Et Tu, Disney? Bleeping God from the Ten Commandments?!

Photo of Kristen Fyfe.
  • Bookmark and Share

Radio Disney is bleeping "God" from ad copy for the upcoming movie "The Ten Commandments."

Seriously.

The folks at Liberty Counsel sent out notices on Monday and Tuesday of this week letting people know about a copy of an email they had in which a Radio Disney representative was advising a media buyer to delete the words "chosen by God" in ad copy for the movie "The Ten Commandments" which opens on October 19. To see the email, and also the petition that Liberty Counsel has to get Radio Disney to reconsider this decision you can click here.

The apparently offensive words are used to describe Moses, you know, kind of a key player in the whole Ten Commandments story. Which comes from the Jewish and Christian scriptures, also known as THE BIBLE.

Just who does Radio Disney think is going to be offended by advertising copy that says Moses was chosen by God? Has political correctness so polluted thinking that the word "God" needs to be censored from copy advertising what amounts to a bible story?

In what may be one of the greatest one-liners ever uttered by a CEO, Frank Yablans who heads up Promenade Pictures, the studio releasing the movie, said, "Who does Disney think chose Moses - Tinkerbell?"

Well, maybe Mr. Yablans. Or maybe media-darling and everyone's favorite atheist Christopher Hitchens is making advertising decisions for Radio Disney now.

 


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

ABC and God

I think a year or so ago ABC bleeped out God, from "Thank God" when one lady left the View, there was a big dust-up with her leaving and all.

The sounds you hear are the

The sounds you hear are the ripping and sticking of my roll of Glenn Beck Duct Tape ... To my head.

LMAO, drill! I love it when

LMAO, drill! I love it when he does that!

no surprise

 This is no surprise. Disney has lately shown a love affair with witchcraft and an affection for all things unAmerican.  They've done a lot through the years to push Christmas as a secular holiday, and now they're trying to do the same for Passover. They're simply doing this to show Jewish children it's okay to talk about Moses without God.  In fifty years, they'll make a movie about Mother Theresa portraying her as a hippie activist. It's the kind of thing they do.

 

 

 

card holding member of the vast right-wing conspiracy

Disney Apostasy

Disney used to be a pro-God organization.  If I remember right, the Mickey Mouse club actually encouraged faith in God.  And there have been tons of Disney movies with religious themes or references.  But I guess the Humanists are in charge now...

Leftivist for the restofus

So mattm, I guess it's safe to say you won't be donating to 'the human fund' this festivus?

Sorry,  I can't make my

Sorry, 

I can't make my charity dollar stretch that far....

This country is going to

This country is going to hell in a hand-basket...

I am sick and tired of this slow bleed they are doing to us all with the word God or any religious symbols that belong to the Christian faith.

Walt Disney must be rolling over in his grave.

This is getting past shameful, it is going to be past shameful if we do not stand up as one and unite...enough is enough....a revolution is the only thing I can foresee in the future that is going to make this country what our Founding Fathers meant this country to be, that so many men have died for from the beginning of this country.

This is getting to be sadder than sad.

God help us all. 

This country is going to ...

You don't have to look far to find the reason. William Jefferson Clinton and Hillary Rodham Clinton and the "if it feels good do it" society. America and American values were killed under the Clinton regime and a dumbed down public who believe Ruth Bader Ginsberg and the ACLU are viable entities. God help us with the election of Hillary, the marxist, and first spouse Bill Clinton the accused rapist.

You are greatly mistaken.

