CBS: ‘Does America Care’ About Edwards Affair?

Photo of Kyle Drennen.
  • Bookmark and Share

Tracy Smith and Jeff Greenfield, CBS On CBS’s Sunday Morning, correspondent Tracy Smith reported on the news that John Edwards had cheated on his wife, but wondered: "I guess my question is, okay, sure, so it's going to be reported...But does America care at this point?" After political analyst Jeff Greenfield replied to her question with "sometimes," Smith cited poll numbers on the issue: "Yes, only sometimes. In a 2007 poll, 56 percent said it wouldn't matter to them if a presidential candidate had an extramarital affair."

Earlier in the discussion with Greenfield, Smith explained how "In a statement Friday, Edwards said that running for office made him feel special, egocentric; in effect, that the campaign made him do it." Greenfield then described: "If you're running for president, you get -- you get on a pedestal. You know, they -- motorcades happen for you and you get the adulation of crowds." However, he also asserted: "The one thing you probably can't do is to cheat."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Following that statement, Smith looked back at history and seemed to lament the coverage of politician’s infidelities: "It wasn't always this way. Grover Cleveland served two terms after a scandal in which he was said to have fathered a child. Much has been made of Franklin Roosevelt's romance with Lucy Mercer and others. And JFK -- well, we all know that song" [Clip of Marilyn Monroe singing Happy Birthday to JFK]. Greenfield explained: "...the rules have changed is that the press, which never used to cover private matters, does." Smith added: "...reporters knew but said nothing...these indiscretions weren't talked about...But somewhere between Kennedy and Clinton, cheating politicians became fair game."

Smith did acknowledge that Elizabeth Edwards having cancer might be one reason why John Edwards’ cheating is "fair game": " Of course, it might matter more if the candidate's wife was well liked and very sick...In her statement, Elizabeth Edwards said that dealing with the affair was ‘a process oddly made somewhat easier with my diagnosis in March of 2007.’"

On Monday’s CBS Early Show, co-host Harry Smith suggested Edwards was "targeted" by his mistress.

Here is the full transcript of the segment:

9:00AM TEASER:

ANTHONY MASON: In this election year, the political world has been shaken by scandal once again. John Edwards is the man at the center of this storm, after publicly admitting to an extramarital affair; a confession that is, as we have come to know, hardly unique. Along with Kelly Cobiella, Tracy Smith will report our cover story.

TRACY SMITH: It's the same old story: the politician, the press, and the sex scandal.

JOHN EDWARDS: I made a very serious mistake.

SMITH: It's been a weekend of new details and new disclosures. I guess my question is, OK, sure, so it's going to be reported.

JEFF GREENFIELD: Yeah.

SMITH: But does America care at this point?

GREENFIELD: The answer is -- I can give you a definite answer to does America care: sometimes.

SMITH: Later on Sunday Morning, a look at yet another fall from grace.

9:06AM TEASER:

MASON: The attorney for Rielle Hunter, the woman with whom John Edwards has confessed to having an affair, says she has ruled out a DNA test to establish who's the father of her baby. More on that coming up in our cover story.

9:07AM TEASER:

JOHN EDWARDS: I have no idea what you're asking about, I've responded to, consistently, to these tabloid allegations by saying-

MASON: Coming up, behind the headlines.

9:09AM SEGMENT:

ANTHONY MASON: Once Again, a prominent American politician has been caught in a marital infidelity. This time it's former presidential hopeful John Edwards. As we've come to know all too well in recent times, he has plenty of company. Kelly Cobiella and Tracy Smith share our cover story this morning. We begin with Kelly in North Carolina.

KELLY COBIELLA: In his hometown of Chapel Hill, North Carolina, from serene sidewalks to bustling diners, the talk is the same: John Edwards, the favorite son, has become John Edwards, the disappointment.

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: I was disappointed. Very disappointed.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN: Well, I'm disappointed but I'm not surprised.

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN B: You know, someone in that high regard and in politics, you think, you know, you want to trust them and believe them, and it just makes it kind of hard to believe anything that he says.

COBIELLA: After months of public denials-

JOHN EDWARDS: I have no idea what you're asking about.

COBIELLA: -the former presidential candidate admitted Friday he strayed from his wife, Elizabeth, two years ago, and into the arms of campaign videographer Rielle Hunter.

