A petulant Washington Post columnist -- who two months ago insisted "Reality Makes Gay Marriage Debate Obsolete" -- took to her computer yesterday to hack out a screed against the Catholic Archdiocese of Washington, painting the Church as "uncharitable and cruel" reactionaries, playing "political hardball with the District" and literally throwing the homeless out into the cold November rain.
Petula Dvorak's November 13 column preached that "Catholic officials shouldn't forsake D.C.'s poor in gay marriage fight," painting the Church as the heavy for standing on conscience in reaction to new legislation that could force its charitable outreaches to hire gays and extend employee benefits to same-sex partners:
In the gray rain -- where the only burst of color comes from the flash of an ambulance scooping up someone who is cold, sick and wet -- threatening to shut a door is the cruelest answer.
Story Continues Below Ad ↓"They want to stop helping us?" asked the woman tucked completely inside her wet jacket.
She is staying at the nearby John Young women's shelter run by Catholic Charities on First Street NW. She'd heard that the Church is threatening to stop taking millions of dollars of the District's money for services such as this shelter, adoption and medical care unless the D.C. Council changes the same-sex marriage bill it is preparing to pass next month.
[...]
By trying to play political hardball with the District, no matter how carefully they word their objection to the bill, officials at the Archdiocese of Washington and Catholic Charities are telling our city's most vulnerable people -- homeless families, sick children, low-income mothers -- that they are willing to throw them on the table as a bargaining chip.
What the Church is doing is an uncharitable and cruel maneuver.
Yet at no point in her article did Dvorak consider that perhaps it's the liberal Democratic city council that may be too inflexible by failing to carve out sufficient exemption for religious entitities to stay true to their convictions while partnering with the city for social services for the poor.
What's more, since these social services are the city's obligation and the Catholic Church is but a helpful contractor, shouldn't the District government plan accordingly to ramp up its handling of social services, seeing as their dedication to liberal policies will necessarily drive conservative religious institutions out of business with the District on conscience grounds?
Dvorak failed to consider this argument, nor did she muse as to whether liberal churches that pride themselves on being "gay-affirming" can mobilize effectively to run homeless shelters and other charitable operations on behalf of the District.
Instead, Dvorak, a lapsed Catholic, went on to paint the Church as having forsaken its sense of compassion seeming to suggest matters of doctrinal witness and conscience are secondary to "tolerance":
I am not much of a churchgoer these days. But I will always hold dear the lessons I learned from the Church I attended in my younger days.
When Father Joe went bicycling and skiing with us, he taught us to love and respect the Earth. Father Grace, with his white hair and an Irish accent so hard the younger kids in catechism called him "The Big Leprechaun," was stern enough to make me think twice before sweating through another confession where I had to admit all the terrible things I had done to my little brother the week before.
But he was gentle in reminding us of the simple rules of forgiveness, love, tolerance and charity.
When I was about to snark about the folks coming for help at the church food bank, the priests told me not to judge, only to help. When I smugly pointed out the inappropriate wrap shorts someone wore to Mass one summer day, someone told me, "She is here at church; judge her no further."
Dvorak's message is clear: she didn't leave the Catholic Church, it left her, and is in turn threatening to leave behind the city's poorest folks over what amounts to a political squabble.
—Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
The Catholic Church
November 13, 2009 - 11:02 ET by iveseenitallWhatever your "opinion" of the Catholic Church, one thing is obvious. They've found out over the past few years that you have to have some principles and stick by them in order to have any credibiltiy at all. As can be seen in this lefty's article, they will never win over the hard core "liberals". So many have left their ranks because of their silence on core values.You can't ignore things and "hope" they will go away. And you can't play both sides of the fence because you end up with no one believing in you. As McCain found out, you lose.The Republican Party's RINOS better learn this lesson or they will continue to lose.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
Dvorak
November 13, 2009 - 10:58 ET by Jerry MackSo Dvoraks' opinion is that the Catholic church must change its' doctrine because she is a supporter of gay marriage. No doubt that at the next tragedy in her life, she will visit a Priest.
close to agreement
November 13, 2009 - 11:43 ET by konoI'd say you're spot-on there, jm, if only you change 'visit' to 'blame' in your last line.
