On Wednesday’s CBS "Early Show," co-host Julie Chen teased an interview with actress Elizabeth Perkins from Showtime’s ‘Weeds’: "We're going to see what she thinks about weed. Not the show, the plant." Later, Chen offered yet another tease: "You know her from 'Weeds' on Showtime. Elizabeth Perkins. We're going to find out if she thinks marijuana should be legal."
Later during the segment Chen eagerly asked the question: "Since it is 'Weeds' it seems like a natural question. As a person...as Elizabeth Perkins, do you believe marijuana should be legalized?" Predictably, Perkins replied: "Oh, yeah, absolutely...Alcohol is legal. It doesn't make a lot of sense to me why marijuana's not. It just doesn't make a lot of sense to me." Chen’s only response was to laugh and declare: "In the name of the show."
Chen followed up by referring to Perkins’ moralist anti-drug character on the show, Celia Hodes: "And Celia Hodes would say?," Perkins replied: "Oh, put them all in jail." Chen interjected: " I know...she's so self-righteous." Earlier in the segment, Chen explained that Perkins’ character on the show was an alcoholic "hypocrite." Perkins went on to explain that: "Well Celia's probably the only character on the show who's never smoked marijuana." Chen wondered: "Is she going to cave?" After Perkins said no, Chen pressed: "Oh, you never know, we still have a few episodes left-" At that point Perkins explained: "Never cave with marijuana because that's the 'evil drug,' according to her." Chen laughed.
Here is the full transcript of the exchange:
8:00AM TEASER:
JULIE CHEN: Also coming up this morning, we're going to talk with Elizabeth Perkins. You know her as one of the stars of the hit Showtime comedy 'Weeds.' We're going to see what she thinks about weed. Not the show, the plant.
MAGGIE RODRIGUEZ: Oh.
CHEN: And maybe her character should take some anger management, you know, courses.
8:20AM TEASER:
CHEN: Look who's here. Elizabeth Perkins, also known as Celia Hodes. In a word, she is evil. We're going to find out why when we come right back.
8:31AM TEASER:
CHEN: Coming up this final half hour, talking to one of my favorite actresses of all time. You know her from 'Weeds' on Showtime. Elizabeth Perkins. We're going to find out if she thinks marijuana should be legal. Harry.
HARRY SMITH: That's a devilishly wickedly funny show.
DAVE PRICE: Brilliantly written.
CHEN: And her character, Celia Hodes, so good.
SMITH: So good, oh yeah.
8:41AM SEGMENT:
JULIE CHEN: This season of 'Weeds' it's darker and funnier. Elizabeth Perkins stars as Celia, the tough-talking 'friendemy' of a drug-dealing soccer mom played by Mary Louise Parker. Recently Celia was thrown behind bars, taking the rap for a pot growing operation that didn't belong to her.
[Clip of show 'Weeds']
CHEN: Joining us now is Elizabeth Perkins. Good morning. It's great to see you again.
ELIZABETH PERKINS: Good morning. It's great to see you, too.
CHEN: This is the fourth season of the show. Your role started out juicy but it got even juicier. What is it like for you as an actress. To sink your teeth into this character that is not all bad, you know, she is someone that we love to watch.
PERKINS: Well it's -- as an actress, you always want to play somebody who is ultimately, you know, really screwed up and evil and, you know, always sort of walking that really fine line and, you know, no holds barred. But what's great about it is that Jillian Cohan our creator has also infused her with -- with a vulnerability.
CHEN: Celia is many things, including, at times, a lush.
PERKINS: Yeah.
CHEN: Let's take a look at this funny clip.
[Clip of show 'Weeds']
PERKINS: Celia, doing it pro bono. Not asking for accolades. Drugs are wrong. And it feels so right to not do them. Just throw them away. I'm a crusader, you know?
UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR: Could you move? You are blocking the goal.
[End of clip]
CHEN: And she's also kind of a hypocrite.
PERKINS: Oh, yeah.
CHEN: You know-
PERKINS: Do as I say, not as I do.
CHEN: Exactly.
PERKINS: Absolutely. Children should be seen and not heard. She's got all of that written on her, you know, on the little plaque in her kitchen.
CHEN: She has a temper.
PERKINS: Oh, yeah. She's out of control.
CHEN: Oh, do not make her -- do not wrong her.
PERKINS: No, she's married to a man she's not in love with. She's going to take it out on whoever happens to be standing in her way.
CHEN: Since it is 'Weeds' it seems like a natural question. As a person, not Celia Hodes, as Elizabeth Perkins, do you believe marijuana should be legalized?
PERKINS: Oh, yeah, absolutely.
CHEN: [Laughter] In the name of the show.
PERKINS: Alcohol is legal. It doesn't make a lot of sense to me why marijuana's not. It just doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
CHEN: And Celia Hodes would say?
