WaPo: EPA Forces Employees to Pull Down YouTube Video Critical of Cap-and-Trade

Photo of Ken Shepherd.
  • Bookmark and Share

Imagine if you will, that during the prior presidential administration two EPA employees put up a video on YouTube that criticized environmental and energy policies supported by Republicans in Congress and President Bush, only to be told by EPA officials that they need to take down the video.

Given the media's consternation about the Bush administration's alleged efforts to squelch proponents of the theory of manmade global warming, such a story would likely be front page news in many newspapers, including the Washington Post.

But in this instance, the administration in question is Obama's, and the EPA employees are going at the president from his left flank, arguing the so called "cap-and-trade" plan would "lock in climate degradation."

Despite this, the Washington Post placed David Fahrenthold's November 11 story, "EPA tells workers to tone down YouTube clip about climate bill" on page A8:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Two Environmental Protection Agency lawyers who made a YouTube video calling current climate legislation a "huge mistake" were told by the agency to remove the clip and edit out some references to their employer, one of them said.

Allan Zabel and Laurie Williams, a husband and wife who have worked in the EPA's San Francisco office for more than 20 years, have been outspoken in their opposition to a "cap and trade" system for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

That system -- in which companies may buy and sell the right to pollute -- is at the heart of a climate bill passed by the House this summer, and another under consideration in the Senate.

On Oct. 31, the two made their case in an opinion piece in The Washington Post, saying the bill was fatally flawed by the inclusion of unreliable "carbon offsets," and would "lock in climate degradation" instead of solving it.

A few days later, Williams said, they were approached by EPA ethics officials. She said the officials demanded they take down a YouTube video they had posted in September that made many of the same points.

In the video, Zabel says none of their statements should be construed as an official position of the EPA or the Obama administration. But Williams said the EPA wanted them to further play down their federal connections. The officials said they could repost the video, she said, if they removed a mention of the length of their experience at EPA.

Another comment, in which Zabel said he oversees a cap-and-trade system for smog-causing pollutants in California, also had to go, she said. In addition, the agency said they had to take out a photo of the EPA's San Francisco office building.

—Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

When the global warming hoaxers

... have no science left, all they can do now is lie.

→ Good presentation

I disagree with these two's premise, but they seem honest about the solutions to climate change (if there really is such a man-made phenomenon)

LYDSEXICS UNTIE!

Another Video Soon to Disappear from YouTube

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=tCAffMSWSzY#t=28

------------------------------------- 

"Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." --Martin Luther King, Jr.

.

.

The EPA stands tall

"Mr. Zabel, take down this video!

Doesn't have quite the same ring, does it? 

I can see the EPA thier

I can see the EPA thier employer restricting thier speech concerning EPA business. The employees of any business has the right to protect it's interests including trade secrets. So a lot of this IMO depends on thier employment contracts and the standards set by the EPA.

That said where are the brakes on NASA hanson when he is plying in agw to the public. So the sauce is not good for the goose and gander.

You forgot a few

There's the time NPR took down a protection-of-marriage ad a short time before people were to vote on a bill (http://www.eff.org/takedowns/npr-forces-takedown-political-ad-weeks-crit...) and CBS censoring a McCain ad just before the 2008 presidential vote (http://www.eff.org/takedowns/npr-forces-takedown-political-ad-weeks-crit...).  Both of which could have influenced the vote.  Of course, once the Obama administration signs the ACTA treaty (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Counterfeiting_Trade_Agreement) they'll be able to silence any kind of descent on any website they like.  Since the American legal system won't be involved in enforcing the law they can kill freedom of speech without violating the Constitution.  (Yes I know, it sounds too insane to be true but read the Wikipedia page, it's real.)  

ONLY Lies Allowed

Censorship and lies are the making of propaganda. All non-conforming opinions will be deleted and the speakers, punished. GOD HELP US! Our government no longer is free and neither are we.

ptson... Amen! 'Doubling

ptson...

Amen!

'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart

Cap and Trade?

"a cap-and-trade system for smog-causing pollutants in California"

California (or the AQMD/CARB) already has the most stringent emissions laws in the entire world.  Since we have no real emissions (by law), just what will we Californians have left to trade with?

As one pundit described the "Cap and Trade" scam:  American taxpayers will be forced to borrow billions each year from the ChiCom government and "trade" it to the Indians, who now have all of the US manufacturing jobs."

This is the manifestation of Obama's redistribution of wealth policy.  November 02, 2012 can't come soon enough.

"The problem with political jokes is they get elected." -Henry Cate VII (?)

bls... Bulls-Eye, Bingo,

bls...

Bulls-Eye, Bingo, Nail on head and all that jazz.

Two words to cut to the chase, because it's late, but if you really looked you could see that train coming down the track at least ten years ago or so...give or take.

    Thank You.

'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart

November 6, 2012

November 6, 2012

Environmental Protection Agency

Remember the lesson of “The Boy Who Cried Wolf”.  The assumption that there is or ever will be man-made climate change is the big dead elephant in the room.  Remember the Orwellian global warming?  I think all the politicians on the bandwagon need to be replaced by public servants who can objectively evaluate scientific and technical data. The EPA has been dominated by extremists since the first Earth Day.  They are part of the problem. 

 Harry Reid has asked EPA for a cost benefit review of Waxman...what?

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.