On Tuesday’s CBS "Early Show," host Hannah Storm interviewed Democratic Senator Joe Biden and when the subject turned to recent success in Iraq, Storm summed things up in this question to the presidential candidate:
And let's talk about this report in "The Washington Post," that says some of the generals are considering declaring victory in Iraq over Al Qaeda. Now, does it matter if they do or don't? Is this just a matter of semantics?
Storm’s astute observation of what is being fought for in Iraq is as wise as John Edwards assertion that the "War on Terror" is just a "bumper-sticker slogan." Or, it could be compared to actress Cate Blanchett’s analysis of military leaders that she shared in an interview with Harry Smith in the 8am hour about her new movie "Elizabeth: The Golden Age": "And when you think about that moment when she arrived in front of the troops, I mean, where was Bush after 9/11? And here you had a female monarch, arriving at the battle scene."
After Biden responded by saying, "I hope the administration stops this malarkey about that the war in Iraq is about Al Qaeda," instead of challenging such a statement, Storm concurred, "And Al Qaeda wasn't there before the war in Iraq. They've been a presence since then."
Later in the segment Storm asked the Senator if any compromise on child healthcare was possible, which Biden used as a platform to launch harsh attacks against Republican opponents: "If they spent as much energy in passing -- in supporting this legislation, as going after that 12-year-old kid, we would be in a much different spot...And the president's position on child health care has been, I think, abysmal." Storm allowed such attacks to go unchallenged and instead fretted over Biden’s chances in the Iowa caucus:
STORM: Alright. Real quickly, you're going back to Iowa tonight.
BIDEN: I am.
STORM: Right? You have to finish in the top three there to stay in the race? Can you do it?
BIDEN: I think that -- Yes, I can.
STORM: You have enough money?
BIDEN: I have enough money. I don't have enough money to compete like the rest of -- look, I've raised about $10 million. That used to be enough money to run in these primaries in the past.
STORM: Yeah, those days are long gone, right.
After an equally soft-ball interview between Harry Smith and Barack Obama just yesterday, apparently the days of the media asking tough questions of Democrats is "long gone" too.
Here is the full transcript of the 7:10am interview:
HANNAH STORM: Democratic presidential candidate, Senator Joe Biden has spent 35 years in the U.S. Senate. As Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, he is at the center of the debate in Congress over the Iraq War. We'll talk to him about that and children's health insurance bill, and lots of stuff. Good morning, Senator.
JOE BIDEN: Good morning Hannah. How are you?
STORM: I'm doing great.
BIDEN: By the way, there's 41 guys older than me still in the Senate.
[Laughter]
STORM: Oh yeah, okay --
BIDEN: I want you to know that, okay?
STORM: We want to clarify that.
[Laughter]
BIDEN: Want to clarify that.
STORM: Yes, yes, it's been 3 ½ decades but you got in the Senate very early, in your late 20s, right.
BIDEN: I know, I know.
STORM: Right, right.
BIDEN: Sounds awful, 35 years, oh my God.
STORM: Alright, thank you so much for clearing that up. Let's talk about something, because Americans and voters are still so concerned about national security, and a drum that you have been beating so hard since 9/11, because you commute, what, 250 miles a day when the Senate's in session, right, on the train.
BIDEN: That's right.
STORM: Is railway security. What have you been able to accomplish in the last six years in that regard?
BIDEN: Not a whole lot. There is such a prejudice against doing something about rail, it amazes me. This morning in this city, six tunnels underneath New York City, more people in aluminum tubes, as train cars, than in 27 full 747s. You don't have adequate lighting, there's no ventilation, there's no escape, you know, nothing.
STORM: But why can't you do more, Senator?
BIDEN: Well I really don't know. I think everything seems to go to the airline industry. I along with a guy named Fritz Hollings introduced legislation, I think 15 days after 9/11. We've been pushing it, and pushing it, and there's this notion that's almost like nothing really going to happen.
STORM: Yeah, but you're there, you know, people see you. You're a prominent U.S. Senator, and they feel like you should be able to get something done.
BIDEN: Well I've, you know, I've been able to get some things done on Iraq, I'm able to get things done, but I don't know what it is, Hannah. There is this sense that somehow rail cannot be protected. We're not trying to protect every rail car in the hundreds of thousands of miles just the major places where you know terrorists would use to go for an attack.
STORM: So are you saying you would have to be president to make a difference in this regard? I mean, you got to know why there's this resistance there, right?
BIDEN: Well let me put it this way, so far, I tell you what, when I get elected, I'm going to be the most pro-rail senator you ever saw.
STORM: Yeah, because --
BIDEN: But all kidding aside, we haven't -- we've hardly implemented any of the 9/11 recommendations.
STORM: But that shouldn't be so mystifying, I mean there's got to be a reason for that.
BIDEN: I think reason for that is that they don't want to spend the money, number one. There is a bias against rail. I just don't -- more people are going to ride an Amtrak today on the east coast than all the aircraft that will land on the east coast today.