PERKINS: Oh, put them all in jail.
CHEN: [Laughter] I know-
PERKINS: Put them all in jail.
CHEN: -she's so self-righteous.
PERKINS: Well Celia's probably the only character on the show who's never smoked marijuana.
CHEN: Is she going to cave?
PERKINS: No.
CHEN: Oh, you never know, we still have a few episodes left-
PERKINS: Never cave with marijuana because that's the 'evil drug,' according to her.
CHEN: [Laughter]
—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.















Comments Policy
Intoxicant
July 2, 2008 - 17:08 ET by allanfI wonder if Perkins is concerned about people driving under the influence of marijuana. Or is it just under the influence of alcohol?
Does she favor banning cigarettes, or is smoking all right. Is she in favor of banning transfats? Does she want to ban guns?
I am sure it is alcohol
July 2, 2008 - 17:09 ET by kgI am sure it is alcohol only.
It is also funny how the anti smoking hypocrites think it is ok and healthy to smoke pot.
"Forget change, I want improvement!"
I don't think "anti-smoking
July 2, 2008 - 17:54 ET by WisdomI don't think "anti-smoking hypocrites" think its "healthy" to smoke pot anymore than its healthy to eat a Big Mac. Maybe they have just realized that smoking cigarettes is worse on the lungs than smoking pot and has no medicinal value. Now that this information is out in the open, many Americans naturally attempt to get the same stigma attached to cigarettes that is attached to pot because they find that stigma so absurd in the first place.
The point is, the true conservative position is to have the government out of our lives and our taxes low. If we followed the Constitution, marijuana would've never been made illegal in the first place. True conservatives are starting to understand that if we eliminated marijuana's huge portion of the War on Drugs, it would cut government spending substantially and keep taxes low for the non-pot smokers (as pot sales could be taxed through the roof). Hence, just like "anti-smoking hypocrites" want a greater tax on cigarettes, they want that same tax on marijuana.
It is a shame the economy is struggling, and we are wasting all this money from America's #1 cash crop (http://abcnews.go.co...) that could be going to worthy governmental causes, instead of highly organized criminal enterprises.
Agree - Legalize!
July 2, 2008 - 18:12 ET by magicalangelicusWisdom, as a libertarian conservative, I wholeheartedly agree with you.While the premise of 'Weeds' is typical Hollywood perversion, I do believe that legalizing marijuana is the right thing to do from an individual right's perspective. It's also the right thing to do from a purely pragmatic, empirical perspective (legalized marijuana will cut government costs, raise government revenue, and cut down on crime).
The Dangers of Smoking Marijuana
July 2, 2008 - 18:31 ET by PopularTechUm... Smoking Pot is much worse than eating a Big Mac, please stop with the pot head propaganda. It is so funny how all the pot heads come out of the wood work to defend their habit.
Addiction:
Marijuana Withdrawal As Bad As Withdrawal From Cigarettes (Science Daily)
Marijuana Withdrawal Reported By Teens Seeking Treatment (Science Daily)
NIDA Researchers Find That Animals Exposed To Marijuana's Active Component Will Self-Administer The Drug (Science Daily)
Smoking, Drinking, Drugs: The Younger They Start, The Harder It Is To Quit (Science Daily)
Negative Health Effects:
Brain Damage - Cannabis Could Increase Risks Of Psychotic Illness By 40 Percent (Science Daily)
Brain Damage - Cannabis Increases Risk Of Psychosis (Science Daily)
Brain Damage - How Smoking Marijuana Damages The Fetal Brain (Science Daily)
Brain Damage - Marijuana Use Affects Blood Flow In Brain Even After Abstinence (Science Daily)
Brain Damage - More Evidence Of Cannabis-induced Psychosis (Science Daily)
Brain Damage - Smoking Marijuana Impairs Cognitive Function In MS Patients, Study Shows (Science Daily)
Brain Damage - Study Finds Cannabis Triggers Transient Schizophrenia-like Symptoms (Science Daily)
Brain Damage - Teen Drug Use Associated With Psychiatric Disorders Later In Life (Science Daily)
Cancer - Marijuana Use Associated with HPV-Positive Head and Neck Cancer, Study Shows (Science Daily)
Cancer - Researchers At UCLA's Jonsson Cancer Center Report Smoking Marijuana May Increase Risk Of Head And Neck Cancers (Science Daily)
Gum Disease - Heavy Marijuana Use Linked To Gum Disease, Study Shows (Science Daily)
