A report on the economic policies of John McCain and Barack Obama by correspondent Chip Reid on Monday’s CBS "Evening News" suggested that Obama’s supposed middle class tax cut would be more beneficial for American families: "Obama's plan is to roll back the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy and use the savings for a middle-class tax cut...A recent study by the non-partisan Tax Policy Center says Obama's plan would give a cut of more than a thousand dollars to families making between $37,000 and $66,000 a year. Under McCain's plan, they'd get just $319."
The "non-partisan" Tax Policy Center is actually a product of the left-leaning Brookings Institution and Urban Institute. Reid went on to explain that: "On spending, Obama wants to jump start the economy with another round of stimulus checks for taxpayers to the tune of $50 billion." After outlining McCain’s policies on taxes and spending, Reid observed: "McCain also now supports extending the Bush income tax cuts, even though he once opposed them as too generous to the wealthy. Barack Obama says McCain's switch is more evidence that a McCain presidency would be more of the same. "
At the end of the segment, Reid mentioned the candidates’ proposals on gas prices: "As for the price of gas, both candidates have elaborate plans for bringing it down in the long run but neither one offers much in the way of short-term relief." Apparently Reid forgot about McCain’s support for a temporary gas tax holiday. While the effectiveness of that policy can be debated, it certainly would qualify as "short-term relief."
Back on the June 29 This Week, George Stephanopoulos cited the same numbers and Brent Baker pointed out on NewsBusters that picking up on the Tax Policy Center's raw numbers, the right of center Tax Foundation crunched them and discovered a trend the media rarely discuss:
Obama's plan would greatly accelerate the decades-long trend toward a federal government that depends for tax revenue almost exclusively on a few high-income people.
This contrasts starkly with the McCain plan, according to [Tax Foundation President Scott] Hodge, which would give every taxpayer a cut and leave the current tax burden distribution approximately where it is.
An excerpt from the Tax Foundation's June 26 press release:
"Under the Obama plan for 2009," explains Hodge, "more than $131 billion would be redistributed from the top 1 percent of taxpayers to all other taxpayers."
As a result, the top 1 percent of households would pay more federal taxes of all kinds than the bottom 80 percent of households. That lopsided distribution under Obama does include payroll taxes and other federal taxes, but it excludes the new payroll tax hike that Obama plans to levy on people making more than $250,000 because details about that plan are currently unclear.
"In other words," says Hodge, "it is at this point a cautious estimate to say that in 2009, under Obama's plan, 1.13 million Americans would pay more in all federal taxes than 128 million of their fellow citizens combined."...
Here is the full transcript of the July 7 CBS Evening News story:
KATIE COURIC: Meanwhile, Senator Obama had to postpone a trip to North Carolina today. His plane from Chicago made an unscheduled landing in St. Louis after a problem developed in the tail. Senator Obama ended up delivering a speech from St. Louis. Both he and John McCain, who campaigned in Denver, are this week making the economy job one. Here's Chip Reid.
CHIP REID: Both presidential candidates laid out their economic plans today. For John McCain, there are two basic themes: Cut spending.
JOHN MCCAIN: I'll veto every single bill with wasteful pork barrel spending on it. You can count on it.
REID: And cut taxes.
MCCAIN: The choice in this election is stark and simple. Senator Obama will raise your taxes; I won't.
REID: A position that had some passionate fans at today's town meeting in Denver.
UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Tax us when we eat! You tax us when we sleep! You tax us every which way! Get off of my back!
MCCAIN: If you're not busy, I'd like to take you with me wherever I go.
REID: McCain also now supports extending the Bush income tax cuts, even though he once opposed them as too generous to the wealthy. Barack Obama says McCain's switch is more evidence that a McCain presidency would be more of the same.
BARACK OBAMA: John McCain's policies are essentially a repeat, a regurgitation, of what we've been hearing from the Republican Party.
REID: Obama's plan is to roll back the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy and use the savings for a middle-class tax cut.
OBAMA: If you make less than $250,000 you will not see a tax increase under my plan. No matter what John McCain says.
REID: A recent study by the non-partisan Tax Policy Center says Obama's plan would give a cut of more than a thousand dollars to families making between $37,000 and $66,000 a year. Under McCain's plan, they'd get just $319. On spending, Obama wants to jump start the economy with another round of stimulus checks for taxpayers to the tune of $50 billion.
