CBS's Smith on Media: 'We're Not Exactly Watchdogs Here'

Photo of Kyle Drennen.
  • Bookmark and Share

On Wednesday’s CBS "Early Show," co-host Harry Smith discussed a question being asked of Chelsea Clinton about Monica Lewinsky on the campaign trail with Washington Post reporter Sally Quinn, who was baffled by the media’s refusal to ask Chelsea tough questions: "Frankly, in all of my years of journalism, I have never seen the press lie down like this before. This is -- this is not what the American public thinks of as the critical and sort of -- killing, marauding, press corps – " Smith responded by admitting that: "Yeah, we're not exactly -- we're not exactly watchdogs here." [Audio available here]

Those comments were sparked by Smith asking Quinn: "As a press, though, we have basically, you know, said, 'okay, if those are the rules, you know, that's fine.' Have we sort of -- you know, have we laid down?"

Prior to talking to Quinn, Smith interviewed the Butler University college student, Evan Strange, who asked Chelsea the question at a campaign forum on campus. Strange, as it turns out, is a Clinton supporter:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

I mean, I'm surprisingly, I'm a supporter of Hillary. I'm a Hillary -- I love Hillary, and I mean, when I talk to my friends and I tell them that, one of their constant, you know, questions to me is, you know, what makes her such a strong leader, and they always bring up, you know, that scandal, and it's not something that, you know, I asked to cause trouble. It was to show those people, you know, what makes Hillary so strong, and it was basically an opportunity for Chelsea, you know, to show all the doubters, you know, how strong Hillary is. And look at her record and not –

NewsBusters.org - Media Research CenterSmith also talked to student Brock Benefiel, editor of the college newspaper, who defended Chelsea:

Well, I think the mood of the room was that everyone was shocked. It kind of was very interesting her response and the question itself. As far as the appropriateness of the question, it's not something I would have asked. I don't know, you know it's -- I guess it's up to Chelsea whether it's really appropriate or not, but the question definitely, I thought, kind of strayed from the issues that were being discussed earlier in the forum.

Smith began his discussion with Quinn by wondering: "Should Chelsea Clinton be off limits?" Quinn responded with a definite no: "As to whether she should be off limits, she's an adult, and she's campaigning for her parents, so she should not be off limits, and I think that anyone has the right to ask someone who's campaigning anything. You don't have to answer it, but you certainly should be prepared to -- to be asked these questions."

Smith concluded by wondering if this was a "distraction" from other issues and Quinn replied by criticizing Chelsea’s handling of the situation:

QUINN: ...frankly, if I had been Chelsea Clinton, I think that she had a certain edge to her voice yesterday. I might well have said, 'you know, I really don't talk about that, and I'm sorry, but I just don't want to discuss that,' rather than say 'it's none of your business,' because, ultimately, if somebody's running for president -

SMITH: It's everybody's business.

QUINN: It ends up being -- it's everybody's business.

Smith then went to Dave Price for a check of weather, but even Price had some media criticism: "It's interesting, also I think in the case of Chelsea Clinton, there's a little bit of a freeze frame here. People remember Chelsea Clinton as this 12-year-old in the White House, and, you know, the press corps maybe hasn't evolved to the point where they say this is a 30-year-old woman on the campaign trail, and let's press her on it."

Here is the full transcript of the segment:

7:14AM TEASER:

HARRY SMITH: And in our next half hour, Chelsea Clinton campaigning for her mother, refuses to answer a question about Monica Lewinsky. We'll talk about that, too.

7:25AM TEASER:

SMITH: Coming up in our next half hour, should Chelsea Clinton be off limits to reporters while campaigning for her mother?

RODRIGUEZ: We'll debate that straight ahead on "The Early Show" on CBS.

7:30AM TEASER:

SMITH: Back when Chelsea Clinton was first daughter, her parents worked very hard to make sure she stayed out of the lime-light, but now she is out campaigning for her mother. Coming up, should reporters be allowed to ask her tough questions, or should any questions be off limits?

7:31AM SEGMENT:

HARRY SMITH: Now more on Chelsea Clinton, a constant presence in Hillary Clinton's campaign, she's made it clear she will not take questions from reporters, but take a look at her response when a college student asked a question she didn't like.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN: Ladies and gentlemen, Chelsea Clinton.

SMITH: In her latest pitch to potential voters, Chelsea Clinton has been on a whirlwind tour of college campuses, where students, never journalists, ask the questions.

CHELSEA CLINTON: I'll answer as many questions as I can today.

SMITH: But yesterday, one student asked if Hillary Clinton's credibility was tarnished during the Monica Lewinsky scandal, a question Chelsea refused to answer.

CLINTON: Wow. You're the first person, actually, that's ever asked me that question in the, I don't know, maybe 70 college campuses that I have now been to, and I do not think that's any of your business.