Heart Disease - Regular Cannabis May Increase Risk Of Stroke In Young Users (Science Daily)
Heart Disease - Study Finds Marijuana Use May Pose Health Threat To Baby Boomers (Science Daily)
Infertility - Marijuana-Like Compounds May Alter Human Fertility, UB Researchers Show (Science Daily)
Infertility - Sperm From Marijuana Smokers Move Too Fast Too Early, Impairing Fertility, UB Research Shows (Science Daily)
Infertility - Study Finds; Abusing Marijuana May Overload System, Inhibit Fertility (Science Daily)
Lung Disease - Impact On Lungs Of One Cannabis Joint Equal To Up To Five Cigarettes (Science Daily)
Lung Disease - Long-term Marijuana Smoking Leads To Respiratory Complaints (Science Daily)
Lung Disease - Marijuana Smoke Contains Higher Levels Of Certain Toxins Than Tobacco Smoke (Science Daily)
Lung Disease - Marijuana Smokers Face Rapid Lung Destruction -- As Much As 20 Years Ahead Of Tobacco Smokers (Science Daily)
Lung Disease - Marijuana Worsens COPD Symptoms In Current Cigarette Smokers (Science Daily)
Obesity - Machinery Of The 'Marijuana Munchies' (Science Daily)
Pregnancy Failure - Marijuana Use Causes Early Pregnancy Failure (Science Daily)
Viral Infection - Marijuana Component Opens The Door For Virus That Causes Kaposi's Sarcoma (Science Daily)
Viral Infection - Regular Marijuana Use Increases Risk Of Hepatitis C-related Liver Damage (Science Daily)
Cannabis Almost Doubles Risk Of Fatal Crashes (Science Daily)
Malt Liquor Linked To Marijuana Use Among Young Adults (Science Daily)
The Anti 'Man-Made' Global Warming Resource
Pop Tech
July 2, 2008 - 18:42 ET by mandrakeYou know I love your lists.. you are the champ! But "Gum Disease"? Maybe they're simply too stoned to bother brushing their teeth..ya think??
Pot Smokers suffer Brain Damage
July 2, 2008 - 18:55 ET by PopularTechHeh, I bet but it is clear that if smoking tobacco would negatively effect your teeth then smoking pot would too. I forgot to add these studies:
Brain Damage - Long-term Cannabis Users May Have Structural Brain Abnormalities (Science Daily)
Heart Disease - Possible Connection Between Marijuana Abuse And Stroke Or Heart Attacks (Science Daily)
The Anti 'Man-Made' Global Warming Resource
Ok, then let's substitute
July 2, 2008 - 19:05 ET by mandrakeOk, then let's substitute the word Alcohol for the word Cannabis/Marijuana in this list and what do you have?
PopTech
July 2, 2008 - 21:19 ET by Rush FanCan I add to your excellent list?
Marijuana may increase psychosis risk http://www.cnn.com/2...
Regular use of marijuana is associated with cardiovascular, pulmonary, reproductive and immunologic problems - http://findarticles....
Cancer risk from marijuana - http://www.hopkinsme...
Marijuana Use and Increased Risk of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck - http://cebp.aacrjour...
------------------------------------------------------------
I'm voting for Barack Obama now that the unbias and fair and balanced AP poll shows people would rather barbecue burgers with Barack Obama than with John McCain. http://news.yahoo.co...
OK, so?
July 2, 2008 - 19:57 ET by magicalangelicusI can buy into every one of these findings but it doesn't change my belief that an individual has a right to smoke a joint if they darn well please. Seriously, why don't we ban alcohol if we're so concerned about our private health?
Because Alcohol can be good for you
July 2, 2008 - 20:44 ET by PopularTechA Drink To Healthy Aging (Science Daily)
A Few Drinks A Day Do No Harm To The Alcoholic Heart (Science Daily)
Antioxidant Found In Many Foods And Red Wine Is Potent And Selective Killer Of Leukemia Cells (Science Daily)
After Dinner Drink Proves Beneficial To Postmenopausal Women (Science Daily)
Alcohol Drinking Linked To Reduced Risk Of Renal Cell Cancer (Science Daily)
Alcohol Linked To Decreased Hypertension Risk In Young Women (Science Daily)
Beer, In Moderation, Cuts Risk Of Cataracts And Heart Disease (Science Daily)
Beer Inhibits Action Of Carcinogenic Mutagens (Science Daily)
Cabernet Sauvignon Red Wine Reduces The Risk Of Alzheimer's Disease (Science Daily)
Compound In Wine Reduces Levels Of Alzheimer's Disease-causing Peptides (Science Daily)
Daily Glass Of Wine Could Improve Liver Health (Science Daily)
Drink A Day May Delay Dementia, Study Suggests (Science Daily)
Drinking Small Amounts Of Alcohol Regularly Reduces Risk Of Obesity (Science Daily)
Drinking Wine May Lower Risk Of Dementia (Science Daily)
