain made a foreign trip and got no coverage at all. On the stump, McCain handles all kids of town-hall questions, and he explains why he holds his policies. Obama, on the other hand, tells children that America is lost without him.
And since Obama's ads are demonstrably nastier, why didn't Schieffer ask the same question to Kaine? You can't say that you showed balance to both campaigns if you show deference to one but you try to undermine the other.
So it's embarrassing for Schieffer to huff about how McCain's campaign needs to go to a higher plane.
Schieffer and all his ilk
August 12, 2008 - 17:55 ET by bigtimerSchieffer and all his ilk don't know when they should be embarrassed of themselves...they do know wrong, they are picture perfect...just ask them.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
How do you judge whose ads
August 12, 2008 - 18:15 ET by balboaHow do you judge whose ads are nastier? I thought Obama's were about the centrally run socialist blahbity-blah?
Simple question, simple answer
August 12, 2008 - 18:27 ET by Indiana JoeObama accuses McCain of being a closet racist, in the pocket of big oil, too old, forgetful, etc, after promising not to "go negative."
McCain accuses Obama of being a neophyte with no experience.
Now, which is "nastier?"
I haven't seen that one. Let
August 12, 2008 - 18:29 ET by balboaI haven't seen that one. Let me look for it.
→ It's no stretch bal
August 12, 2008 - 18:48 ET by Cool ArrowYou should recognize the racist angle flung by the Obama
camp in his speech containing the line “did I mention He’s black”
Though it’s not in his ad, it’s a facet of the Obama package. Inasmuch you’re at least as adept at being
facetious as I, recognizing a facet should be no problem.
I ♣ my seal
Haha. Still haven't found
August 12, 2008 - 18:59 ET by balboaHaha.
Still haven't found this ad, though. I've found one that portrays him as on the side of oil & drug companies.
→ Good ad, bal
August 12, 2008 - 19:06 ET by Cool ArrowThat ad brought to the front Obama's YES vote to increase tax cuts to oil companies while McCain voted against them.
Fortunately for the cash-strapped McCain campaign, The Obama camp throws in its shoulder for some heavy lifting from time to time.
I ♣ my seal
Here's one
August 12, 2008 - 19:19 ET by KC Mulvillehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBPZyXvEw6M
This one is the direct reply to McCain's Paris Hilton ad. It accuses McCain of lobbyists running a "low road" campaign, giving billions to oil and drug corporations, etc. Of course, it makes a foolish distinction between oil and drug companies and "families like yours," but that's pure class warfare. Besides, these days, over half of those "families like yours" are invested in the stock market, and many probably have some stake in those oil and drug companies.
Definitely nastier than the ad it replies to.
→ Bravo Mullville
August 12, 2008 - 19:26 ET by Cool ArrowA nd we'll be seeing in the coming days more scrutiny of major international corporations reporting their earnings overseas rather than in the US to avoid American taxes.
It cannot be honestly denied the oil companies pay a huge chunk in taxes in America.
God, bless them.
I ♣ my seal
I don't know...maybe it's me
August 12, 2008 - 20:01 ET by balboaI don't know...maybe it's me but none of these ads on either side seem especially nasty.
→ Right, bal
August 12, 2008 - 20:07 ET by Cool ArrowI don't see any racism in either camp's ads either.
There are fair game comments made by both candidates, but none of them are in campaign ads.
I ♣ my seal
Can't argue about that
August 13, 2008 - 01:21 ET by KC MulvilleFor my taste, they're pretty mild. I fully agree with you there.
That's why I react against the self-important, trumped-up huffing by Schieffer, Matthews, Couric, etc., that these ads represent McCain taking the "low road." In my opinion, McCain's ads were more poking fun than anything else. And, they were directed against the media as much as Obama himself. So when these media prima donnas harrumph-harrumph (echoes of Mel Brooks) about McCain's "Karl-Rove" style politics, I think they're trying extra-hard to instill the perception that McCain is playing dirty, using spin rather than facts.
I wish I was hated
August 12, 2008 - 18:02 ET by bigpapaas much by the left as Rove is...
that would make me smile every morning... and afternoon, and before I went to bed!!!
NOBAMA 08 !!!
Very good! But I want to be
August 12, 2008 - 18:07 ET by celatorVery good! But I want to be the most hated!! It's MY turn!! ;+}
The major media report only half the news. Why are they surprised they have only half the potential audience?
"I want to get back to my
August 12, 2008 - 18:24 ET by Indiana Joe"I want to get back to my question"
Translation: "Don't bring up inconvenient facts when I'm trying to frame the discussion."
Go get 'em, Karl!
Jane you ignorant slut
August 12, 2008 - 19:48 ET by i b squidlyor
SCHIEFFER you schlerotic coprophrene
First, kill all the lawyers.
-Wlm Shakespear
Rove Kicked Butt!
August 12, 2008 - 20:43 ET by avenarKudos Karl Rove! Very nicely done interview.
Karl Rove Overwhelmed Schieffer
August 12, 2008 - 22:38 ET by rammingspeedThe more the Bob Schieffers of the left wing MSM push, the more they'll get detailed, intelligent responses from Karl Rove and other people who know the truth. Of course, Schieffer doesn't know what's hitting him, being a stone ideologue without a clue.