Look, I despise liberals more than most of you, since I work in Hollywood and have a birds eye view of what they're trying to do to this country. But you're WAAAAY OFF BASE with this one! Think for a second before you run off leveling charges of "Religious Bias"! Did YOU fund this movie? Did You sink millions into a God based project or did Disney? Now, exactly why do you think they would do that if their desire was to CENSOR GOD? How ridiculous have you people become? Talk about "straining at a gnat and SWALLOWING A CAMEL! The piece of crap governor of California just signed a bill into law that would OUTLAW the use of the words MOTHER and FATHER and this is what gets your panties in a bunch? It's not like YOU funded a friggin' movie and the distributor (Disney) then, in an ode to political correctness, "Censored" out the word GOD from a tale about the ten commandments. WRONG. Disney with no mandate from anyone used it's own money to tell the biblical story and all they get for it is CRAP from the very people who are supposed to appreciate it! THE WORDS WERE CONFUSING IN THEIR PLACEMENT! The words "SENT BY GOD" only make sense if MOSES NAME appeared in the AD! It did not. Instead the words in question appeared over the names of several people who did the VOICE WORK and therefore was confusing. Look at the internal memo generated in THIS case! Does it hint at "political correctness" and fears that people will be "offended"? Or does it say that it's CONFUSING? You unregenerated "christians" really are something. Why don't you spend your time making sure that you're Baptized properly in JESUS' NAME when most of you ARE NOT!  Why don't you spend your time REPENTING of your sins so that you can RECEIVE the HOLY GHOST with the evidence of speaking in tongues, which you IGNORANTLY RIDICULE. There is NO ONE in the biblical record who received Christ's Spirit in the way in which you imagine you have, i.e. with no glossalalia (tongues). The only people in the entire bible who receive the HOLY GHOST, have EVIDENCE OF IT! Evidence that is ridiculed by most of the false churches that are the spawn of the Catholic Church!  Before you get yourself all in an uproar why not READ the danged BIBLE and see how vast the differences are between what YOU were taught by your guy and what the Apostles charged with furthering Christ's ministry taught! Instead of attacking people who are producing movies for YOU, that is. Movies that wouldn't exist if we waited for Christians to make them, of course. 

Censor A**ah.

Censor A**ah.

Keith, this still isn't the right place for Born Again soapboxing.

The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy

i guess we should be

i guess we should be "thankful" for Disney then...

Priest was an inspiring Disney film, gay days is always a hoot for our kids every year - also looking forward to Disney's new "Pedfest" in the near future - and Pot-smokers of the Carribean and It's a Porn World After All in 2030 with my grand kids... 

so where can we externals see this internal memo...?

A service of the new NB respect police

Oh Keith... Get a

Oh Keith...

Get a life...before you have a heart-attack. 

Must be halloween BT

Deborah's baaaaaack!!!

Zis iz ze vay u vill vorship ze gotd eenfidelz schwine...

acumen...Nooooo! Say it

acumen...

Nooooo! Say it isn't so!

Seriosly I rarely respond to keith, but he always posts like he is going to have a heart-attack every minute...

That is if you can read all the angry jumble most times...lol.

Hey you're the fake who

Hey you're the fake who can't stand the truth, not me.

Keith, I guess you missed

Keith, I guess you missed DeMill and Heston. You need to spend a little more time emersed in the Word yourself. Defending a godless act, like you seem to be, is something that Paul or Peter would have never done.

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

Sorry Keith, but funding

Sorry Keith, but funding the movie doesn't give them the right to ban reference to the major charactor in the story. If they paid for a movie about Islam and banned the use of "Allah", would there be no outrage?

If the ad was so misleading, THEN FIX THE AD. Banning the name of "God" has nothing to do with a misleading advertisement. It has everything to do with Disney's coming-out-of-the-closet political correctness.

And what the Governator did has nothing to do with this. That is a whole other topic for discussion. Or shall we also digress and discuss Disney's blatant opposition and violations of the 2nd Amendment? At least that still involves Disney while going off-topic. 

The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers

keith, the point is they

keith, the point is they shouldn't try to have it both ways. If you object to the Christ child (that's a general "you", not you personally) then don't celebrate Christmas. Don't try to change Christmas into a non-denominational generic "holiday." If you don't believe in the Resurrection, don't celebrate Easter. Don't try to make it a Spring Holiday about a bunny and colored eggs.

I love it when towns erect a "holiday tree." What holiday would that be? A July 4th tree? A Memorial Day tree? What holiday does that tree represent????

Like it or not, these are religious holidays. No one forces anyone to go to church on Christmas, or Easter, you are free to "celebrate" those days in whatever secular manner you desire...just don't insist on taking all the religious significance out of it for everyone else in the name of "tolerance."

There! I feel better now!

Oh, and TOLERATE CHRISTMAS!!! TOLERATE GOD!!

Well said MB! The Closed

Well said MB!

The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers

You're blaming the wrong people.