Drinking Wine, Particularly White Wine, May Help Keep Lungs Healthy, University At Buffalo Study Finds (Science Daily)
Frequency Of Light-to-moderate Drinking Reduces Heart Disease Risk In Men (Science Daily)
Further Evidence That Alcohol, When Consumed In Moderation, Reduces Risk Of Death (Science Daily)
Further Evidence That Moderate Drinking Reduces Men's Heart Attack Risk (Science Daily)
Grapes May Minimize Brain Damage In Stroke Victims (Science Daily)
Grapes Or Grain? Wine Drinking May Reduce Colon Cancer Risk; Beer, Hard Liquor Provide No Benefit (Science Daily)
Health Benefits Of A Christmas Brandy (Science Daily)
Light Alcohol Use May Protect Against Sudden Cardiac Death (Science Daily)
Light To Moderate Drinking Reduces Risk Of Cardiac Events, Death (Science Daily)
Light Wine Intake Is Associated With Longer Life Expectancy In Men (Science Daily)
Little Evidence That Binge Drinking While Pregnant Seriously Harms Fetus, Review Of Research Suggests (Science Daily)
Men With Hypertension Who Drink Moderate Amounts Of Alcohol May Have A Lower Risk Of Heart Attack (Science Daily)
Moderate Alcohol Consumption Can Act As A 'Blood Thinner' (Science Daily)
Moderate Alcohol Consumption Enhances The Formation Of New Nerve Cells (Science Daily)
Moderate Alcohol Consumption In Middle Age Can Lower Cardiac Risk, Study Shows (Science Daily)
Moderate Alcohol Consumption Decreases Risk Of Cardiovascular Disease Death In Men (Science Daily)
Moderate Alcohol Intake Associated With Better Mental Function In Older Women (Science Daily)
Moderate Alcohol Intake May Reduce Risk Of Dementia In Older Women (Science Daily)
Moderate Drinking Associated With Better Cognition In Women (Science Daily)
Moderate Drinking Lowers Women's Risk Of Heart Attack (Science Daily)
Moderate Drinking May Boost Memory, Study Suggests (Science Daily)
Moderate Drinking May Help Older Women Live Longer (Science Daily)
Moderate Drinking May Protect Heart By Improving Insulin Resistance, Study Suggests (Science Daily)
Mounting Evidence Shows Red Wine Antioxidant Kills Cancer (Science Daily)
New Cholesterol Fighter Found In Red Wine (Science Daily)
New Study Ties Moderate Beer Drinking To Lower Heart Attack Risk (Science Daily)
No Need For Reduced Alcohol Consumption In Later Life, Study Suggests (Science Daily)
One Or Two Drinks A Day May Be Better For Women Than None (Science Daily)
Researchers Discover That A Protein In Grape Skins Can Kill Cancer Cells (Science Daily)
Researchers Link Red Wine To "Good Cholesterol" (Science Daily)
Red Wine And Grape Juice Help Defend Against Food-borne Diseases, Study Suggests (Science Daily)
Red Wine And White Wine May Be Equally Good For The Heart (Science Daily)
Red Wine Can Help Maintain Immune System, UF Researcher Finds (Science Daily)
Red Wine Compound Shown To Prevent Prostate Cancer (Science Daily)
Red Wine Lovers, Take Heart: More Evidence Points To The Drink's Cardiac Health Benefits (Science Daily)
Red Wine Molecule Extends Lifespan Of Fat Mice Lives By Reversing Obesity-Related Gene Pathways (Science Daily)
Red Wine Protects The Heart (Science Daily)
Red Wine Protects The Prostate, Research Suggests (Science Daily)
Red Wine's Resveratrol May Help Battle Obesity (Science Daily)
Red Wine, Tea, May Help Regulate Blood Sugar In Type 2 Diabetics, Research Suggests (Science Daily)
Staying Active And Drinking Moderately Is The Key To A Long Life, Study Suggests (Science Daily)
Study Finds That Moderate Drinkers May Have Lower Risk Of Mortality After A Heart Attack (Science Daily)
Substance In Red Wine, Resveratrol, Found To Keep Hearts Young (Science Daily)
Wine Drinkers Have Healthier Lifestyles (Science Daily)
Wine Keeps Women's Hearts Beating Healthily (Science Daily)
Wine May Combat Tooth Decay And Upper Respiratory Tract Disease Bacteria (Science Daily)
Wine May Protect Against Dementia, Study Suggests (Science Daily)
The Anti 'Man-Made' Global Warming Resource
And the award for the most
July 2, 2008 - 21:01 ET by mandrakeAnd the award for the most industrious NB poster goes to POP TECH
Awards
July 2, 2008 - 21:06 ET by Free StinkerHe's got another award right here !
There is no rational reason weed is illegal when alcohol isn't
July 2, 2008 - 21:56 ET by Johnny_BancoAlcohol is an infinitely more dangerous substance than marijuana, speaking both physically and sociologically, but because it is more popular, it is legal while marijuana isn't. Popularity-that's a great, righteous criteria for legality, isn't it?