EDWARDS: I made a very serious mistake, a mistake that I am responsible for and no one else. I, in 2006, told Elizabeth about the mistake, asked her for her forgiveness.

COBIELLA: The admission stirred up even more questions: When did Edwards end the affair? Who is the father of Hunter's five-month-old daughter? And how did mother and daughter end up out of North Carolina and into a $3 million California home? A longtime Edwards campaign financial backer, Fred Barron, said in a statement Saturday he helped pay for Hunter's move because of harassment by supermarket tabloids. He did not give a dollar amount, but said John Edwards was not aware of the deal. As for Hunter's child, Edwards insists he is not the father and offered to take a paternity test to prove it. Through her attorney late yesterday, Hunter said she's not interested in any paternity tests. And that recent tabloid photograph claiming to show Edwards holding Hunter's daughter?

EDWARDS: I don't know anything about that photograph, don't know who -- I don't know who that baby is. I don't know if the picture has been altered, manufactured, it's a picture that was taken of me some other time holding another baby. I have no idea.

COBIELLA: Edwards' supporters are at best skeptical.

WOMAN B: Just looking in his face, it's like, 'He's not telling the whole truth.'

COBIELLA: At worst, crushed. David Bonior ran Edwards' most recent run for the presidency.

DAVID BONIOR: They feel deceived, betrayed. They put their faith and confidence into Senator Edwards and it was not reciprocated. And so they feel terrible about this.

COBIELLA: His most strident support has come at home, in the woods outside Chapel Hill. Elizabeth Edwards stood by her husband, saying in a statement: "I am proud of the courage John showed by his honesty in the face of shame." Even with a wife's forgiveness, former aides are saying forget about a possible return to public life and focus on family.

BONIOR: The confidence that people have had in him has been shaken, and I hope this story is over with, but I don't think it is. And we'll see.

EDWARDS: I made a very serious mistake.

TRACY SMITH: And so, Once Again. This is Tracy Smith. Another sex scandal, another contrite politician delivering, on national TV, what sounds like different parts of the same speech.

JIM MCGREEVEY: It was wrong, it was foolish, it was inexcusable.

ELIOT SPITZER: The remorse I feel will always be with me.

EDWARDS: The truth is, you can't possibly beat me up more than I've already beaten myself up.

SMITH: Politics is a tough business, but being a politician seems to be, well, emboldening. In a statement Friday, Edwards said that running for office made him feel special, egocentric; in effect, that the campaign made him do it. It's a common affliction says CBS News senior political correspondent Jeff Greenfield.

JEFF GREENFIELD: If you're running for president, you get -- you get on a pedestal. You know, they -- motorcades happen for you and you get the adulation of crowds. And if you get to be president, you know, all the planes stop when your plane takes off and when you die you're on a stamp. The one thing you probably can't do is to cheat.

SMITH: It wasn't always this way. Grover Cleveland served two terms after a scandal in which he was said to have fathered a child. Much has been made of Franklin Roosevelt's romance with Lucy Mercer and others. And JFK -- well, we all know that song.

MARILYN MONROE: Happy birthday, Mr. President.

SMITH: You've heard it before: reporters knew but said nothing.

GREENFIELD: The reason why the John Edwards thing, I think, is so striking is the other way the rules have changed is that the press, which never used to cover private matters, does.

SMITH: FDR, JFK-

GREENFIELD: Right.

SMITH: -these indiscretions weren't talked about.

GREENFIELD: Right. It was what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas.

SMITH: But somewhere between Kennedy and Clinton, cheating politicians became fair game. I guess my question is, okay, sure, so it's going to be reported.

GREENFIELD: Yeah.

SMITH: But does America care at this point?

GREENFIELD: The answer is -- I can give you a definite answer to does America care: sometimes.

SMITH: Yes, only sometimes. In a 2007 poll, 56 percent said it wouldn't matter to them if a presidential candidate had an extramarital affair. Of course, it might matter more if the candidate's wife was well liked and very sick. Amy Walter is editor in chief of The Hotline.

AMY WALTER: I think that a lot of the focus of the affair, actually, has been about its impact on Elizabeth Edwards. Obviously, Elizabeth Edwards' story, her fight with cancer, the fact that she's very well liked and has very high regard, I think, is what has really made this story stick a little bit more than maybe it would for somebody else.