EAMON JAVERS: The real question for Barack Obama is how do you pay for all these goodies you want to dole out on the campaign trail?
REID: As for the price of gas, both candidates have elaborate plans for bringing it down in the long run but neither one offers much in the way of short-term relief. Katie.
COURIC: Chip Reid on Capitol Hill. Chip, thank you.
—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.





Obama's plan would greatly accelerate the decades-long trend toward a federal government that depends for tax revenue almost exclusively on a few high-income people.














Editor at Large
Comments Policy
roll back the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy and use the savings
July 8, 2008 - 16:59 ET by CarlosSWill I be able to designate which "wealthy" person I get my tax CUT from?
What is their definition of......
July 8, 2008 - 17:12 ET by BEGRUNTrich? If $66,000 a year is "rich", then they dont live in California, and that makes me rich, since my wife and I, struggling mind you, our combined income is $85,000 a year, and we are barely making it. Between taxes, they have raised taxes in L.A. 4 times in the last year, (oops sorry they dont call them taxes here, there "fees"), food and gas.....there aint nothin left. I wouldn't believe Obamatron if he told me the sun will rise tomorrow.
"If a man does his best, what else is there"?
General George S. Patton Jr.
So is family income of
July 8, 2008 - 17:07 ET by sublight68So is family income of $66,000 the new bar for being "the rich"?
I don't think that's what it meant...
July 8, 2008 - 18:01 ET by ImAllRightNow I'm not an Obama guy, and I surely will not be voting for anyone else in the Democrat Party either but:
I think it was just a comparison in the dollars in increased returns that the tax payer will recieve. I think they used 37K-66k as an example because most of our fellow Americans make somewhere in that range.
From what I've read, the rich in the case of Obama's plan means those making 250K as a household.
I don't dislike Obama as much as many of you seem to but I'm honestly holding out hope that someone like Delay jumps in and could find a way onto the ticket instead of this phony conservative in McCain.
Its a shame Newt couldn't run. That would have energized our base more than anything.
You're right....I was being
July 8, 2008 - 18:32 ET by sublight68You're right....I was being sarcastic.
But it's another example of arbitrarily setting income amounts to decide who gets what when it comes to taxes and generate a little class envy.
Sixty grand where I live goes a whole lot farther than it would in LA or New York. Should I have to pay more in taxes than someone making the same amount in one of those places? Should I get fewer benefits?
Admittedly, I'm not as familiar with some of the finer points as I should be, but on the surface a flat tax seems to be the way to go. The "rich" will still pay more in actual dollars, but they won't be punished for being successful. And there won't be the need for bribes in the form of tax cuts or "rebates." Just let us keep more of our money to begin with.
Obama wants tax cuts,
July 8, 2008 - 17:11 ET by MidAmericaObama wants tax cuts, faith based initiatives, supports gun rights, supports denying abortion for 'mental stress, is talking about patriotism and family values, says his religious faith is important, supports FISA, wants to unite the country, supports comprehensive immigration reform, supports death penalty for child rapists, and now wants to end the war in consultation with the Generals.
Vote for Obama! George Bush's third term!
"Obama's plan is to roll
July 8, 2008 - 17:22 ET by Chris Norman"Obama's plan is to roll back the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy and use the savings for a middle-class tax cut"
What "savings" exactly? They act like taxes are a self contained issue with no repercussions whatsoever. A zero sum game. If they raise taxes on the "wealthy", a lot of that wealth is going to shift somewhere else and tax receipts from the "wealthy" will shrink - as they always do. Here's a better idea - cut spending and use those savings for a tax cut - they never suggest that, do they?
McNotObama '08
Nope, they never mention
July 8, 2008 - 18:53 ET by GregENope, they never mention spending cuts anymore. And THAT p***es me off in a big way!!!
Same thing happening in my state of VA right now. Democrat Governor Turdburglar gets elected partly on his promise to not raise taxes AND at the same time ensure funding of a roads/transportation bill. Yea like we're stupid enough not to see what was coming, and here it is now, he's proposing a $1 billion tax increase and lays out all the areas that the money will come from. No mention of cutting anything. I guess VA government is running as efficiently as is humanly possible and there's no spending cuts that can be done. Idiots!