Just where does the US gov't get the right to treat people like children and tell them that it is ok for them to ingest alcohol into their bodies, but not marijuana? Does it get that right from our Creator, or does it take it from the same place our Founders did when they said it was acceptable for slavery to be legal?
Control freaks love to limit what other people can do with own bodies, and then tell them they are free even while they are limiting their freedom. Stalin loved that kind of Orwellianism, didn't he?!!!
Oh, and to head you off from your inevitable use of personal attacks, I don't use nor condone the use of marijuana. Why would it mattter if I did though? The fact is, prohibiting an individual's personal use of a substance on him/herself is antithetical to what freedom is; there is no logical argument against that. The truth is, some people love to believe to they value freedom despite the fact they actually detest it.
Sorry but the facts don't support your Weed Propaganda
July 2, 2008 - 22:56 ET by PopularTechThe Dangers of Smoking Marijuana
vs.
The Health Benefits of Alcohol
The Anti 'Man-Made' Global Warming Resource
PopTech, Congratulations
July 3, 2008 - 05:03 ET by TheGingermanPopTech,
Congratulations on writing the single, most ignorant post I've ever read. I mean, you're joking right?
The amount of damage caused by alcohol in our society is unbelievable
and to claim that it's more dangerous than marijuana is hilarious.
First of all, how many people die a year from alcohol poisoning?
How many people overdose on marijuana (i'll give you a hint, it starts
with 0)
How many people die in drunk driving accidents a year? How many children are abused by drunken parents? Marriages ruined? Bodies ruined?
Not only is making marijuana illegal, decidedly ANTI-conservative,
it makes no sense. You're telling me that I have the right to get
black out drunk but I can't smoke a joint, watch a movie, and go to
bed? That's outrageous.
As for your studies, you're a complete waste of time. What are the
use of studies if you only read the headline, champ? I'll just point
out one - the marijuana = psychosis. It's routinely accepted that this
finding persists because people that are predisposed to or suffering
from mental illness are more likely to experiment with drugs. Really
not that hard to figure out.
Health benefits of alcohol bwahahahaha
If possible, please exert a little self control, and refrain from
responding with a list. We get it, you don't work, stop rubbing it in
our faces.
Joking? I don't smoke the funny stuff
July 3, 2008 - 08:50 ET by PopularTechI never claimed alcohol is more danerous than pot.
I'll try to stop responding with facts so you can continue your emotional rants.
The Anti 'Man-Made' Global Warming Resource
Pop Tech-So Much Wasted Time & Effort- So Easily Dismissed
July 4, 2008 - 16:34 ET by Abe_JeffersonPop Tech acts as a propagandist in his presentation of studies to
make a case against legalizing marijuana and to make a case for
legalized alcohol, while ignoring tobacco. He flaunts his extreme
bias, selectively choosing which information to use and not to use. He only uses misleading headlines of articles, yet the articles
tell a more innocuous story.
The scientific community would reject Pop Tech's presentation (his
postings) based on the extreme bias and we should too. Then there's
his offensive hypocritical position against the same freedom for
marijuana as extended to alcohol and tobacco.
Let me start by
easily dismissing the studies and argument against smoking pot by
making them totally irrelevant.
--Simply Legalize the sale of marijuana
but only in food products. No physical endangerment -None.*
-----No study has ever proven serious to life threatening physical
conditions due to smoking pot alone.
-----No One Has Ever Died of Cancer, Emphysema, or other
Respiratory Diseases From Smoking Marijuana Alone. In fact one
of Pop Tech's referenced articles states that studies have shown NO
increased risk of emphysema from smoking pot.
----- It is impossible to overdose on marijuana. There is never
any immediate physical danger, let alone life threatening, in simply smoking pot.
Pop Tech insults our intelligence in so many ways. His extreme
bias is flaunted in his selective choices on what he uses and doesn't
present, thinking we would miss his choice to use studies of
frequent or heavy pot use, use among young people (no group
advocating the legalization of pot advocates making it available to
those under 18, but unfortunately that group can get it relatively
easy now), and use in combination with other negative factors (such as use with alcohol or with other illnesses such as Hepatitis) while only citing studies of low to moderate alcohol use.
Or that we wouldn't read these studies beyond the headlines and find
none of the studies prove serious ill effects from moderate use of
marijuana alone.
* Does not address auto accidents due to using pot because no
group advocates the legalization of driving under the influence of
pot.
Might also be worth noting
July 4, 2008 - 21:41 ET by Giles WinterbourneMight also be worth noting he seems to have 'pinned' on his expertise today.
It shouldnt surprise anymore....
July 3, 2008 - 07:26 ET by dronetekThese are people who hail Woodstock as some kind of historical event, when it was really just a bunch of idiots getting stoned on various drugs.
