Scientifically unsound claims about global warming are being used to seduce young students and to cajole lawmakers into accepting the legitimacy of regulatory schemes that restrict the use of fossils fuels, according to a new documentary.
The husband-wife team of Phelim McAleer and Ann McElhinney co-produced and directed “Not Evil, Just Wrong” in an effort to highlight the long history of “anti-human propaganda” that reaches back to the scientifically inaccurate claims made about DDT (Dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane) in Rachel Carson’s 1962 book “Silent Spring.” The same alarmist rhetoric is now being used to rationalize severe limits on carbon dioxide (Co2) emissions that could cripple modern economies, the filmmakers warn.
The documentary will premier 8 p.m. on October 18. The film is available for purchase online where “Cinematic Tea Parties” are already being organized. A special screening was held for supporters at the Americans for Tax Reform (ATR) office in Washington D.C. Wednesday night.
“Carbon is the new DDT,” McAleer said in interview. “Environmentalists are pushing the same kind of anti-human propaganda that triggered the ban on DDT. Millions of children died of malaria because of this ban. The same kind of deception is now being used to target carbon dioxide. Industries that rely on fossil could be shut down and jobs lost thanks to all of the fear mongering and the disinformation that is not justified by science.”
Americans, unlike Europeans, seem more aware and attuned to the growing body of evidence that questions the premise of man-made global warming theories, he added. The documentary features a number of scientists who have identified natural forces, as opposed to human activity, as the primary drivers of climate change. The real threat to future livelihoods come more from global warming policy proposals than do from any actual warming trend, McAleer suggested.
Although the British High Court recently ruled in favor of parents who objected to the distribution of Al Gore’s film “An Inconvenient Truth” in the school system, its message of pending man-made climate catastrophe continues to hold sway with students who are interviewed in“Not Evil, Just Wrong."
John Day, the lawyer for British parents who sued the British Department of Education over Gore’s film, discusses the court ruling in the film and compares actual scientific estimates of climate change contained in the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) with the assertions made in “An Inconvenient Truth.”
“The judge identified nine aspects of `An Inconvenient Truth,’ nine core errors, where Al Gore either misstated the IPCC or prejudicially exaggerated what they found,” Day said. “For example in relation to the sea level rises which is perhaps the starkest error in Al Gore's film arguably. Al Gore is giving an impression that the sea level is going to rise by 20 feet in a very near future. The IPCC talks about 20 feet sea level rises over millennia, over thousands of years, thousands and thousands of years. And sea level rises by a matter of inches by the end of the century. Now that is a very disturbing misstatement of the science.”
Contrary to what students have been taught in British schools, human emission have little or nothing to do with melting glaciers, Syun Ichi Akasofu, founding director of the International Arctic Research Centre at the University of Alaska, concluded in his research.
“We have ice in the Arctic Ocean and it has been receding, but this receding began around 1850, not the just the last 50 years,” he said in the film. “It does happen all the time because of natural phenomenon. So it is very difficult to associate all the changes in the ice to carbon dioxide.”
Patrick Moore, a founding member of Greenpeace, also appears in the documentary and comments on the modern environmental movement. He is particularly critical of how the news media has covered and reacted to the concept of global warming.
“There’s a real unbalanced situation in the media, always trying to look for the global warming connection,” he said. “The fact that the Antarctic ice sheet, the sea ice around Antarctic is growing rapidly, the fact that the arctic ice is not disappearing the way that we’ve been told, as a matter of fact, it came back even larger last year, and this year it looks like it’s going to be even more extensive, but that doesn’t get reported.”
Moore eventually left Greenpeace in the mid 1980’s because it adopted what he describes as an “anti-human” and an “anti-science” agenda.“I don’t believe that there is climate catastrophe,” he said. “I don’t use the word chaos or disaster to describe the present changes in climate, which are well within natural variations that have occurred in the past history of the earth.”
“Not Evil, Just Wrong” also focuses attention on the impact global warming polices have had on the most underdeveloped parts of the world. British Lord Nigel Lawson calls out environmentalists for erecting barriers against economic progress where it is needed most.
“The people who are calling for massive carbon dioxide reduction, the Al Gore’s of this world, are in fact the enemies of poverty reduction,” he says in the film. Industrialized areas of America, such as Vevey, Indiana are particularly vulnerable to European-style regulatory schemes now making their way through Congress, the documentary points out. The community, which is located near the Kentucky border, greatly benefits from the availability of cheap energy sources like coal.
Tim and Tiffany McElhany are among the Vevey residents who take part in the documentary. They explain how the anti-industry policies now under consideration would greatly diminish the standard of living in their community and jeopardize economic opportunities for their children.
In June, the House passed the Waxman-Markey “cap and trade” bill, which could come up for final approval in the fall.
“It would mean the death of American industry,” McElhinney said. “We already have the proof of how disastrous green policies can be to economies. Spain has been held up as the poster child for renewable energy and Obama has talked repeatedly of Spain’s green jobs. Spain has 17.9 percent unemployment, is that what America wants?” Green jobs are a myth - they dont exist. If you tax energy and make it more expensive you make jobs more expensive and decrease employment. Cap and Trade is simply a stimulus bill for Chinese power station workers.”
