CBS ‘Early Show’ Asks ‘Is America Broken?’

Photo of Kyle Drennen.

NewsBusters.org - Media Research CenterTouting a new CBS News/New York Times poll on Friday’s CBS "Early Show," co-host Maggie Rodriguez teased an upcoming segment on the poll’s findings: "Is America broken? In a new CBS News poll, 81% of Americans believe this country's on the wrong track. Never has that number been so high."

Co-host Harry Smith later introduced the segment by declaring: "A new CBS News/New York Times poll shows 81% of Americans say the country is headed in the wrong direction. The 14% who think we're on the right track is all -- an all-time low in the 25 years that CBS News has been asking the question." Conveniently, as Smith pointed out, CBS News began asking that question in 1983, during the Reagan Administration, and never asked the poll question during the Carter Administration. If they had, one might suspect that quite a few Americans thought the country was "headed in the wrong direction" at the time.

Smith then highlighted a restaurant owner in New Jersey, Marianne Cuneo-Powell, who "is cutting costs any way she can." Smith went to show how Powell’s situation reflected the poll numbers: "She is among the 78% of Americans who believe the economy is in bad condition... Like Marianne, two-thirds of Americans believe the U.S. economy is already in a recession. And they are not encouraged by their leaders in Washington...Only 21% of Americans approve of President Bush's handling of the economy." Of course a recession is defined as two consecutive quarters of negative economic growth, not based on what the latest poll numbers say.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Smith then observed that: "Voters have more confidence on economic issues in Democrats Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, than they do in Republican John McCain." Smith then turned to CBS political analyst and former speech writer for Robert Kennedy, Jeff Greenfield, who explained: "Unsurprisingly, when economic times are tough and the Republicans have been in power for eight years, they're more skeptical about the Republican, in this case John McCain, than they are about the Democrats. But nobody gets highly confident marks here."

NewsBusters.org - Media Research CenterSmith and Greenfield also discussed the belief that Republicans are seen as favoring the rich with their economic policies:

SMITH: Yeah, it's interesting because when they go then to the question, who do these candidates particularly favor, middle class voters or rich, this is really stunning.

GREENFIELD: It is. Only 13% think that Obama would favor the rich. 23% Clinton. But more than half of the registered voters say McCain would. That's an endemic Republican problem. Republicans always have to convince voters they're not for the rich, just like Democrats have to convince voters they're tough enough. But in this economic mood it tells you why John McCain is so anxious to separate himself, Harry, from the Bush Administration. Four more years is not going to be the chant at the Republican convention, certainly not about the economy.

Here is the full transcript of the segment:

7:00AM TEASER:

MAGGIE RODRIGUEZ: Is America broken? In a new CBS News poll, 81% of Americans believe this country's on the wrong track. Never has that number been so high.

7:01AM TEASER:

RODRIGUEZ: So much to get to on this very busy Friday. We told you about those stunning numbers in our new CBS News poll on Americans who believe this country is broken. We'll take a look at that poll this morning and what people think it will take to turn things around.

7:04AM SEGMENT:

HARRY SMITH: A new CBS News/New York Times poll shows 81% of Americans say the country is headed in the wrong direction. The 14% who think we're on the right track is all -- an all-time low in the 25 years that CBS News has been asking the question. Americans are worried about major financial burdens like college tuition, mortgages, and even paying their daily bills. At a little café in Vorhees, New Jersey, Marianne Powell is cutting costs any way she can.

MARIANNE CUNEO-POWELL: We used to have a guy that came every week and sharpened our knives. Now we're doing them ourselves.

SMITH: She is among the 78% of Americans who believe the economy is in bad condition.

CUNEO-POWELL: This year I was really afraid that I would have to close the restaurant. But instead of closing, what I did is I just cut things out.

SMITH: Regrettably, her staff is one of those things.

CUNEO-POWELL: When it first opened, we had a hostess, we had four people, five people, six people in my kitchen, waiters. Now I have one waiter tonight, one bus girl. And I got two people in my kitchen.