I'm not sure about pot, but
July 2, 2008 - 17:02 ET by ConservativeRexI'm not sure about pot, but I'm all for making CBS illegal.
CR... I Second
July 2, 2008 - 18:37 ET by bigtimerCR...
I Second that!
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Wilson
Weeds, huh.
July 2, 2008 - 17:30 ET by GalvanicI don't get Showtime, and I've never heard of this program, let alone seen it. But I would guess that if its producers and writers are as self-righteous about smoking pot as their "Celia" character is about abstaining, she will commit some horribly violent act because she's not hip.
Is Celia, by any chance, a white, evangelical Christian character who votes Republican? If so, her demise on the show is certain.
I think she's right.
July 2, 2008 - 17:49 ET by balboaI think she's right.
"Weeds" is apparently about
July 2, 2008 - 17:59 ET by jdhawk"Weeds" is apparently about a suburan divorcee that to make ends meet becomes a felon drug pusher. Of course, Hollyweird makes her out to be hip.
I never knew that a show of this kind existed, but hey, if we can have a show about "swingers" on prime time TV and TV movies that give their tacit approval of adults engaging in sex with a minor - as long as the adult is female and the minor is male for now - then why not?
I gotta ask, where is the outrage? This is crap TV. It is a despicable that our FCC is allowing trash like this to be broadcast over public airwaves. This and the Swingtown crap ought to be flushed back into the cesspool where it came from.
Predictably, Perkins
July 2, 2008 - 18:05 ET by MidAmericaPredictably, Perkins replied: "Oh, yeah, absolutely...Alcohol is legal. It doesn't make a lot of sense to me why marijuana's not. It just doesn't make a lot of sense to me."
Well actually we need pot available. If the 'weed' and all the other mood altering substances available were to dissappear we wouldn't get all the fine entertainment out of hollywood that we have grown accustomed to. And without their use of these mind sharpening drugs we would be without all the brilliance and inner wisdom that so many actors and guitar strummers now possess and who use that wisdom to become guides for all the rest of us.
Isn't this like an actress
July 2, 2008 - 18:14 ET by motherbeltIsn't this like an actress thinking she knows all about farming because she played a farmer's wife in a movie?
If Perkins played a hooker, do you think Chen would have asked her if she thought prostitution should be legal?
Shoot 'em all; let God sort 'em out! - Marge Simpson
I have always supported the
July 2, 2008 - 18:45 ET by mostlymoderateI have always supported the legalization of marijuana simply to eliminate the need for drug dealers.
Do What?
July 2, 2008 - 19:15 ET by HumblepieCocain, PCP, LSD, Crack... the list goes on.. Eliminate drug dealers?? How??
During this time with political correctness at its zenith, I reserve the right to let you know you're an idiot.
Eliminate Drug Trade
July 2, 2008 - 19:33 ET by ThatDudeThat's what I really want. If we can get rid of the low-life drug dealers and the gang activity surrounding it, we'd be much better off. Admittedly we're more likely to have more people who have smoked themselves retarded, but that's the tradeoff that comes with freedom of choice. I'll admit to having tried it and that the only real reason I somewhat support its illegality is because I don't like the substance. At the end of the day, I think we should just regulate the drug like we do tobacco and alcohol. Also, we need to tax it heavily so these liberals make money to support the socialist policies they put in place. Escapism is immoral, but making it illegal to escape through the use of a substance seems silly to me. We have so many people addicted to cigarettes and alcohol, so how much of a difference would it make to have people addicted to legalized marijuana?
ThatDude - with regard to
July 3, 2008 - 05:08 ET by TheGingermanThatDude - with regard to your smoked themselve silly comment if you actually if you look at countries where marijuana is normalized, such as Denmark, usage among the general population is lower than in America.
Yeah, I'm also aware of
July 3, 2008 - 15:06 ET by ThatDudeYeah, I'm also aware of that. However, I'm unsure how much of that is a cause of the culture. It seems likely that legalization of marijuana would rival or supercede the current tobacco use. This is only my opinion though. It's more likely that the popular use of marijuana here has more to do with it being against the law and something of a taboo. As for my comment about Americans smoking themselves silly, plenty already do so and legalization would likely raise the number exponentially. Americans have a tendency to overindulge. In the end though, it's a personal choice and making the substance illegal is fairly unnecessary.
I support legalisation and
July 2, 2008 - 19:30 ET by Damian GI support legalisation and have never once touched the stuff, both because of personal choice and to avoid a conflict of interest.
All drugs should be legalized
July 2, 2008 - 19:47 ET by steveba4Weeds is a pretty good show except that every few episodes, a character has to go on a 2 or 3 minute whine fest about Bush. There's plenty not to like about Bush, but of course they always hit him from the left. Let's just say they're not whining about him being weak on the border...but I digress.
