Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 24, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Ken Shepherd's blog
  • NBC Fails to Report Its Own Scoop That AG Holder Approved Investigation of Fox's Rosen
  • The Long Hike: Media’s 13 Years of Bullying Boy Scouts Over Gays
  • Only CBS Notes IRS Official’s Leave, Yet ABC and NBC Have Time to Show Obama’s Prom Photo with ‘Foxy’ Friend
  • Hearing on IRS With Lerner Taking the Fifth? Newspapers Had No Front Page Story Thursday
  • Chris Matthews Trashes 'Morning Joe' for Being 'Open to All People's Points of View'
  • Thursday Morning: Fox Gives 15 Minutes to Latest IRS Scandal Details; NBC and ABC Ignore
  • On Taxpayer-subsidized PBS, Liberal Reporters Lament Benghazi Won't Go Away
  • No Mention of IRS Scandal on NBC's 'Today,' But Plenty of Time for Obama Prom Photo

MSNBC's Martin Bashir Hails Obama Response to Libya As 'Measured,' Slams 'Neocon' Criticism

By Ken Shepherd | March 01, 2011 | 19:08

A  A
Ken Shepherd's picture

"President Obama has been taking a truckload of flak from the right for his measured response to the crises embroiling the Middle East," MSNBC's Martin Bashir harumphed as he opened his "Clear the Air" commentary on the March 1 program.

"Measured is my word because it's certainly not one that right-wing pundits have been using," Bashir complained.

Of course the term "measured" implies deliberate calculation and an overarching strategy, whereas the timeline of the Obama administration response to Libya suggests there has been, objectively speaking, some amount of "dithering" by team Obama.

Indeed, even liberal observers such as MSNBC's Chris Matthews and Washington Post's Eugene Robinson have been critical of Obama's approach to Libya.

Amazed that, "to date, not a single American life has been lost," Bashir concluded that Obama "actually managed to walk a careful line between encouraging protests without encouraging protesters to blame America for all their troubles."

Of course, this wasn't the case with Obama's similarly "measured" response to the Iranian protests two years ago, when the theocratic regime repeated ad nauseam its usual complaints that the Great Satan was behind the opposition movement.

Indeed, back then Obama was careful not to explicitly endorse the opposition movement and sent signals that he still hoped for nuclear talks with the Ahmadinejad regime.

What's more, is Bashir actually suggesting that American foreign policy in the Middle East must be governed by the fear of propaganda efforts of this country's enemies?

It's one thing to say that President Obama must be careful not to give political and rhetorical ammunition to those who can play on anti-Americanism in the Arab street, but it's quite another to do next to nothing to lend our support to opposition movements that are homegrown, on the verge of toppling dictators, and practically begging for our help.

Here's a transcript of the commentary, courtesy of my colleague Scott Whitlock:

MARTIN BASHIR: Time now to clear the air. And President Obama has been taking a truckload of flak from the right for his measured response to the crises embroiling the Middle East. Measured is my word because it's certainly not one that right-wing pundits have been using. For instance, Paul Wolfowitz has criticized the administration's response to the conflict in Libya, saying "he situation calls for urgent action, not just improved rhetoric." And not to be outdone, Bill Kristol, Wolfie's former associate in that band of brothers known as neocons, says "the dithering of the Obama administration has raised a more fundamental question, have our elites become so encumbered by self-doubt, so weakened by sophistication, that they are incapable of acting decisively?"

 

But is the President really dithering or has he been deliberately cautious? Maybe he's been thinking about that pledge made by Paul Wolfowitz in 2002 that U.S. troops would be welcomed into Iraq with flowers, something that still hasn't happened. You see, I'm not so sure that their strategy of strike first, think later, is really all that effective when it comes to Middle Eastern patriarchs like Hosni Mubarak or Colonel Qadhafi. President Obama has actually managed to walk a careful line between encouraging protests without encouraging protesters to blame America for all their troubles. Indeed nobody is calling the United States the Great Satan, nor is anyone suggesting that America is responsible for the unrest. In fact, Qadhafi has been reduced to blaming al Qaeda and the elicit use of drugs for the protests. And who knows if he's right.

 

You see, Paul Wolfowitz and Bill Kristol may have short memories, but the President seems to know his history and particularly as it relates to Teddy Roosevelt. Speak softly and carry a big stick. He may even be thinking of the 18th century poet Alexander Pope who wrote those immortal words "Fools rush in where angels fear to tread." And right now, the big stick is sailing toward Libya and to date, not a single American life has been lost. I think in today's circumstances cautious resolve is proving to be the better part of valor.

About the Author

Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters. Click here to follow Ken Shepherd on Twitter.
  • Conservatives & Republicans
  • Labeling
  • Libya
  • Anti-Americanism
  • Middle East
  • Foreign Policy
  • Military
  • Martin Bashir
  • Martin Bashir
  • MSNBC
  • Government & Press
  • Ken Shepherd's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Geezekers

Submitted by Jerry Mack on Tue, 03/01/2011 - 7:49pm.

Now that the Messiah's problem has been exposed by Bashir perhaps people will be less critical of him. His brain is filled with the ideas and words of others. First it was Lincoln, since then it has been Roosevelt, Kennedy, Reagan, Clinton and now Alexander Pope. There is not enough capacity for independent thought.

  • Login to post comments

Bashir's journalist credentials: interviewing Michael Jackson

Submitted by SickofLibs on Tue, 03/01/2011 - 8:04pm.

Sounds like another up-and-coming NBC/MSNBC star...  Bananas Guthrie.

Bananas' credentials: Covering the two Michael Jackson trials for CourtTV by waiting daily outside the courtroom for Jacko  to arrive (or not arrive depending on the day/and or trial)

What is the Jacko connection? Is it tribal? (H/T Tingles)

  • Login to post comments

"And, who knows

Submitted by UpNorth on Tue, 03/01/2011 - 8:25pm.

if he's right"?  Pardon me, but, BwaHaHaHa.

So, doing nothing at all for two weeks is a "measured response"?  Someone better clue Mika in that she isn't on the top of the list of those who get the White House talking points every morning. 

"Cautious resolve", as in, what do the polls say I should do? 

To re-elect Obama would be like the Titanic backing up and hitting the iceberg again.
  • Login to post comments

"You see, Paul Wolfowitz and

Submitted by ckc1227 on Tue, 03/01/2011 - 9:19pm.

"You see, Paul Wolfowitz and Bill Kristol may have short memories"

Not as short as yours, Basmear. Since you were apparently sleeping at the time, let me remind you that we actually were "greeted with flowers" in Iraq, if that's the way you want to put it. But don't take my word for it, take the NY Times'.

By the way, Basmear, why are we sending warships to Libya, and why are we considering enforcing a no-fly zone? Libya hasn't attacked America, have they?


  • Login to post comments

I hope political correctness isn't about to turn NB into the...

Submitted by Dave. on Wed, 03/02/2011 - 2:21pm.

...same milquetoasty pile of squishy goo that it has HotAir and RedState.

That would be truly sad, as it would give the left yet another undeserved victory.

-Dave

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

Why would you say that, Dave?

Submitted by Blonde on Wed, 03/02/2011 - 2:25pm.

Just curious.

Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)

  • Login to post comments

Check yourself before you

Submitted by Ken Shepherd on Wed, 03/02/2011 - 6:22pm.

Check yourself before you wreck yourself.

I don't tolerate racial/ethnic slurs such as the one I deleted.


 

  • Login to post comments

A point of inquiry for Mr. Shepherd

Submitted by Dave. on Wed, 03/02/2011 - 8:38pm.

So am I to take it that the term "camel washer" is now verboten on the pages of NB, even though it has been used by many of us here for years?

I realize the term is derogatory, as it is intended to be, but I hardly think it rises to the level of an "ethnic slur."

I would appreciate some clarification on this matter, as this is the first time I have encountered any objections of any kind on the part of the admins here concerning the use of the term in question.

-Dave

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

You've been warned. Posting

Submitted by Ken Shepherd on Wed, 03/02/2011 - 11:45pm.

You've been warned. Posting here is a privilege, not a right.

Posting your thoughts on someone else's web site is a privilege, not a right. Your privilege to do so on NewsBusters ® is contingent upon your ability to refrain from using any defamatory, libelous or abusive language on the NewsBusters ® blog, and your ability to keep your postings relevant to the current topic of discussion, to adhere to the copyright laws of the United States of America.


Read more: http://newsbusters.org/legal#ixzz1FVLj5TkW


 

  • Login to post comments

Well---

Submitted by matthewdean on Wed, 03/02/2011 - 11:52pm.

I guess that warning carries some weight, though how much is debatable if banning is the ultimate censorius action by NB's. I saw one crazy poster get banned for nasty references to religion, and he stayed banned off the threads for a whole 36 hours.
"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

It must depend on the

Submitted by Radical1979 on Wed, 03/02/2011 - 11:57pm.

It must depend on the religion.  I've complained about a poster spewing crap about a Christian religion and nothing was done.

Looks like it depends on the religion.

Proud member of the 53%!
  • Login to post comments

Rad---

Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 03/03/2011 - 12:08am.

Yep. Depends on whose ox is getting gored. My point was, of course, that banning, while legal, legitimate, upright, proper, appropriate, and maybe self-satisfying for the one wielding the ban hammer; doesn't seem to be all that effective when not enforced after the initial action.
"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

I'm nowhere near banning

Submitted by Ken Shepherd on Thu, 03/03/2011 - 12:35am.

I'm nowhere near banning Dave. I didn't care for the camel-washer comment and I deleted it.

It's the sort of comment that I think is beneath the dignity of our commenters on NewsBusters, particularly when there's plenty of stuff to legitimately criticize the liberal media about without having to bring race, ethnicity, or other derogatory terms suggestive of race or ethnicity into it.


 

  • Login to post comments

Entirely your right as---

Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 03/03/2011 - 1:06am.

Managing Editor at NB's; the Terms of Agreement at NB's; and your personal feelings about race, ethnicity, and what are, or what you deem to be are, derogatory statements related to either race or ethnicity. Your game, your rules, that is fair. Regardless of the saw that people who curse are not classy, and people who use profanities have lost the argument; sometimes, saying fiddlesticks just isn't as satisfying as saying (%#!&%$@#. I have watched, over the years, as Political Correctness has slowly advanced it's mission creep and it will surely continue to spread rather than suffer any recidivism. That is a shame because being PC does not always relate to being right.
"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

md and Rad,

Submitted by Dave. on Thu, 03/03/2011 - 2:58am.

I have been around here for five years now, and the recycled troll and plant list would blow your minds.

Trust me, as I have busted more than a few of them.

Strange how those of us who try and play by the rules attract more attention than the trolls and plants seem to.

I guess it's like football zebras - they only see the second punch thrown, not the first.

-Dave

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

"You've been warned."

Submitted by Dave. on Thu, 03/03/2011 - 2:26am.

Duly noted, Mr Shepherd.

-Dave

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

timid response

Submitted by egutopia44 on Wed, 03/02/2011 - 6:00pm.

timid response is a better description. the presidents response to mubarac was not measured. libya is easy mr president. tell this terrorist dictator get out step down or we are comming in there  to get you and charge you with terrorism.  

ernest goins
  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Oops: Obama fails to salute Marine, went back to shake hand (Weekly Standard)
  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter Column: When Did We Vote to Become Mexico?
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • Weekend Open Thread
  • Leno: ‘Not Looking Good for Obama - Today His Teleprompter Took the Fifth’
  • Robert Redford Blasts America's Belief System, Tech Advancements
  • Dennis Miller: 'Nixonian' Obama Will Need Teleprompter to Say 'I Am Not a Crook'
  • Leno: Obama Knows Nothing Because They Moved ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ to the White House
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use