There's an easy fix
November 13, 2009 - 11:11 ET by nwahsJust exempt religious groups who's doctrine condemns homosexuality, from the legislation. That way gays can get married, religious groups can adhere to their faith, and the wet and shivering homeless children can get fed.
Win win win.
I'm sure the militant gays wouldn't put their agenda of undermining the Catholic Church ahead of wet, shivering, homeless children.
a fix in fantasyland
November 13, 2009 - 11:40 ET by konoBut factoring-out the difference between traditional marriage and life-commitments-between-same-sex-couples doesn't somehow create a generic kind of marriage, any more than chopping-off the physical differences between men and women creates a generic kind of person. So letting churches opt-out while society lives a lie is no "win win win."
"I'm sure the militant gays wouldn't put their agenda of undermining the
Catholic Church ahead of wet, shivering, homeless children."
Maybe not the majority of gays, Shawn. But you apply that point to militant gays, who most certainly would do that, especially if they thought they could point the finger of blame at Catholics, Mormons, and other "oppressive, bigoted institutions" in the process.
You'd think this would be
November 13, 2009 - 14:14 ET by moderncommentaries83You'd think this would be the solution, wouldn't you?
Because I - as a Catholic - have no problems per se with what Methodists, Episcopalians, or Lutherans do in their respective churches. I may find it theologically incorrect, but I do not devote my life or career to complaining about Methodist doctrine or make it my life's work to force Methodists to conform to my worldview.
In other words, if I believed Methodists to be correct, I'd be a Methodist.
But that's not the case. Just as when states try to compromise via civil unions (same legal protections, different language), the radical gay lobby goes crazy.
It's either full marriage or nothing.
Why?
Because it's all about control. It's not about "live and let live" and it's not about having the freedom for your own religion (or non-religion) to affirm gay marriages. It's about making people who believe homosexual acts to be sinful and contrary to God's natural law embrace something they find morally offensive. Tolerance is not enough. You. Must. Approve.
But that's not what's going to happen. The "public service" clause in this bill will be used by some group to say that because the Catholic Church offers a public service to homeless people, it cannot discriminate against allowing a gay couple to marry in the local cathedral.
Aut viam inveniam aut faciam
By trying to play political
November 13, 2009 - 11:14 ET by motherbeltBy trying to play political hardball with the District, no matter how
carefully they word their objection to the bill, officials at the
Archdiocese of Washington and Catholic Charities are telling our city's
most vulnerable people -- homeless families, sick children, low-income
mothers -- that they are willing to throw them on the table as a
bargaining chip.
No, Ms. Dvorak, it is Washington DC who is throwing the vulnerable on the table as a bargaining chip.
They are, in effect, telling Catholic Charities that they CANNOT assist the poor unless they hire gays and extend employee benefits to same-sex partners:
Who is it that is attaching strings to the funds?
They were counting on the Church to chuck its principles and ignore its teachings as the price for being allowed to help the poor.
Didn't happen.
Again with the catholic bashing?
November 13, 2009 - 11:21 ET by octaviojDo they never get tired? When I took the test to become a citizen there was a question: Why did the pilgrims come to America? To escape religious persecution. Have they ever heard of American history? If this is not persecution I do not know what it is.
Its certainly coming close
November 13, 2009 - 11:35 ET by nwahsIts certainly coming close to being unconstitutional.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of
the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the
Government for a redress of grievances."
Coming close? "A
November 13, 2009 - 11:42 ET by MikeBComing close?
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
It an uderstatement
November 13, 2009 - 11:47 ET by nwahsI see no difference between this legislation applying to the Catholic Church, and legislation requiring the Catholic Church to make women priests. Its unconstitutional.
I think the previous
November 13, 2009 - 14:16 ET by moderncommentaries83I think the previous commenter was saying that it's not 'coming close' to being unconstutional - that it's already there.
As a Catholic, I fully expect the radical left to attempt to pass legislation that forces Catholics (and other conservative religious grouops, except Muslims, of course) to bless and sanction gay marriages and open up the heirarchy to women, gays, etc.
It will not come as a surprise but it will be met with mass resistance.
Aut viam inveniam aut faciam
Attack Catholics
November 13, 2009 - 12:40 ET by OxyCon...Coddle Muslims terrorists.
That's what Liberals and their Lamestream media does.