Every thing you said is ONE HUNDRED PERCENT CORRECT! But that's not the point. Disney for all of their flaws, are not the town legislatures or p.c people that we have a problem with. Again, perhaps this was too much for you all, combined with the detour about the baptism, so I apologize. But, WHY WOULD SOMEONE MAKE A MOVIE ABOUT GOD IF THEIR DESIRE WERE TO "RID THE COUNTRY OF GOD"?  Is there any doubt that  a movie called "The TEN COMMANDMENTS" is about GOD? How silly can you people be? Yes, there is an "anti-Religion" movement afoot,  but I daresay that it can hardly be found in the camp of the people who are making movies about GOD!  GRANTED, some p.c sensibilities should have occurred to the probable liberal who made the decisioin. Meaning, that he or she should have known that you'd strain at this particular gnat, but everybody's not that bright. But that still doesn't mean that an act of insensitivity should be regarded as a hate crime. Especially considering the fact that the act of funding and shooting movies is VOLUNTARY.  They didn't "owe" you a movie! Out of their own volition they spent their millions on one. A movie that contains every reference to God that the original did. I mean, it's not as if this is some godless liberal new "look" at the ten commandments where God is a "she" or "gay" or something. It's the friggin' TEN COMMANDMENTS! Can't you see how having the words "SENT BY GOD" over top of peoples NAMES, could be, in a strictly advertising sense, confusing? If some Christian group had funded this movie and the distributor who has varied interests, made some p.c move for some strange reason, I'D BE WITH YOU!! In fact, since I'm aware of more instances of this sort of thing than any of you, having been in films that were nominated for Academy Awards, I'd be out IN FRONT OF YOU! But that's not the case. Actors RISKED their careers to perform in a film that many in Hollywood would rather not be made. Think not? Ask Mel! Seen KIRK CAMERON on anything lately?? The company itself risked a certain amount of derision in certain circles but still they made the movie. All I'm saying is that your concern IN THIS ONE SINGLE INSTANCE, is misplaced. 

In fact I did write about

In fact I did write about what the California Governor did to moms and dads and kids with the stroke of his pen.  You can check it out here. And lots of things get my "panties in a twist" as you so eloquently stated.  If I wrote about them all I wouldn't have time to take care of my own children.

My Insensitivity

Dear Kirsten,
I apologize from the bottom of my heart. The phrase "panties in a bunch" was in no way a reference to your gender and I apologize if it was taken that way. In all honesty, I didn't see your name or realize you were a woman, until I read your response. My apologies. I only meant it to mean, "up in arms", which it would have, had you been male. I apologize for how that was stated.

Keith, thanks for

Keith, thanks for clarifying yourself. Your post makes it imminently clear that being PC is highly important to you, and that is the problem. You are defending Disney's over-the-top PC actions by trying to downplay their negative impact, and, by extension, all PC acts.  Does Disney have the right to dictate how their product is advertised? Yes, but that doesn't make their decision right, and people who see this PC crap for what it is also have a right: to speak out and denounce anti-Christian decisions. If you want to defend Disney, go ahead, but don't do it on the pretense of, "There are bigger problems," or make any dice about your own feelings on it. PC-driven acts, specifically anti-Christian ones (that would be most of them, by the way), are possibly the greatest threat to this country, so don't try to tell me that denouncing them isn't worth our time.

http://www.rhjunior.com/CC/ Great comics with a hefty dose of Christian and anti-nutjob goodness.

"With your mind as high as Mt. Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see all the forces that shape events; not just the things near to you." -Miyamoto Musashi

Keith, why did Peter say...

1)

Why did Peter say in Acts 11:15, The Holy Spirit fell upon them, JUST AS IT HAD UPON US AT THE BEGINNING.

This was years after the first "baptism" of the Holy Spirit.

Why did he not say, "The Spirit came upon them as it has upon ALL believers to this day"?

2.)   1 Cor 13:8 

As for Tongues, they will cease

3.)  Romans 14:10

WHO ARE YOU TO PASS JUDGEMENT ON YOUR BROTHER OR SISTER?  Before God we stand or fall.

Clearly Tongues, that is speaking a language that someone can understand, is what is in view, and I have yet to meet a single so-called Christian who does anything but babble.

If that is what God puts on your heart, more power to you but in Acts 2, they preached so that others from all different languages could understand them and in 1 Cor 13 Paul talks about speaking INTELLIGIBLE words that Unbelievers can understand.  

The reason it gets ridiculed is becuase what we SEE is NOT what is in view in the Bible.

So get off your high horse and realize 1 Cor 13:1  If you speak in Tongues and have not LOVE you are a CLANGING CYMBAL.

Obviously Disney can do whatever they want and we can criticize it from a Chrisitan perspective if we want.

In my opinion 99% of stuff produced "For Christians" by Hollywood is watered down and I have yet to see half-a-dozen movies that really do it.  I am not going to accept some garbage passed off as catering to a Christian audience becuse that is the best we can get.

The Passion of the Christ was one of the few and the evidence that is was on the money was the amount of persecution Gibson and the Movie got.