Obama is wrong
July 8, 2008 - 17:25 ET by Biff McCainAs the value of the dollar shrinks because of record deficits, a person
making $50,000 a year can only buy goods that cost $35,000 10 years ago
(maybe even less.)
It would stand to reason to call that a $15,000 a hidden tax increase.
If we all paid $5,000 a year more to balance the budget the bleed on the dollar would stop.
"Burn that mother down." -- Jimmy Ellis
pay more, pay more, etc..... why?
July 8, 2008 - 17:40 ET by wizardjrWhy not slow down the drunken spending spree instead? The Federal government does not need to be building bicycle paths and museums. If you cut out all the crap and stick to basics there's way more than enough money and still give a tax cut.
The stupid part is in not making all working citizens pay taxes. Right now the bottom third either pay nothing or actually get a (welfare) check. Of course they'll vote to "tax the rich" it does nothing to hurt them. Altruistically it sounds so very Christian to let the small fish take home their entire pay check. The problem, however is as stated. They'll gladly plunder your pocket to enrich themselves.
And when you don't pay
July 8, 2008 - 18:43 ET by sublight68And when you don't pay taxes, when you make no investment yourself, you have no stake in anything.
Why are so many people defaulting on mortgages? Because they were able to get their loans with little or no money down and had next to zero equity. What incentive is there for them to stay? Not going to cost them anything to do the easy thing and just skip out.
Most government housing is uninhabitable because none of the residents have any ownership -- it was given to them. If they had paid for the place themselves, chances are it would be better taken care of.
Allowing so many people to avoid taxes, even if it's just a token amount, means they have no stake in government. Wasteful spending, spiraling entitlement costs, increased taxes? Doesn't matter, they don't have to pay for it.
The quickest way to begin reforming our tax system is to require more people to pay into it.
66k=rich ???
July 8, 2008 - 17:45 ET by pagg3066K/yr in southern NY = barely hanging on by the skin of your teeth and a choice between a small apartment close to your job OR a small house for the family and an hour and a half commute.
66k hmmm. Finally a number. It's way the eff off, but finally a number.
"Party for the working class"...Under Stalin maybe.
If you have a brain, vote for McCain!
We will all
July 8, 2008 - 17:44 ET by 10ksnookerBe rich under the Obambi tax plan. Middle class, it's where the money is. I guess $3 TRILLION isn't enough for the Marxists -- Afterall, the Soviet Union failed simply because they didn't have enough money.
It's CBS... Blah blah
July 8, 2008 - 17:46 ET by bigtimerIt's CBS...
Blah blah blah...Couric...blah blah blah...Brookings Institute...blah blah blah....Chippie-pooh...blah blah blah...
No lying and bias here.
Btw..McCain and his gas tax holiday is BS also (JMO) McCain has been a VERY BIG reason we are inthe mess now...I am sick of everyone ignoring this.
Drill.
Here.
Period.
Prices will come down.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
bt, Maybe John Edwards was
July 8, 2008 - 17:55 ET by Chris Normanbt,
Maybe John Edwards was right - there are two Americas. Except, instead of his class warfare nonsense, we're divided into: those who get their information from the Mainstream Media - then vote accordingly and those of us who reject that MSM information as being twisted, tainted, and hopelessly biased - and who can see clear enough to vote accordingly.
McNotObama '08
Chris... I
July 8, 2008 - 18:00 ET by bigtimerChris...
I agree.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
Over 50% of the permits
July 8, 2008 - 17:57 ET by Biff McCainOver 50% of the permits issued to drill have yet to be drilled. Big oil is waiting for $500 a barrel.
The North Slope they have at a trickle, and that all goes to Japan.
Drilling ANWR may be nice for Exxon and Japan, but won't help us any.
"Burn that mother down." -- Jimmy Ellis
Wrong Biff...
July 8, 2008 - 18:00 ET by Clear thinkerEven if the oil did not stay in the US, it would help with supply. Increase global supply, exceed demand, and the price should go down.
45 Communist Goals for America http://www.nationmakers.com/com_goals.htm
Ct... Biff isn't worth
July 8, 2008 - 18:06 ET by bigtimerCt...