SMITH: In her statement, Elizabeth Edwards said that dealing with the affair was 'a process oddly made somewhat easier with my diagnosis in March of 2007.' And in an interview last summer, she spoke frankly about facing her own death. This idea that you're getting things in order?

ELIZABETH EDWARDS: You know that when you die, any of us when we die, are going to leave a bunch of headaches for the people behind us in addition to the fact that they'll miss us, of course. And so I'm trying to minimize that to the extent that I can. Got to do something with your day, and that's what I choose to do.

SMITH: Now she's chosen to stand by her husband. Whether or not the American public will is still very much an open question.

GREENFIELD: There'll be sympathy. There'll certainly be sympathy for her. You know, he's got a family, he's got kids of various ages, and you feel for them. We -- I mean, you do. But the other part of it is I think you feel an enormous sense of -- as Jay Leno said to Hugh Grant -- "What the hell were you thinking?" And, of course, thinking is probably the last element in a story like this.

—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Does CBS care?

Of course, America cares. Even most of the Democrats care, or they would not be wringing their hands about what to do with Edwards at Demver.

The real question behind the question is: Does CBS care? And we have the answer to that one too, considering how they have ignored it.

Oops, out of step again, CBS.

Impunitas semper ad deteriora invitat.

does America really care

does America really care about Larry Craigs bathroom stance...? 

IN THAT CASE THEY SURE AS HELL DO!!!!!!

 

Journalism is the opium of the liberals

Funny, I never heard this

Funny, I never heard this question asked by the MSM when Republicans stray… strange…unusual…huh…

McNotObama '08

You can only wonder and

You can only wonder and grin at what the percentage would be if a Republican President had an affair.

"Forget change, I want improvement!"

In the grand scheme, I

In the grand scheme, I wouldn't care, Republican or Democrat, that this involved. It seems to happen so often, it's just another disappointment. 

Now, if Edwards were in Obama's position, then it would be a bigger story. 

He WAS in Obama's postion

"Now, if Edwards were in Obama's position, then it would be a bigger story."

He WAS in Obama's position as a potential democratic candidate for president. Obama has yet to be nominated, remember? He was also being considered for VP, Obama's "right hand man," so to speak. I guess this story is bigger than you realize.

As far as his political affiliation is concerned, it doesn't matter. Just as you said, this happens far too often.

What I find disturbing is that most of the MSM ignored this almost completely until Edwards actually admitted to his adultery. What ever the reason they may state for ignoring it, the impression has now been made of MSM bias in favor of a particular party. They are now in full spin mode trying to justify their lack of coverage and regain a little bit of their lost respect. Not that it‘s going to help them much. Just like John Edwards, the MSM bright this upon themselves and I have little sympathy for them.

Yeah, but he's not in

Yeah, but he's not in Obama's _current_ position, the presumptive Democrat nominee, was my point.

I just get tired of hearing about another politician doing something stupid. It's no wonder why people get so apathetic about politics. 

Blame the politician, not the press

It's the politicians’ fault for doing the things they do. It's not the press's fault for reporting it.

We NEED to keep telling people when our elected officials break the law, violate their vows, and/or just generally act stupidly. If you want them to stop acting stupidly, you need to punish them for their digressions and not ignore them. Without a constant vigil over our elected officials, they will completely ignore US and they will turn themselves into the emperors of old and have complete dominion over us without fear of public reprisal. That's NOT what America needs in order to survive. History has taught us this again and again. Let’s remember history and not make those same mistakes. WE are the power, not the politicians and WE demand that they abide by the same rules that WE must follow. Don't EVER let them forget that.

Why is CBS trotting out a

Why is CBS trotting out a poll from 2007? Nobody has polled that question since then? Or is this CBS cherry-picking polls to support their narrative?

Maybe tomorrow Ms. Smith can dust off a poll from 1972 to tell us that Americans still  want to get out of Vietnam.

If it will help their narrative

Then it works

Btw silly, America only cares if its Republicans who have affairs/cheat because we claim to be 'moral' - which was always a stunning admission to having none by the libs

I have only ever made one prayer to God, a very short one: O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous. And God granted it - Voltaire

Tracy Poll

Did Tracy cite this poll when reporting on the New York Time's allegations that McCain had an affair?

