On Thursday’s CBS Early Show, co-host Maggie Rodriguez talked to Republican strategist Ed Rollins about the recent exchange of ads between the McCain and Obama campaigns and started the discussion by declaring: "Let's begin with the one that started this negative tide, John McCain's ad last week comparing Barack Obama to celebrities Paris Hilton and Britney Spears." Rodriguez went on to admit the media’s distaste for the ad as she asked Rollins: "So even though he was being criticized, do you think this was an effective ad because it got people talking about McCain again?" On Wednesday’s CBS "Evening News" correspondent Dean Reynolds said of the McCain ad: "Some Republicans wonder about the new approach. McCain's own mother said using Paris Hilton in this controversial ad to insult Obama was, quote, ‘kind of stupid.’"
Later in the Early Show segment, Rodriguez introduced a clip of the Obama campaign’s response ad in a positive fashion: "Barack Obama says that he -- John McCain is taking the low road. He's supposed to be a straight talker who doesn't resort to this sort of thing, but he has. And he said as much in this ad, let's take a look at it." When Rodriguez asked Rollins what he thought of the ad, he observed: "Well he's responding to McCain. The truth of the matter is you want to run your own campaign, you don't want to respond in the opposition. That's the basic rule." Rodriguez seemed surprised by the critique: "You don't think that Barack Obama pointing out John McCain's weaknesses, in his view, is a good strategy?"
At the top of the show, co-host Harry Smith teased the segment by declaring: "McCain launches another attack on Obama. Is it having an effect on the latest polls?" Rodriguez offered a similar preview: "Up next, McCain versus Obama. Yet another new negative ad is out. You will see it." This new "attack on Obama" referred to a new McCain ad that again referred to Obama as a "celebrity": "Is the biggest celebrity in the world, ready to help your family? The real Obama promises higher taxes, more government spending. So, fewer jobs."
Rodriguez described the latest ad as "a part two" to McCain’s original celebrity ad, but seemed to suggest that it wasn’t quite as negative: "So still a jab about the celebrity but much more on message...And also when they say things like ‘he's going to raise your taxes,’ which they focused on much more in this ad than the first one." In reality, both 32-second ads spent only about 7-8 seconds referring to Obama’s celebrity status.
Following up on Smith’s question: "Is it having an effect on the latest polls?" Rodriguez quoted new poll numbers: "A new CBS News poll on the presidential race is out this morning and it shows Barack Obama leads John McCain 45% to 39%, the same lead that he had a month ago." Prior to proclaiming that McCain started a "negative tide," Rodriguez observed: "With such a tight race, the gloves are off as more and more campaign ads take negative turns." Apparently only McCain campaign ads, according to CBS.
Here is the full transcript of the segment:
7:00AM TEASER:
HARRY SMITH: The Paris effect. Her ad draws millions of viewers as McCain launches another attack on Obama. Is it having an effect on the latest polls?
7:12AM TEASER:
MAGGIE RODRIGUEZ: Up next, McCain versus Obama. Yet another new negative ad is out. You will see it. Plus, has Paris Hilton's ad changed the game?
7:16AM SEGMENT:
MAGGIE RODRIGUEZ: A new CBS News poll on the presidential race is out this morning and it shows Barack Obama leads John McCain 45% to 39%, the same lead that he had a month ago. With such a tight race, the gloves are off as more and more campaign ads take negative turns. Ed Rollins is a Republican strategist and a veteran of political campaigns and he's here to talk ads with us this morning.
ROLLINS: Morning. My pleasure.
RODRIGUEZ: Good morning. And that's why we're so far apart, because we're going to watch these ads. Let's begin with the one that started this negative tide, John McCain's ad last week comparing Barack Obama to celebrities Paris Hilton and Britney Spears. Obama had just come back from his overseas trip. Everybody was talking about him. Then suddenly this ad comes out and everybody -- us -- starts talking about John McCain. So even though he was being criticized, do you think this was an effective ad because it got people talking about McCain again?
ED ROLLINS: Well, it was a very effective ad because for the first time since really February, the equal news coverage for the week, and it was about this ad. Network television, cable television put this on and made it work. At the end of the day the message is that he's not ready to lead. And I think that's in essence what McCain wanted to do.
RODRIGUEZ: Last week the McCain camp told me they were very pleased with the ad and the response. And they must be, because we're sort of seeing a part two, a new version of this which just came out. And I'd like to show it for those of you who haven't seen it. So let's take a look.
UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Is the biggest celebrity in the world, ready to help your family? The real Obama promises higher taxes, more government spending. So, fewer jobs. Renewable energy to transform our economy, create jobs and energy independence. That's John McCain.
RODRIGUEZ: So still a jab about the celebrity but much more on message, Ed.
