The worldview of conservatives and republicans makes them a happier lot than liberals and democrats, even in a year when the republican "candidate is sinking in the polls," the republican "president plumbs historic depths of popular scorn" and the republican "free market squeals for intervention" according to a story in The Washington Post.
The story, A Happiness Gap: Doomacrats and Republigrins takes an initial head-scratching approach to reporting that conservatives - once again, and regardless of what country they live in - are happier than liberals even in a year marked by economic gloom and doom and a year that seems "so rosy for Democrats."
Staff writer David Montgomery spices up his reporting on the latest happiness poll from the Pew Research Center by including some partisan jibes from right and left about happiness. Unsurprisingly the democrat comes off sounding a little more.... Unhappy.
"I'm very happy," says Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform, and a Republican. "When I was 12, I realized the world was not organized around my desires and wishes. The problem with guys on the left is they never figured that out at age 12. And they're just irritated the world is not organized around their vision. This makes them grumpy."
Chris Lehane doesn't sound grumpy. The Democratic consultant is on the phone from San Francisco: "My guess is if [Pew] checked the cross tabs out in California, we're all pretty happy out here. The wine is still good, the food is fresh, the people are beautiful."
But seriously, says Lehane, if Republicans are more happy, it's because they care less.
"The typical Republican is happy coming home to a 62-inch television, pulling out a fine bottle of cognac or Scotch, putting his feet on the table and enjoying the fruits of his labor, but not caring what's going on in the world outside their living room . . . and their gated community."
After imbibing in a little ideological tit-for-tat Montgomery gets to the heart of the poll which has been consistent in showing conservatives and republicans are a happier lot since "the happiness gap" was first discovered in 1972.
And it doesn't just apply to American conservatives. Turns out those traditional values of belief in God, marriage, hard work, perseverance and personal responsibility are indeed the keys to happiness. Montgomery wrote, "Pew found that Democrats are more likely to say that success in life is mostly determined by outside forces. Republicans lean toward thinking that success is determined by one's own efforts."
Paging Joe the Plumber.
More from Montgomery's story:
The study does identify a series of characteristics found in many people who call themselves happy. Good health is a key factor. Marriage and religion are big, too, and so is wealth. (If money doesn't buy happiness, it appears to help with the down payment.)
When you control for all the other variables, Taylor says, a Republican is 13 percent or 7 percent more likely to be very happy than a Democrat, depending on which regression analysis model you use.
It turns out the happiness gap is not just an American phenomenon. In country after country, happiness studies find that "conservatives" are happier than "liberals."
...
"The question is not whether Republicans are happier than Democrats, or conservatives are happier than liberals," says Arthur Brooks, the incoming president of the American Enterprise Institute and author of "Gross National Happiness: Why Happiness Matters for America -- and How We Can Get More of It." "That's unambiguously true. The question is, why?"
Brooks says a lot hinges on the answer to this question: Do you believe that hard work and perseverance can overcome disadvantages? Conservatives are more likely to say yes.
Montgomery also notes that, according to the poll, "extremists are happier than moderates" and that "hard-core liberals are the happiest liberals and hard-core conservatives are the happiest people on Earth." Which means Rush Limbaugh is always going to be happier than Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews combined. And that is something to smile about. :-)




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
BANG BANG SHOOT SHOOT
October 24, 2008 - 11:36 ET by KC BeachHappiness is a warm gun...
Liberals just cannot stand
October 24, 2008 - 11:40 ET by MrSnugglesLiberals just cannot stand seeing people do better than them, while conservatives share in the happiness when someone else succeeds.
The old "crabs in a bucket" fits liberals to a T.
Difference: knowledge of history
October 24, 2008 - 12:23 ET by anneftxanneftx Well educated people (that would be those not in the thrall of unbalanced, fear mongering instructors and influence) take the long view and remember history. Everything ebbs and flows -- climate, politics, economics and, right now, the stock market. One needn't have a college degree to be well informed.
Poorly informed people appear to wake up each morning in a pugalistic pose, looking for something or someone to hate and denigrate and demonize. Contented people seem to wake up to reality. Gotta go to work, buy groceries, sigh at increasing prices and cut back on spending. While I deplore the war in Iraq, it's a reality and we need to get out -- but I don't think we should lose the progress that has been made. I deplore President Bush's spending spree, but think that in the end the public will prevail and insist on less government -- even those who are essentially socialists. I don't agree that the fringe elements are more or less discontent/happy. It's the middle of the road folx... the ones who ignore daily anger and hysteria.
Yup, freeing a nation from
October 24, 2008 - 18:51 ET by zfYup, freeing a nation from a vicious despot was so deplorable and let's get out know while the surge is suceeding even Obama's "wildest dreams." Real smart.
Bush's spending spree? Um, no, actually the democratic congress is responsible for that. The time they have been in power has led to the biggest increase in the Bush years of spending.
