CW's 'Provocative' Ad Campaign Targets Teens and Blasphemes God

Photo of Kristen Fyfe.

“OMFG” is text-speak for the unspeakable. It's also the tag line for a new ad campaign aimed at teens and featuring a jumble of sexual situations, including teens undressing each other and two girls kissing. The campaign blitz is appearing in print and television, all aimed at drumming up eyeballs for the CW network's teen-themed soap "Gossip Girl."

For the uninitiated, “OMG” translates to “Oh My God” in the language of email and text messaging. The addition of the “F” means … well, it’s the word that can cost broadcasters a hefty government fine if someone actually says it on TV.

Now, of course, executives at the CW could never admit that they were actively targeting teens with such a "provocative" ad. Nor would they ever admit they were intentionally dodging an FCC fine by using the letter "F" instead of the unspeakable word. Nor would they ever consider that "F" used next to "G," which stands for "God" would be blasphemous. In fact they've gone out of their way on these subjects. But reality has a way of well, keeping it real.

  • CW insists the show is aimed at an 18-to-34 audience. But "Gossip Girl" was the top-rated new show among 12-17 year olds last fall, according to Media Life magazine.
  • In a statement carried by the Hollywood Reporter, CW said that the OMFG campaign was intended to be “provocative … and remind(s) viewers of some the ‘OMG’ moments that have made "Gossip Girl" one of the most buzzed-about new shows on television.”
  • On April 28, CNN reporter Brooke Anderson interviewed CW Vice President for Marketing Rick Haskins, who defended the campaign by saying:
  • “Some people can say, ‘Oh my frickin’ goodness’ …OMG and OMFG are just letters. Anyone you talk to—you can talk to 10 people and you’ll probably get 10 different answers.”

     

    An incredulous Anderson took a camera out on a sidewalk and said, “We spoke to 30 people, and all of them, except for two women in their 60s, said they knew what it meant.” Most of the interviewees had to be bleeped. One young man summed it up: “I think it’s blasphemy, actually.”

    The new ad campaign has run in Entertainment Weekly, In Touch, Soap Opera Digest, TV Guide, and People. The video ads have appeared on Bravo, VH1, MTV, E!, Style, and Oxygen.

The salacious ad campaign has drawn fire from parent groups, including the Parents Television Council (PTC), a non-partisan group that promotes broadcast decency. By contrast, the entertainment media have given tacit approval. The Hollywood Reporter and MediaPost have reported the story only in the context of cutting-edge advertising. Reuters called the campaign “sexy.”

The CW network is a joint venture between Warner Brothers Entertainment and CBS. "Gossip Girl," which is based on a teen book series about spoiled rich kids, airs at 8 p.m., which most broadcasters deem the “family hour.” The PTC review of "Gossip Girl," in which the organization gave its highest warning, reports the show regularly features foul language, teen sex scenes, teen drinking and drug use. Parents are depicted as uncaring and distant.

In an article for WorldNet Daily, Melissa Henson, PTC’s director of communications and public education, who was also interviewed on the CNN segment, said, "It's sort of like "Sex and the City" for the Clearasil set. There are frequent episodes of underage drinking, promiscuous sexual behavior, teens going to strip clubs, hanging out at night clubs. Moreover, there's really little or no discussion of consequences or risks of engaging in this behavior.”

Aside from the fact that CW is being completely disingenous about what it is doing with this campaign and the entertainment media playing it off as just another edgy step in marketing, there's another more troubling aspect to all of this. It's about how the media are talking to our kids.

Countless news reports last week featured all kinds of reporters and pundits wagging their fingers at Miley Cyrus (aka Hannah Montana) for a photo shoot that will appear in the June issue of Vanity Fair. Newspapers were quick to splash headlines across their front pages bemoaning the fact that one in four teenage girls is infected with a sexually transmitted disease.

Everyone talks about how kids are getting sexualized by the culture and how Hollywood is leading the effort. And yet ad campaigns and shows like this go on the air and there is collective cultural silence. No one looks at Mr. Haskins, from CW, and says, "Are you kidding me?" And when groups like the PTC (or MRC's CMI) do stand up and say, "This isn't good for our kids," they are regularly dismissed as angry, out of touch nanny-staters.

We're not. I love free speech and the free market of ideas just as much as the next person. And I think parents need to do a better job of turning off the television/computer/videogame system/iPod, etc and unplugging their kids from the 24/7 media onslaught to which they are exposed. But. I also think it's appropriate to call producers and Hollywood executives to task and ask them if THEY are concerned about kids. I wonder if Mr. Haskins, of the CW, were to superimpose the face of his child (assuming he has one) on the poster for this OMFG ad campaign whether he'd be discomfitted by that image? Would he be proud to hear his kids utter the actual words for the text-messaging euphemism he's plastered around the country promoting "Gossip Girls?" Would he be happy to find out his teens were smoking pot, drinking and having sex like the kids on the show he is so proud to be "provocatively" promoting?

I wish Brooke Anderson of CNN had thought to ask him that.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Bad Marketing?

Being in the marketing field these ads have done their job.  They are provocative, memorable and are causing lots of people to talk.  So the ad genius’ that came up with the idea have done their job well.  However, after barely getting that out I have to say I am appalled that this is what shows are coming to.  I will admit I have seem parts of this show (however, not a whole episode.  I would have shot myself in the head if I had to watch the whole hour.) and ever single part of this crap fest reeks of trash and lascivious behavior in out youth.  I can say that I did not know anyone in high school participating in any of the activities I’ve seen on the show (and it has probably only been 30 minutes of watching time combined).  It’s a horrible show that portrays under age drinking, drug use, theft and promiscuous relations as hip, cool and necessary to be popular.  I’m tired of this and I think America is too.  Yes we have our free speech, but it goes both ways.  People are always screaming about free speech, but never when it comes to the free speech of the opposing opinion.  My values say this is wrong and I’m not going to let twist their obvious meaning to try and get away with it.  Its wrong plain and simple, “and THAT’S a fact!” 