STORM: So where's the -- why isn't the leadership on this effective? I mean you've tried to --
BIDEN: Well, I really don't know. The truth is I think in part because most states don't have Amtrak. Most states, they view it as -- everybody has an airport.
STORM: So it's like a geographical bias --
BIDEN: Everybody has an airport. Everybody has -- not everybody has a port. The two places we have not been able to make much progress in our ports, that is, where all those cargo containers come in, and in railroads, and I think it relates to the fact that you probably have 30 states with virtually no interest in rail.
STORM: Alright, you say you have been able to make a difference in Iraq. And let's talk about this report in The Washington Post, that says some of the generals are considering declaring victory in Iraq over Al Qaeda. Now, does it matter if they do or don't? Is this just a matter of semantics?
BIDEN: Well, look, here's what I think it's a matter of. The point I've made to the president my eighth trip coming back from Iraq is, Mr. President even if every Jihadi in the world is dead and Al Qaeda's gone, you still have a full blown war in Iraq. I hope the administration stops this malarkey about that the war in Iraq is about Al Qaeda. Al Qaeda's a bad element, we've made progress against Al Qaeda. The problem is the civil war, and what are you going to do, Mr. President, to end this civil war so our kids don't keep getting killed in the middle of this civil war.
STORM: And Al Qaeda wasn't there before the war in Iraq. They've been a presence since then. So where do we need to concentrate on Al Qaeda?
BIDEN: We need to concentrate on Al Qaeda in Afghanistan and in Pakistan and in northern Africa. That's where we have to concentrate on Al Qaeda. We have to concentrate on Al Qaeda by having much, much closer relations with our allies and even those who aren't our allies who have an interest in making sure we grab these terrorist networks. We need a network to combat the network.
STORM: Alright, let me ask you about this, moving along, to the president vetoing this children's health care insurance program bill and he's calling for a compromise. Can you work on a compromise with the president on this, and what would that entail? What are you going to call for?
BIDEN: Well, I'm calling for passage as it is, quite frankly. I mean, If they spent as much energy in passing -- in supporting this legislation, as going after that 12-year-old kid, we would be in a much different spot. Look, I'm one of those people who believe that if the president says 'I want a compromise,' obviously we should listen. But usually --
STORM: You're saying it's not possible though?
BIDEN: No, I think it is possible, but usually the president's compromises are you do it my way, we compromise and we do it my way, the president's way. And the president's position on child health care has been, I think, abysmal. And this is overwhelmingly supported by the American people, Republicans, Democrats, and Independents. So, he should compromise by moving considerably in the position that the United States Senate and the House of Representatives have passed.
STORM: Alright. Real quickly, you're going back to Iowa tonight.
BIDEN: I am.
STORM: Right? You have to finish in the top three there to stay in the race? Can you do it?
BIDEN: I think that -- Yes, I can.
STORM: You have enough money?
BIDEN: I have enough money. I don't have enough money to compete like the rest of -- look, I've raised about $10 million. That used to be enough money to run in these primaries in the past.
STORM: Yeah, those days are long gone, right.
BIDEN: Those days are long gone. I think we'll do very well in Iowa.
STORM: Okay, Senator Joe Biden, thanks so much for being with us this morning.
BIDEN: Thanks for having me Hannah.
—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Hannah, Albert Belle's on
October 16, 2007 - 18:05 ET by drillanwrHannah, Albert Belle's on the phone ... Pick up the extension in the dug-out ...
Handling Hannah
October 16, 2007 - 19:27 ET by allanfIt cost Albert Belle $50,000, but he seemed to get through to Hannah. (There was no violence involved).
Yeah, no animals were
October 16, 2007 - 19:34 ET by drillanwrYeah, no animals were harmed ...
Whodda thunk Albert Belle was so prescient about the MSM??
Words Don't Matter
October 16, 2007 - 19:45 ET by allanfThat's what happens when you think being asked to leave a dugout is just "semantics" and "words don't matter".
Victory is only a word
October 16, 2007 - 18:07 ET by Lame CherryI guess Hannah Storm is still suffering from semantics in Al Gore loosing to George Bush and John Kerry loosing to George Bush as victory is all semantics.
Semantics means you pretent Al and John are president and semantics means no press coverage of Iraq victories as .............gee whiz it means that Hannah Storm and all the MSM were completely wrong.
No civil war in Iraq.
No lost Iraq war.
No religious war in Iraq.
No US loss in Iraq.
All semantics. Hannah Storm is a disgrace and should be fired a her "semantics" casts a shadow over all the dead and wounded soldiers who gave so much for that literal victory........but I guess their wounds and grave are only semantics too.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
Biden has been in the
October 16, 2007 - 18:34 ET by Trix RabbitBiden has been in the Senate for 35 years???
So, what has this tax-fattened parasite done in those 35 years besides voting himself pay raises and other cushy perks?
