On Wednesday’s CBS "Early Show," co-host Harry Smith began the show by declaring: "A place in history. Barack Obama claims the Democratic presidential nomination. The first African-American to do so." While Obama’s win was indeed historic, correspondent Dean Reynolds later reported on Obama’s "ecstatic" supporters and the Senator’s humility: "...despite the thunderous, indeed ecstatic, applause at the arena in St. Paul, Barack Obama was not gloating. He dutifully paid homage to his defeated rival and her [Hillary Clinton’s] legion of supporters."
Reynolds soon followed up describing John McCain's speech as the beginning of a Republican "attack" against Obama: "John McCain is waiting for him and Tuesday night he sounded a theme of attack." In a later interview with McCain, co-host Maggie Rodrigguez wondered: "It's one thing to say that you are the better candidate. It's another to say that he [Barack Obama] is not qualified. Which is it?" Rodriguez also linked McCain, who spoke from New Orleans, to failures in Hurricane Katrina: "Here in New Orleans, a city that symbolizes one of the greatest failures of the Bush Administration, the response after Hurricane Katrina, you spoke a lot about failings of this administration. Are you trying to distance yourself from President Bush?"
In an earlier segment, co-host Harry Smith talked to CBS political analyst Jeff Greenfield, who described McCain’s speech this way:
There's no energy here. There's no crowd behind him the way there was with Senator Clinton and Senator Obama. You see the slogan, 'A Leader You Can Believe In' that's designed to say 'I'm the Commander in Chief and Obama's credentials are weak.' But you can barely read the slogan because he's blocking it. Also, if you were the oldest candidate ever to run for president and you want to communicate a sense of dynamism, you want to surround yourself with energy, and that is not what happened in McCain's event last night.
Compare that to how Smith and Greenfield described the Obama event:
SMITH: Then again we go to the Obama rally in St. Paul, in the very building where the Republicans will have their convention.
GREENFIELD: Yes, do you think that was a coincidence?
SMITH: 17,000 to 20,000 people inside, they said another 10 to 15 outside.
GREENFIELD: Well, there are a couple of things about this. One, I loved this moment. It wasn't quite as passionate as Al Gore's kiss at the 2000 convention, but when they [Barack & Michelle Obama] banged their fists together, there's a kind of youthfulness about that. The other thing is, here Obama is actually in effect giving a acceptance speech in a convention hall two months before he will really give the acceptance speech. A lot of people have said there are too many of these things. He should be down on the ground. Tonight was the -- last night was the night for that.
While McCain’s speech certainly did not have the same style and excitement as Obama’s, Smith and Greenfield focused entirely on image, not on what was actually said in either speech.
Here are the full transcripts of the segments:
7:00AM TEASER:
HARRY SMITH: A place in history. Barack Obama claims the Democratic presidential nomination. The first African-American to do so.
BARACK OBAMA: America, this is our moment. This is our time.
7:01AM TEASER:
HARRY SMITH: Take a look at these headlines, folks. In the New York papers this morning, 'Destiny,' 'History,' first African-American to be selected as the standard bearer for a party.
7:02AM SEGMENT:
MAGGIE RODRIGUEZ: The man who the local papers here announce in big, bold letters, 'Obama seals the nomination and makes history as the first black man to lead a party ticket.' CBS News national correspondent Dean Reynolds was with Senator Obama last night as he gave a victory speech in St. Paul, Minnesota, and he joins us now from Washington. Dean, good morning.
DEAN REYNOLDS: Good morning, Maggie. Well, having achieved the historic milestone, Barack Obama now turns his attention to the main event.
BARACK OBAMA: America, this is our moment.
REYNOLDS: After 16 months of non-stop campaigning, it was safe to exhale.
OBAMA: Because of you, tonight I can stand here and say that I will be the Democratic nominee for the President of the United States of America.
REYNOLDS: But despite the thunderous, indeed ecstatic, applause at the arena in St. Paul, Barack Obama was not gloating. He dutifully paid homage to his defeated rival and her legion of supporters.
