Greenland to Hillary Clinton: We Like Global Warming, Thank You Very Much
Global warming has been kind to Greenland, expanding tourism and with it economic opportunity and giving farmers a growing season long enough for vegetables.
But it sure makes it a bit awkward when Hillary Clinton comes there to clamor about the dangers of climate change.
From Joby Warrick's page A6 story (emphasis mine):
Story Continues Below Ad ↓NUUK, Greenland — Few places on Earth have seen starker changes in weather than this icebound island straddling the Arctic Circle. With that in mind, America’s top diplomat arrived here this week intent on calling attention to the perils of climate change.
The problem was that Greenlanders aren’t exactly complaining.
In fact, as Secretary of State of Hillary Rodham Clinton toured snow-covered fjords on Thursday, there were awkward reminders of Greenland’s embrace of the rise in temperatures that began two decades ago. Rather than questioning global warming, many of this island’s 60,000 inhabitants seem to be racing to cash in.
The tiny capital of Nuuk is bracing for record numbers of visitors this year; the retreating sea ice means a longer tourist season and more cruise ships from the United States. Hunters are boasting of more and bigger caribou, and the annual cod migration is starting earlier and lasting longer.
In the far south, farmers are trying their hand at an exotic form of agriculture: growing vegetables.
“Before, the growing season was too short for vegetables,” said Noah Melgaard, a local journalist. “Now it is getting longer each year.”
For Clinton, who was visiting Greenland for a meeting of the eight-nation Arctic Council, it was one of several jarring contradictions that threatened at times to distract from the messages she traveled 2,000 miles to deliver. The secretary argued for a global response to climate change but had to acknowledge that the United States — the single biggest source of greenhouse-gas pollution — has failed to ratify international treaties on reducing carbon dioxide emissions.
Clinton appealed to Arctic nations at council meetings to coordinate their policies on oil and gas exploration near the North Pole. But afterward she was questioned about the U.S. Senate’s refusal to approve the 1982 Law of the Sea convention, the landmark treaty that regulates countries’ rights to exploit mineral resources up to 200 miles from their coastline.
“It’s been challenging in our political system to take the kinds of actions that we know are dictated by the science and by what we see in front of our eyes,” Clinton said at a news conference.
- Ken Shepherd's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Drill Greenland
Submitted by upcountrywater on Fri, 05/13/2011 - 4:25pm.
“It’s been challenging in our political system to take the kinds of actions that we know are dictated by the science and by what we see in front of our eyes,”
You Didn't Build That.
About the temp records in Nuuk, Greenland. nuck nuck
Submitted by Gary Hall on Fri, 05/13/2011 - 6:43pm.
You'd think that they'd be smart enough to check out the temperature record and to find a cooperative location, before they make a fool of themselves. Of course, it'd be even better if the MSM would show a little curiosity.
Other than the odd anomaly in the data graph, one can easily see here, that the bulk of the warming - in fact, the most pronounced period of warming (longest and largest) in the last 130 years was from about 1880 to 1940. It's been cooler since then.
Now, this is rather interesting, as all of that warming from 1880 to 1940 occurred during the period which preceded the advent of AGW.
Back to that anomaly in the data - perhaps that's when Hillary showed up, or Boxer, or Hansen, or Gore? A lot of hot air.
(;~> gary
The secretary argued for a
Submitted by Reaver on Fri, 05/13/2011 - 11:21pm.
The secretary argued for a global response to climate change but had to acknowledge that the United States — the single biggest source of greenhouse-gas pollution — has failed to ratify international treaties on reducing carbon dioxide emissions.
Arrgg! Every time one of these idiots describes my exhaled breath as “greenhouse – gas pollution” it makes my skin crawl! Also didn’t China surpass us as the single biggest source? Oh well, can’t let a few inconvenient facts get in the way of “taking the kinds of action that we know are dictated by science”.
Hillary should look at this
Submitted by deadeyedan on Sat, 05/14/2011 - 12:19am.
During WWII several aircraft became lost in attempts to reach Iceland and were forced to land in Greenland. Since then, they have been covered by snow and ice to the tune of an average of 5 feet 7 inches per year. Multiplying that amount across just half of Greenland allows one to conclude that the weight of new snow and ice outdoes the amount NASA purportedly finds being lost to the Greenland ice sheets on an annual basis by a large margin. Hillary should have tried to find the aircraft; she may have been in for a surprise.
Climategate - the revelation that the pseudo-scientists at East Anglia University know just as much about the atmosphere as Harvard law professors know about the Constitution - deadeyedan
LOST (Law of the Sea Treaty)
Submitted by lrgon on Mon, 05/16/2011 - 4:50pm.
has been around as the author noted since 1982 but few people ever heard of it. Conservatives Senators kept LOST from passage and there was hope among liberals during Bush's 8 years that it would pass. Fortunately it did not despite Bush's support of this United Nations inspired treaty. Obama has not given LOST his utmost attention up until now. Hillary "Cold as ICE" Clinton has begun stumpimg for the Law of the Sea Treaty.
http://thenewamerican.com/world-mainmenu-26/australia-mainmenu-34/1779
Will we someday see an ice-free Greenland.? Maybe they'll be growing grapes in the land of Eric the Red by next summer? Chardonnay a la Kalaallit Nunaat anyone?