SMITH: Like Marianne, two-thirds of Americans believe the U.S. economy is already in a recession. And they are not encouraged by their leaders in Washington.

GEORGE W. BUSH: It's a rough patch right now in our economy. But I'm confident in the long term we'll come out stronger than ever before.

SMITH: Only 21% of Americans approve of President Bush's handling of the economy.

HILLARY CLINTON: The American people need a president who will confront economic crises.

BARACK OBAMA: Our economy is in a recession.

JOHN MCCAIN: I will not play election year politics with the housing crisis.

SMITH: Voters have more confidence on economic issues in Democrats Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, than they do in Republican John McCain. But to those feeling the burdens of the current economic downturn, the solution is in self-reliance and determination.

CUNEO-POWELL: I want to stay open, I love what I do. And I, you know, I want to survive. I'm going to stay. And I'm going to make this work.

SMITH: And joining us now with some analysis of the poll is CBS News Senior Political Analyst Jeff Greenfield. Jeff, good morning.

JEFF GREENFIELD: Good morning.

SMITH: I want to put some of these charts up, some of these graphs up again. If you're running for political office in a season when the numbers are like this, what does it mean?

GREENFIELD: That the country is very skeptical about anybody's ability to really turn this economy around. Unsurprisingly, when economic times are tough and the Republicans have been in power for eight years, they're more skeptical about the Republican, in this case John McCain, than they are about the Democrats. But nobody gets highly confident marks here.

SMITH: Yeah, it's interesting because when they go then to the question, who do these candidates particularly favor, middle class voters or rich, this is really stunning.

GREENFIELD: It is. Only 13% think that Obama would favor the rich. 23% Clinton. But more than half of the registered voters say McCain would. That's an endemic Republican problem. Republicans always have to convince voters they're not for the rich, just like Democrats have to convince voters they're tough enough. But in this economic mood it tells you why John McCain is so anxious to separate himself, Harry, from the Bush Administration. Four more years is not going to be the chant at the Republican convention, certainly not about the economy.

SMITH: Yeah, and if we can put one more graphic up. It's just -- it's so interesting to have this kind of volatility. We're so many months still away from this general election and to -- to have this feeling in the country. I think it makes it difficult for whoever you are to try to convince the electorate you're the one with the answer.

GREENFIELD: No, the numbers have never been this bad. So anybody with a nostrum is going to look -- look with suspicion.

SMITH: There you go. Jeff Greenfield, thanks for your expertise, as always.

—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

And what does this say about our Congress ?

Congress is innocent of this Survey ?  Is America stopping the "Majority rules" in Congress from going in the RIGHT direction ?

Voting to Pull out troops last year, was the WRONG direction by Congress . . Gen. Pelosi, Gen. Reid, meet Gen. Petraeus, he's the new General in Town now.  

8 years of negative news

8 years of negative news coverage, Liberal demagoguery and Republican compromising and caving, and what else would we expect the mood of the country to be?

I've never considered an economy good that had a 40% tax burden, and in which almost every aspect of the economy is regulated to death - mainly by Liberals.

Reagan's free-market revolution only accomplished about 10% of what was needed...

Cut taxes, drill ANWR, build more refineries, ban ethanol, reform Social Security, institute MSAs, privatize education, cut entitlements, reduce foreign aid...

...until these things happen, I am going to consider this a bad economy no matter how much I personally own.

Congress is included

The NYT article said this about Congress: "But Democrats, who have controlled the House and Senate since last year, also face the risk that unhappy voters will punish Congressional incumbents".

But, why would CBS want to report on that, huh?

___________________________________ 

If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber

Congress Job Ratings

When Dems took over Congress in early 2007, they had a job approval of 40%. That has dropped to 25%

On the other hand, the job approval of Repubs in Congress, which was 19%, is now up slightly, to 22%. Not good, of course, but also not a 15 point drop. And since many polls have been busted for unethical methodology, who really knows how bad it is for the Jackasses?

Joe the conservative?

The MSM. Tell the people over and over again that the economy sucks, things are looking terrible, then take a poll to see how we're doing. - - CNBC's Joe Kernan summing it up.