OBAMA: Our party and our country are better off because of her and I am a better candidate for having had the honor to compete with Hillary Rodham Clinton.
REYNOLDS: He will need to be a better candidate. John McCain is waiting for him and Tuesday night he sounded a theme of attack.
JOHN MCCAIN: For all his fine words and all his promise, he has never taken the hard, but right, course of risking his own interests for yours.
REYNOLDS: McCain also has an eye on the Clinton supporters and, in his speech in New Orleans, went out of his way to praise their champion.
MCCAIN: The media often overlooked how compassionately she spoke to the concerns and dreams of millions of Americans. And she deserves a lot more appreciation than she sometimes received.
REYNOLDS: But will McCain say that if Clinton winds up Obama's running mate? Sources tell CBS News that efforts toward an Obama/Clinton ticket have been quietly endorsed by Clinton's campaign. Though it's unclear that she wants the job, to say nothing of whether Obama would seriously consider offering it to her. His campaign is said to believe the party will soon unite behind him, dimming the need for the so-called 'dream ticket.'
HILLARY CLINTON: This has been a long campaign, and I will be making no decisions tonight.
REYNOLDS: Clinton spoke to her loyal supporters in New York City, sounding unwilling to surrender but unsure of what to do next. So she asked for guidance.
CLINTON: I want to hear from you. I hope you'll go to my website at hillaryclinton.com and share your thoughts with me and help in any way that you can. To determine how to move forward with the best interests of our party and our country guiding my way.
REYNOLDS: And until she decides, her next move will be grist for much speculation. There's no doubt however, what Barack Obama's next move will be. It's on to the general election and John McCain. Maggie.
RODRIGUEZ: And as Senator McCain told me, he is ready for battle. Dean Reynolds, thank you. My interview with Senator McCain is coming up in a few moments. But first, with more on Obama and Clinton, let's go back to Harry in New York.
7:12AM SEGMENT:
HARRY SMITH: We want to go back to Maggie who is in New Orleans and, of course, spoke to John McCain just last night. Good morning again, Maggie.
MAGGIE RODRIGUEZ: Good morning, Harry. Voters who were choosing between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama were choosing between two candidates who share very similar platforms. So says the Republican nominee John McCain, who left no doubt now what his argument will be as this general election kicks off. It will focus on, as it did here last night, what he calls 'stark differences' between a veteran and a rookie. What is the single most important difference between you and Barack Obama?
JOHN MCCAIN: I think our approach to government in everything from the role of government in health care, in taxes, in regulation, to our nation's security.
RODRIGUEZ: You argue that you're older. You have more experience. You feel that you have a better vision for this country. But Senator Clinton made all the same arguments and still lost to Senator Obama. Do you worry that you may be underestimating his appeal to voters?
MCCAIN: Oh, no. I think he has -- he has done a very fine job, and I congratulated him tonight. But I think Americans are just beginning to know Senator Obama. But we have these stark differences, and I'll let the American people choose. It's about leadership. And it's about the future.
RODRIGUEZ: It's one thing to say that you are the better candidate. It's another to say that he is not qualified. Which is it?
MCCAIN: Well, I leave that judgment up to the voters.
RODRIGUEZ: What do you personally feel?
MCCAIN: Well, I believe that he does not have experience, and I think he has exercised very bad judgment on national security issues and others.
RODRIGUEZ: Here in New Orleans, a city that symbolizes one of the greatest failures of the Bush Administration, the response after Hurricane Katrina, you spoke a lot about failings of this administration. Are you trying to distance yourself from President Bush?
MCCAIN: No. I'm trying to make sure that the American people know that there have been serious differences between myself and the Bush Administration long before I ever ran for President of the United States. I think the American people know that I'm -- I'm who I am. And that's a person who has stood up to both Democrats and Republicans when I thought -- when I knew that I -- what was the right path to take.
RODRIGUEZ: You talk about being bipartisan. Would you consider someone from another party as your vice president?