ROLLINS: It's definitely on message and the message obviously are the things that are the negatives. But I think the key thing here is it's building on this celebrity. This is a guy who basically four years ago nobody knew who he was, now they do. He's very famous but there's no substance. And I think that's their message.
RODRIGUEZ: And also when they say things like 'he's going to raise your taxes,' which they focused on much more in this ad than the first one.
ROLLINS: Absolutely. That's the message you want to drive. I mean, it's -- this is an ad that'll work in August. It may not in October. But the message of raising taxes will definitely work in October. And I think you're going to keep hearing that over and over and over again.
RODRIGUEZ: Alright, Barack Obama says that he -- John McCain is taking the low road. He's supposed to be a straight talker who doesn't resort to this sort of thing, but he has. And he said as much in this ad, let's take a look at it.
UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN B: He's practicing the politics of the past. John McCain. His attacks on Barack Obama 'not true,' 'false,' 'baloney,' 'the low road,' 'baseless.' John McCain, same old politics, same failed policies. Barack Obama supports a $1,000 middle class tax cut, an energy plan that takes on oil companies, develops alternative fuels, and breaks the grip of foreign oil. That's change-
RODRIGUEZ: What do you think?
ROLLINS: Well he's responding to McCain. The truth of the matter is you want to run your own campaign, you don't want to respond in the opposition. That's the basic rule. But I think he thinks that the ads must have been effective enough that he's out there basically responding already. Once again, this is August. What goes on in September, October, maybe a totally different game.
RODRIGUEZ: You don't think that Barack Obama pointing out John McCain's weaknesses, in his view, is a good strategy?
ROLLINS: Well, it's a good strategy in the sense, if he can make McCain a grumpy old man as opposed to a significant command-in-chief, he's done his job. And I think that's what he wants to do. He's the more likable candidate by an overwhelming margin. And in the end, these undecided voters often vote for the person they like the most.
RODRIGUEZ: I want to ask you about Hillary Clinton real quick, because we're hearing this morning that she is not ruling out placing her name for nomination at the convention.
ROLLINS: I think that'd be a foolish mistake on her part. I think she's had a tremendous campaign. I think she's only enhanced herself, even though she didn't win. I think if she plays any kind of havoc, and it would create havoc at a convention, it'll be a detriment to her.
RODRIGUEZ: She can't do that.
ROLLINS: I would hope that she wouldn't for her sake.
RODRIGUEZ: Alright. Thank you very much.
ROLLINS: My pleasure, thank you. Wonderful to be here.
RODRIGUEZ: Ed Rollins, appreciate your time. And if you have a video response to any of these ads, send them to our website, it's earlyshow.cbsnews.com. And we'll air the best ones.
—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.





















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
it's Goooooood!
August 7, 2008 - 15:52 ET by okiehawk44To steal from Dennis Miller "It's good to see Johnny finally show that he has a pair of Snickers."
Obama has a soft gut Johnny, keep banging away.
Oh, I get it...
August 7, 2008 - 16:08 ET by motherbeltMcCain pointing out Obama's weaknesses is "taking the low road."
Obama pointing out John McCain's weaknesses is "a good strategy."
And after Rollins says that about it being good strategy, Rodruguez, rather than asking him why it isn't a "good strategy" for McCain too, leaves the point as a conclusion, and changes the subject to Hillary Clinton.
Nice work.
>>>"Let's begin with the
August 7, 2008 - 16:18 ET by seanrobins>>>"Let's begin with the one that started this negative tide, John McCain's ad last week comparing Barack Obama to celebrities Paris Hilton and Britney Spears."
I would dearly appreciate someone explaining to me HOW any candidate for any office makes a campaign ad concerning an opponent that is NOT negative.
I guess such an ad by John McCain might read: "I'm John McCain, and I'm voting for Barack Obama for President - I wish you would, too!"
Other than that, any other ad HAS to be a negative ad.
sean robins
blog.seanrobins.com
sean, they are supposed to
August 7, 2008 - 23:31 ET by motherbeltsean, they are supposed to say "My opponent is a wonderful guy who would be a great President. But vote for me, because I'm even better!"
Oh, wait, that could be considered negative too. Leave it at "but vote for me anyway!"
Or is that negative?
Oh, hell, nevermind even mentioning opponents. They could just see who comes up with the best list of promises.
Yep mb.... Pretty soon it
August 7, 2008 - 23:36 ET by bigtimerYep mb....
Pretty soon it will be....
Drill Often!...Drill Everywhere!
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
Motherbelt,
August 7, 2008 - 23:37 ET by RESTLESS 1You have it almost right. If obama lambasts McCain about anything, whether true or not, that is above board politicking. If McCain says anything about anyone voting for him and not obama, then that is dirty pool and racist tactics. :(
SSSSIIIIGGGHHH!!!! Could you please pass the duct tape?
