Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 10, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Blogs » Kristen Fyfe's blog
  • CNN Reporters Call CPAC a ‘Conservative Petri Dish’
  • Chris Matthews Reacts to JFK Mistress: Kennedy a Hero Who 'Still Arouses the Country'
  • Covering Up JFK’s Roguish Behavior for 50 Years Not Long Enough for NBC’s Viewers
  • Bozell: It's 'Hilarious' CNN Suspended Roland Martin for Inoffensive Tweet; Maybe 'Lefty Loons at MSNBC' Can 'Scoop Him Up' Now
  • CNN Responds to Bozell Letter Demanding Coverage of Catholic Outrage at Obama; We Reply
  • Barbara Walters: It's 'Heartbreaking' to Force Women to View an Ultrasound Before an Abortion
  • MRC Study: ABC and NBC Anything But Fast and Furious On Gunwalking Scandal
  • Bozell Column: The Secular Media vs. Religious Liberty

Sex Ed for 5 Year Olds a 'Hot Topic' on The View

By Kristen Fyfe | September 22, 2008 | 20:17

Change font size:  A |  A
Kristen Fyfe's picture

Sex education for kindergartners is certainly a hot topic.  It's also the subject of a McCain campaign ad that many in the media have called a "lie."  In the Hot Topic segment of ABC's The View on Monday (Sept. 22), token conservative Elisabeth Hasselbeck  explained that the ad is NOT a lie and Barack Obama did in fact support legislation establishing sex education for kindergartners.

There is an adage that says being a parent is like being pecked to death by a duck.  Perhaps the same can be said of Hasselbeck with regard to her fellow View hosts, all liberals who think they are smart.  As if on cue, the left-leaning ladies picked apart the points Hasselbeck made in order to continue to defend their favorite candidate, Barack Obama.

The Culture and Media Institute recently addressed the ad issue and detailed the bill's content (click here and here) but the mainstream press has been reluctant to get the word out on the actual facts. Recognizing this, Hasselbeck took the opportunity to use her platform to dispel the "lie" rumor.

WHOOPI GOLDBERG: What we hope does leave are campaign ads that McCain and Obama have been throwing around lately. They're accusing each other of doing all kinds of things and some is true, and some is not, some is sort of true. You're standing by one specific ad though, Elisabeth, are you not?

ELISABETH HASSELBECK: There was one ad the Obama campaign and anyone who has spoken about Sen. McCain and his campaign has said the campaign is lying - the McCain campaign -  and it's the ad that pertains to the Senate Bill No. 99 -

BARBARA WALTERS: The Illinois Senate.

HASSELBECK: Illinois state bill 99 that dealt with expanding sex education to kindergarteners. And the ad simply stated that Obama supported expanding sex education, teaching sex ed, to kindergartners. And specifically that ad although people want to paint it as a lie, actually is the truth. That bill, number one, supported the expansion of the amount of kids receiving sex education - age-appropriate sex education to kindergartners.

GOLDBERG: That's very important.

HASSELBECK: Right. But it also is determined by whoever is teaching it and becomes a mandate unless otherwise opted out by parents. Number two,  it also took out any sort of language -- as directed by Planned Parenthood -- of the link to sex and marriage. They took that out of the existing bill. And then, not until there were 11 points made, and the Obama campaign has since come forward and said this bill was primarily about keeping kids safe from predators - where it wasn't until 11 points down in the bill that it dealt with that. And one of the five sponsors of this bill, ‘cause I just want to get all the information out, when asked if the bill was specifically and primarily about inappropriate touching - as claimed by the Obama camp - this sponsor of the bill, Sen. Martinez said, in quotes, absolutely not. That was not the main focus of this bill. So I think there is a lot of twisting of the truth, and we need to be...

After Hasselbeck stated her case she barely got a word in edgewise as Goldberg, Walters and Joy Behar all jumped to mitigate and qualify every statement to Obama's benefit.  Walters and Goldberg did most of the pecking.  Both reiterated that this Illinois State Senate bill didn't pass.  Both touted the "age appropriate" qualification.  Walters noted the opt-out provision (which exists in nearly every sex education program in the nation, but she didn't mention that).  When Hasselbeck cited Sen. Martinez's comments that the bill was never intended to be about sexual predators, as Obama has claimed it was, Goldberg said, "Now, does it matter what his take on it was, or is it just what Sen. Martinez's take on it [was]?

That statement in and of itself is revealing.  By following Goldberg's logic, voters shouldn't worry about whether their elected officials actually know what the legislation they support says, just what they believe it says.  In fact, Hasselbeck later said, "What you support says a lot about you, too" to which Goldberg responded, "Let's not go there."

Goldberg and Walters also did not want to "go" to the issue of Planned Parenthood's involvement.

HASSELBECK: A lot of people have issue with this because in planning the revamping of this bill, which was existing and did include the idea of marriage and waiting until marriage to have sex, and the definition of marriage, many people have issue with it because Planned Parenthood was consulted on this bill.

GOLDBERG and WALTERS: That's not the issue. 

WALTERS: Elisabeth, Elisabeth...

But Planned Parenthood's involvement is very important to this issue.  The organization's key policy points - eliminating talk of marriage and abstinence until marriage - was written into the legislation.  This is the organization that receives more than $300 million in taxpayer money and is responsible for more than 300,000 abortions in 2006. The fact that Obama supported this language and legislation is important.  The fact that he supported legislation that failed to pass because it was so radical is also important. But not to the liberal ladies of The View.  No, they'd rather defend Obama while asking John McCain if Whoopi needs to be worried about becoming a slave again.

Share this
  • 2008 Presidential
  • Sexuality
  • Barack Obama
  • Barbara Walters
  • Elisabeth Hasselbeck
  • John McCain
  • Joy Behar
  • Whoopi Goldberg
  • Broadcast Television
  • ABC
  • The View
  • Kristen Fyfe's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 

  • Where are the blacks for Roland Martin? (NRO/Media Blog)
  • Turkish Islamists turn church into mosque (Commentary)
  • CNN suspends Roland Martin (Big Journalism)
  • Birth control mandate is unconstitutional (National Center)
  • Obama's Catholic 'problem' (S.E. Cupp)
  • Debt crisis not inevitable for America (Williams)
  • Catholic 'Obamacan' says he may have to reconsider in 2012 (CNA)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • I always find it funny how Ron Paul thinks it's okay for
    2 min 31 sec ago
  • Cardinal-designate Timothy
    3 min 41 sec ago
  • It's all about who pays for it.
    3 min 48 sec ago
  • Good morning MB
    4 min 11 sec ago
  • Tired
    5 min 1 sec ago
More >

Obama's Bully-the-Catholic-Church Pulpit
more cartoons
  • Gov. Perry Tells NewsBusters He's Just 'Fighting on a Different Front'
  • Jay Leno Pines for More Socially Liberal Republican Party
  • Dan Savage Says FRC Leader 'Dances a Jig' at Teen Suicides
  • Cornel West Scolds Al Sharpton: 'Tell the Truth About the White House'
  • Politico: Is Nancy Pelosi A 2012 Asset, or Not?
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.