MCCAIN: I don't -- I don't think so, but look --
RODRIGUEZ: That's not a no.
MCCAIN: I think -- no, no, I mean, someone who is your vice president, the prime qualification is who shares your values, your principles and your goals and is prepared to take your place immediately. But I really can't get into names because as soon as we do, then we go through a -- actually, what ends up is an invasion of people's privacy.
RODRIGUEZ: Finally, you ready for one-on-one combat? You have some experience in that arena.
MCCAIN: It's going to be an interesting time. But I really believe that we must conduct a respectful campaign, and it's going to come down as to who is most qualified to lead. And I believe I can prevail.
RODRIGUEZ: Jeff Greenfield noted how many times Senator McCain used the word 'change' in his speech here last night. I couldn't help but notice how many times he used the word 'differences' when he and I sat down face to face. And I think that's what we can expect from John McCain in the next five months, for him to highlight the differences not only between him and Barack Obama, but between him and President Bush. I'll have much more from New Orleans ahead this morning.
—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Get ready kids
June 4, 2008 - 13:53 ET by greenfairieThis is going to be par for the course until Election Day.
oh, when you dance with the
June 4, 2008 - 13:57 ET by TruthMongeroh, when you dance with the Devil...
John, John, John:(...
still want us to "calm down" ol buddy...?
It Starts
June 4, 2008 - 14:06 ET by MeanderingNow begins the attack the conservative phase in the MSM. They focused their attacks on Clinton, now it’s on to the conservatives. I really do wonder if a something bad breaks for Obama like he is an undercover Muslim terrorist whose main goal is toe take down the U.S. that the MSM would still justify and back him. It wouldn’t surprise me they treat him like a deity and no one is suppose to question the all mighty Obama. So we best get used to it and guard ourselves to fight back with the truth.
the MSM will spit-polish
June 4, 2008 - 14:22 ET by TruthMongerthe MSM will spit-polish any Obama turd you can possibly imagine up to election day...
lights camera action standing by:)
McCain's Catering to the Left will Not Get Him Elected.
June 4, 2008 - 15:06 ET by allanfThe folks in the MSM are in love. It is absolute adoration. Apparently today's journalists just want to narrate a "drama" and Obama makes their little liberal hearts flutter.
When McCain is asked about Katrina, it would be nice if he talked about the great Democrat failures. The failure to organize, the failure to fix levies. New Orleans was a city ruled by Democrats and welfare for 70 years. The result was a culture of victimization.
McCain will be elected not because he caters to the left, but in spite of it.
I don't remember any of the
June 4, 2008 - 14:09 ET by ThatDudeI don't remember any of the serious primary cadidates from either side as being less qualified than Obama. Even ignoring the policies of any of them, Obama essentially only has a year under his belt as a senator which he seems to have either voted party lines or no vote. He doesn't have a resume to show he's a worthy candidate and his policies back up his inadequacies.
I don't know about the rest here, but my ideal candidate would be a governor who's served a term or two in the house or senate. Also, the person would have to be something other than a proffesional liar *ahem* "lawyer." I had hope for Ron Paul, but he's just not putting up a strong enough presence.
The best possible outcome
June 4, 2008 - 14:10 ET by MassConservThe best possible outcome would be for McCain to win, simply to drive these people NUTS! Well, crazier anyway.
I'd love to be a fly on the wall as they bang their heads against it, (OK, I'd move first) and gnash their teeth seeing that all their hard work is for naught. I'd love to hear their cries wondering what it is they have to do to manipulate people into voting for the socialists.
Granted, McCain is not a forgone conclusion and they can probably pull off their charade.
even if Mc wins we still
June 4, 2008 - 14:28 ET by TruthMongereven if Mc wins we still lose:(
lets have the first black prez...
what the worst thing that can happen? global meltdown and armegeddon? so what...?
it'll be a great step backwards for racism - I mean isn't that what we all want?!?!
(I'm just kidding and I don't approve this message:)
TM, I'm not at all thrilled
June 4, 2008 - 14:36 ET by MassConservTM, I'm not at all thrilled with McCain as our option, trust me. I was just speaking to the (obvious) bias evident in the way they're discussing him vs. BHO.
I'm imagining my own satisfaction with knowing a McCain win will turn these people inside out with frustration.
just checked..Pacific Sea is NOT RISING !
June 4, 2008 - 14:20 ET by JayTeesomeone check the &tlantic ..gulf coast...nothing to PUSH BACK on here.
who is this IDIOT ?
Mccain is about as exciting
June 4, 2008 - 14:22 ET by oldArmyMccain is about as exciting as watching paint dry. He needs to pick it up. Maybe learn to juggle or something....Dye his hair red...something.
lol...wouldn't it be funny if this came down to Florida again and MC took it....LOL......THAT WOULD BE HILARIOUS!!!!
Old Army - Dye his har red or something lol
June 4, 2008 - 14:51 ET by Dee BunkYou Newsbusters guys are cracking me up today. This is how it used to be on here all the time. All of you guys were frequently making funny statements. It's great. We have to laugh or we'll cry.
CBS is right..total lack of Energy...In theUSA
June 4, 2008 - 14:31 ET by JayTeeCrowd noise doesn't fill my Tank
Platitudes about non existant "sea rise" makes me think BHO IS NOT READY to lead ANY COUNTRY !!
I hate to say it, but Lil'
June 4, 2008 - 14:34 ET by SickofLibsI hate to say it, but Lil' Harry, Greenfield and Reynolds' sickening homoerotic display makes Matthews look like a logger on History Channel's 'Ax Men'.
McCain saying Obama is not qualified is an attack? Then he must think the Powerpuff Girls cartoon is gratuitous violence.
Obama
June 4, 2008 - 14:51 ET by iveseenitallIgnorance and emotion are what drives these campaigns. These are what people like Barry depend upon. So far his blackness and his speaking style have driven the emotions of the ignorant. Now he must keep people ignorant of who and what he is and the destructive plans he and his masters have for America. If he can do this he will win. Unfortunately, McCain is not a man who can fight a political battle. He seems to believe that Barry is an honest individual with whom he simply disagrees. How naive. A dangerous communist vs. a naive old man. What a stinking choice we have. "Liberals" everywhere are smiling today.
BTW, I am really disgusted at McCains's criticisms of our wonderful president. They make me sick.
Who is Barry Sotero?
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
As far as the media is
June 4, 2008 - 15:05 ET by Chris NormanAs far as the media is concerned, Obama is the next president. The election process is merely a formality and any GOP opposition, is just an unnecessary distraction.
What bothers me the most
June 4, 2008 - 15:16 ET by DEVILDOCMOMis the continually out right lying by the failed media regarding President Bush and ANY Republican.
New Orleans and Louisiana were run primarily by the DEMOCRATS! The failure before, during, and after Katrina were the failures of ray nagin and kathleen blanco and those dems who preceeded them. It was not the shining moment for the US Government, but it was NOT all President Bush’s fault.
However, as with many other issues, the media just beats the drum for the far left, whether it is true or not. Truly, they drink some weird Kool-Aid.
Since the public relies on
June 4, 2008 - 15:20 ET by Chris NormanSince the public relies on the media for information on candidates and their policies and performance to decide on who to vote for in elections, the dishonest and liberal-biased reporting from the same media constitutes election fraud, more or less.
Yes, Chris
June 4, 2008 - 15:24 ET by DEVILDOCMOMbut, definitely more, not less.
Right on Chris - if anything should have forced degregulation
June 4, 2008 - 15:31 ET by Dee BunkIt should be the media. They have a oligopoly on communication to the public. The big three networks march in lock step and disallow conservative perspectives. It's not right since they are using public airwaves. Now with campaign Finance, the media has an even bigger influence. They are the fourth branch of government that we don't get to elect or have any say over.
They operate irrespective of ratings to force their political position down everyone's throat.
NO had decades to prepare
June 4, 2008 - 15:39 ET by krendlerYep. The clowns in NO and LA had half a century to take precautions to prevent a disaster and make plans for worst case scenarios. It finally happens and, of course, it's the fault of a racist Republican president. The media started repeating that talking point loud and often immediately after landfall and now it's some kind of "settled historical fact" that Katrina was all Bush's fault.
McCain didn't do himself any favors with Republican moderates with his recent Katrina comments (still, McCain is infinitely better than Obama).
Now we're hearing from Chris Matthews that the bridge collapse in Minneapolis is also, of course, the fault of the big, bad Republicans.
Your point
June 4, 2008 - 17:31 ET by DEVILDOCMOMregarding McCain's denigration of Bush's policy in NO really bothered me when I heard the speech. But, as you say, McCain is infinitely better. I hope.
Oh give him time...he'll
June 4, 2008 - 17:39 ET by bigtimerOh give him time...he'll point the finger at Pres. Bush for the bridge failure too.
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Wilson
The bridge joke was
June 4, 2008 - 17:42 ET by TheGingermanThe bridge joke was outrageous and completely out of line. There's no doubt about that.
I
don't blame Bush for the bridge failure, but I do believe we will soon
face an infrastructure crisis of an epic proportion within the next
decade and a lot of money that could have been dedicated to fixing our
own country is being squandered elsewhere. So, I don't blame
Bush, but I do think he took his eye off the ball on this one.
TG... You have got to be
June 4, 2008 - 17:49 ET by bigtimerTG...
You have got to be kidding....
ROFLMAO!
So little time....so not worth it.
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Wilson
Yeah you're right. We
June 4, 2008 - 17:57 ET by TheGingermanYeah you're right.
We have dedicated lots of federal funding
for infrastructure repairs. I don't know what I'm
saying. Our infrastructure is in a great state right now.
Across America, roads and bridges are crumbling. When our
infrastructure was assessed in 2005, it received a D. That's
right, a D.
In 2004, approx. 1 out every 4 bridges, was rated deficient by the DOT (26.7% to be exact).
Bush
had plenty of time to address this issue, and he didn't.
Furthermore, billions of dollars have been wasted in Iraq, our lack of
oversight has led to constant inefficiencies. We are literally
hemorraghing money because of simple ineptitude. Money that could
have been dedicated to fixing our own country, that is in dire need of
repair.
So you're right. Everything is A-OK. No need to worry.
The Highway/Transport. bill
June 4, 2008 - 18:06 ET by bigtimerThe Highway/Transport. bill is one of the largest federally funded bills there are every year..it is up to the states to do something about it...you have heard of federal gas taxes haven't you Ginger..let alone state taxes.
Go cry a river over this standing on a bridge somewhere.
You cannot blame President Bush for any of this, unless you are John McCain.
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Wilson
Well, it's clearly not big
June 4, 2008 - 18:13 ET by TheGingermanWell, it's clearly not big enough now is it? And you don't
think the rampant, irresponsible spending over the past 8 years hasn't
detracted from infrastructure funding? Please, you must be joking.
One out of four bridges deficient. A D rating from the American society of Civil Engineers.
Your loyalty to a single man instead of principles has put in you a perpetual state of spinning.
I
care about my country first and foremost, above all else, above any
other country. I'm angry about three things right now.
(1) Social Security; (2) Pathetic State of American
Infrastructure; (3) Failure to capture Osama and Zawahiri,
the two men directly responsible for the death of over 3,000 Americans
and counting (with the respitory illness pervasive in the first
responder community).
These 3 items sicken me and they have
forced me into an undecided position for the fall elections. I
can no longer simply ally myself with a party for the sake of loyalty.
I feel that I have been severely let down and disappointed over
the past eight years.
It was up to Minnesota to
June 4, 2008 - 18:30 ET by bigtimerIt was up to Minnesota to fix the bridge...they had the money...plenty of money for it...they already knew about the problems...it was reported on the news plenty of times.