 

Now, the REST of the story

Here's what the NYT article also said: "Today, however, Americans report being deeply worried about the country even though many say their own personal finances are still in fairly good shape."

Did CBS miss that part; or did they deliberately omit it? And just how would Americans know what everybody else is doing? Answer: The MSM feeds them the MSM agenda, that's how. And that agenda is designed to bring down Republicans. Here's the Times bottom line quote: "The unhappiness presents clear risks for Republicans in this year’s elections, given the continued unpopularity of President Bush". AGENDA ALERT!

___________________________________ 

If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber

Did I miss?

Did I miss the part where they talked about how bad he has gotten since the Democrats took over Congress - the part of the government that has the greatest impact on the economy? Not that the Republicans were doing a bangup job but things did come to an abrupt halt when the rumors started about removing tax credits and environmental bills being passed along with the housing market (stupid power grab bill eminent).

Here in the Great Blue Garden State

it is surprising that Marianne is still in business, considering our gov hs said, in public, twice, that anyone who thinks there is any wasteful spending or currption in the state, is out of touch - So very true, we're out of touch of the money that's being stolen by our government through the fees and taxes that are being mispent.

What this report showed, is that WE cut corners, making due with what we have, instead of spending more - where was the "reporting" on that?

There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V

The last time we had a real

The last time we had a real bad economy was 1980. A lot of folks were'nt around for that. A normal recession back then was usually double digit unemployment, and in 1980 double digit inflation. The 70's were not all that great either. There is such a thing as a business cycle. Booms always bust whether stocks or housing or cigars and IMO the American public is spoiled rotten (myself included) and when we vote in a socialist government we can become spoiled rotten children.

Thanks, ahusser -

You saved me half my posted reply.

"The country is broken"???

 As opposed to what? The Carter years?

 "The US jobless rate was more than 10 per cent. Inflation touched 15 per cent. ... Mr Carter’s defenders say: very well. Not our finest hour. But at least people liked us. Better to be pitied than despised. ..."

  http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/gerard_baker/article1837738.ece

 

When you men get home and face an anti-war protestor, look him in the eyes and shake his hand. Then, wink at his girlfriend because she knows she’s dating a pussy… ~ Attributed to General Tommy Franks

Ahhh, the Carter

Ahhh, the Carter years....And what did this great leader do to help the economy? He put on a sweater, sat by a fire, and told us to turn our thermostats down. (Oh, and at that time they were talking about a new ice age a-commin.) Did he cut taxes to stimulate growth? No. Did he reach out to OPEC? Yep. And they cut us off, completely. Gas went up 60%, inflation up to 12.4% and the prime rate went up to 21.5%. And then, there was Iran...but thats another story.

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

I think Carter told us when

I think Carter told us when folks were complaining about the relatively high gas prices that folks should move closer to where they work. What a guy he was. Barack Obama is the black Jimmy Carter. Oh by the way who made him an elder statesman. Every time Carter spoke my buddy would say "More mush from the wimp" 

 Every time Carter spoke

 Every time Carter spoke my buddy would say "More mush from the wimp"...

.....and unfortunately we are still be fed liberal doses of mush from this pathetic ex Pres. every now and then...they never know when to just go away with some semblance of dignity or grace.

Classless leftists who win awards from other classless leftists.

Never-ending. 

 "Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

Another first from Carter,

Another first from Carter, was his criticizing of a sitting president. All former presidents before him never committed on policy of a sitting president, before Carter. And Reagan still let him go to Iran for the hostages. They were statesmen. Jimma is not now, nor was he ever a statesman. He is a dottering old fool. 

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

Excuse me?

The last time we had a real bad economy was 1980.

I believe there was that recession in 1991-992. 