Liberal: a power worshipper without power. George Orwell
Uh, he's plagiarized
October 16, 2007 - 19:39 ET by Chris NormanUh, he's plagiarized speeches by Neil Kinnock?
don't forget his racial slur...
October 16, 2007 - 20:20 ET by VT Con Mansome lame jabber about having to be part indian to go into a local convenience store. and that obama is "clean and articulate".\doofus. hair plugs. oops got personal ; )
Pardon my French ...
October 16, 2007 - 20:05 ET by jonathananderson... but Democrats and liberals are nothing but yappers and crappers, sh_tters and spitters.
Senator Stupid: "BIDEN:
October 16, 2007 - 20:11 ET by jdhawkSenator Stupid:
"BIDEN: Well let me put it this way, so far, I tell you what, when I get elected, I'm going to be the most pro-rail senator you ever saw."
No, Senator Stupid, you would be "the most pro-rail president . . ."
Fortunately for all of us, that will never happen.
Is he running for
October 16, 2007 - 20:13 ET by Chris NormanIs he running for president? Why? :)
jd
October 16, 2007 - 20:20 ET by botgactually it's more like "3rd rail president"
"Television is where you watch people in your living room that you would not want near your house." Groucho
The Dems would shut down
October 16, 2007 - 20:26 ET by Chris NormanThe Dems would shut down all commerce and movement if they try to inspect every container coming into port and every commuter taking the subway or rail. They still regard terrorism as a law enforcement issue that can be deterred at the very, very last point - here. This is idiocy.
"Semantics". That's a
October 16, 2007 - 20:17 ET by Chris Norman"Semantics". That's a pretty big word, coming from a moron...
Analysis ? ?
October 16, 2007 - 21:52 ET by JayTee"actress Cate Blanchett’s analysis of military leaders"
Waht...watt...uh...WHAT ?
Is Chris running out of people that he is SMARTER THAN, to have on his show ?
Tha boy is Tanking...........and we have to watch him Spiral downward...which is a GOOD reason to watch.
What good is a Free Press, if it is a False Press ? David Foote GoE
Moving the goalposts
October 16, 2007 - 21:56 ET by nkviking75Given the MSM's penchant for moving the goal posts, cherry picking fragments of quotes, and impugning the motives of administration officials and the generals in the field, nothing that's accomplished in Iraq will ever be considered a success. That is, unless a Democrat takes over the White House before we get out. Then whatever way we end the war, even by surrender, will be a great accomplishment.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
She should have asked Sen.
October 16, 2007 - 22:55 ET by bws53She should have asked Sen. Biden about the semantics involved with running a Dunkin' Donuts or 7-11 but that would involve asking a sitting Democratic Senator to explain his idiotic comments and, well, we can't have that on national TV.
Nothing new, just further
October 17, 2007 - 01:03 ET by DCC1Nothing new, just further confirmation Victory for America is defeat for the "democratic" party, heck they don't even hide it anymore.
But alas there is hope, with each day of the media brusing off the brass, and keeping silent I know we are winning!
Crazies to the left, and Whimps to the right
What is this ... "Cate's"
October 17, 2007 - 01:43 ET by drillanwrWhat is this ... "Cate's" second time playing Liz? And so she's a frakking military expert now?
The broad ain't even an American ... So, where does she get off ...
Oh, and `Cate', tell it to UBL, huh ... I mean, I didn't see him flying one of the planes on 9-11 ...
YOU ARE AN IDIOT!!! And for the record: What you do is pretty much insignificant in the full scope of life on, but not limited to, planet Earth ..
Just sent a scathing email
October 17, 2007 - 08:02 ET by regimeofterrorJust sent a scathing email to Hannah. This kind of dishonesty has GOT to be confronted directly. She has a blog at CBS (http://www.cbsnews.c...) and I encourage the rest of you to attempt to penetrate the liberal media bubble and inject some facts.
As someone who has spent literally hundreds of hours and years researching this topic for media outlets, including my own site on Saddam - www.regimeofterror.c... - I am sick and tired of these people lying day in and day out about something incredibly important. Total perversion of the truth by CBS, once again, doesn't surprise me but continues to infuriate me.
Saddam Hussein and terrorism. The rest of the story...
http://www.regimeoft...
The left's effort to
October 17, 2007 - 08:36 ET by Free ThinkerThe left's effort to trivialize victory will only embolden our enemies further and is a despicable way to treat our troops who have achieved that victory. The msm and the left feel guilt when they have to say we won. Fortunately, I don't. People like Hannah have dug themselves a deep hole by advocating defeat early and ofton and now are letting their personal pride blind them to reality. As for Biden, I give him a pass because he has proved over the years to be just plain stupid and out of touch. He is a cartoon of the democrat party.
OK ...Hannah Storm's
October 17, 2007 - 14:26 ET by ConservativeRexOK ...Hannah Storm's qualifications for anything, is doing the traffic in Houston on FM 97.5. Not Nobel Prize material...then again.