See Veggie Tales for an blatant example of movies produced by Christian, with great Chistian themes, completely watered down by Hollywood in order to put it on TV.

Your err in your understanding GREATLY

You made so many mistakes that this might take a while. I'll try to answer all now, but I'm late for an appointment.

First. Peter said "The Holy Spirit fell upon them, JUST AS IT HAD UPON US AT THE BEGINNING" to the APOSTLES who remained in Jerusalem because of their RELIGIOUS BIGOTRY. The Apostles had brought Peter to a "counsel" because he had VIOLATED the LAW by GOING INTO CORNELIUS' HOUSE in the first place. It was ILLEGAL for a JEW to eat with a GENTILE. The apostles had to know that this was in fact the SAME outpouring of the HOLY GHOST that ALL OF THEM had received. You are trying to intrepret that to be as if Peter was making some significance between this group of believers and others that had been saved since the DAY OF PENTECOST. In this  YOU ERR GREATLY. If that reference was to "this " group of believers at Cornelius' house as being "set apart" from others who had not exhibited speaking in tongues, then Peter wouldn't hearken back to the prophecy about the COMING OF THE HOLY GHOST given by JOHN THE BAPTIST! Here he speaks about the COMMON SALVATION, that JESUS PROMISED ! He goes in his reference to this NEW GROUP of believers BACK TO THE VERY PROPHECY GIVEN TO THEM BY CHRIST!

Acts 11:13-17 (parentheticals mine)

 13. And he shewed us how he had seen an angel in his house, which stood and said unto him, Send men to Joppa, and call for Simon, whose surname is Peter; (Cornelius told Peter that an angel told him to look for Peter)

 14. Who shall tell thee words, whereby thou and all thy house shall be saved. ( What Peter had to say is what was promised by the Angel to save them. How you DISCOUNT the ACTUAL EXPERIENCE they had is frankly, beyond me.)

 15. And as I began to speak, the Holy Ghost fell on them, as on us at the beginning.( again this reference is to the Jews who had a gripe against Peter who did not want to believe that the Gentiles could be saved. Want proof? In ACT 10: 47 AFTER the Gentiles had received the Holy Ghost, Peter STILL had to ASK PERMISSION to the JEWS that came with him to baptize them! Acts 10:47 ** 47Can any man FORBID water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?**Now why do you suppose he had to ask if anyone could FORBID the new converts baptism if what you said makes ANY sense? It doesn't.

 16. Then remembered I the word of the Lord, how that he said, John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost. ( as you can see he goes back BEFORE the DAY OF PENTECOST in his reference, this is BEFORE even the Apostles themselves had received it and WHEN THEY DID they ALL SPOKE IN TONGUES ( acts 2:4!)So the tortured distinction you're trying to make is patently absurd. More to the point, if they ALL were told that they WOULD receive the Holy Ghost and THEY ALL RECEIVED IT THE SAME WAY, from whom would the idea that "it comes without proof" come from? Answer: satan's influence over the false (catholic) church that Paul SPECIFICALL REFERENCED HERE.. 1TIM 4:1-4 you will note that he SPECIFICALLY tells you HOW TO RECOGNIZE the fake church and tells you SPECIFICALLY that their "doctrine" will come not from God but from SATAN. 

 17. Forasmuch then as God gave them the like gift as he did unto us, who believed on the Lord Jesus Christ; what was I, that I could withstand God? ( You will notice here that he said that GOD gave the Gentiles the LIKE or SAME gift that they had received so he had NO CHOICE but to baptize them. Clearly illuminating the prejudice the situation entailed as opposed to the tortured reasoning you offered. Furthermore the fact that the GENTILES received the SAME SPIRIT that the APOSTLES had received on the DAY OF PENTECOST is doubly, troubling for your argument against proper Reception and proper Baptism or does your bible neglect THESE words? Ephesians 4:4,5  

4. There is one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are called in one hope of your calling; (if there's only ONE SPIRIT and it's VERIFIED as the SAME SPIRIT that BOTH the APOSTLES and the GENTILES received, that sound you hear is your argument DYING A SLOW AGONIZING DEATH as all lies must, when confronted by the TRUTH.)

 5. One Lord, one faith, one baptism, (There is, it seems, only ONE BAPTISM, contrary to the Falwell, Graham gobbledegook whereby they imagine it another way. The only baptism in the bible is in JESUS' NAME, not in the EMPTY TITLES of FATHER SON AND HOLY GHOST. or didn't you know that the POWER is IN THE NAME? ACTS 4:12.

**YOU WROTE**

2.)   1 Cor 13:8 

As for Tongues, they will cease

You write this as if to smarmily suggest this shows that people now won't be speaking in tongues or something or that everyone doesn't have to. Clearly you have no "dispensational" understanding.  The Holy Spirit WILL BE TAKEN FROM THE EARTH and when that happens TONGUES WILL CEASE. The fact that people are STILL SPEAKING IN TONGUES is actually the PROOF that the DAY OF CHRIST has not yet come. In response to false doctrine from people who claimed to be Apostles but were not, Paul wrote to the church at Thessalonica. There were those who said   that the resurrection had already taken place and it had shaken the faith of some. In response Paul had to let them know that the Day of Christ couldn't come UNTIL THE HOLY GHOST WAS TAKEN FROM THE EARTH (2Thess 2:1-8) How would people speak in tongues during the tribulation when their is NO HOLY GHOST ON EARTH? This is where you err, not knowing the scriptures. You have a form of godliness but you have NO POWER, no Holy Ghost. That's why you don't really understand what you read. 

***you wrote***

WHO ARE YOU TO PASS JUDGEMENT ON YOUR BROTHER OR SISTER?  Before God we stand or fall.

1Co2:15

 15. But he that is spiritual judgeth ALL things, yet he himself is judged of no man. (this is who I am, who are YOU?)

Again you err because you don't have the spirit of the one who WROTE IT. That's why you think the scripture "judge not lest ye be judged" is a prohibition against "judging" as opposed to HYPOCRISY which was the subject. If the saints (not catholic inventions but merely those saved by Christ(rom 1:7), are supposed to JUDGE THE WORLD, you're really behind the curve, now aren't you?

1 Corinthians 6:2
Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters?

Really your understanding NEEDS the SPIRIT OF GOD dude, really! No offense but ..come on! And the HITS just keep on coming!

***YOU WROTE**Clearly Tongues, that is speaking a language that someone can understand, is what is in view, and I have yet to meet a single so-called Christian who does anything but babble.*** 

Here you do what you accuse ME of, insulting people or something, or did you think that accusing people of ''BABBLING" was an act of LOVE? Now, I'm gettin' pissed. Here's how VERY LITTLE you know about speaking in tongues. YOU SAY it's a language that can be UNDERSTOOD. The APOSTLE PAUL would BEG TO DIFFER.

1 Corinthians 14:2
For he that speaketh in an unknown tongue speaketh not unto men, but unto God: FOR NO MAN UNDERSTANDETH HIM; howbeit in the spirit he speaketh mysteries.

See how LITTLE you know? Mr smarty pants insulting persoN? About the Clanging symbol, stuff, if we who know the truth don't tell YOU who clearly know almost NOTHING the error of your ways, the sin is on US. Having told you and CONCLUSIVELY shown you that you know nothing. It's now up to YOU. Go to an Apostolic Church and get baptized correctly and they'll tarry with you until God BABBLES through you too.

Ezekiel 33:8
When I say unto the wicked, O wicked man, thou shalt surely die; if thou dost not speak to warnthe wicked from his way, that wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at thine hand.

Jesus said that if you are not BORN AGAIN you will not be saved. What it takes to BE "Born Again" is not some amorphous vague thing that you can't get a grasp on, it's SPECIFIC and it's LAID out comprehensively in your bible. YOUR ERROR is in trying to take the easy way out and in listening to people who don't have the Holy Ghost in the first place. The Catholic Church IS the church of 1TIM4:1-4, and their LEAVEN is seen in the IMPROPER BAPTISM and NON-RECEPTION OF THE HOLY SPIRIT, of their offshoots ( Baptist, Methodis, Lutheran, Protestan, Episcopalian, etc virtually most non-Pentecostals and even some of them unfortunately). What you call insulting is simply recounting HISTORY to you. The apostles SAID that after they were DEAD, Satan would try to CORRUPT THE DOCTRINE OF CHRIST, the gave you LABORIOUS SIGNS with great SPECIFICITY as to how to recognize and combat them. You are aware of neither. There are MORE WARNINGS in the N.T against listening to false doctrine than ANY OTHER SINGLE SUBJECT. You follow them at your peril. If I boast my boast is in the Lord so don't think that I think I'm some "big shot Christian" or something. I simply know more about the Word than any human being you have every spoken to or read, if that were not true, they would have instructed you as I have since I have the "Word oF Knowledge".  Do you even know what that is? It's a Gift of The Spirit that one may receive AFTER being born again properly and BEING a gift, I cannot and DO NOT take credit for it. It provides a perfect knowledge of scripture. Not perfect knowledge mind you, just a perfect knowlege of SCRIPTURE. I'm no better necessarily at FOLLOWING it than most of you and in some cases PROBABLY WORSE. Since those with the most gifts are the ones most persecuted by the enemy of God. Gifts are not without tribulation as Paul told you in reference to his "flesh" doing that which he "would not", etc, or James saying "if we say we have no sin we lie". So please don't think that I, in any way, think of myself as "better" than you, or anyone for that matter, I'm not. In fact, I'm probably WORSE, that 's the kind of guy that is so vile he is confronted with his evil and he falls to his knees and does what Peter said, he Repents, that's all. And in the process the Lord has blessed with a few gifts. Amen.

