Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 25, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Ken Shepherd's blog
  • Taranto: ‘Obama Presidency Has Given Liberal Media Bias a New and Dangerous Form’
  • Fox's Ed Henry: Colleagues Cheered Me On When I Grilled Bush Administration - They Don't Now
  • Bozell Column: The 'Assassinate Wall Street' Movie
  • Paul Krugman’s Flagrant ‘Austerity’ Double Standard
  • WashPost's Milbank Mocks Nikki Haley, 'Reached Out to' 'White Supremacists'
  • Networks Give Three Times More Quotes to Supporters of Gay Scout Admittance Than Opponents
  • State Dept. Official Who Altered Benghazi Talking Points Promoted; Only Fox Covered
  • MSNBC’s Krystal Ball Gushes Over Obama Speech, Claims the President is ‘Reining In His Own Power’

AP Buries Lede in Australian Muslim Veil Story

By Ken Shepherd | July 11, 2011 | 13:11

A  A
Ken Shepherd's picture

A proposed "culturally insensitive" traffic law in New South Wales, Australia, could land Muslim women of good conscience in jail for a year, the Associated Press alerted readers in a July 10 story. Essentially the law requires motorists pulled over by police officers to show their faces so that officers can confirm their identity against a driver's license photo.

Failure to do so could result in a fine and/or jail time.

"A vigorous debate that the proposal has triggered reflects the cultural clashes being ignited by the growing influx of Muslim immigrants and the unease that visible symbols of Islam are causing in predominantly white Christian Australia since 1973 when the government relaxed its immigration policy," the AP preached.

But buried deeper in the article was an explanation of why the bill is being considered in the first place (emphasis mine):

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

The New South Wales state Cabinet decided to create the law on July 4 in response to Police Commissioner Andrew Scipione's call for greater police powers. Other states including Victoria and Western Australia are considering similar legislation.

"I don't care whether a person is wearing a motorcycle helmet, a burqa, niqab, face veil or anything else — the police should be allowed to require those people to make their identification clear," State Premier Barry O'Farrell said in a statement.

The laws were motivated by the bungled prosecution of Carnita Matthews, a 47-year-old Muslim mother of seven who was booked by a highway patrolman for a minor traffic violation in Sydney in June last year.

An official complaint was made in Matthews' name against Senior Constable Paul Fogarty, the policeman who gave her the ticket. The complaint accused Fogarty of racism and of attempting to tear off her veil during their roadside encounter.

Unknown to Matthews, the encounter was recorded by a camera inside Fogarty's squad car. The video footage showed her aggressively berating a restrained Fogarty and did not support her claim that he tried to grab her veil before she reluctantly and angrily lifted it to show her face.

Matthews was sentenced in November to six months in jail for making a deliberately false statement to police.

But that conviction and sentence were quashed on appeal last month without her serving any time in jail because a judge was not convinced that it was Matthews who signed the false statutory declaration. The woman who signed the document had worn a burqa and a justice of the peace who witnessed the signing had not looked beneath the veil to confirm her identity.

In other words, establishing the identity of a suspect is paramount to proper police work and prosecution of suspects in courts of law.

Yet at no point in the 28-paragraph story did the AP quote a career police officer or prosecutor about the legitimate public interest addressed by the proposed law, choosing only to quote a politician backing the law:

"I don't care whether a person is wearing a motorcycle helmet, a burqa, niqab, face veil or anything else — the police should be allowed to require those people to make their identification clear," State Premier Barry O'Farrell said in a statement.

That one statement in favor of the bill was countered by two opposing views and one Muslim group's rep suggesting he was reluctantly leaning towards thinking the proposed legislation was Muslim-bashing (emphasis mine):

"It does seem to be very heavy handed, and there doesn't seem to be a need," said Australian Council for Civil Liberties spokesman David Bernie. "It shows some cultural insensitivity."

[...]

