Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 10, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Blogs » Kyle Drennen's blog
  • CNN Reporters Call CPAC a ‘Conservative Petri Dish’
  • Chris Matthews Reacts to JFK Mistress: Kennedy a Hero Who 'Still Arouses the Country'
  • Covering Up JFK’s Roguish Behavior for 50 Years Not Long Enough for NBC’s Viewers
  • Bozell: It's 'Hilarious' CNN Suspended Roland Martin for Inoffensive Tweet; Maybe 'Lefty Loons at MSNBC' Can 'Scoop Him Up' Now
  • CNN Responds to Bozell Letter Demanding Coverage of Catholic Outrage at Obama; We Reply
  • Barbara Walters: It's 'Heartbreaking' to Force Women to View an Ultrasound Before an Abortion
  • MRC Study: ABC and NBC Anything But Fast and Furious On Gunwalking Scandal
  • Bozell Column: The Secular Media vs. Religious Liberty

CBS: White House ‘Dragging its Feet on Review of Toxic Chemicals’

By Kyle Drennen | April 30, 2008 | 11:26

Change font size:  A |  A
Kyle Drennen's picture

Still Shot of Katie Couric, April 28 On Monday’s CBS "Evening News" anchor Katie Couric hyped a new potential scandal for the Bush administration as she declared: "Meanwhile, on Capitol Hill, a report due out tomorrow raises some serious questions about one of the most influential government agencies, the Environmental Protection Agency...It even suggests political pressure may be putting the health of Americans at risk."

Correspondent Chip Reid followed up by explaining that the new report "...also points a big finger of blame at the White House, and in particular the Budget Office at the White House, saying that they're interfering in this process." Reid went on: " The bottom line, they say, is that the administration is dragging its feet on review of toxic chemicals to the point that the health of millions of Americans could be in danger."

Reid highlighted White House critics, like liberal Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), and an anonymous EPA scientist during the segment:

REID: A new government report by the investigative arm of Congress concludes that the process for analyzing health effects of toxic chemicals "is at serious risk of becoming obsolete" because of endless delays and secrecy. Behind it all, critics say, is the White House.

BARBARA BOXER: Well, we're witnessing a scandal of major proportions, in my opinion. And, yes, politics has taken over the whole thing. And the scientists are being thrown, you know, to the rear.

REID: An EPA scientist with extensive experience in this area, who refused to go on camera due to fear of retribution, told CBS News "these chemicals have effects ranging from learning disabilities to cancer" and EPA scientists can't protect the public because of White House interference.

However, Reid only briefly mentioned the fact that the longer chemical review process is due to changes made by the Bush Administration to improve the quality of the regulation. Even then, Reid described the more detailed review process as a flaw: "...the White House added layer after layer of review. Five years ago, EPA set a goal of assessing 50 toxic chemicals a year. In the past two years they completed a total of four." Reid gives only one sentence, the final one in the segment, to the White House response: "Now, in a letter the White House budget office says this report is seriously flawed because it focuses on timeliness and not the quality of the end product, which they say is improving."

Here is the full transcript of the segment:

6:39PM SEGMENT:

KATIE COURIC: Meanwhile, on Capitol Hill, a report due out tomorrow raises some serious questions about one of the most influential government agencies, the Environmental Protection Agency. The report says non-scientists are playing a bigger and bigger role in EPA decisions. It even suggests political pressure may be putting the health of Americans at risk. Chip Reid got an advanced look at the report. And, Chip, this is really damaging to the EPA's reputation.

CHIP REID: Well, it certainly could be, Katie, but it also points a big finger of blame at the White House, and in particular the Budget Office at the White House, saying that they're interfering in this process. The bottom line, they say, is that the Administration is dragging its feet on review of toxic chemicals to the point that the health of millions of Americans could be in danger. Formaldehyde is found in everything from home building materials to furniture to those infamous trailers that made thousands of Katrina victims ill. For more than a decade the EPA has tried and failed to regulate formaldehyde. The same is true for hundreds of other toxic chemicals, including some that have contaminated drinking water supplies across the nation. A new government report by the investigative arm of Congress concludes that the process for analyzing health effects of toxic chemicals "is at serious risk of becoming obsolete" because of endless delays and secrecy. Behind it all, critics say, is the White House.

BARBARA BOXER: Well, we're witnessing a scandal of major proportions, in my opinion. And, yes, politics has taken over the whole thing. And the scientists are being thrown, you know, to the rear.

REID: An EPA scientist with extensive experience in this area, who refused to go on camera due to fear of retribution, told CBS News "these chemicals have effects ranging from learning disabilities to cancer" and EPA scientists can't protect the public because of White House interference. This is what the process for assessing toxic chemicals looked like five years ago, and this is what it looks like today after the White House added layer after layer of review. Five years ago, EPA set a goal of assessing 50 toxic chemicals a year. In the past two years they completed a total of four. Now, in a letter the White House budget office says this report is seriously flawed because it focuses on timeliness and not the quality of the end product, which they say is improving. Katie.

COURIC: Chip Reid. Chip, thank you very much.

Share this

About the Author

Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Kyle Drennen on Twitter.
  • Congress
  • Conservatives & Republicans
  • Environment
  • Political Groups
  • Political Scandals
  • Pollution
  • Regulation
  • Chip Reid
  • George W. Bush
  • Katie Couric
  • CBS Evening News
  • Kyle Drennen's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 

  • Where are the blacks for Roland Martin? (NRO/Media Blog)
  • Turkish Islamists turn church into mosque (Commentary)
  • CNN suspends Roland Martin (Big Journalism)
  • Birth control mandate is unconstitutional (National Center)
  • Obama's Catholic 'problem' (S.E. Cupp)
  • Debt crisis not inevitable for America (Williams)
  • Catholic 'Obamacan' says he may have to reconsider in 2012 (CNA)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • Who??
    2 min 9 sec ago
  • Good call!
    3 min 36 sec ago
  • Yeah, that's a great solution.
    7 min 39 sec ago
  • Actual investigative and truthful reporting from MSNBC??!!!
    16 min 47 sec ago
  • something strange
    18 min 6 sec ago
More >

Obama's Bully-the-Catholic-Church Pulpit
more cartoons
  • Gov. Perry Tells NewsBusters He's Just 'Fighting on a Different Front'
  • Jay Leno Pines for More Socially Liberal Republican Party
  • Dan Savage Says FRC Leader 'Dances a Jig' at Teen Suicides
  • Cornel West Scolds Al Sharpton: 'Tell the Truth About the White House'
  • Politico: Is Nancy Pelosi A 2012 Asset, or Not?
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.