Back to the part about all drugs being legalized. Well marijuana being legal is a no brainer, but they should just go ahead and legalize it all...yes, even the "hard stuff". But there would be a catch. Absolutely zero tax dollars should go to prevention and rehab. You want to shoot heroin? Go ahead but don't expect any free needles from the taxpayers. You're addicted to meth and want to quit? Well feel free to pay for rehab yourself. What, you say that if you don't get help you'll die? Tough. You made the choice. Live with it...or don't, it's not my problem.
I also think that the penalties for providing drugs to minors, driving while under the influence, etc. should be tripled upon legalization. It's all about personal responsibility and choice. As a 33 year old, gainfully employed, tax paying citizen; I think I'm a big enough boy to come home from work, kick back on the couch with a joint, and watch the Glenn Beck show in the privacy of my own living room.
I have never heard a sane
July 2, 2008 - 19:53 ET by Clear thinkerI have never heard a sane and logical argument as to why we should legalize drugs. Never!
Enemies of the USA love the idea of a nation of whacked out lazy good for nothing slackers. It makes for a much easier citizenry to control.
We need clear headed, logical thinking people to keep this country from falling into the hands of our enemies and legalizing drugs works against us as a society.
Legalize drugs.... very bad idea!
45 Communist Goals for America http://www.nationmakers.com/com_goals.htm
This is where I depart the Republican agenda.
July 2, 2008 - 19:58 ET by FoolicanEnemies of the USA love the idea of a nation of whacked out lazy good
for nothing slackers. It makes for a much easier citizenry to control.
We need clear headed, logical thinking people to keep this country
from falling into the hands of our enemies and legalizing drugs works
against us as a society.
Isn't that the same as saying that other countries won't sit by and say "okay" because we eat as much as we want, ride around in SUVs, and keep our thermostats at seventy degrees?
Even if drugs were legal, I wouldn't touch them, because I am rational, but mostly because I have the power to decide for myself. I think you're taking on the liberal perspective of denying people choices because you don't trust their ability to act as independent human beings. It's no better than making drugs mandatory for all people because they don't know any better.
Foolican... Yours is a
July 2, 2008 - 20:06 ET by Clear thinkerFoolican...
Yours is a downright silly argument.
45 Communist Goals for America http://www.nationmakers.com/com_goals.htm
Explain, pray, the reasoning
July 2, 2008 - 20:10 ET by FoolicanExplain, pray, the reasoning behind that conclusion, for those that don't have the patience to read my writing.
Choices... Let's just
July 2, 2008 - 20:13 ET by Clear thinkerChoices...
Let's just cancel the seat belt laws while we are at it. After all, it should my choice right?
45 Communist Goals for America http://www.nationmakers.com/com_goals.htm
And bike helmet laws, too.
July 2, 2008 - 20:17 ET by FoolicanAnd bike helmet laws, too. In fact, while we're at it, let's take those silly government warning labels off mattresses and airbags. Those who are stupid enough to not wear a seatbelt or a helmet deserve to be offed.
Free Choice
July 2, 2008 - 20:17 ET by magicalangelicusWell, yes, we should cancel the seat belt law. You see, the real test is to know whether or not you are infringing on someone else's individual right. My not wearing a seat belt doesn't infringe on your rights, does it?
magical... But it will
July 2, 2008 - 21:03 ET by Clear thinkermagical...
But it will impact me, and you know it!
45 Communist Goals for America http://www.nationmakers.com/com_goals.htm
???
July 2, 2008 - 21:11 ET by FoolicanI'm spinning my wheels trying to figure out how magical's not wearing a seat belt affects you wearing yours.
I'm with you on removing
July 2, 2008 - 21:56 ET by CJK51I'm with you on removing mandatory helmet and seatbelt laws, all because I'm for thinning the herd. If these simple safety measures don't make any sense to you, go for it. As someone whose seatbelt spared me serious injury in a car accident, I choose to wear mine, but if someone else doesn't, I don't care.
I honestly don't have a good argument for legalizing marijuana, but I do have one for keeping it illegal: stoners are SO damn annoying! The asinine pontificating, the depth of stupid things, the laughing, etc. Can we compromise and legalize the drug but criminalize the stoners? ;-)
Foolican, I totally agree.
July 2, 2008 - 23:43 ET by mostlymoderateFoolican,
I totally agree. I don't like seatbelt laws. I don't like helmet laws. I particularly don't like marijuana laws. As for hard drugs? Fine, hard drugs manufactured/refined drugs like heroin, cocaine, crack, excstacy, etc should be banned. But marijuana? Hell, my grandfather worked in Argentina when coca leaves were legal and nobody really got out of hand.
Bottom line: I always wear a seatbelt, I always would wear a helmet, I don't drink, smoke or do any drugs. HOWEVER, I don't like the government telling people what to do. Sure, driving while under the influence of anything would be illegal, but what a person does INSIDE their home (whether it be drugs, sex (except with minors ofcourse) firearms, etc. should be no business of the law.