 

"I don't think our troops ought to be used for what's called nation-building." -President George W. Bush, October 11, 2000

It was nothing compared to

It was nothing compared to the 70's ending in 1980. Sorry. That was a BS recession promoted by the libs to get the Clintoon bufoon elected. I don't think unemployment ever got above 6 percent and the stock market was leveling off from new highs. Most recessions had unemployment in the double digit percent. We haven't had a real recession since 1976-1980. Either you are deceiving yourself or you aren't old enough to remember. it's Deja vu all over again as the lib propaganda machine is spinning and promoting a so-so economy into some kind of depression so that the shining hero lib can fix it all. What cr&p. I guess you believed "It's the economy stupid" tagline of the buffoon.

Wow.

That was a BS recession promoted by the libs to get the Clintoon bufoon elected.

 So, that's why President Bush raised taxes?  It wasn't to try and fix the economy and get us out of the recession?  No.  He must have been in on the 'lib conspiracy' to get Clinton elected, too. 

 

"I don't think our troops ought to be used for what's called nation-building."
-President George W. Bush, October 11, 2000

Another ignorant comment

Another ignorant comment from you. Bush raised taxes because the Democratic Congress threatened to shut down the government by not passing the budget. He knuckled under to prevent the shutdown. It was important for him not to shut it down, a debatable point. Once again there was no real recession during 91-92. The stock market was near its peak in 1965 in the 965 range. In 1972 it came back to a little above 1000. The market bottomed in 1974 at 577 close to a 43 percent loss and that doesn't include inflation, if included the loss was closer to 70-75 percent. The market turned around and came back a little above 1000 in  It didn't cross above 1100 again until 1982. In other words the market was stagnant for 17 years with inflation considered it didn't come back until 1985. All booms bust, all business follows cycles. The japanese market peaked at 39000 in 1989 and bottomed below 10000 in 2003 a 75 percent loss. It is nowhere near its highs and that was 19 years ago. This is just a propaganda recession like in 1991 promoted by the media to promote their agenda and to get their democratic candidate elected.  

It's election season.....

....so that means as sure as the sun rises in the morning, the media will recycle its old tried-and-true stories of desperation, soup lines a mile long, everyone's miserable, everyone's a "paycheck away from being homeless", the Republicans are only "looking out for the rich", "we need change", this is the Great Depression, etc etc etc blah blah blah.

My God - the media thinks that EVERYONE is a helpless, depressed, miserable idiot.

"women and minorities hardest hit"

This Isn't Even a "Poll"

Captain Ed over at Hot Air has already exposed the faulty polling sample in this C-BS attempt to sway public opinion. Apparently, C-BS sampled 40% more Democrats than Republicans to get the result they wanted.

Yes we can! May I have another?

There's a saying, "If it ain't broke don't fix it!" The saying does not apply exclusively to mechanical objects, it also applies to outmoded ideals. Wake up CBS this means you! Your MSM idealistic lack of values are why your "news" ratings are in the septic tank. We the people are problem solvers. We the people are not bogged down by your dim view of our country. We the people have our own lives to go about without concerning ourselves with hidiousely over hyped "reports."

For example the 26% of STD's in 14- 20 year old women was caused by a group of plotting liberals who thought they could raise children better than their doting parents. Thank you, for you've given "spoil the rod" a whole new meaning.

Only 21% of Americans approve

 

"These differences are attributable to partisan differences in unemployment (which has been 30 percent lower under Democratic presidents, on average) and GDP growth (which has been 30 percent higher under Democratic presidents, on average); both unemployment and GDP growth have much stronger effects on income growth at the bottom of the income distribution than at the top." Bartels 'Partisan Politics and the U.S. Income Distribution'

Economy

Nothing bothers me more in news reporting than using "X% of Americans believe that something is happening" to try to show that the "something" is happening. If 100% of Americans believe that the economy is in a recession, that doesn't mean that there is a recession, it just means that 100% of Americans don't know economics or the definition of a recession.  Typically, no one knows if there has been a recession, or when it ends, until well after the fact (just ask George H.W. Bush about the time Bill Clinton campaigned on a recession that ended well before the presidential election).  I suppose the media use these type of stats to show that they are doing their job (that is, if their "job" is to depress and worry Americans during Republican administrations).  Way to do what's best for your country, media!!

Premises

I object to several premises here:

  1. The president's handling of the economy: Presidents don't handle the economy - thank God. They have surprisingly little control over it. Oh, when things go great, they take a lot of credit, and when things go bad, critics offer a lot of blame, but it's all raindancing. (Raindancing = dancing at dawn, believing that your dance has raised the sun, but your dancing has no effect on the sun.) A president with a long term philosophy can screw things up, but that takes years, and even then, the effect is minimal. What counts is the day to day, cumulative decisions made by millions of entrepreneurs and workers, not the politically theatrical prancing of 536 elected federal officials.
  2. Right/Wrong track: I'm sure the pollsters have reams of statistics to offer, but this one is entirely silly. We ain't on a track. The country isn't going in any one direction, and even so, there's no way you can assign credit or blame, and it doesn't offer any insight into what's really happening. Let's face it, people's "contentment" can be boiled down to the price of gas and milk. When they go up, suddenly the country is discontent with politicians. When they go down, people feel better. (Learning standards? Doesn't register. Psychological breakdowns? Doesn't register. And so on.) The poll itself is meaningless; however, because pollsters and media pinheads inject their own self-serving "meaning" into the results, it has an effect. It's just a receptacle for whatever conclusion you want to draw.

Two speeding trains colliding on the wrong track

KC, may I add to your two excellent points? If we could ask the respondents how America is on the wrong track (assuming this was a fair poll, which apparently it wasn't), how would the people define that? As a conservative, my notions of America's failings would be far different than someone who's liberal. But the MSM will spin it to suggest that people want more liberalism, when in fact a significant portion want less liberalism.

When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.

"That's an endemic Republican problem."

"9 out of the 10 Democratic administrations having a favorable growth
ratio (i.e., greater than 1), compared with only 2 of the 11 Republican
administrations
."

 

"Growth rates in real GDP per capita tend to be higher under Democrats
than under Republican
s. There were three Democrat administrations and
five Republican administrations, and all three Democrat administrations
were among the 4 fastest growth administrations. All four of the
slowest growing administrations were Republican."

 

 

Yep, you have totally

Yep, you have totally convinced me I dont need to look behind teh curtain.  I chhose the shell in teh middle, and taht is where teh pea is.  The numbers and how they are presennted is just that a shell game.  Taking teh best year and teh worst and averaging them for a fictitious number.  These do not take into account any other factors.  Yep the pea is definitly in the middle shell.

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.

Polls = Some people

Polls = Some people Say....

This doom and gloom is never-ending with the msm...going to stay this way until Nov. after-all this is an agenda.

The sky is falling and we need more govt. which means the dems doncha' know.

More to come at network stations near you....and the endless saga continues.

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

Data source not supporting MSM 'doom and gloom'?

"..doom and gloom is never-ending with the msm.."

Is there some data that disproves this reporting from the MSM?

Giles... Yeah everyday

Giles...

Yeah everyday life for most of us out here in the real world...that doesn't have an intentional poll driven agenda for the silly little looney leftists in this world...to vote for change and hope...hope and change....

What drivel...what tripe. 

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

some more 'everyday life'

"Even during the good years, job growth under Bush was slower than the average under Clinton " Krugman The Bush jobs record

Very scientific poll

Here's the Yahoo/Reuters version: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080404/ts_nm/usa_economy_poll_dc_1

The poll found that 81 percent of respondents felt "things have pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track." That was up from 69 percent last year and 35 percent in early 2003.

Some polling question that is.  As a matter of fact, it's not even a question.

 

jiminy christmas

The actual question is

"q4 Do you feel things in this country are generally going in the right direction or do you feel things have pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track?"

 

...................Total Rep Dem Ind March08
Right direction 14     32    5    11   19
Wrong track    81     61   93   82   75

I'm one of the 81% and 61%...

...but that sure as heck doesn't mean I'm going to vote for HRC or BHO.