SMITH: This isn't the first time a Chelsea Clinton campaign event has made headlines. Last year, she turned down a 9-year-old Scholastic News reporter saying, "I'm sorry, I don't talk to the press, and that applies to you, unfortunately, even though I think you're cute." And just last month Clinton asked CBS News Correspondent Kelly Wallace to stop the cameras from rolling. We are joined by Evan Strange, who asked the question yesterday, and Brock Benefiel, an editor and reporter for Butler University student newspaper. Good morning to you both.

EVAN STRANGE: Good morning. Thanks for having us.

BROCK BENEFIEL: Good morning

SMITH: Evan, let me ask you, why did you ask that question?

STRANGE: Well, first I want to actually say what the question actually was. What I basically asked, I asked for Chelsea's opinion on the criticism of her mother that, you know, how she handled the Lewinsky scandal may have been a sign of weakness and she may not be a strong enough candidate to be, you know, the President of the United States, and the reason why I asked it is because, I mean, I'm surprisingly, I'm a supporter of Hillary. I'm a Hillary -- I love Hillary, and I mean, when I talk to my friends and I tell them that, one of their constant, you know, questions to me is, you know, what makes her such a strong leader, and they always bring up, you know, that scandal, and it's not something that, you know, I asked to cause trouble. It was to show those people, you know, what makes Hillary so strong, and it was basically an opportunity for Chelsea, you know, to show all the doubters, you know, how strong Hillary is. And look at her record and not --

SMITH: So you were trying to give her an opportunity then. How surprised were you by her response?

STRANGE: I mean, I was very surprised. I mean, there -- I can see where she would get a little defensive because of the question, and, you know, just hearing Lewinsky over and over and over again. I mean, I can see where she would react that way, but, I mean, I would have liked to hear her say something about, you know, her record or something else like that instead of just, you know, dismissing the question.

SMITH: Yeah. Brock, you're one of the editors of the student newspaper. You were there. What was the mood in the room, and did you think the question felt or seemed out of line to you?

BROCK: Well, I think the mood of the room was that everyone was shocked. It kind of was very interesting her response and the question itself. As far as the appropriateness of the question, it's not something I would have asked. I don't know, you know it's -- I guess it's up to Chelsea whether it's really appropriate or not, but the question definitely, I thought, kind of strayed from the issues that were being discussed earlier in the forum.

SMITH: Yeah, it seemed pretty serious. Does this create a distraction? Because so many people, serious people, about the campaign, want it to be about issues. Is this an issue, or is this just another, as I would call it, a roadside distraction?

BROCK: Oh, I think it is a distraction, and it's unfortunate, because, you know, yesterday was such a good opportunity to meet Chelsea and here at Butler University we had a wonderful exchange of ideas and, you know, we talked a lot about policies. So, it's unfortunate that it is a distraction, but I think it's the way it's going to be covered.

SMITH: Yeah. Brock, Evan, thank you very much for taking the time to speak with us today. Do appreciate it.

STRANGE: Thank you.

BENEFIEL: Thank you.

SMITH: Joining us to talk more about Chelsea Clinton and questions from reporters is Sally Quinn from The Washington Post. Good morning, Sally.

SALLY QUINN: Hi. How are you?

SMITH: Should -- should Chelsea Clinton be off limits? I mean, so many of us have tried to ask her or roll a camera while even approaching her and 'turn it off or I'm not going to talk to you.'

QUINN: Well, first of all, let me say that I think that what happened yesterday is Bill Clinton's legacy, and it really is heart-breaking that this -- his daughter at this age, almost 30, is going to be confronted with this question for the rest of her life, and I'm sure that she has anticipated, even though no one has ever asked it of her before.

SMITH: Sure.

QUINN: And I'm sure that she had a response ready for it. As to whether she should be off limits, she's an adult, and she's campaigning for her parents, so she should not be off limits, and I think that anyone has the right to ask someone who's campaigning anything. You don't have to answer it, but you certainly should be prepared to -- to be asked these questions.

SMITH: Yeah. As a press, though, we have basically, you know, said, 'okay, if those are the rules, you know, that's fine.' Have we sort of -- you know, have we laid down?

QUINN: Well, Harry, I don't understand why the press is being suckered like this, frankly. I mean, there are all these cameras, and they say turn off the cameras, and what happens if everybody gets together and just says 'we're not turning off the cameras' ? And so, 'if you don't want to be on the campaign trail, fine, but we're going to cover you.' I don't understand why the press is allowing this to happen when they wouldn't for -- I mean, you mentioned earlier Caroline Kennedy, and she's now campaigning for Barack Obama, and people may ask her a question or not ask her a question. She can answer or not answer it, but I don't think that if she said off go the cameras, that they would go off. So I do think this is a little strange. Frankly, in all of my years of journalism, I have never seen the press lie down like this before. This is -- this is not what the American public thinks of as the critical and sort of -- killing, marauding, press corps --

SMITH: Yeah, we're not exactly -- we're not exactly watchdogs here.