"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008
This is getting to be
August 7, 2008 - 16:21 ET by bigtimerThis is getting to be hilarious to me...
My ad is meaner than your ad...blah blah blah...I'll drill a little bit more than you'll drill....blah blah blah...tire gauges are silly, tire gauges are good...blah blah blah...
msnbc talking heads are besides themselves asking why Obama isn't being tougher to McCain with his responses....yet if McCain does that he is bad...bad I tell ya.
Like a poster said above regarding the Dennis Miller remark last night on BOR...I'm glad to see McCain grow a pair of snickers...now keep fighting the good fight against your old pals in the msm John.
The debates ought to be a real comedy show....I can already hear the talking heads with their biased polls right afterwards at the ready.
Btw...Go Hillary Go...give us some fun at the convention.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
There's exactly McCain's
August 8, 2008 - 08:40 ET by ThatDudeThere's exactly McCain's problem. He has so little exposure and the media themselves are so poorly reporting anything negative about Obama. Let's not forget to mention that Obama had actually started negative campaigning a while ago. Anyway, the fact is that McCain's ads would be completely unnecessary if the media would do its job and Obama would grow a spine and join him in direct debate. I don't care which side it comes from, but campaign ads always make me dislike both candidates. Let's stick to direct debates instead of this foolish back and forth.
Obama started the Hilton Paris comparison, not McCain
August 7, 2008 - 17:37 ET by Gary HallWhile maintaining more context than the MSM requires of ther own, let me remind all once again, it was Obama started the Hilton Paris comparison, not McCain. As fellow NB'er Seton Motley posted just a few days ago in, McCain Not First to Compare Obama to Paris Hilton:
Besides, it still appears to me that Hilton's 'how to address the current energy issues,' was much closer in line with McCain's than Obama's proposals. Therefore, in the end Ms. Maggie Rodriguez, there's really no negative advertising here at all, as it's only going to result in a larger more positive conversation on how to address the problems. The only real negative issue here is CBS and friends in the media and their negative agenda.
The establishment media has
August 7, 2008 - 18:38 ET by winston smithThe establishment media has really seized on this McCain ad and are trying to squeeze every ounce of negativity they can get out of it until it's a mercifully dead issue. Since this is an election year, my political paranoia is running into the red-zone and I do believe this incident will be used as a precursor by the MSM to apologize for all the Obama negativity that's soon to come -- thus any dirty or negative ad courtesy of Obama & Co. will be viewed as 'just desserts'. As I stated in another thread, I believe the unusual silence from the media on the issue of McCain's past involvement in the Keating Five scandal of the eighties is a calm before the storm as the MSM will conveniently revisit the issue in the final weeks of the campaign. And when it does happen, I just wonder if media partisans like Maggie Rodriguez will muse upon the outright unfairness of this "tide of negative campaigning". Why of course not --- it was McCain who started it all in the first place, right?
Using the MSM's elastic
August 7, 2008 - 18:56 ET by Chris NormanUsing the MSM's elastic definition of "negative campaigning", just by saying, "You should vote for me instead of my Obama, because I have better ideas" is negative campaigning. Heck, using their twisted rationale, one could make the case that even running against Obama is, in a sense, a negative act.
McNotObama '08
The media started this whole
August 7, 2008 - 20:27 ET by mostlymoderateThe media started this whole thing when they started treating Obama like he was a modern-day equivalent of Jesus Christ.
You're exactly right.
August 7, 2008 - 20:36 ET by GregEYou're exactly right.
And I guess, according to the media, Obama using the line several weeks ago that "they will say.......did I mention he's black?", implying that there would be attempts to use his race as a ngegative, was a high road and no part of a negative tide. Reality is, it was one of the lowest roads he could have taken, implying that someone is racist or would play a race card, and probably hoping for it of course.
These people are idiots. Useful idiots.
The media, formerly part
August 7, 2008 - 20:27 ET by GregEThe media, formerly part McCain's love-crowd, now can't help themselves since he's against a Democrat.
Makes one wonder just how much worse the media would be if the Republicans would have been able to have a truely conservative candidate.
CBS started it
August 7, 2008 - 21:22 ET by CobraMan"Let's begin with the one that started this negative tide"
Yea, let's begin with CBS's bogus questioning of McCain's eligibility for President as he was born in Panama and not CONUS. I would call that a negative attack, wouldn't you?
McCain exposing MSM
August 7, 2008 - 21:28 ET by nkviking75What really irks the media is that the attacks on Obama are also attacks on the MSM, which is openly campaigning for Obama. The Celebrity and Messiah spots expose the worshipful way Obama is being portrayed to the country.
I think McCain is going to have to campaign against the MSM (the Messiah Spin Machine) almost as much as he campaigns against Obama.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.