Giles I ask you a question

Giles I ask you a question with a yes or no answer.  Have you stopped beating your wife?  The poll says 80 percent have not stopped beating their wives.  Firts the question has only two outcomes, a loaded question and the two outconmes assume you beat your wife.  The poll assumes and loads the answers of the USA is broken.  Now I could mean its broken in any number of ways, say too many illegal aliens and its broken.  The poll itself is broken.

So your answer is yes you have stopped beating your wife?

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.

A better case could be made

A better case could be made for the alarmist headlines in the reporting than arguing about the quality of the poll. There are plenty of specific questions to narrow down if or where the 'wrong track' or 'right direction' is pointing.

This is Sweet

The old James Carville mantra of "It's the economy stupid" that is credited with Clinton (D-Male) being elected president is now being pushed hard by the media to promote the next democratic presidential win and it will not be Clinton (D-Female) -- SWEET.

Wrong Direction?

The problem with the surveys is they don't define "wrong direction".

I've taken these surveys that ask this question and have answered "No" to the question "Is the country headed in the right direction." Zogby asks it on their surveys once in a while. But I think it means different things to different people. To me it means we are spending too much money and Congress is worthless. It also means we fail to hold people accountable both personally and through the courts. The nanny state is out of control and so is abortion. But, I bet a liberal defines it totally differently.

"We are going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."  Hillary Clinton, 6-28-04 San Francisco

more specific questions

in the poll.  Just an overall POV question. Most polls start with general questions and focus / drill down later on.

Surveys

The survey are usually worded so you have to answer: Strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree or something along those lines. I might have "misspoke" when I said it was a yes or no response. I did it for illustration purposes only. I did it while dodging sniper fire. That's a lot of stress you know.

"We are going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."  Hillary Clinton, 6-28-04 San Francisco

Exactly river city

This is a point I make constantly.

As a Christian the country will probably NEVER be headed in the right direction, since the Media is forever pulling us slowly but surely into a moral abyss.

So sure, you'll get the low number.  

It's the same with Bush's low approval rating.  I'll listen to a liberal rant about how much they hate Bush and how low his poll numbers are in an effort to "prove" their view is correct.  Then I have to point out to them that "Their View" probably accounts for about 20 points. At least 40 points of the Presidents approval rating is with his base.  I then point out the real reason his approval rating isn't at 40-50 percent and that it's diametrically opposite to their opinion.

Finally, think about this, does anyone on this site take part in these surveys?

I constantly get junk email in my aol account asking me to take part in surveys for cash and prizes.  My wife tried it once and had to sign up for credit cards and give away all your peronal information.  I told her never to do that again.  So, the people who take these surveys are probably extremely to the left or not at all aware of what's really going in the world other than what the media tells them subliminally.  

 

Ridiculous Critcism

Conveniently, as Smith pointed out, CBS News began asking that question in 1983, during the Reagan Administration, and never asked the poll question during the Carter Administration.

Honestly, you're claiming bias because they don't have statistics available from BEFORE they asked the question?

That's like the NFL is at fault for not recognizing not having the number of quarterback sacks Night Train Lane had... because they weren't keeping that statistic at the time.

CBS did nothing wrong in this story.  They reported numbers from a poll... showed expamles indicitive of those numbers... and had an analyst who basicially said (paraphrasing) "if you've been in power eight years and there's now a recession, people will trust your opponenet on economic matters more."  A true statement for dems or repubs.

 

"I don't think our troops ought to be used for what's called nation-building." -President George W. Bush, October 11, 2000

Is America Broken?

Is America broken? Let’s consider that question, shall we?

Compared to the past (the Civil War, the Great Depression, the massive rationing that occurred during past wars. the low infant survival rates of the last centuries, the longevity we enjoy today, the lack of healthful food and water in the past, the large and deadly epidemics we faced in the past, and every other personal and social hardship that dominated the history of America and the rest of the world), I would have to say that America is doing just fine, thank you very much.

Do we really want to compare the conditions of today with the conditions of the past? Let me tell you, NO ONE would like to go back and live the way we used to live just 50 years ago. I know I wouldn’t. So, you tell me, is America really broken or is that just a bunch of hype?