Liberal Salon.com Writer to Jon Stewart: Drop Your 'Trite' 'Comedian First' BS, You're an 'Activist'
It's not just conservatives who are sick and tired of Jon Stewart hiding behind his "I'm a comedian" excuse when called out for his dead-serious liberal pontifications.
Even liberals like Salon.com's Will Bunch are tired of the "Daily Show" host's faux sanctimony, even as he cheers Stewart's liberalism and calls on the comedian to embrace it.
From a June 21 War Room blog post (emphases mine):
[O]utside of "The Daily Show," in interviews like the one he gave to Chris Wallace and even his famous 2004 confrontation that may or may not have killed CNN's "Crossfire," I find that Stewart (and it pains me to say this, as such a fan) can come across as kind of lame, his "media criticism" beyond trite. In interviews, his complaints against the media tend to be an unsophisticated "pox on all of your houses." I thought his largely pointless D.C. mall rally in late October repeated the mistake he makes in these interviews -- trying to argue that our discourse is too loud while ignoring the real point that he hammers home on "The Daily Show," that our politics is irrational.Story Continues Below Ad ↓
But the lamest thing of all, frankly, is Stewart trying to absolve responsibility from the gravitas of what he does -- and make no mistake, the gravitas is there -- by claiming that merely, "I am a comedian." That's true, but he fails to see what many others realize, which is that he is also much more than a comedian. In a world where far too much of highly paid professional journalism, especially inside the Beltway, has become a joke, it has fallen on the comedians -- Stewart, Stephen Colbert and Bill Maher perhaps the most prominent -- to say what on-one-hand, on-the-other hand journalists are too tied up in knots to tell you, that much of America's discourse in 2011 is bat-guano insane.
Actually, Jon Stewart, you are an activist, and the cause you fight for is most worthy because -- as you do correctly note -- it is not a purely ideological one, but the cause of reason. And the fight against illogic is not a "fair and balanced" one, that the most dangerous bogus ideas may be concentrated in the spots where global warming doesn't exist and the way to balance a budget deficit is more tax cuts for rich people. For whatever reason, in the past your friend and colleague Colbert -- who coined "truthiness" and said that reality has a known liberal bias -- has gotten it a lot better than you do.
Maybe Stewart is starting to get it, too. He did say on Sunday that he has an ideology that "is non-partisan and focuses on 'absurdity,' 'anti-corruption' and 'anti lack-of-authenticity.'" That sounds exactly right, so now it's time to drop the "just a comedian" shtick, which comes off like a giant cop-out, exactly the kind of thing that you normally expose so very well, night after night.
# # #
- Ken Shepherd's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Whether he's a not-too-funny
Submitted by killa37 on Wed, 06/22/2011 - 11:39am.
Whether he's a not-too-funny 'comedian' or a not-too-sharp activist............this guy isn't anything special...........just another psuedo know-it-all flapping his dumb gums.
Zydokomuno
Submitted by Xpat48 on Wed, 06/22/2011 - 11:42am.
Zydokomuno
Can't really blame jon
Submitted by Diesel on Wed, 06/22/2011 - 11:55am.
Can't really blame jon LIEbowitz for hiding behind the "clown nose."
The minute he drops the "clown nose" excuse, he just becomes another bill maher or joy behar.
If he keeps it
Submitted by jon_torlin on Wed, 06/22/2011 - 11:57am.
If he wants to keep the "comedian" title, he needs to add the word "failed" before that.
That's what he and Maher are, failed comedians.
-Jon
How so?
Submitted by balboa on Wed, 06/22/2011 - 12:01pm.
How so?
How so?
Submitted by HelenS on Wed, 06/22/2011 - 2:37pm.
Well, most obviously, he's not funny.
Me - "The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years - the cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil."
Solid argument...
Submitted by balboa on Wed, 06/22/2011 - 3:16pm.
Solid argument...
If success in the entertainment industry is measured by . . .
Submitted by Galvanic on Wed, 06/22/2011 - 12:25pm.
. . . fame and fortune, I'd say Jon Stewart is one of the most successful around.
Is he a comedian? Yeah, I'd say so. Is he an activist? Well, he definitely has a political agenda behind his schtick.
What might be success.....
Submitted by jon_torlin on Wed, 06/22/2011 - 12:52pm.
To me, I equate a comedian's success to having some shows like Bill Engvall, Jeff Dunham, Jeff Foxworthy, and so on.
For Stewart, not so much.
-Jon
What do you mean by "some
Submitted by balboa on Wed, 06/22/2011 - 1:03pm.
What do you mean by "some shows"? Like stand-up concerts?
All the guys you mentioned are successful, Foxworthy wildly so. But I bet Dunham and Engvall would kill to have their own show on Comedy Central. (I think Dunham used to have one)
EDIT: So did Engvall for a while. With Nancy Travis. Hotchacha.
Not TV
Submitted by jon_torlin on Wed, 06/22/2011 - 1:16pm.