QUINN: No.

SMITH: Very quickly, I asked the kids is this a distraction or is this real? Is this -- because this campaign has gone on so long, we're in this -- in this netherzone waiting for Pennsylvania to happen, so we're -- we're obsessed with this as opposed to what's really happening with the subprime – subprime crisis and foreclosure and everything else.

QUINN: Well, you know, as we all know, ultimately the subprime mortgage crisis is not why people are going to vote for a candidate. It's going to be their gut instinct and their gut reaction to a candidate. And whether people like Hillary Clinton, whether they think she's strong or weak depending on how she responded to her husband's affair with Monica Lewinsky is going to be a factor in that, and frankly, if I had been Chelsea Clinton, I think that she had a certain edge to her voice yesterday. I might well have said, 'you know, I really don't talk about that, and I'm sorry, but I just don't want to discuss that,' rather than say 'it's none of your business,' because, ultimately, if somebody's running for president --

SMITH: It's everybody's business.

QUINN: It ends up being -- it's everybody's business.

SMITH: There you go. Sally Quinn, great to see you. Thank you so much.

QUINN: Thanks.

SMITH: Alright. Dave is here. Hello, Dave.

DAVE PRICE: Very interesting conversation, huh?

RODRIGUEZ: You know, it reminds me, I was on the bus with John McCain and his family down in Florida, and Meghan McCain, his daughter, we did an interview with her. After she finished she begged me not to use it and I said why? She said she's terrified to say something that will hurt her father. They're terrified to say something that will tarnish their parent's image.

DAVE PRICE: It's interesting, also I think in the case of Chelsea Clinton, there's a little bit of a freeze frame here. People remember Chelsea Clinton as this 12-year-old in the White House, and, you know, the press corps maybe hasn't evolved to the point where they say this is a 30-year-old woman on the campaign trail, and let's press her on it. Very interesting stuff though, thought provoking, and you know what, all coming from the journalists and question askers on a college campus.

SMITH: There you go.

—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Hey, Harry.  You know the

Hey, Harry.  You know the rules.  Hands off the "victim"...Chelsea, Michael J. Fox, The Dixie Chicks, the Jersey Girls, Anita Hill, James Brady, the teachers, the children...

Those comments were sparked

Those comments were sparked by Smith asking Quinn: "As a press, though, we have basically, you know, said, 'okay, if those are the rules, you know, that's fine.' Have we sort of -- you know, have we laid down?"

I had to, you know, read this a few times, you know, for it to be processed mentally. 

You know what I mean?

agreed newsbuster

A lot of viewers are starting to, they're starting to get kind of annoyed, you know, with the way news anchors seem to use a lot of what you'd call, you know, passive language that really, it really seems to slow down the pace of the program and in a sense almost makes the speaker sound, I don't know, kind of stupid, because, you know, it seems to take them, it takes them all day to make a point that could have been made with something like 12 words, but the reality is, the anchors aren't very good, Harry, they're just not very good at being concise, or even being brave enough to stick by a plain assertion, you know, so they sort of hum hall around and talk with, you know, platitudes that give you the impression they're trying to be humble.

Spot on, Candance

This is a spot-on point, Candance. On the rare occasions when I am watching a news program other than FoxNews, I get the feeling that I am listening to my daughter when she was 15. It's like, you know, like, absolutely nothing is being said, and yet they still complement each other for their perceptive and incisive observations!

One time my daughter had a friend over, and I could overhear them talking, and I swear my brain was trying to escape from my skull.

How people can sit and listen to those idiots on those morning shows is beyond me. I mean I can understand if you have it on for background noise during your morning routine, but to actually sit and pay attention to what those morons are saying is insanity defined!

You know that I know that

You know that I know that you know that I know that you know what you meant...you know?

and don't you dare think

and don't you dare think Idon't know what you think I don't know. 

The Deal

Consider this:

  1. The press wants a special privilege in the First Amendment. They want a shield against being forced to reveal their sources. They want to be able to publish any accusation, rumor, speculation, or even deliberately planted falsehoods, without fear of being forced to reveal their sources.
  2. Their argument is that the press is the watchdog for society, keeping government honest.

    (I reject this argument entirely, but that's for another day.)

  3. So even if we accept that premise, here's my question: if the press refuses to be a watchdog, or only keeps one political party under scrutiny, then they should lose any of the protections that go along with the job.

If the press wants the privilege of being a watchdog, then they lose that privilege if they refuse to do their jobs. After all, a watchdog who only watches half of the burglars isn't really a watchdog, is it?

