On Wednesday’s CBS "Early Show," co-host Maggie Rodriguez teased an upcoming segment on former White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan’s new book attacking the Bush Administration: "Breaking news this morning -- a bombshell memoir. President Bush's former press secretary accuses him of misleading the nation on Iraq." Co-host Harry Smith then introduced the segment by declaring: "Sharp attacks on President Bush by his former Press Secretary, Scott McClellan, who is releasing a memoir."
Correspondent Thalia Assuras then reported that: "...in a book to be released Monday, former Press Secretary Scott McClellan takes direct aim at the administration. On the war in Iraq, which he defended daily – In some 350 pages of 'What Happened Inside the Bush White House and Washington's Culture of Deception,' McClellan accuses President Bush and his advisers of confusing a propaganda campaign with the honesty needed to ensure public support."
Later, Smith quoted from the book and emphasized McClellan's credibility as he talked to Mike Allen from the Politico, who broke the story:
Story Continues Below Ad ↓I want to read a little bit from the book. 'Waging an unnecessary war is a grave mistake,' these are the words of Scott McClellan. 'But reflecting on all that happened during the bush Administration, I've come to believe that an even more fundamental mistake was made. A decision to turn away from candor and honesty when those qualities were most needed.' These are the words of a loyalist, whose roots with George Bush go all the way to Texas and the governor's mansion. Put this into perspective for us.
Allen then responded to Smith by further explaining that:
Scott might have been one of the least likely people on the Bush White House staff to do this. He, as you well know, was always thought of as being one of the most on message people who was in the White House. As you know, he came with the president from Texas. He worked in the governor's office. And from behind the podium, he was almost like a robot in repeating their talking points. But, Harry, Scott took off his administration's flack hat and put on a historians hat here and gave what he says is a clear-eyed view of what he saw.
Smith went on to quote from the book again: "There's another quote from the book. 'Rather than choosing to be forthright and candid, they chose to sell the war and in so doing they did a disservice to the American people and to our democracy.' These are damning, angry words." Allen responded: "Yeah, well, and Harry, what's fascinating about them is that they echo both the substance and even the rhetoric, the phraseology of left wing liberal critics." Of course there was no suggestion that McClellan's motivation may have been to sell books.
Here is the full transcript of the segment:
7:00AM TEASER:
MAGGIE RODRIGUEZ: Breaking news this morning -- a bombshell memoir. President Bush's former press secretary accuses him of misleading the nation on Iraq.
7:01AM SEGMENT:
HARRY SMITH: Let me get right to the top of the news this morning, sharp attacks on President Bush by his former Press Secretary, Scott McClellan, who is releasing a memoir. CBS News correspondent Thalia Assuras is live at the White House with more. Good morning, Thalia.
THALIA ASSURAS: [Inaudible] He stood at the podium defending his boss for three years, explaining policy, answering questions, at times bickering with reporters. But in a book to be released Monday, former Press Secretary Scott McClellan takes direct aim at the administration. On the war in Iraq, which he defended daily --
SCOTT MCCLELLAN: The Iraqi people have shown through their courage and determination that they are determined to live freely and determined to build a brighter future.
ASSURAS: A different tone in the book. In some 350 pages of 'What Happened Inside the Bush White House and Washington's Culture of Deception,' McClellan accuses President Bush and his advisers of confusing a propaganda campaign with the honesty needed to ensure public support. On Hurricane Katrina, for which the administration was so severely criticized, McClellan claims to have been uncomfortable with a photograph of Mr. Bush scanning the enormous devastation. Then there is one of the most controversial scandals to plague the Bush White House. The CIA leak case.
MCCLELLAN: There will be a time to talk about this, but now is not the time to talk about it.
ASSURAS: : McClellan claims that among those who misled him was Karl Rove, the president's former advisor, and Louis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff.
UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Earlier this week you told us that neither Karl Rove, Elliott Abrams nor Lewis Libby disclosed any classified information with regard to the leak. I wonder if you could tell us more specifically whether any of them told any reporter that Valerie Plame worked for the CIA.
SCOTT MCCLELAN: I spoke with those individuals, as I pointed out, and those individuals assured me they were not involved in this. And that's where it stands.
ASSURAS: Well, as it stands this morning, the White House has no comment on the book. Harry.
SMITH: Not surprised. CBS's Thalia Assuras at the White House, thanks. Joining us now is the man who broke this story, Mike Allen, chief political correspondent for politico.com. Good morning, Mike.
MIKE ALLEN: Good morning, Harry.
SMITH: I want to read a little bit from the book. 'Waging an unnecessary war is a grave mistake,' these are the words of Scott McClellan. 'But reflecting on all that happened during the bush Administration, I've come to believe that an even more fundamental mistake was made. A decision to turn away from candor and honesty when those qualities were most needed.' These are the words of a loyalist, whose roots with George Bush go all the way to Texas and the governor's mansion. Put this into perspective for us.