(It’s the only time I’ll quote Bill Maher).

A new low!

What parent will let their child watch such trash?? This makes me recall the Black Entertainment Television commercial a few months ago aimed at teaching young kids to read. It was a cartoon with gang looking types singing "read a book, read a book, read a M-Fing book." I am continually amazed at what our youth are exposed to. Without strong parents and guidance, they really don't have much of a chance.

Amen!

Amen to that!

And the worst of it is that

And the worst of it is that it is mostly 12 and 13-year olds who are watching this! And parents who don't pay attention just think "oh, it's about high school kids."

My daughter is 19 now, but when she was younger, there is no way I would allow her to watch "Dawson's Creek." And I don't think it was as blatant as Gossip Girls.

 

And the

And the Hollywood/Entertainment crowd is just shocked, SHOCKED, that people view them as immoral. 

This reminds me of after the 2004 election when "Values Voters" won the election by and large for Bush, and the Democrats and others on the Left were flabbergasted that they were viewed as anti-religious or irreligious.  You can't be the champion of tolerance and acceptance and then be surprised when people who draw a line in the sand, ethically and morally speaking, do not stand arm in arm with you.

Darth Dutch

Where's the outrage

The only outlet that covered this campaign was (surprise) FoxNews.  Pretty much everybody else ignored it, which was interesting.

Whether the ad was aimed at children or not, the fact of the matter is the ad was in really, really bad taste and offensive.  The network was trying to up the sleaze to attract viewers and talk to the kids in their own lingo (I've seen the acronym used frequently online).  It doesn't mean though that it's appropriate to plaster on bus stop posters, billboards, signs at the mall, etc.. There are plenty of things teenagers say among themselves that shouldn't be used in an ad campaign.

And what does it say about our culture that this sort of blasphemy/vulgarity is cool among the youth? 

The funny part was in some

The funny part was in some ads they took out the "F" so as not to offend.

As was previously posted, this is a great ad campaign for the show. It's probably gotten the show more attention than it ever had before. (The ratings still aren't that good for this show.) But it's definitely pushing the boundaries.

Well that just proves that

Well that just proves that they knew it was offensive; they couldn't plead "ignorance" of a modern acronym. Which ads had it removed? Was it done by time period, channel, geographic area, do you know?

They are like little kids....negative attention is better than none.

Parents Television council lol

"The salacious ad campaign has drawn fire from parent groups, including
the Parents Television Council (PTC), a non-partisan group that
promotes broadcast decency. By contrast, the entertainment media have
given tacit approval. The Hollywood Reporter and MediaPost have reported the story only in the context of cutting-edge advertising. Reuters called the campaign “sexy.”"

The PTC would protest the crack of dawn if they could. I do agree with the first few sentences of your last paragraph. Parents just have a to a better job of turning off the tv

From the PTC website for

From the PTC website for the show 1 vs. 100: "The show is hosted by raunchy comedian Bob Saget, and it is with him
that any concerns for family friendliness lie. On very rare occasions
Bob will make a sexually suggestive comment regarding a question or a
contestant’s answer. Sex and violence do not play a role in this game
show."

Are they talking about the same Bob Saget from Full House and America's Funniest Home Videos?

It is Bal

The PTC will do all they can to take back free speech on tv back at last a decade.

The good thing is nobody takes them seriously. Look at Grand Theft Auto.They say they want to keep it out of the hands of children, which I agree with, but they are basically trying to get retailers not to sell it at all.

They sure did not do anything to make a dent in their sales,thats for sure.

"Are they talking about the

"Are they talking about the same Bob Saget from Full House and America's Funniest Home Videos?"

It's long been known that Bob Saget is a raunchy comedian.  His false image on Full House and America's Funniest Home Videos is just a front to what he really values.  I'm not surprised at all.

Darth Dutch

The majority of America is

The majority of America is not familiar with his edgier, more recent stand up. And he's hardly raunchy on that show.

FCUK

While not as provocative, French Connection UK (FCUK) also targeted teenagers.

I remember walking into a

I remember walking into a major department store and coming face to face with a 4-foot tall sandwich board with an ad for that on it.

They got many many complaints, and the ads disappeared. 

Bah

I hate CW. They cancelled Veronica Mars and replaced it with crap like Gossip Girl.

 

Zap! You're my new best

Zap! You're my new best friend.

Did you ever see the pilot they shot for Veronica in the FBI? 

It Seems Like A Good Show To Me...

You can't always believe everything you read from the cat-foot-eating degenerates at WorldNutDaily or CMI. They probably haven't even watched one episode of this show. I have, and from what I've seen, it seems like a pretty good show, writing-wise that is.

As for the moral quandaries or blasphemies, I could care less, since I am an Agnostic Jew. TV writers and producers have a perfectly legitimate right to blaspheme anything they want because it's usually in the best interests of the people. I mean, without the attacks against organized religion, you never would have exposed these Muslim radicals who went on killing sprees over cartoons making fun of their prophet Muhammad, or these pedophile priests in the Catholic Church who molest boys (and who are most likely gay, I will concede)

It's healthy to blaspheme organized religion and the beliefs of some certain factions that are so gay about censoring everyone else. I say, congratulations, CW. Keep offending those losers who have nothing better to do than get gay about someone saying OMFG.