My first post (I beg to differ Keith)

As a sister in Christ I agree completely with your theological basis for discussion but I'm afraid I must point out your inaccuracy concerning the creators of the Ten Commandments movie...

It is not Disney who has produced it, it in fact is produced by a Christian entertainment company http://www.promenadepictures.com/ and the issue is directed toward ads created by Radio Disney that as pointed out by the CEO of Promenade:

"We were told to delete the reference that Moses was 'chosen by God,' " said Frank Yablans, CEO of Promenade Pictures. "Who does Radio Disney think chose Moses — Tinkerbell?"

If you navigate the site you can see the aim of Promenade Pictures as a mission by others in the entertainment industry to produce family faith-based entertainment.  And if the CEO was requested by Disney to remove the reference to God why would he lie to cast aspersions on Disney?

It's a known fact that Disney has done a 180 degree turn from their wholesome fare of 50 years ago---something begun after Michael Eisen took the helm and something that sadly remains now after his departure. 

 

You may have something there....

You are absolutely right about Disney taking a turn towards the dark side, I am aware of "Gay Day" or "Sodomy Central" to call it by another name. There was a statement that was issued where they explained that they asked for it to be removed because it was confusing. I looked for it but can't find it. But I'm not calling Yablans a liar! Far from it. As the studio they know what the reference is intended to mean, so when he says "We were told to delete the reference that Moses was 'chosen by God," he could be accurate but not right. The problem wasn't whom HE thought the words "chosen by God" referred to, meaning Moses, the problem was the placement of the words. At least that was their explanation which I tended to believe IN THIS ONE SINGLE CASE, namely because no one put a gun to their heads to do the money. However, after thinking about it, I THINK YOU'RE RIGHT. I think that EVEN though they had something to do with the financing, meaning that if they didn't outright finance it they would have had to pay for the advertising and post production costs. In light of their past and recent shifts, I could STILL see some obsequious dweeb of a liberal making the call for fear of offending Muslims or something. So while I was kinda willing to give them the benefit of the doubt, I think I was wrong. My apologies. 

Apology accepted--:)

As I read your comments, I saw that you are in the very midst of a modern day "nest of vipers" and so being such, you are in a position where you can in fact make a difference...so you should check out Promenade and what they are producing as a future venue for your talents.  As a matter of fact, I may consider them for a project I have in the works, my own anime-style Tribulation series, the first novel having been published in January.

I created the characters in anime-style with an absorbing multi-layered plot (like anime) that will be told in four illustrated novels.  This genre is very popular with ages from pre-teen to young adult.  And although it is nowhere near a best-seller (yet) it is available on websites all over the world.

The industry needs more Christian creative input---so I hope you'll allow the Lord to use you (remenber the verse about the talents) as I plan to allow him to use me

GoldAngel-Are you Rob

GoldAngel-Are you Rob Liefeld? Go to page four of this interview.

Edit-GA, nevermind I just read your above post. I see your female.

My bad. ; )

My book series--"The Gleaning Time"

I checked out the article and saw Rob Liefeld's work as a comic artist was inspired by anime as well.   Although I was inspired by the manga giants Nobuhiro Watsuki (creator of Rurouni Kenshin)and Rumiko Takahashi (creator of Ranma II and Inu-Yasha), my series is different as the books are illustrated novels---written words with spot illustrations in each chapter---not a graphic novel or comic.  My graphic design website has a virtual tour of the book with character designs, an excerpt and story overview.  Here's the link if you want to check it out

http://faithfulexpression.dnswh.com/index.html

I had planned it originally as a graphic novel but MS has severely limited my drawing skills---so I create my art on the computer with Adobe Illustrator

Does that mean one can no

Does that mean one can no longer refer to the Jews as the Chosen People, either?