ALLEN: Well, Harry, I think that's a great point. Scott might have been one of the least likely people on the Bush White House staff to do this. He, as you well know, was always thought of as being one of the most on message people who was in the White House. As you know, he came with the president from Texas. He worked in the governor's office. And from behind the podium, he was almost like a robot in repeating their talking points. But, Harry, Scott took off his administration's flack hat and put on a historians hat here and gave what he says is a clear-eyed view of what he saw. Now the people inside, his former colleagues, take that as a personal betrayal. As you might imagine, they are furious. They described it as pathetic. They say that Scott was out of the loop. They say that Scott didn't voice any of these concerns at the time and they're even making a cruel joke. The title of the book is 'What Happened.' And they are saying it should be 'What Happened?' with a question mark.
SMITH: There's another quote from the book. 'Rather than choosing to be forthright and candid, they chose to sell the war and in so doing they did a disservice to the American people and to our democracy.' These are damning, angry words.
ALLEN: Yeah, well, and Harry, what's fascinating about them is that they echo both the substance and even the rhetoric, the phraseology of left wing liberal critics. Here, Scott McClellan, or 'Matrix,' as we learn in the book, his Secret Service code name is, says that the White House Press Corps was too deferential to the administration. That's something we've heard for years. Clearly not from the inside. He says that the White House Press Corps should have asked tougher questions going into the war and even says that some of the things that he's said from the podium himself turned out to be badly misguided.
SMITH: Right. Mike Allen, thanks so much. Good job breaking the story. Do appreciate it this morning.
ALLEN: Thank you Harry.
—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
So Much About Nothing
May 28, 2008 - 13:29 ET by allanfI have never seen so much ado about nothing. Has anyone seen Scott's book yet other than a brief quote?
careful allan
May 28, 2008 - 13:34 ET by candanceI made that very same point and have been ridiculed for it.
Scott McClellan is a greedy, backstabbing attention whore who has obviously written the nastiest things he could to sabeutage the election come November. That's the official GOP mantra and don't you forget it.
Reviews
May 28, 2008 - 16:33 ET by iveseenitallSo the "objective reviews" have begun already. Those in the MSM will be falling all over themselves to praise the book. Written by an incompetent, vindictive, disgruntled former employee and "friend", it is sure to garner great praise. Poor President Bush. He showed such loyalty to so many people and got so little in return. God Bless him.
"Et tu, Brute" --Shakespeare
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
Katie Couric called Stephanopoulos a "Turncoat" in 1999
May 28, 2008 - 13:46 ET by Gary HallMargret Carlson, writing in Time Mag., March 14th, 1999. Everone remember how popular these once a week tell-all books on Bill Clinton were - with the media? Didn't think so. My bold:
This Wimp
May 28, 2008 - 13:58 ET by ChasvsSo Scott the limp D McClellan needs to b eloved by the MSM so he dishes the dirt on his Benefactor...
Hope this wuss can sleep at night knowing he has no honor.
He always unimpressive with his quivering upper lip and lack of coherent answers to the questions of the White House press gaggle.
Too bad Bu sh kept his sorry a$$ around as long as he did!
At least the President shows signs a loyalty!
See, THIS is the reaction I
May 28, 2008 - 14:03 ET by balboaSee, THIS is the reaction I don't understand.
If we start acting like
May 28, 2008 - 14:16 ET by mofosesameIf we start acting like liberals, maybe we'll get the attention of the MSM.
We've been sitting around waaaaaay too long.
cue candance...
cue me for what?
May 28, 2008 - 14:17 ET by candanceYou make a snarky response about acting like liberals and then try to drag me into the middle of it?
I think mofosesame was
May 28, 2008 - 14:21 ET by balboaI think mofosesame was backing you up on your previous post about reaction to this book. (?)
um no
May 28, 2008 - 14:25 ET by candanceMofo is making a smart remark about the way I get annoyed at people for using immature debate techniques like name calling and personal ridicule.
Funny how Republicans never said McClellan sucked until after he turned against Bush. Now all the sudden he was a bumbling, stuttering fool who could barely string two sentences together. Sounds eerily familiar to the "Bush is stupid" mantra we hear from the left.
I don't know where you've
May 28, 2008 - 14:31 ET by fitzfongI don't know where you've been. Republicans always thought McClellan sucked. He was clearly in over his head in that job from Day One. And the fact that his two successors, Tony Snow and Dana Perrino subsequently ran rings around him only underlines that fact. Every Administration makes a few bad hires...that one was clearly the worst of Bush's tenure.
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan
you know fitz
May 28, 2008 - 14:33 ET by candanceI really wish Ari Fleischer would have stayed.