Honestly, I can't believe I live in a culture where a woman can go whore around, get pregnant, and annihilate the life of the baby but I can't smoke a little weed when I feel like it.
mm... That is exactly how
July 2, 2008 - 23:55 ET by bigtimermm...
That is exactly how I feel about the govt. intrusion too of our personal freedoms, they have been peeling them away little by little since I can remember, the seat belt laws were the exact reason I started paying attention to politics, how govt. worked ect. when I was very young, when I had time that is, but I have ever since...and it has not been better, it has been worse.
It has also helped destroy businesses if able, or a detriment to them, let alone all the $$$ they make in the meantime.
I could go on and on...it entails so much, from insurance rates to tickets, city state feds ect..
Being forced instead of choices has been outrageous.
I'd like to start with Nader's Raiders...who came in force with the Carter administration...the lawyers ect...
...and it continues on...
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
I know! In my lifetime, I
July 3, 2008 - 00:21 ET by mostlymoderateI know! In my lifetime, I have seen the government take away numerous rights that we used to take for granted. For example, here in California there are hardly any beaches left where you can walk a dog. Surfers are not "allowed" to go surfing if the ranger deems it "unsafe" (even if you are a pro surfer). You are not allowed to sit in the bed of a truck while it is moving (like the good ol' days) even if you are on a country road! MUST have insurance. Can't use cell phone in the car while driving (although a trucker can use a CB???). You MUST spay cats and dogs. You MUST license your bicycle. NO open containers on the beach. Children have to dress up like HOCKEY PLAYERS if they want to ride a bicycle in public (helmets, arm pads, etc etc.) Oh, I think it's even illegal now simply to spank a child. I could go on but these are the the few rights I have noticed in MY lifetime that have eroded.
Oh, they are trying to eliminate our right to purchase "vitamins and herbal supplements" now too. See, the thinking is that the average consumer is not bright enough to determine what vitamins or herbs they might want to try. They want these to be sold my pharmacists only. :(
Enemy of the USA?
July 2, 2008 - 20:02 ET by magicalangelicusAs a clear-headed, logical conservative I support legalizing marijuana and I happen to love this country. Question for you: why don't you support the ban on alcohol too?
Because
July 2, 2008 - 20:04 ET by FoolicanBecause the Republican Old Guard likes to forget how well the 18th Amendment Prohibition went for this country's crime rate.
How do you know that I
July 2, 2008 - 20:04 ET by Clear thinkerHow do you know that I don't support it?
45 Communist Goals for America http://www.nationmakers.com/com_goals.htm
Do you support prohibition?
July 2, 2008 - 20:19 ET by magicalangelicusSo Clear thinker, do you or don't you support a ban on alcohol? Answer one way, and you are a nanny-stater that the Left would be proud of, answer another way, and you're inconsistent. I'm all ears...
A ban on alcohol is no big
July 2, 2008 - 20:26 ET by Clear thinkerA ban on alcohol is no big deal for me.... I live in a dry county.
45 Communist Goals for America http://www.nationmakers.com/com_goals.htm
Well, I agree with you
July 2, 2008 - 20:32 ET by FoolicanWell, I agree with you there. Decisions on freedoms and liberties should be determined at the state and municipal level, not at a federal level. That's how a federalist republic effectively works, and I have no objection to how you choose to live in that aspect.
Why ban alcohol when it can be good for you?
July 2, 2008 - 20:54 ET by PopularTechAlcohol can be good for you
The Anti 'Man-Made' Global Warming Resource
PT... Oh, I hear ya. All
July 2, 2008 - 20:59 ET by Clear thinkerPT...
Oh, I hear ya. All I'm saying is... if it was the law I would follow it. That's all.
45 Communist Goals for America http://www.nationmakers.com/com_goals.htm
Understood
July 2, 2008 - 21:02 ET by PopularTechI got that but I was really replying to magical. I am not a drinker myself but unlike pot there are legitimate health benefits to certain drinks, especially red wine.
The Anti 'Man-Made' Global Warming Resource
PT... BLACK GOLD...
July 2, 2008 - 21:06 ET by Clear thinkerGotta go, my new favorite show is on. It's called Black Gold. I love watching oil being found in Texas!
BBL!
45 Communist Goals for America http://www.nationmakers.com/com_goals.htm
My type of show
July 2, 2008 - 21:20 ET by PopularTechClear, thanks I had not heard of it, I will check it out.
The Anti 'Man-Made' Global Warming Resource
Pop Tech...
July 2, 2008 - 21:28 ET by Clear thinkerIt's on tru TV channel.
Commercial is over, gotta go.
45 Communist Goals for America http://www.nationmakers.com/com_goals.htm