Edwards would have done better had we known.

I bet Edwards would have done better if this all came out six months ago.
America likes a guy with a sense of adventure, look how popular Bubba got.
It's only you guys throwing stones, the rest of America is having a good time.

I know how to win wars!

Of course he would of

Of course he would of Biffy....

No doubt about it.

He and his other half aren't very smart now are they?

....they could of announced this news themselves...why he'd of been the nominee now wouldn't he?

Although Hillary who has had experience herself of the scenario of which you speak thinks different, she seems to think she would of been the nominee if this little Edwards kerfuffle had been exposed earlier..in fact you have to wonder if this is the real reason why the msm kept silent as long as they could about this...they needed to make sure to get their messiah sock puppet in...instead of Hillary.

Personally...I love every second of this on going soap opera..... 

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

Three swings...and three

Three swings...and three strikes for Biff.

Six months ago Edwards was already out of the race. Don't see this helping him much. Yeah, look at Bubba now. The Democrats don't even like him anymore. Nice legacy there Bubba. And I really don't see any stones being thrown, or the memo where it says "Biff speaks for the rest of America."

Go have a seat at the end of the bench rookie.

"look how popular Bubba

"look how popular Bubba got"

It also got him impeached, something the feckless, spineless liberals in Congress dont' have the guts to do to our current president.

It only made him more popular with the bourgeois in the MSM, not with most American people.

But your right, cheating on your terminally ill wife with a proffessional bimbo and fathering a child with her while campaigning for POTUS is definitely "street cred' for liberals.

Classy.

 

 

"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "

- Ben Kenobi on  Liberals, and the MSM.

" The Cake is a lie."   

  bubba popular?   He

  bubba popular?

  He never got 50% of the popular vote.  His Vice-President lost.  His wife lost.  He's now a caricature of a man/child and an object of derisive humor.

Bill Clinton is three times

Bill Clinton is three times more popular than Bush.

 

I know how to win wars!

Biff

And he was, at best, three times more ineffective at his job than Bush.

Popularity, Biff, is way overrated. Go back and remind your minions of this as you and all your ilk care so much about "popularity" over substance.

 

* * * SOCKS THE CAT '08 * * *
For REAL Change

you gotta love Biff

First he says it won't hurt Edwards because it didn't hurt Bill Clinton.

Then we remind him that BJ never got more than half the vote, couldn't get his veep re-elected, and helped his wife get canned in the DNC primaries.

To this he replies with "nah nah nah, he's still more popular than Bush."

(and all the while he's hoping we've forgotten that Bush is still more popular than Pelosi)

So really, in essence, it's not much to brag about being slightly more popular than Nancy Pelosi.

Oh, and I do believe you owe a certain rent-a-cop an apology. I know it's hard to bring yourself down to the level of apologizing to an hourly employee, but hold your breath and it'll be over before you know it. :)

Americans don't care about anything that might hurt Obama

Funny watching these partisan reporters try to defend not reporting news they should be reporting, but would rather not (e.g., Iraq and the surge, McCain trips abroad, Edwards scandal) while over-reporting and sensationalizing other topics (The Exalted One, The "Recession").

The go-to excuse always seems to be "Americans don't care about that, that's why we don't give it much air time", as if they'd taken some poll on what "Americans" wants to see on their nightly/morning news programs, and the news organizations are simply following orders. Lame beyond belief.

The real question is does

The real question is does America care about what drive-by media tells us America does or doesn't care about? The mdia does not care about Edwards' affair, and made it abundantly clear they would not cover the story, but they assume their lofty indifference is shared by the majority of Americans. It ain't.