They're pretty good

They're pretty good watchdogs when it comes to bashing the people they hate.

You know it.  When the

You know it.  When the Democrats finally choose one of their lying socialists to go against McCain, well, then the MSM liberals will have someone to really go after.  They'll have an older, white male war veteran to try to destroy--a dream come true for the baby boom hippie liberals. 

"Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him." -Muhammad

You know...Chelsea is

You know...Chelsea is working, you know, for her, you know, mommy... you know...she should you know, expect, you know, to be asked, you know, questions like this...you know...and be expected... you know...to handle...you know...them...you know..after-all, you know...she is...you know...a fully...you know...grown adult...you know...or at least pretends to be...you know?

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

Kyle... whoa, I'm a little confused here..

Kyle... whoa, I'm a little confused here.. I want to make sure I'm straight on the backgrounder here.

..Sally Quinn, who was baffled by the media’s refusal to ask Chelsea tough questions..

Smith posed the question: "should Chelsea Clinton be off limits to reporters while campaigning for her mother?"

I thought she is off limits to the press. This doesn't seem clear here. Did they change something? It seems that both are dancing around just coming out and stating what I thought the rules laid out by the Clinton regime are; the press is not allowed to ask questions. It's not simply that they are backing off of asking tough questions. At another recent event, someone in the crowd asked a question (had some meat to it) and her handlers (minders, if you will - reminds me of the Saddam regime) verbally jumped the guy; but then being assured that he was just a student, let him continue. The story here on that piece, was that the rules of the game here, is that members of the press (I guess the student college press is an exception) are absolutely not allowed access to Chelsea in any public setting.

For the benefit of readers, do you know what the bottom line is here; is that clearly the case, or not?    (;~> thanks, gary

You know, that when the

You know, that when the newsreaders are flying without a teleprompter, you know, these people are, you know, not exactly English majors – you know!

Duh

"Have we sort of -- you know, have we laid down?"

And they make fun of Dubya for being inarticulate.

Hey, Harry, you only had to be hit over the head with enough two-by-fours to build a couple of large cities.

When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.

A little OT but,

Sally Quinn: "...she's an adult, and she's campaigning for her parents..."

Campaigning for who?

Cmon' Sal fill us in! Hill gonna pick Bill for VP?

 

 Harry... If the job is too much for you I hear there is a small junkyard outside West Undershirt Minnesota with an open position. No ice cream but a steady supply of day-old donughts is among the perks.

JPR

campaigning for her parents..." 

LOL.  I was watching Morning Joe (this a.m.?  yesterday a.m.?) and Chrissy was just apoplectic....and every time he should have said "Hillary Clinton" he said "they" or "the Clintons".

I was seriously stunned...he didn't have a clue that he was doing this....just kept spewing "they, they, they".

This dem primary has gone from the sublime to the rediculous.  All the way around.

P.S.  I watch Morning Joe for the humour factor...if you don't take any of the myriad liberal talking heads seriously, you'll be laughing all day long at the insane stuff that comes out of their mouths.

David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive

 

Hi Blonde

"...from the sublime to the ridiculous."

and I'm lovin' it. Question is what will it be come convention time. Might need a new word.

How any reasonably intelligent adult can observe this and believe these people should be running this country is...maybe need another new word.

Morning Joe... have to try recording that on the good 'puter. Have a pretty good idea just hearing the NB critique.

Chrissy and apoplectic...wonder if he has shrink?

Ahem...


Sally Quinn: "...she's an adult, and she's campaigning for her parents..."

...every time [Chris Matthews] should have said "Hillary Clinton", he said "they" or "the Clintons".

Um, Sally ... Chris ... your Freudian slip is showing!

~~~

I admire FDR for not insisting on getting the approval of France and Germany before going to war.
--Anne Coulter

Searching For the Wrong Words

It's hard to express your thoughts when you have to walk that tightrope between not offending any group on the Internationalist Current Victim's List ™ and not stating anything with certitude that might come back to bite you in the future.

As in "Allegedly, the sun rose over the eastern horizon today, and reportedly after travelling it's anticipated path across the sky punctuated by it's arrival at the highest point in the sky at approximately local noon, it is expected that the sun will disappear from view beyond the western horizon later in the day."

The talking-head cesspool that is television news coverage is so afraid that they'll be trapped in some statement that they've perfected the art of aimless circumlocution in order to avoiding making any definitive statements.

Ranks right up there with the "big lie" school of reporting, you know the one - “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it." A big historical tip of the hat there to Jozef Gobbels, Nazi propaganda minister back in the 1930's.

Sally Quinn skills challenged

Sally Quinn has always come across as weak in the writing skills section. She’s married to Ben Bradlee of Washington Post fame and he’s several decades older than her. Lets see now, weak skills, marriage, Washington Post, Executive Editor and Vice President… go figure.