In respect of God, that is?

How about God's strongly suggested people?

Check out my latest YouTube...but only if you support the troops and their mission: Better Men Than Me/The Battle For Fallujah

come on jack read yer

come on jack

read yer danged Bible 

A service of the new NB respect police

God wanted spiritual

God wanted spiritual fruits, Keith, not religious nuts

The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy

So Smarmy Are You

Okay class, Let's examine this prime example of NEW AGE GARBAGE masquerading as "faith". In an effort to ridicule me this fellow has actually shown how abysmally ignorant he is.

He wrote ***God wanted spiritual fruits, Keith, not religious nuts*** 

Wow. That's sooooo deep! Somebody call Hallmark and get a card ready! My poor deluded friend God does NOT want "spritual fruit", how stupid is that? God wants YOU to have the Spiritual fruit buddy, God's got all the spirit He needs! Roflmao. And in order for YOU to have "FRUIT of the spirit you first need to HAVE the HOLY GHOST, doofus. See, how stupid you make yourself sound in  your effort to humiliate and degrade ME? God wanted YOU to have the Holy Ghost, it is your "earnest" money, your proof of His promised salvation. God would be pretty cold to ask you to give up all and follow Him without any proof right? Well, HE provided that proof, which by the way is totally CONTRARY to the churches that teach that there IS NO PROOF! (EPH 1:13,14)The problem is that you want to deal with Jesus in sound bites as opposed to reality. While it may make you friends in the democrat party it won't save your soul. The truth is the Jesus Christ came to earth and He picked thirteen men to carry out His ministry knowing that His mission on earth would soon end.  But even then the prophecy about Satan bruising the heel of the Messiah, (Gen 3:15) had to be lived out. So, one of the men he picked was a devil. Through him Satan sought to compromise the salvation of the world by cutting off the doctrine of Christ at the source, Christ himself. The Lord, knowing all things was aware of all of this and took steps to combat it. To do that He had to educate the Apostles on the spritual warfare that they were going to face. He tried to prepare them for His death, by letting them know His eternal nature so that they would not fear what was to come. He also endeavored to prepare them for life AFTER His ascension into Heaven. One of the ways He did this was by prophecy. He told them that after his "death" basically, all hell would break loose. After He had ascended He continued to send prophecies to His Apostles to encourage them to KEEP THE DOCTRINE (teaching) OF CHRIST PURE.

Acts 20:28-30 (King James Version) 

 28Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood.

 29For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock.

 30Also of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them.

These weren't idle utterings or useless warnings, these things came to pass. In fact Jude was so put out about it that he warned thusly, 

JUDE

3. Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.( 1. the salvation is common, not one way for me and another for you. 2. He wanted them to struggle or contend for the faith. Fight (not physically ) to keep it pure. 

 4.For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ. ( this prophecy is similar to the warning in 2thessalonians were people were PRETENDING to be Apostles and told folks that they missed the Day of Christ.)

John went on to urge the following...I could go on but I'll wrap with this... 1JOHN2:18-19

18. Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.

 19. They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.

The devils efforts to stop the doctrine oF Christ, didn't end at the cross. He had other people, just like Judas, that had infiltrated into the ranks of the disciples. They then went out preaching and teaching perverse things. Most of the N.T. warnings against false doctrine concern teachings that entered the world in this fashion. Other warnings concern far away threats to the doctrine. ONe of those concerned the Catholic Church, it can be found here.. ***NOTE** I am not hating on Catholics I want all to come into the full knowledge of Christ, I am recounting the TRUE history of the doctrine of Christ and exposing them this way is necessary. That said, in 1Tim 4:1-4, Paul warns Timothy about an entire Church of False Doctrine. A Church based on LIES and HYPOCRISY that it learned from demons...

1TIM 4:1-4

1 Timothy 4

 1. Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; ( In order to "depart" from the faith, they had to be "in" the faith to begin with, right?)

 2. Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron; ( This is why it didn't bother Cardinal Mahoney to cover up for the pedophile priests,this is how he can move them around, lie to the police about it and issue proclamtions about the "immorality" of arresting illegals, while his priests are butt raping little boys. CONSCIENCE SEARED.)

 3. Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth.( ****this is how you will know them! They will A. Forbid to marry and B. command the abstention of certain foods. The Catholic Church is the only "church" to prevent priests and nuns from marrying AND to command "no meat of Friday". Interestingly enough, they made the changes to "celibacy" and "no meat on friday" AFTER bibles were written with these very verses in them, proving that God's Word will not return to Him void!)