That's a tough one,
May 28, 2008 - 14:39 ET by fitzfongThat's a tough one, candance. At the time, he seemed pretty put-together. However, I believe he perjured himself at the Scooter Libby trial...so I'm not a huge fan.
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan
well
May 28, 2008 - 14:48 ET by candanceAs much as I love Bush, he's made a few bonehead moves over the years and allowed the media to beat up on him way too much.
I'm just looking at the options he had when Fleischer left and wondering why on Earth he felt compelled to hire McClellan.
I think he often confused
May 28, 2008 - 15:04 ET by fitzfongI think he often confused personal loyalty with job competence. And no doubt many of his appointments were designed to appease Democrats in the face of confirmation scrutiny (Gonzalez comes to mind...fat lot of good that did him). Personally, I think he should have replaced Fleischer with John Bolton. He would have sorted out that ignorant mob in the press...armed with the facts and the confidence to deliver them.
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan
Yeah, well, atleast he
May 28, 2008 - 14:49 ET by mofosesameYeah, well, atleast he didn't use immature debate techniques like name calling and personal ridicule.
what mofo?
May 28, 2008 - 14:51 ET by candanceIs that supposed to be funny? Do you have *anything* serious to add to this thread?
I'm hoping to keep you busy
May 28, 2008 - 14:56 ET by mofosesameI'm hoping to keep you busy enough so the people of NB can get something done without the PC Police breathing behind them telling them how to react to media bias and all things liberal.
That's a serious job!
Did you just referred to
May 28, 2008 - 14:36 ET by mofosesameDid you just referred to US as Conservatives? Scott has never been a favorite of OURS - we had to defend him because he represented OUR President.
Something about you smells funny, candance.
how nice
May 28, 2008 - 14:44 ET by candanceYou reply to me by suggesting I'm really not a conservative. How original.
That's right folks. You can tell someone's ideals by how much hateful rhetoric they employ.
Do you come on here to discuss any kind of issue or just start arguments with people who annoy you?
I was just wondering the
May 28, 2008 - 14:53 ET by mofosesameI was just wondering the same about you. All you do is tell people how to act at NB and defend the liberals on this site.
sniff---sniff---sniff
really
May 28, 2008 - 15:03 ET by candanceI defend the liberals on this site? That's hilarous. Go ask a few of libs on here what I think of them and you'll get the truth pretty quick.
Incidentally, you're basing my entire NB career off two threads in which I mentioned name calling. Even when I make serious points about Ari Fleischer, you respond with some snarky comment. Since you've been visiting NB for so long (you remember Hater!) it seems you'd be familiar with my positions since I post here almost every day.
I'm only speaking of your
May 28, 2008 - 15:10 ET by mofosesameI'm only speaking of your recent behavior. You're a know-it-all - if you don't have current information on a subject you blast everyone with an opinion...telling them to wait, wait, wait until more info comes out. Well, I've got news for you candance, this has been coming for over two years. It's not my fault you knew so little about it. I come here to learn, not share my opinion. I was content just watching. However, just as Syrius' comments caused me to enter the arena, yours have done the same.
I'm ready for you to tell
May 28, 2008 - 14:23 ET by mofosesameI'm ready for you to tell us how to act here at NB ;)
Ready, set...GO!
bal, Scotty wants to be RICH, Scotty LOVES money, cash 4 lies.
May 28, 2008 - 14:23 ET by upcountrywaterHAY Scotty; I wonder if selling books, will get you into, your Mc Mansion
Sleeping good are, ya! Doing all those 4 am talk shows, ya Book worm.
Liberals62%
IranianUranium
It's the American dream!
May 28, 2008 - 14:38 ET by balboaIt's the American dream!
bal: It's not really that
May 28, 2008 - 14:30 ET by Killgravebal:
It's not really that hard to understand. The bushies are attacking McClellan’s character for the sake of expediency.
But let's be honest here. The man HAS no character. The bushies are wondering aloud why, if this man is such a conscientious objector, he didn't immediately resign. And I think that is an excellent point.
Someone else here made a great point. At one time McClellan was a boob hack that was openly mocked by the MSM. But now he is suddenly a hero to truth whose word is gospel and shall be heard all across the land.
I think there's a
May 28, 2008 - 14:35 ET by balboaI think there's a difference between being a bad WHS and having insight into the events he was involved in. I thought he was bad. Bumbling, back-tracking, etc. But I don't think "limp dick" is an appropriate response to this situation, do you?
Way too much emotion for one thing. ;-)
"...insight into the events
May 28, 2008 - 14:48 ET by Killgrave"...insight into the events he was involved in."
I'm sure you're familiar with the literary concept of an "unreliable narrator".
What I'm getting at is that McClellan was a hack back then, and he is even more of a hack now.