I wasn't referring to TV shows, I meant when they go do shows on the road. Sure, some of them get recorded, but even so.
-Jon
I suppose if you're looking
Submitted by balboa on Wed, 06/22/2011 - 1:46pm.
I suppose if you're looking at it strictly in terms of being a stand-up, but Stewart got out of that because he could make more money, get more exposure doing a TV show, which is why Foxworthy has done 2-3 shows (?), Engvall and Dunham did theirs, Larry the Cable Guy is on The History Channel, etc.
By that standard, Dane Cook is probably the most successful, as he plays to huge arenas (much like the Blue Collar Comedy Tour did once).
But your own show is still the "dream."
WOW.... Your own side turned on you Jon
Submitted by OldJarhead77 on Wed, 06/22/2011 - 12:19pm.
Guess you have to admit it now that you even you own side is saying its so!
He's All Day Dream-y And Stuff
Submitted by rammingspeed on Wed, 06/22/2011 - 12:42pm.
Jon Stewart is guilty of believing what ALL liberals believe, which is they have the corner on right and wrong. It isn't political to them, it's simply the way life IS. He is simply making fun of "bad behavior," which all right thinking people can easily see, so what's the big deal? Why are you labeling it "political?" "Of course I'm NOT political..." Jon says. That's the result of the velvet lined cocoon living that is the bane of the left. It's worse with Hollywood-ers and intellectual elites all around, but it is the bottom line of all of their lives.
ramming, that is pretty much
Submitted by Smartypants on Wed, 06/22/2011 - 3:56pm.
ramming, that is pretty much what I have always felt (and what I posted yesterday in a related thread). Liberals believe that there is no viable alternative to their agenda, so that anyone who favors those alternatives must have some kind of problem. This is why they are not bothered by media bias in their favor even while they rail on FOX News. People like Mr. Stewart do not see the hypocrisy in this because they think the other networks (and he himself) are just biased towards "the truth," so there is no problem.
Yes Jon, come out of that
Submitted by inquiringmind on Wed, 06/22/2011 - 1:34pm.
Yes Jon, come out of that liberal closet.
So, what's it gonna be Jon?
Submitted by Boil It Down on Wed, 06/22/2011 - 2:54pm.
Too many couch potatoes with voter registrations believe Stewart is the real news and won't venture beyond the comedy channel to discover otherwise. What Stewart carelessly says on his show for laughs become reality to those folks.
My point is, be a comedian or a pundit but not both Jon, but be very careful how you mislead people from here on out. Get your facts and logic straightened out, then decide. -bidn-
Reality does not have a liberal bias.
Submitted by Phryj1 on Wed, 06/22/2011 - 4:31pm.
Regarding what the guy said here:
"...the most dangerous bogus ideas may be concentrated in the spots where global warming doesn't exist and the way to balance a budget deficit is more tax cuts for rich people."
First of all, there hasn't been any measurable warming in a decade. Second, when you cut taxes for everyone (because they aren't just cutting taxes for the rich like the left would have you believe) it stimulates the economy and tax revenues go up. Dangerous bogus ideas? I don't think so.
I think my tagline sums it up nicely:
Progressives seem to be completely averse to facts and logic. Apparently, reality has a conservative bias.
Stewart makes no amount of
Submitted by tombaker on Wed, 06/22/2011 - 8:22pm.
Stewart makes no amount of hiding that he heavily leans Democrat. But he is mainstream enough, if you consider his rally. Most Americans feel Congress is worthless and not helping the country...that includes both parties.
Chris Wallace did not engage in an interview, he was openly debating Stewart. Wallace had the agenda. Of course it the normal self-centered FOX News side. Wallace did the classic, "enough about FOX News, what do you think about how others view our network"
Wallace was smirking the entire time, and then he states FOX news is the counterbalance to MSNBC.
Wallace is no longer straight news....watch the interview, he is advocate and stating his point of view...and that is not Straight journalism.
FOX News is part of the MSM, no matter how much Wallace shills. Sites like this are not part of the MSM. Fox News needs to stop playing the victim card.
Stewart is
Submitted by packman on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 8:59am.
simply a member of the host of liberal clowns that for some unexplainable reason we see and hear about in the media every single day. No one really gives a flying rat's rear end for these dork's opinions, yet we can hardly read a single web site or watch a news show that the likes of Maher, Stewart, Schulz, Olberman, Amanpour, etc., etc., etc., ad nauseam ad infinitum are forced into the range of our vision and hearing. These people have no solutions for anything except maybe holding hands across the beach or some other totally meaningless activity. But then we have to remember, they are all liberals...
"...Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want bread..." ~Thomas Jefferson
I see a fin in the water--
Submitted by carolina09 on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 10:44am.
--it's a shark!! Get ready to jump, Zeppo.
"faux sanctimony," great description
Submitted by Jack Coleman on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 12:28pm.
You nailed it, Ken