As for the 'extremist' remark, I wouldn't give that part much thought though, these are the people who think those opposed to killing fetuses and higher taxes are "extremists."
ANGRY LITTLE LIBS...
October 24, 2008 - 12:25 ET by danybhoyThe most angry people I come across during my travels are almost always libs. They are almost always bitching about something, & they almost never smile. I ty to avoid them.
"...it's still We The People, Right?" Megadeth
They needed.....
October 24, 2008 - 12:53 ET by TASS71to do a study?
Amazing
October 24, 2008 - 12:55 ET by Eurikathat Conservatives are 'Oprah's kind of people' then! You know, those types who are always grateful for everything? I think Oprah should endorce Sarah Palin......
Which means Rush Limbaugh
October 24, 2008 - 12:57 ET by bigtimerWhich means Rush Limbaugh is always going to be happier than Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews combined. And that is something to smile about. :-)
Something to smile about indeed...
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
not surprised
October 24, 2008 - 13:01 ET by MNotaroI am not surprised to find out that conservatives are happier than liberals. Liberal illuminati are always complaining and bitching and moaning--grumbling about Bush, the war, the economic turmoil and blame, blame, blame--atleast the conservatives are trying to find solutions to the problems!
Of course, if this article
October 24, 2008 - 13:05 ET by balboaOf course, if this article said the reverse, you'd poo-poo it as some lame WaPo bit of liberal bias, blah blah blah. But since it says something you like "YES! They are so right."
ha Where's the rebuttal
October 24, 2008 - 14:57 ET by arkansaszippersha
Where's the rebuttal to that one?
There is no rebuttal. Balboa
October 24, 2008 - 16:40 ET by FoolicanThere is no rebuttal. Balboa brings up a good point, and thus has an ironclad argument.
Are you denying the study or
October 24, 2008 - 16:43 ET by MrSnugglesAre you denying the study or just being an angry whiner?
»→ Snuggles scores!!
October 24, 2008 - 22:05 ET by Cool ArrowMaybe bal took part in the survey.
LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
Good afternoon Bal
October 24, 2008 - 16:51 ET by cocodrieGood point
No, not because it's
October 24, 2008 - 18:32 ET by zfNo, not because it's "something we like", it's because most of us being conservatives know ourselves and know it to be a fact. For the paper to have said otherwise would have been a bold-faced lie. Most of the libs or lefties I met are dour, "the world is going to hell and everything is a crisis" types. Also, because their embrace of socalism leads to them to poo-poo the ability of individuals to help themselves and thus lead to personal improvement, they tend to have a negative view of humankind's ability to better itself.
All this combined does not lead to happiness.
P.S. You notice the paper STILL managed to be anti-conservative and get many jabs in, so it's not like we're embracing this as a bias-free report. It's more like, "I didn't like the findings, so I'll cast them in as negative a light as possible."
arkansas' zipper
October 24, 2008 - 22:16 ET by RESTLESS 1I've yet to see YOUR retort to this comment. Very telling indeed.
No worries, I can wait for you to get your answer from kos.
"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008
Very True
October 24, 2008 - 13:57 ET by buzzbeeBecause we see the good in the nation and appreciate what we have.
Annoy a liberal - Smile and work hard!
Drill here, Drill Now!
of course:
October 24, 2008 - 14:33 ET by mbuel"But seriously, says Lehane, if Republicans are more happy, it's because they care less."
Really?
Is that why according to reality (and other polls) Conservatives (Republicans if you really must) time and time again, donate more PERSONAL time and money to helping other people?
By not caring what he really means is that we are against welfare programs and BIG government to help...
What he REALLY means with this statement is that he believes government is the solution, even though it's failed under Bush's liberal big government policies, the RIGHT person in that seat can make it flow smoothly and make it work right.
Lehane, if by care less you
October 24, 2008 - 18:42 ET by zfLehane, if by care less you mean conservatives don't treat every problem whether real or imagined like a major crisis and demand people give up their freedom and/or money to solve them in the name of the "greater good", then yes, we could care less.
But that's how misery spreaders work, they convince you that you being happy is unfair and selfish because the wold has problems and then one guilt trip later your as miserable and as feckless to solve those problems as they are.
bingo
October 29, 2008 - 16:23 ET by mbuelThat's how socialism works. They don't make people's lives better. They make us equal in despotism.
Fonzie, Richie, Opie and Andy
October 24, 2008 - 14:47 ET by bigtimerSpeaking of liberals....this was taken down from Youtube last evening...got directed here....
Richie/Fonzie/Opie/Andy
I caught this on Fox last night, was disappointed with this....so I wanted to share it with others here..
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
Also, while the media ever
October 24, 2008 - 20:17 ET by zfAlso, while the media ever tire of the lame and thin meme of theirs that most Republicans/conservatives are gated community, country club multi-millionaires? I know I sure the hell ain't. I'm also not a backwoodsman with 50 guns who lives for NASCAR either, which is the other media meme about conservatives. They themselves don't seem to notice the contradiction.