Yet all the left is going to throw themselves at his feet. He has come a long way, baby.
Yeah, they are going to
May 28, 2008 - 14:51 ET by balboaYeah, they are going to "throw themselves at his feet," but I don't think it's because they suddenly think he was a really competent WHS; they're doing it because they see him as their "smoking gun."
But in order for this man to
May 28, 2008 - 15:01 ET by KillgraveBut in order for this man to be a valid "smoking gun", they have to sell the notion that he is being truthful for the sake of truth, and not simply throwing red meat out to the partisans who will swallow it whole without even chewing.
I think there is enough BS here that it is moot which cow is doing it.
The Point Is
May 28, 2008 - 15:37 ET by ChasvsThe point you miss is that if he was so upset by this at the time (if any of it is true) then he had the duty to resign. That's the honorable thing to do
Now he comes out with a book to pay back the President for allowing him to be the weakest spokesman for the Bush Administration I've even seen. He was way over his head and should never had been given this position.
The guy is a limp dick in oh so many ways.
George W. Bush's fatal flaw
May 28, 2008 - 14:25 ET by fitzfongGeorge W. Bush's fatal flaw is his inability to articulate his policies clearly. He's effectively allowed himself to be portrayed as disengaged and stupid on one hand and secretive and maliciously methodical on the other...seemingly mutually exclusive. Then, he makes matters worse by hiring Scott McClellan...perhaps the only person alive who can make George Bush sound coherent and erudite...as White House Press Secretary. McClellan, as Press Secretary, redefined the word incompetent. His mealy-mouthed, defensive responses to dishonest media interrogations made him a laughingstock. And, like an ill-tempered racehorse, McClellan finally allowed the media to break him so that he'd run their way...though it seems he's going to get more rewards than a couple of carrots.
Basically, Scott McClellan is a whore. Rather than look inward to recognize his own failure, he has decided it's easier and more financially rewarding to blame the Bush Aministration for his singular incompetence. The fact that the media is playing Huggy Bear to this two-bit tart is totally unsurprising.
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan
not bombshell, just 'bomb'
May 28, 2008 - 15:47 ET by wizardjrI think this is going to sell a few thousand books in the first couple of weeks and then nosedive (e.g., "bomb"). After all, you can rely on the libtards living in Mom and Dad's basement to rip the book and post it for 'free' on the internet. Just desserts.
Yeah, the only way I can
May 28, 2008 - 19:12 ET by fitzfongYeah, the only way I can imagine this fluff selling is if the Unions go for another one of those Jim Wright-style mass drops. No doubt the New York Times will still find a way to contort sales statistics to make it a "best seller".
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan
Agree
May 28, 2008 - 19:28 ET by doug1950In six months you will be able to buy the book at the Dollar General store right next to the whoopie cushions and tacky paperweights from China. Others have said it already, he was in over his head and the WH press corps used to ride him around the room like a trick pony every day. Of all the WH Press Sec. he was the most inept and always looked he was in the principle's office. I also agree that Bush is loyal to a fault. There are other times when he should have replaced people who weren't doing him any service. Colin Powell comes to mind. And Harriet Myers for Supreme Court was another collossal gaff that went on for too long.
McClellan's bedfellows
May 28, 2008 - 16:13 ET by nkviking75If you look up the book on Amazon.com, you learn that it's published by a company called Public Affairs. If you check Public Affairs listing on Wikipedia (a source I never totally trust, given the ability of absolutely anyone to tamper with it), Public Affairs published six books for George Soros (and the paperback edition of a 7th). The Chief Exec is Peter Osnos, emeritus director of Human Rights watch. (Interesting that the first line of his Wikipedia entry includes a reference to George Soros.)
Please understand, I am not saying Soros had anything whatsoever to do with McClellan's book. However, it does give you a sense of the company he's keeping these days.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
Well, I didn't do any
May 28, 2008 - 19:17 ET by ckc1227Well, I didn't do any research, I just assumed Soros was involved somehow, because it's his MO. At the least, he likely bought thousands of copies.
viking... Very
May 28, 2008 - 19:24 ET by bigtimerviking...
Very interesting information, informative and it does figure.
Thanks for the digging you did.
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill
Vari interestink, vari interestink
May 29, 2008 - 02:28 ET by CTYou have been quick to uncover what maybe a 'vari interestink' aspect of this betrayal.
chip off the old black
May 28, 2008 - 20:05 ET by WesenAmazing how the Bush haters have prospered. They'll miss him when he's gone.
Scott McClellan = pathetic pissant
May 28, 2008 - 23:56 ET by CTJUDAS
He's not even that smart.
May 29, 2008 - 12:32 ET by fitzfongHe's not even that smart. For intelligence and courage under fire, he's more like Fredo Corleone.
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan