In an interview free of substance in which Scott McClellan appears to be an innocent victim on Monday’s CBS "Early Show," co-host Harry Smith began by asking the former White House Press Secretary turned Bush-bashing critic: "How you holding up?" McClellan responded by claiming: "It's tough when you take on the system. The system kind of fights back and engages in some personal attacks and misrepresentations of what's in the book."
Smith then referenced "personal attacks" made against McClellan by Bob Dole: "Among the people who have come out to say disparaging things about you, Bob Dole called you a 'miserable creature.' What is it like to have been so much a part of a certain -- of that political culture and have that culture turn on you?"
Later, McClellan explained that: "...it's time to move beyond this destructive culture in Washington and end the partisan warfare that has existed for the past fifteen years, if not longer. And that's the larger message in the book that they can take away from it." Smith replied by asking: "Do you think Republicans will look at this and take this seriously at all?" So according to Smith, the "destructive culture in Washington" is a Republican problem.
McClellan responded to Smith:
MCCLELLAN: Well, right now I think it's the initial reaction phase. I think it's hard for them to move beyond this whole mentality that, you know, when we're addressing these hard issues, you just get caught up in this back and forth
SMITH: Because you -- you're looked at as Judas. But in the end, after the dust settles will people say --
MCCLELLAN: Well I -- yeah. I was raised on speaking up and speaking out. And that's what I'm doing. This is an extension of my career in public service. Another way to continue to making a positive difference. And I think it has struck a nerve, but it needed to strike a nerve.
Here is the full transcript of the segment:
8:31AM TEASER
HARRY SMITH: Also coming up, speaking of Washington, because you really gave us the amazing transition before. This is another one of those amazing transitions. Former White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan is going to be along to talk about the aftermath and the reaction to his quite controversial book.
8:33AM SEGMENT:
HARRY SMITH: It has been an interesting week or so for the former White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan. His memoir has created a firestorm of controversy. And now he's come under attack from some key players in Washington. And joining me now is Scott McClellan. Good morning.
SCOTT MCCLELLAN: Good morning Harry. Glad to be with you.
SMITH: How you holding up?
MCCLELLAN: Well, well. It's tough when you take on the system. The system kind of fights back and engages in some personal attacks and misrepresentations of what's in the book. But it's important that this larger message get out. And that's really taking on the destructive permanent campaign culture in Washington.
SMITH: Among the people who have come out to say disparaging things about you, Bob Dole called you a 'miserable creature.' What is it like to have been so much a part of a certain -- of that political culture and have that culture turn on you?
MCCLELLAN: Well, you know, I expected it to some extent. You know, these are some unpleasant truths and hard realities that I'm trying to address in the book. And no one's really refuting the key themes and perspectives in the book. What they're doing is taking some of these personal attacks and misrepresentations and trying to shift the focus away from what this book talks about. And I think it's important to get it back on the larger message in the book.
SMITH: At least immediately, some of the people reacted and said, well, you know, Scott was out of his league, he was naive. In retrospect, do some of those seem -- things seem applicable to you?
MCCLELLAN: Well, I certainly was idealistic, that we would come to Washington and really change it. The president, as you know, was a bipartisan leader in Texas. 70 percent plus approval rating. And that was -- this is the story of a young idealistic political person who thought, you know, that he came into public service to really do things for the better. And we got to Washington, we got caught up in this culture and things didn't turn out the way we thought. They went badly off course. And I'm trying to address why in this book.
SMITH: Yeah. You go through this process of self-analysis.
MCCLELLAN: I do.
SMITH: If you had a chance for do-overs, one do-over in this whole thing, what would you have done differently?
MCCLELLAN: I think I would have spoken up more internally at the time about some of my concerns. Now, I had some different views back then. I got caught up in this culture just like everybody else. It really -- it really, you know, pulls everybody into it. And you get in this politics is war mentality. We need to move beyond that, restore honesty and civility and bipartisanship to the process.
SMITH: Yeah. If people in this whole controversy over the last week, if you want them -- people to take away one thing, what would it be?
MCCLELLAN: That it's time to move beyond this destructive culture in Washington and end the partisan warfare that has existed for the past fifteen years, if not longer. And that's the larger message in the book that they can take away from it.
SMITH: Do you think Republicans will look at this and take this seriously at all?
MCCLELLAN: Well, right now I think it's the initial reaction phase. I think it's hard for them to move beyond this whole mentality that, you know, when we're addressing these hard issues, you just get caught up in this back and forth
SMITH: Because you -- you're looked at as Judas. But in the end, after the dust settles will people say --
MCCLELLAN: Well I -- yeah. I was raised on speaking up and speaking out. And that's what I'm doing. This is an extension of my career in public service. Another way to continue to making a positive difference. And I think it has struck a nerve, but it needed to strike a nerve.
SMITH: Yeah. Scott good to see you.
MCCLELLAN: Harry, thanks for having me.
SMITH: Thanks for coming in. Do appreciate it.
—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
A couple of tools
June 2, 2008 - 12:32 ET by ChrisMillsHarry and Scott were made for each other. Unfortunately, they're just a couple of the tools in the MSM toolbox.
Mellowed out
June 2, 2008 - 14:00 ET by MCPO AirdaleI've mellowed out in my dotage. I would, however, make an exception to slap the snot out the sleazy little sh**-weasel that is McClellan.
Your a traitor and a
June 2, 2008 - 14:12 ET by bigtimerYour a traitor and a sleazy has-been Scottie...get over yourself and your fifteen minutes of fame..what Dole wrote about you was dead-on.
Harry...you sir are a simpleton IMHO...another useless idiot.
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill
Bipartisanship is crap
June 2, 2008 - 14:18 ET by KC MulvilleI’m a conservative. That’s why I’m not completely at home in either party. The Democrats oppose conservative values outright, whereas the Republicans have the decency not to oppose us outright. They just avoid acting like conservatives when they get into power.
Parties have no coherent theory of government. They simply try to win elections. For strategic reasons, they may favor one ideology or another, but it’s almost always a matter of convenience. Both parties routinely risk the wrath of their core voters to “reach out” to voters of completely opposite values. They gussy up this shameless pandering by calling for a “big tent,” which means they really want anyone on their side, and they don't care why. Partisans simply want to win, by hook if possible, but by crook if necessary.
Partisans consider themselves “pragmatic,” which works out to mean that they’ll abandon reason and use emotion and plain old-fashioned lying if it will get them to victory.
Rush Limbaugh claims that once Republicans get to Washington, they morph into liberals because they want to be invited to the chic dinner parties. I argue that they’re not morphing – unlike conservatives, partisan Republicans weren’t much different from partisan Democrats to begin with. They’ll do whatever it takes to win elections.
Bipartisanship sounds like it means “respect everyone,” but what it really means is “only listen to the two political power groups.” And, when you’re really honest, we’re really talking about two dozen people on each side. Take the presidential candidates, a handful of committee chairmen, majority and minority leaders … add in a few George Soros’es and a few Republican fat cats, and that’s about it. Once you recognize that bipartisanship is really just a pledge of allegiance to those small groups of party leaders, whose main focus is just winning elections and acquiring power …
… bipartisanship isn’t what it’s cracked up to be.
Bipartisanship is Crap...
June 2, 2008 - 19:30 ET by Uncle DonExcellent, excellent, excellent. This is exactly why I'm probably not going to even vote in this election...I'm disgusted with the whole bunch...including McCain..no, especially McCain.
UD... Include me...my
June 2, 2008 - 19:35 ET by bigtimerUD...
Include me...my sentiments also.
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill
Ask Harry
June 2, 2008 - 14:21 ET by JoelCTSomeone should ask Harry on-air, "Harry, if Scott had published his original book about the bias in the media as he experienced it in his position at the White House, and the MSM had jumped all over him for it, would you have asked him 'How are you holding up' to the barrage of attacks from the MSM?"
Smith: How you holding
June 2, 2008 - 14:58 ET by fitzfongSmith: How you holding up?
McClellan: Well, as you've seen over my career in the White House, I've always had a difficult time standing on my own two feet. Fortunately, you fine people noticed this and have seen fit to provide me with cushy chairs so that I can hold up my ever-expanding frame...which, due to the fine menu provided by the assorted craft services on my tour, is only going to get bigger, fatter and wider.
By the way, the only "positive difference" Scott McClellan has ever made is in getting himself fired.
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan
lol, fitz
June 2, 2008 - 15:54 ET by mom_roxThis is the equivalent to the SNL parody of the media getting Barack a pillow.
A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.
- George Bernard Shaw, 1944
Thanks. After reading
June 2, 2008 - 16:31 ET by fitzfongThanks. After reading Novak's article, you know what I found shocking? The guy is only 40?!!?!?? He doesn't look a day over 55! Could you imagine hitting 40, the midlife crisis, wondering if this is "all there is"...and knowing the answer is "yes, if I'm lucky"? What a loser!
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan
So I didn't speak up right away
June 2, 2008 - 17:11 ET by exLibMCCLELLAN: Well I -- yeah. I was raised on speaking up and speaking out. And that's what I'm doing.
---
Of course it's like, what 4 years later? After you were fired and the general climate is totally anti-Bush.
I guess you were raised on "speaking up and speaking out" only when it's convenient.