WashPost Still Not Informing Readers That Va. Abortionists Already Conduct Ultrasounds
In a 37-paragraph front-page article today, Washington Post correspondents Laura Vozzella and Anita Kumar detailed how, as the "invasiveness" of an ultrasound requirement in an abortion regulation bill "emerged" that "enthusiasm waned."
Vozzella and Kumar examined how pro-choice activists ginned up protests via social media and how liberal-leaning comedians on Saturday Night Live and Comedy Central mocked the legislation. Yet not once in the entire story did Kumar and Vozzella note that abortionists in the Old Dominion who are affiliated with Planned Parenthood already do ultrasounds prior to conducting abortions. Despite discussing the ongoing controversy on MSNBC yesterday, Kumar also failed to mention the fact for that network's audience.
Former NewsBuster, now Commentary magazine assistant online editor Alana Goodman broke that story on Tuesday morning and followed up on Wednesday by noting (emphasis mine):
Planned Parenthood policy already requires ultrasounds before abortion procedures.
“That’s just the medical standard,” said Adrienne Schreiber, an official at Planned Parenthood’s Washington, D.C., regional office. “To confirm the gestational age of the pregnancy, before any procedure is done, you do an ultrasound.”
According to Schreiber, Planned Parenthood does require women to give signed consent for abortion procedures, including the ultrasound. But if the women won’t consent to the ultrasound, the abortion cannot take place, according to the group’s national standards.
- Ken Shepherd's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
They will never publish this
Submitted by c5then on Fri, 02/24/2012 - 1:10pm.
And if it is pointed out to them they will first lie, then deny, and then lie again.
Madison and Jefferson and Franklin built a Republic - Roberts killed it!
Washington Post
Submitted by John21 on Fri, 02/24/2012 - 2:54pm.
NEVER, expect facts or truth in the Washington Post.
I have lived in Washington for a long time and every story you read in that rag you can always find massive amounts of errors. I used to think they were just errors but after a couple of years and you begin to notice the errors are always to provide cover for whatever liberal agenda it is reporting on.
It is a provider of liberal propaganda and every article should alert you to do some very basic research to confirm the facts.