 4. For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving:

After the death of the last apostle (John on the Isle of Patmos), the devil used his people to change certain aspects of the doctrine of Christ, the IMPORTANT ASPECTS! They changed the BAPTISM which until this time 250A.D. or so, had only been performed according to scripture, in the NAME OF JESUS CHRIST ( acts 2:38, Acts 4:12, Acts 10:44-48, Acts 19:1-6, etc). And the churches were full of people saved like me ( with spiritual utterance) and not like you (without). Proof of this is located in the 8th chapter of the book of Romans. Paul tells the church that if any man did NOT have the Spirit of Christ, he didn't belong to Jesus! Which would be pretty stupid if the presence or absence of the Holy Spirit weren't definitive,  heh? Hardly the namby pamby "tone" you're used to, btw.

Romans 8:9

9. But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his. ( wow. That's not "inclusive" at ALL is it?)

Now, if you can say to people,  "if you don't HAVE SOMETHING you're in dire straights", doesn't it stand to reason that they would need to be able to know whether they had it or not? In fact, Paul here, is relying on THIRD PERSON proof since he isn't writing the letter to individually suspect persons within the church, he was writing to the church leaders, who would need to make such an assessment. This question COULD NOT BE ASKED by many church "leaders" today because they have LIED to their flock and told them that there IS NO evidence that one has the Holy Ghost. Again Paul, would beg to differ, in fact while he was on his way to Ephesus, to establish the ephesian church, he met some disciples and if we were to judge the conversation by modern principles it wouldn't make any sense. Paul is again, asking for proof of something that most fakes today say, doesn't come with proof.

Acts 19

 1. And it came to pass, that, while Apollos was at Corinth, Paul having passed through the upper coasts came to Ephesus: and finding certain disciples,

 2. He said unto them, Have ye received the Holy Ghost since ye believed? And they said unto him, We have not so much as heard whether there be any Holy Ghost. ( why would he ask them if they had received the Holy Ghost SINCE they came to "believe" if they had no way to answer?)

 3.And he said unto them, Unto what then were ye baptized? And they said, Unto John's baptism.

 4. Then said Paul, John verily baptized with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the people, that they should believe on him which should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus.

 5. When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. ( Gee I guess it DOES matter how one is baptized, huh? Guess it's not some liberally vague "just do your own thing", huh?)

 6. And when Paul had laid his hands upon them, the Holy Ghost came on them; and they spake with tongues, and prophesied. ( now if all you have to do is "believe" which the liars say, why on earth did Paul wait for them to receive the Holy Ghost by speaking in tongues? Why didn't he just say, "hey you guys believe, you're good to go!")

Because it wouldn't be true that's why. Long about 250 AD at a certain council at Nicea, the doctrine regarding baptism was changed. Now the Catholic or Universal Church (did u know that's what "catholic" meant?) began to deliberately misinterpret Matt 28:18 from a figurative command, meaning that when Christ said "baptize them in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost", they now interpreted this to mean the literal WORDS "father, son, Holy Ghost". INSTEAD of the understanding with which the apostles formed the church, namely that the Godhead ( father, son, holy ghost, sometimes falsely referred to as the "trinity") existed fully in Jesus.

Colossians 2:8,9

8.Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ. ( well they were in fact, "spoiled" through the traditions of men)

 9. For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily. ( see Jesus told them that HE is THE FATHER ( john 14: 9 and the son (obvious) and the HOLY GHOST ( John 14:26 says the Holy GHost is coming in Jesus' NAME). 

So, Peter was appropriate when he told them to be baptized in  Jesus' name and he was appropriate when he told them that the speaking in tongues that they were mocking was in fact the outpouring of God's spirit. Acts 2:13-38. The problem is you learned most of what you know ( false doctrine) from the false church EVEN IF YOU'RE NOT CATHOLIC! Their "offshoots" churches that came out of the catholic church continue to teach their false doctrine as it relates to baptism and reception of the Holy Ghost, the two most important areas. That's why you can't understand what you read and rely on slogans and half scriptures to make your point. Repent and do this (acts 2:38) and you'll get this (acts 2:4) and then you too, will know, rather than "believe". 

 

Disney hipocrisy

What else would one expect from a company who hosts "Gay Days" where gays are welcome to dress in drag and, regardless of how many children are in their presence be able, with police protection, to make statements like "I am bisexual, I sleep with men and boys" and other digusting statements. Thank you Bill Clinton for giving us a society where this is acceptable. Can't wait for Hillary's contribution to deceny.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.