Bernie noted that while a bandit disguised with a veil and sunglasses robbed a Sydney convenience store last year, there were no Australian crime trends involving Muslim women's clothing.

"It is a religious issue here," said Mouna Unnjinal, a mother of five who has been driving in Sydney in a niqab for 18 years and has never been booked for a traffic offense.

"We're going to feel very intimidated and our privacy is being invaded," she added.

[...]

"I wouldn't like to go and say this is Muslim bashing," said Ikebal Patel, president of the Australian Federation of Islamic Councils, of the proposed New South Wales laws.

"But I think that the timing of this was really bad for Muslims," he said.

# # #

About the Author

Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters. Click here to follow Ken Shepherd on Twitter.
  • Islam
  • Australia
  • Religion
  • Wire Services/Media Companies
  • Associated Press
  • Ken Shepherd's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

OK......I"m reading this, and

Submitted by killa37 on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 1:27pm.

OK......I"m reading this, and I"m thinking that this is a Mooooooooooooooooooooooslem woman who IS driving a car - which may not be allowed in a lot of Moooooooooooooooooooooooooslem countries. And she is living in a non-moooooooooslem country which ALLOWS her to drive a car. And she's wearing a burkqa, and the police officer wants to confirm her identity......and she is fighting it???

Oh........and she has SEVEN kids???? And the other lady has FIVE kids??

Folks..................can you see what is going on here???

  • Login to post comments

I'm with you

Submitted by Franksam on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 2:15pm.

Fecundity is destiny.

  • Login to post comments

"...can you see what is going on here???"

Submitted by Dave. on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 2:41pm.

Yep, the Aussies, like their European cousins, are well on their way to being displaced by the Islamists.

Can a movie named Crocodile Akhmed be very far away?

-Dave

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

Hey Dave.....a few years ago

Submitted by killa37 on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 11:51pm.

Hey Dave.....a few years ago some of the 'local ragheads' were going down to the beaches in south Sydney and hasseling the lifeguards and telling the girls to 'cover up'......you know, those places can be topless - which is fine with me, you, and the Aussies who have been living there for a hell of a lot longer than these camel-jockeys showed up to bring their own brand of misery and intolerance to yet another country.

Well, from what I could gather from some Aussie surfer friends of mine, 'da Auzzie boyz' didn't take too kindly to this kind of 'intolerance', and went in to the Mooooooooooooooooooooslem area of that town and laid down the law hard!!! Burned cars, broke some windows, punched out a few punks.............and told these guys how the hell things REALLY went on in Australia.
From what I can tell, the Moooooooooooooooooooooooslems sort of backed off in that area on trying to get people to live by THIER rules.

Oh, but we can't be forceful with these people...........it's intolerant and racist and bigoted!!!

  • Login to post comments

NOPE NOT MUSLIM BASHING

Submitted by OldJarhead77 on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 1:45pm.

The Veil, while a sign of faith for Muslim women, is not a screen or protection from ill or bad deeds. I traveled in Europe this summer and saw Muslim women showing their faces to passport control officers (Albeit women passport control officers) in the UK, in France and in the Netherlands. The fact the we have confirmed reports of men dressing as women to escape from the Military in countries like Afganistan, shows the necessity of the law. Islam does not allow men to dress as women, ANYWHERE in the Koran. Nor does it allow a woman a free pass under the Veil to Not be examined by legitimate law enforcement. I admire those women who use the veil as a sign of their dedication to God but those that use it as excuse to get away with breaking the law have to understand that breaking the law puts them under the authority of law enforement.

Liberals: No Morals, No Standards, NO Problem!
  • Login to post comments

Wasn't it Al Qaeda that said

Submitted by Kenyon Schraeder on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 1:47pm.

they'd use "our" adherence to "our" laws, "our" respect for individual rights and "our" regard for freedom and liberty against "us" so as to eventually take "us" down? {"our", "us" means infidel}

  • Login to post comments

Amen, brother......amen.....sometime in the future,

Submitted by nonncom on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 1:55pm.

these liberal asses will see what their failure to stand up to these creeps has accomplished for them, and then they'll say "WTF did we do!?".....Of course, it'll be too late by then....