Colleen Holmes, executive director with Eagle Forum, attended the screening at ATR and expressed concern over the direction of U.S. policy."The people who form the backbone of our nation, small business owners and hard working, middle and lower income Americans know this policy will directly affect them by killing jobs and increase their taxes and energy costs, yet the liberal elites ignore their concerns and treat them with contempt," she said. "The film addresses that very well.”
—Kevin Mooney is a freelance investigative reporter specializing in environmental and government corruption issues.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Sounds like a great doc
Fri, 08/21/2009 - 12:48 ET by IgnatzJFahrquarI'm sure it'll be airing on P. O. V., Frontline or NOVA sometime soon ... not!
Sad, I'll just have to enter it into my Netflix "wishlist" and hope that they do pick it up.
"You should always tell the truth, because if you tell the truth you make it the other person's problem." Sean Connery
I only wish..
Fri, 08/21/2009 - 14:28 ET by wizardjrthat this could be shown on the National Geographic channel, and History, and Science channels, etc. on cable along with every school room in America.
Fat chance.
Cap And Trade
Fri, 08/21/2009 - 15:03 ET by JDWInteresting. How does Obama's $2B taxpayer loan to Brazil for offshore oil drilling fit into this theory?
JDW
DAILY WAVE
Jobs, jobs, jobs ... Spending, spending, spending
JDW.... Soros is
Fri, 08/21/2009 - 15:14 ET by bigtimerJDW....
Soros is smiling.
Obama's a Community Agitator, a walking, talking destroyer. ~ Rush Limbaugh
Just as I am reading this
Fri, 08/21/2009 - 15:40 ET by DoktorFrankenJust as I am reading this that stupid commercial with Noah Wyle (sp?) came on and pleaded with people to help ''Climate Change'' by sending money to the World Wildlife Fund. Those poor, poor polar bears (who happen to be growing in number and thriving - totally opposite situation from ol' Noah's spiel). How freaking stupid can people get?? Do you HAVE to be an actor to be this monumentally (emphasis on the mentally) stupid?
I am glad someone is trying to get the truth out. And I sincerely doubt that the ''crisis'' channels (HIST, DSC, NGC, TWC) or the ''public'' channel (PBS) will ever show the Ignorant Masses this flagrant use of facts.
Re Noah
Fri, 08/21/2009 - 17:21 ET by slickwillie2001Man I hate that ad. It almost sounds like he is crying as he reads his lines. I've got a new picture for him for his next ad: http://www.moonbattery.com
Inconvenient fact: In Northern Canada, they kill hundreds of polar bears a year because they get into town garbage dumps and lose their fear of people.
Crippling industry has
Sat, 08/22/2009 - 09:14 ET by ReaverCrippling industry has always been the goal – “Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialised civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring that about?” -- Maurice Strong, head of the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro and Executive Officer for Reform in the Office of the Secretary General of the United Nations.
"Obama's health care plan will be written by a committee whose head, John Conyers, says he doesn't understand it. It'll be passed by a Congress that has not read it, signed by a president who smokes, funded by a Treasury chief who didn't pay his taxes, overseen by a Surgeon General who is obese, and financed by a country that's nearly broke. What could possibly go wrong?" –Rush Limbaugh
I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me. - Hunter S. Thompson
False Green vs Global Warming
Sat, 08/22/2009 - 18:46 ET by hwm98264.....The current political battle over global warming/climate change is a totally different subject than “air pollution” and boils down to the fundamental issue of: "Does CO2 cause global warming?" How can carbon dioxide (CO2) be a pollutant when there would be no life on Earth, as we know it, without carbon dioxide (CO2)? CO2 is an invisible, odorless and non-toxic trace gas. You would NOT exist without Carbon Dioxide......Carbon Dioxide (CO2) does not cause Global Warming because there is no past historical scientific factual evidence, data and/or records that link CO2 as a forcing factor or a cause of any past meaningful increasing temperature rises of climate warming periods. Any current rising temperatures is not causation. ALL other global warming arguments are irrelevant, since humans are incapable of controlling any various exogenous and endogenous natural processes of climate change.....So, when you read or watch on TV articles/stories on the POTENTIAL disasters resulting from Global Warming or Climate Change, ignore them, because they are purely exaggerated speculations based on falsehoods meant to scare you and intimidate you to support a “Green” future; which has nothing to do with true energy efficiency. Efficiency is OK if that is what you desire, but “Green” is not going to give it to you because green energy cannot exist without huge taxpayer subsidies. ...The current cap-and-trade climate energy bill is one of the greatest frauds ever foisted on the American Citizens.
Global Warming Debate
Sat, 08/29/2009 - 07:17 ET by tarunkjuyalOfficial government measurements show that the world’s temperature has cooled a bit since reaching its most recent peak in 1998.
That’s given global warming skeptics new ammunition to attack the prevailing theory of climate change. The skeptics argue that the current stretch of slightly cooler temperatures means that costly measures to limit carbon dioxide emissions are ill-founded and unnecessary.
Proposals to combat global warming are “crazy” and will “destroy more than a million good American jobs and increase the average family’s annual energy bill by at least $1,500 a year,” the Heartland Institute, a conservative research organization based in Chicago, declared in full-page newspaper ads earlier this summer. “High levels of carbon dioxide actually benefit wildlife and human health,” the ads asserted.
Source: http://lifeofearth.org/2009/08/2231.html