Bill O'Reilly

You are a fake and a charlatan, BOR!. I think you want to fancy yourself as a "lonesome" Rhodes type... BUT BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU HOPE FOR..or think that you are..
You said today, you knew about the Edwards scandal ....but didnt want to report it (because you didnt want to 'hurt' him')...but then you told us, AGAIN, how you reported about his vietnam vets and living under bridges story??? Soooooooooooo what? 2 mins on why and how great you were that you didnt report the edwards/affair story....8 mins on telling us how great you were for telling us about the vets/bridges story.. YOU are a fake wanna be; You are a 'play both sides of the fences' wanna be.
If you havent seen 'A face in the crowd' with Andy Griffith aka "Lonesome Rhodes", that is you to a tee!!! I fell for the 'your one of us', but not any more. I dont know what happened to you....I dont care. But until you decide what side of the fence you really are on ...and im sure there'll be plenty of posters here that are still falling for your B.S. and telling me how wrong I am but, maybe you should just stick to begging/cajoling BHO to come on your show. But thats the difference between Ditto heads and Billo heads

The MSM is trying their

The MSM is trying their darndest to hurry up and sweep this under the rug, before it really has had a chance to get started.

John was p.o.ed that ABC publicised his non-confession, non-apology when most people may have been tuned into the Olympic ceremonies. I think he should have been thankful ABC chose to lob him softballs and not ask him the really poignant questions like:

Senator if your affair with Ms. Hunter ended in 2006' why did you feel it necessary to visit her and a child you claim is "not yours" for several hours at a very odd hour of the night last month. 

Why did you continue to employ her even after your indiscretions were revealed to your wife.

You claimed earlier that you are not the father of Ms. Rielles child, in fact you stated this week "its impossible".  Andrew Young a close campaign aid of yours claimed paternity several months ago and provided support and seperate housing for her in the same gated community in Chapel Hill where he also lives with his wife and children. Is Andrew Young in fact the father?

Why did you deem it necessary to go and visit Ms. Hunter and her child in Beverly Hills, but not Andrew Young?

So is it safe to say Senator that both you and Andrew Young both carried on affairs with Ms. Hunter while she was under your employ during your campaign?

Dont' worry Johnny, this aint' goin' away anytime soon. Sooner or later your ruse will be up despite the best intentions of your cohorts in the MSM.

Someones gonna' ask, exactly these questions. Lets see who you "channel" to get out of it next time. Perhaps I may suggest Joe Isuzu,or Tommy Flanagan,..........."yea, thats the ticket."

 

 

"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "

- Ben Kenobi on  Liberals, and the MSM.

" The Cake is a lie."   

Do we care? To some extent.

Do we care about the affair? Yes, to some extent. We care MORE about the fact that he LIED to everyone about it for months. That's the real interest here, the fact that he and his wife weren't willing to be honest about his adulterous past and they actually EXPECTED that we would dismiss any allegations as tabloid trash.

SMITH: But somewhere

SMITH: But somewhere between Kennedy and Clinton, cheating politicians became fair game.

  I'll tell you what happened.  It's no longer just a man's world.    Use to be the little woman stayed home.   There have been a whole lot of rules for behavior that have changed since the time of the JFK administration.

180: John Edwards Sudden Drop From "Major" to "Minor"

May 14 2008: Via NewsBusters:

"CBS Evening News:KATIE COURIC, TEASE: Tonight , a major endorsement for Barack Obama from former rival John Edwards. COURIC LED: And good evening, everyone. Well, Hillary Clinton didn't get to enjoy her landslide win in West Virginia very long at all. Barack Obama took back the spotlight this evening dramatically when he won an endorsement both candidates wanted badly -- John Edwards. COURIC, AT VERY END OF NEWSCAST: And once again, our top story tonight: John Edwards endorses Barack Obama, saying he's one man who knows in his heart that it's time to create one America, not two".
August 10 2008: CBS Sunday Morning: "Tracy Smith: I guess my question is, okay, sure, so it's going to be reported...But does America care at this point?"

Please forgive us Tracy. For a minute there we forgot “that it’s only news when you say it’s news”.

of course everyone cares about sex

The interesting question is "does America give a crap about this?" So far, all my evidence points towards a sad "no."
JMR

The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.

Does America care about Edward's affair?

What real hard working Americans really care about is why the media does not condemn "Grumpy" MCain for the affair he had the way they have John Edwards?

Play to win or don't play at all

→ fieldon

Given those rumors have been around for years, don't you think "hard working Americans" would have ferreted out the truth on John McCain by now?

I'm a hard working American.  I worked 84 hours last week.  I'm not particularly interested in what you say McCain did.

I am, however interested in the MSM's next attempt to make the current or next Democrat foulup all about some Republican's failings.

Try to do better with your next post. 

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.