  • Login to post comments

You give liberals too much

Submitted by ThatDude on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 7:02pm.

You give liberals too much credit. Cause and effect are completely disconnected in their eyes. They seem to believe that just because they claim to have good intentions that they are never at fault.

The answer to 1984 is 1776.
  • Login to post comments

delete double

Submitted by ThatDude on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 7:03pm.

delete double

The answer to 1984 is 1776.
  • Login to post comments

Yup.

Submitted by almostacowboy on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 3:35pm.

Infidelicious!

  • Login to post comments

People wearing full hoods

Submitted by Tugboat Phil on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 1:57pm.

have NO peripheral vision and should NOT be allowed to drive that way. I think even Klansmen drive without their hoods until they get to the rally.

President Obama is a Muslim (from his own lips), Kenyan (read it from his publicist) a homosexual (read it on a news magazine cover) and a Socialist (I'm alive and can see it for myself)
  • Login to post comments

New slogan

Submitted by Radical1979 on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 2:22pm.

Add to:
Don't drink and drive
Don't text and drive

Don't burqa and drive

Works for me.

Proud member of the 53%!
  • Login to post comments

The peripheral vision point

Submitted by Ken Shepherd on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 2:26pm.

The peripheral vision point you raised is good. This law has to do with identifying the driver for purposes of issuing a ticket or what have you, but the peripheral vision implications could be a legitimate public safety reason to not allow them when one is driving.


 

  • Login to post comments

There Is Something Wrong With Moslim Bashing? Not Ever!

Submitted by Avitar on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 2:26pm.

The Veil, while a sign of faith for Muslim women is also part of the Muslim military uniform. The dress of Muslims was designed by its leader Mohammad to create unit cohesion within the oversized thieves gang which is Islam.
Wearing the veil is a declaration of war against the non-Muslims and a claim of Muslim legal authority that can only exist if the country is subjugated beneath the heal of Islam. Any authority which accepts the authority of Islam is selling out his country.

  • Login to post comments

And just suppose......

Submitted by almostacowboy on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 3:37pm.

some one, some body, some "thing" in a full burqa pulls a stickup. What then? If they're grabbed in the act, is they fact that it's "against their religion" to pull back the curtains going to get them off (meaning "set them free")?

  • Login to post comments

I seem to recall a few

Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 3:49pm.

I seem to recall a few incidents in the states with burkas and head coverings. One in FL sticks in my mind. And seriously are these people allowed to wear burkas while flying; now there is a candidate for full body search via TSA. Wonder what would come of full Klan regalia? Dang I am being ornery today.

Nuke em til they glow; then shoot em in the dark
  • Login to post comments

Jeez, just show your face.

Submitted by E.S.Blofeld on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 4:02pm.

I want to know from Muslims what would they do if they were the police. So no one gets hurt feelings, how do you confirm the identity of a person under a burqa? It's dangerous to drive with your face covered.

Ernst

"Isn't it pretty to think that way?"-EH

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Obama/Holder DOJ's radical departure on press freedom is chilling (Boutrous @ WSJ)
  • Oops: Obama fails to salute Marine, went back to shake hand (Weekly Standard)
  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter Column: When Did We Vote to Become Mexico?
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • Leno: Obama Can Close Gitmo By Making it a Government-Funded Solar Company
  • Charlie Sheen Changes Name to Carlos Estevez for Upcoming 'Machete Kills' Film
  • HUH? Slate Editor: Kaitlyn Hunt Case 'Is About Gay Rights. But It’s Not About That'
  • Weekend Open Thread
  • Leno: ‘Not Looking Good for Obama - Today His Teleprompter Took the Fifth’
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use