Great phrase:  "signal/noise ratio of Daily Kos". 

Would need to know exactly what Obama believes about them before accepting your statement.  I would wager that he is privately all for their misadventure as long as it benefits him, since I see him as an opportunist, provocateur, and prevaricator. 

As an example, Obama's segmental distancing from Reverend Wright as more damning data was revealed demonstrated a calculated public narrative designed to obfuscate and indemnify Obama from his chosen mentor, spiritual advisor, friend, political stepping stone and Black Theology/Black Nationalistic socialist-based "religious" affiliation.

A similar methodology is appearant in Obama's treatment of the Ayers relationship, where Obama was only as forthcoming as necessary to maintain an elusive narrative.

Then there is the Tony Rezko relationship which received even less illumination, and, therefore, less need for Obama to backstroke away from a toxic relationship.

Just because Obama may correctly identify the sky as blue does not mean I'll reflexively disagree with him. 

Like a broken clock, even Shamrock O'Bama can be right about something, though, IMO, he is rarely correct or benevolent in his political ideology concerning the USA. 

Edit --  I read your comment below.  Obama is much more publically guarded than you make of him.  I believe a very revealing comment in one of his books speaks volumes of how Obama operates on a public level.  In his book, Barry talks about how he learned to speak to White people so as not to scare them:

"

On p. 94-95 he describes an effective tactic to deal with White people:

It was usually an effective tactic, another one of those tricks I had learned: People were satisfied so long as you were courteous and smiled and made no sudden moves. They were more than satisfied; they were relieved - such a pleasant surprise to find a well-mannered young black man who didn't seem angry all the time."

Good speakers learn effective tools for communicating and connecting with their audience.  Obama, per usual, filters these concepts through the context of Race.  And the dirty little secret is that the practised well-mannered Barry was angry.... often... below that calm exterior.

OY!  Such is a uniter?  Meshugana!

I'm thinking that Josh might be one of those people responsible for those long lines at the polling booths. Not able to read or interpret the ballots. "Let's see, what does this mean? Am I supposed to mark this here? Gee, did I just vote for Buchanan? I meant to vote for Obama. Waaaaaahhhh -- the evil Republicans just stole my vote!"

___________________________________ 

If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber

--Do you not yet see that he (and the Kos) do not see eye to eye with you and that they consider John McCain to be "radically conservative" from their far Left point of view?-- 

Yes, I can see that. As I think it was Rush who pointed out a week or so ago, the Republican's push to get a 'moderate' candidate hasn't worked, as shown by the moderate Republicans who are not backing McCain. 

--That fact in and of itself ought to remove any remaining misgivings anyone may have about voting McCain/Palin.-- 

It is strong, yes, though I also have the hope that a conservative third party will have a strong enough showing to make the Republicans think about how real conservatives are not happy with their drift to the center and left.

Because to me, this seems to be more about "not Obama" then "for McCain", though pro-Palin should not be shortchanged. If not for her, McCain's campaign would be dead in the water by now.

It's truly scary how close the liberals and media push for Republicans needing to select a moderate candidate (do they ever say that Dems need to pick a moderate?? i doubt it) has come to working.  

--We should not have to wait -- mainstream America should know better. Unfortunately, however, as we know from history, control of the masses begins with control of mass propaganda. 

Both sentiments of Obama betray his far-left mindset. He is a wolf in sheep's clothing, a smiling tiger. The sad thing is he could easily be stopped (for example, if self-professed Bible-believing Christians would say "no" to any candidate supporting radical abortion-on-demand, with the same vocal unity as held by certain minority groups), but it seems too many have been assimilated as Obamatons.--

Very true. It is a shame of the damnedest (and I don't mean that as cussing, either) sort that real and supposed Christians have sold their votes (and dare I say, their souls) to such a man.

Keep your eyes on this--the 'social justice' crowd, particularly the religious part of it, will become more and more extreme. CNS reported about a school in Chicago, called Social Justice High, which is designed specificially for gay and lesbian students. That's the one where PETA is demanding an all-vegan diet. Religious social justice people are already trying to hijack and spin 'pro-life' to mean not just the saving of unborn babies, but also such extremes as pacifism and anti-death-penalty.

"Thoroughly worldly people never understand even the world; they rely altogether on a few cynical maxims which are not true."

Chesterton, Orthodoxy