Biff isn't worth the time of day...or night.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
bt... Oh I know. I wrote
July 8, 2008 - 18:09 ET by Clear thinkerbt...
Oh I know. I wrote it more for others because I don't want his assertions to go unchallenged. Some libs would read what he wrote and high-five each other while saying "right-on dude".
45 Communist Goals for America http://www.nationmakers.com/com_goals.htm
Ct... Sorry...Hope you
July 8, 2008 - 18:18 ET by bigtimerCt...
Sorry...Hope you didn't thake that wrong at all from me...sometimes I answer his intentional trollish posts too...
Just depends on my mood...
He is nothing but a troll, wished he was gone.
We do need to confront them now and then...one of us always will too...thank goodness.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
No. I think we need to
July 8, 2008 - 20:11 ET by Cureboy675No. I think we need to drill, drill, drill, drill.
Granted, we don't have the refineries to turn it into gasoline. But it will make us feel better.
Non-partisan
July 8, 2008 - 17:48 ET by BarrackSo a biased reporter cited a group as being non-partisan (despite it being birthed by a partisan group) while using that group's findings in his biased report, which was presented under the guise of objectivity.
What's misleading about that?
www.benbarrack.com
Obama Quote...
July 8, 2008 - 17:53 ET by Barrack"If we keep on getting distracted by this problem then we are not solving it."
- Barack Obama, November 15, 2007 when pressed by Wolf Blitzer on his stance on drivers licenses for illegals..
I wonder if he'll whip that quote out again when his tax re-distribution plan leads to less tax income.
www.benbarrack.com
So nice to have
July 8, 2008 - 18:35 ET by Delsaa "Clear Thinker" around here.
You too BT
Ok so did the incomers
July 8, 2008 - 18:57 ET by GregEOk so did the incomers between $66,001 and $249,999 just disappear completely..............?
..........kinda like the color of Obama's mother now that he can be a "first" in the list of presidents?
I'm just askin' :-)
If you are unwilling or
July 8, 2008 - 21:05 ET by fitzfongIf you are unwilling or unable to make the distinction between tax cuts for "the wealthy" and income tax cuts, you lack the credibility to deliver news on fiscal issues. If you are unwilling, you are dishonest. If you are unable, you're incompetent. Either way, Chip Reid is unfit for his job.
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan
fitzfong.blogspot.com
I have this mental picture
July 8, 2008 - 21:24 ET by CJK51I have this mental picture of Obama Election Headquarters: Right beside the Che poster, there is a big wheel not unlike the one on the "Price is Right." Each morning, one of Barry's disciples spins the wheel to determine where the annointed one will stand on a particular topic on any given day -- getting closest to the actual retail price without going over. Even if you're a moonbat, it has to concern you just a little bit that your chosen candidate changes stances as often as most people change socks. By the way, doesn't Chip Reid sound like he should have been a character in "Animal House?"
Those evil rich people horde their money
July 8, 2008 - 22:07 ET by buzzbeeWe all know those rich people just stuff all that money into their mattresses and bury it in their basements. They don't do anything useful with it like start small businesses, hire employees, or invest in the stock market so other companies can grow and expand.
It is so convinient for the MSM to skip over other parts of the tax cuts in place, like getting rid of the depriciation on new equipment that allows businesses small (schedule C ) and large to write off the cost of investing in new equipment in the first year, as opposed to spreading it out over 5 years.
Nice of them not to mention how Obama favors nearly doubling the capital gains tax. That never affects any of the middle class.
If anything we really should do away with all the income and corporate tax and move to a national sales tax. Turn the USA into the largest concentration of corporate headquarters in the world and probably even rebuild some of the industry that has gone overseas.
Drill here, Drill Now!
Alan Keyes will abolish the
July 9, 2008 - 01:30 ET by savvyconsumer7Alan Keyes will abolish the IRS and income tax in favor of a Fair Tax with a market basket of items which are exempt from taxation, such as food, clothing, transportation, etc.
Alan Keyes says compelling Americans to file income tax in essence violates our 5th Amendment protection from self incrimination.
Alan Keyes for President 2008, Independent Candidate at www.AlanKeyes.com www.AmericasRevival.com www.SelfGovernment.US