Google it and look yourself.
Btw...leave it to liberals like you to not know the Highway/trans bill is huge, and then turn around and blame the President for it if there is a major problem...instead of the locals and what they do with the money and who pockets it...example Katrina/levees.
I'm going to leave it to others to argue with you about the other big problems you seem to have...
Troll on.
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Wilson
Since the bridge had a poor
June 4, 2008 - 22:09 ET by ckc1227Since the bridge had a poor rating for 17 straight years, you'd think it would have been repaired during the glory years of the Clinton administration. Actually, how can their be an infrastructure problem at all after 8 years under the great one? That there is an infrastructure problem now means it was ignored by others before. But why let that get in the way of a good ol' Bush bashing rant, lol.
At least the messiah is running. He's gonna fix everything. And if he can't fix it, he'll make it off limits to talk about.
Good grief, Kev....didn't you get the memo?
June 4, 2008 - 22:18 ET by BlondeFor crying out loud...the London Bridge fell down during the Bush admin....don't you get it? It's all Bush's fault!
There is no fault in the world...other than that of GWB!!!! What is your problem?
Okay, <sarc off>
The idiots in this world, actually in this country, are NOT going to go away. It's up to us to either (1) convince them of their stupidity; or (2) figure out a way to deprive them of their vote in November.
It's insane. And sad...and sick.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
"Well, it's clearly not big
June 4, 2008 - 22:01 ET by ckc1227"Well, it's clearly not big enough now is it? And you don't
think the rampant, irresponsible spending over the past 8 years hasn't detracted from infrastructure funding? Please, you must be joking"
I think the joke is on you. As long as states spend the money that's supposed to go to infrastructure on other things, it will never be enough.
"These 3 items sicken me and they have
forced me into an undecided position for the fall elections."
1 party denies there is a problem with social security and blocked all efforts at reform over the past 8 years, and the same party did nothing to stop OBL and Zawa as they declared war on the U.S.A. and attacked us unopposed for several years, and in fact refused to take the head guy when he was offered to them on a silver platter, unlike the current administration who is trying to find the same 2 guys, having at least neutralized them into doing nothing more than making videos in a cave somewhere. As for infrastructure, please, hyperbole much?
Undecided position my ass. Your arguments have the stink of lib talking points all over them. Is that you, Scott?
Ginger to quote Boss from
June 5, 2008 - 11:30 ET by Dan The Man 2Ginger to quote Boss from Cool Hand Luke "What we have here is a failure to communicate" The constitution specifically says what is not given to the feds are regulated to teh states. So the resposibility for state indrastructure is teh states not teh feds. You are saying that the water and sewer mains and all streeets are supposed to be governed by the feds and not the state/county/city or local entity?
Get real then get educated. BTW I work in commercial development and know how it works.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.
Obama
June 4, 2008 - 15:18 ET by WR JonasGod does indeed work in mysterious ways . Obama will cause a swelling in the Christian community that hasn't been seen . To what purpose Obama is aligned we do not know. In his speech and conduct he is a deceiver and liars always serve a deceiving Master.
Media already ratcheting up their general election Obama push
June 4, 2008 - 15:29 ET by krendlerMainstream media outlets in the tank for Obama?
Go check out the "politics" seciton of AP/Yahoo right now.
http://news.yahoo.co...
There are always 5 Top Political Stories. Right now, 4 of the 5 are about Obama, all positive. This is typical for this section of their news page. All Obama - All The Time. Similar to MS-NBC.
What if the Media loses this Election?
June 4, 2008 - 15:51 ET by JayTeeSo you won't VOTE for McCain ?
HOW ABOUT VOTING AGAINST THE MEDIA who would gain great confidence if BHO won . . . Vs. Media Defeat if the dems. LOSE.
that is the best Reason to VOTE...or the MSM WILL HAVE ITS WAY WITH YOU !!!
dbl post
June 4, 2008 - 15:58 ET by JayTeed