It stands to reason.
October 24, 2008 - 21:12 ET by GregEIt stands to reason. Notice how orgasmic liberals are that the Obama is so close to the presidency. Conservatives might be happy when a conservative is in the same position, but nothing near orgasmic because we don't view government in the same way - godly and all-knowing. Liberals love government, so having their ideology in power is orgasmic for them, with equal contrast when their ideology is not in power.
good point grege
October 24, 2008 - 21:21 ET by porpoiseboymaybe that is why even though the country is supposedly so centrist the libs are hard to beat. by definition when alot ( hopefully most ) conservatives vote we are actually voting against govt. the libs are voting for govt. i believe there is alot more passion in being for something (not that being against more govt is being FOR something, but it is a harder concept to get across). it doesn't mean it isn't important for conservatives to vote, but it is more of an art convincing people to vote to keep something from happening as opposed to trying to make it happen.
Ecclesiastes 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.
porpoiseboy
October 24, 2008 - 22:24 ET by RESTLESS 1Let's rephrase. I am FOR less government... damn, I see your point.
Have heart though, according to this article, we will still be happier than liberals, no matter who wins. And just like history says, we will come back to the right, eventually.
"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008
r1
October 24, 2008 - 22:31 ET by porpoiseboyyeah, it's hard to quantify properly. i thought about it and i guess it's just that i am more concerned about everything BUT govt. except as you put it, when govt gets soooo freakin' big i have to think about it. otherwise, i want govt out of my way so i can really live, man.
cheers!
Ecclesiastes 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.
Take heart porpoise
October 24, 2008 - 22:55 ET by RESTLESS 1After 12 years of a rebublican president, the country voted for "change", (no thanks to perot), and after only two years of liberal BS, the country quickly swatted it down with the '94 mid term elections.
In effect, even if obama wins, he will have to do what the right says, or he will lose Congress and become a figurehead the way Clinton was for six years.
"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008
porpoise here
October 24, 2008 - 23:04 ET by porpoiseboyi have actually thought of that. i we are lucky and bho is more of an opportunist that idealist like clinton was...we can survive him.
hey i just heard a funny that made me crack up! i have the telly turned up because "biography" is on and it's johnny cash. so johnny is on stage in front of the audience in the late 60's early 70's and he says "i'm just glad we live in a country where we can enjoy the freedoms we do...even if that means the freedom to burn the flag"....the audience starts kinda booing and is confused....he say "hold on, hold on" then he says "we also live in a country where we have the right to keep and bear arms....and if you burn my flag, i'm gonna shoot you!" priceless
Ecclesiastes 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.
»→ Take heart Restless
October 24, 2008 - 23:04 ET by Cool ArrowGiven the mess Obama will make his first 100 days, (what with inviting an international crisis as prophesied by Biden), Obama knows he may lose Congress within 2-4 years.
Obama! That which you do, do quickly. And Obama went out into the night.
LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
Cool,
October 24, 2008 - 23:14 ET by RESTLESS 1Two years, maybe sooner if constituents go at DC with pitchforks. We here in Texas are lucky, our representation is conservative anyway.
Seeing as 0 is even more to the left than clinton inc., I don't see how we don't make gains in Congress in two years, that is if we don't make them now. I know polls say different, but I don't see how dems keep seats with the approval rating they have...oops, I forgot, the msm has their backs. Logic goes out the window, well for two years anyway.
"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008
Kudos Chicago!!!
October 24, 2008 - 21:59 ET by Cool Arrow»→ Let's all congratulate Chicago on attaining the title MURDER CAPITOL OF THE US
Edging out New York City which had only half as many murders per capita.
Chicago would like to thank Senator Obama for his tireless efforts in raising his city to such great heights.
LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
Great job you did there in
October 24, 2008 - 22:59 ET by Clear thinkerGreat job you did there in Chicago Obama. Socialism works so well in Chicago he wants to spread the love around. Jerk!
It’s Your Country - Two Choices For America
Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/
"I'm very happy," says
October 24, 2008 - 22:19 ET by RESTLESS 1"I'm very happy," says Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax
Reform, and a Republican. "When I was 12, I realized the world was not
organized around my desires and wishes. The problem with guys on the
left is they never figured that out at age 12. And they're just
irritated the world is not organized around their vision. This makes
them grumpy."
I believe that sums it up right there.
"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008
grumpy libs
October 24, 2008 - 22:27 ET by porpoiseboyman you are that is soooo right on! what is it with all the grumpy cranky libs?!?! i wrote to fox today asking how they can keep asking bob beckel to come on to represent the lib viewpoint. that guy is sooo angry, rude, prickish.... then you have the sourpuss's like colmes...same cloth slightly different result. and the ones that aren't of that cloth are like bob burton. man, i'd sure like to wipe that arrogant, elitist looking grin off his puss!!
Ecclesiastes 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.