JUST IN!  This was GREAT.  Atty. read it!:

----------------------------------------------------

THE TRUTH ABOUT THE HEALTHCARE
BILLS ?
__________________________________

Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 12:51
PM
Subject: It is not about health care

Well, I have
done it! I have read the entire text of proposed House Bill 3200: The Affordable
Health Care Choices Act of 2009. I studied it with particular emphasis from my
area of expertise, constitutional law. I was frankly concerned that parts of the
proposed law that were being discussed might be unconstitutional. What I found
was far worse than what I had heard or expected.To begin with, much of what has
been said about the law and its implications is in fact true, despite what the
Democrats and the media are saying. The law does provide for rationing of health
care, particularly where senior citizens and other classes of citizens are
involved, free health care for illegal immigrants, free abortion services, and
probably forced participation in abortions by members of the medical
profession.The Bill will also eventually force private insurance companies out
of business and put everyone into a government run system. All decisions about
personal health care will ultimately be made by federal bureaucrats and most of
them will not be health care professionals. Hospital admissions, payments to
physicians, and allocations of necessary medical devices will be strictly
controlled.

However, as scary as all of that it, it just scratches the
surface. In fact, I have concluded that
this legislation really has no
intention of providing affordable health care choices. Instead, it is
a

convenient cover for the most massive transfer of power to the
Executive Branch of government that has ever occurred, or even been
contemplated. If this law or a similar one is adopted, major portions of the
Constitution of the United States will effectively have been
destroyed.

The first thing to go will be the masterfully crafted balance
of power between the Executive,
Legislative, and Judicial branches of the
U.S. Government. The Congress will be transferring to the Obama Administration
authority in a number of different areas over the lives of the American people
and the businesses they own. The irony is that the Congress doesn't have any
authority to legislate in most of those areas to begin with. I defy anyone to
read the text of the U.S. Constitution and find any authority granted to the
members of Congress to regulate health care.

The paragraph below is
really frightening
This legislation also provides for access by the
appointees of the Obama administration of
all of your personal healthcare
information, your personal financial information, and the information of your
employer, physician, and hospital. All of this is a direct violation of the
specific provisions of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution protecting against
unreasonable searches and seizures. You can also forget about the right to
privacy. That will have been legislated into oblivion regardless of what the 3rd
and 4th Amendments may provide.

If you decide not to have healthcare
insurance or if you have private insurance that is not
deemed

"acceptable" to the "Health Choices Administrator" appointed by
Obama there will be a tax imposed on you. It is called a "tax" instead of a fine
because of the intent to avoid application of the due

process clause of
the 5th Amendment. However, that doesn't work because since there is nothing in
the law that allows you to contest or appeal the imposition of the tax, it is
definitely depriving someone of property without the "due process of
law."

So, there are three of those pesky amendment that the far left hate
so much out the original
ten in the Bill of Rights that are effectively
nullified by this law. It doesn't stop there though. The

9th Amendment
that provides:

"The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights,
shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the
people;"

The 10th Amendment states: "The powers not delegated to the
United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are
preserved to the States respectively, or to the people." Under the provisions of
this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the states are
going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas that once were theirs to
control.

I could write many more pages about this legislation, but I
think you get the idea. This is not about health care; it is about seizing power
and limiting rights. Article 6 of the Constitution requires the members of both
houses of Congress to "be bound by oath or affirmation" to support the
Constitution. If I was a member of Congress I would not be able to vote for this
legislation or anything like it without feeling I was violating that sacred oath
or affirmation.
If I voted for it anyway I would hope the American people
would hold me accountable.

For those who might doubt the nature of
this

threat I suggest they consult the source. Here is a link to
the

Constitution:http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html

And
another to the Bill of Rights:

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html ;

There you can see exactly what we are about to have taken from
us.

Michael Connelly, Retired attorney,

Constitutional Law
Instructor

Carrollton , Texas

http://us.mc318g.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mrobertc@hotmail..com

Michael Connelly

Author of "The Mortarmen"
www.trafford.com/04-2710 and "Riders in
the

Sky: The Ghosts and Legends of Philmont Scout Ranch"

I also
teach law courses via the Internet through colleges and universities worldwide..
To find a college or university near you, go to Education To

Go's website
at http://www.ed2go..com/ .

jdly...

Where has Matthews been...warming up the padded cell for Olbie, heck, I was hoping they would go on the buddy plan, Shuster will not be that far behind no matter what.

'Go Green...Recycle Congress'

Fn...

ROFL!

Good one. 

'Go Green...Recycle Congress'

KC:

I'm sure you understand that Shuster does not know an enumeration from his elbow.  But you may not know that Shuster was once asked to use "hortatory" in a sentence. to which he responded"

"I gave a hor ta [T]ory on his birthday."

Shuster is a meatheaded moron.  No wonder our society is dumb-downed.

 You mean there are people like Shuster who enjoy all the freedoms & protections that the US Constitution/Bill Of Rights provide, but think that you can pick & choose what you like about it without damaging it?

This guy does'nt know crap about the the Constitution or the Bill Of Rights, he is an idiot on TV every so often. The problem Shuster has, is that most people don't know who the hell he is, & those who do, don't respect his "journalism".

"...How blind can you be, don't you see...

...that the gambler lost all he does not have..."  

Nightwish

Hmmm? A constitutional amendment is "balony".

Or Thomas Jefferson?

Which do i chose? This is a hard one.