SF Chronicle Writer Exposes How City Policies Are Punishing Homeless Man's Self-Reliance

Photo of Ken Shepherd.
  • Bookmark and Share

From time to time, I like to highlight when the media do something right, so today I thought I'd give hearty kudos to San Francisco Chronicle's C.W. Nevius for his June 4 column, "Bureaucrat scuffs dream of homeless shoe shiner."

In his page A1 story, the Chronicle columnist informs readers of the plight of a homeless man who, rather than panhandling for spare change, decided to earn his own money by shining shoes.

But it seems the enterprising man is now being punished for his responsibility and entrepreneurial spirit by city bureaucrats shoving red tape in his face:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

He sleeps under a bridge, washes in a public bathroom and was panhandling for booze money 11 months ago, but now Larry Moore is the best-dressed shoeshine man in the city. When he gets up from his cardboard mattress, he puts on a coat and tie. It's a reminder of how he has turned things around.

In fact, until last week it looked like Moore was going to have saved enough money to rent a room and get off the street for the first time in six years. But then, in a breathtakingly clueless move, an official for the Department of Public Works told Moore that he has to fork over the money he saved for his first month's rent to purchase a $491 sidewalk vendor permit.

"I had $573 ready to go," Moore said, who needs $600 for the rent. "This tore that up. But I've been homeless for six years. Another six weeks isn't going to kill me."

The bureaucrat told Moore that she found out about his business after reading about his success in this paper.

Along Market Street, Moore's supporters are indignant. Nothing happens when mentally ill men wander the street talking to themselves and drunkards pee in the alleys. Yet Moore creates a little business out of thin air, builds up a client base, and the city takes nearly every penny he's earned.

Nevius went on to document that Moore has had a tough go of jumping through the city's legal hoops and failed to find any helpful souls in the bureaucracy:

Moore is nothing if not dutiful. He attempted to work his way through the byzantine city government channels, although he didn't get much help.

"I guess my gripe is that when the city came by and told him to get his papers in order but couldn't tell him how to do it," said Travis See, who manages the Custom Shop Clothiers on the corner of Market and New Montgomery. "This lady couldn't even tell him which building to go to so he could stand in line and waste all day."

When Moore found the permit application, he got a money order and headed down to the appropriate department to pay. But because he didn't have a valid ID card, they wouldn't take his money.

Could this be any more difficult? Moore doesn't want to get into city housing, preferring to make it on his own. But could you blame him if he gave up, kicked back and settled into a life of panhandling, subsidized housing and soup kitchen meals?

Nevius is on to something. Big government policies that punish self-reliance while making mooching off the public dole encourage homeless men to be panhandling bums. Public policymakers should encourage, not discourage, the Larry Moores of the world, and Nevius and the San Francisco Chronicle do well to inform the public so as to allow for public pressure to build in that direction.

—Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Great story Ken, and one

Great story Ken, and one that liberals and conservatives will likely agree on.  Perhaps a related business in the area will see the promise of Moore's client base and popularity and just hire him outright, or enter into some sort of mutually beneficial partnership.

JasonC

You left out centralist.Dont make me get the PC police on you.It is a good story.I agree it would be great if someone could work something out with him.If loyal customers came into a store there is a good chance they would look around and spend money.A win win situation.

Instead of shoveling money

Instead of shoveling money into shelters, why not set aside a bit for helping those who wont to help themselves.

I guess the only thing a liberal likes more than that self-righteous feeling of helping the homeless is keeping massive bureaucracies shuffling along.

The left's dirty little

The left's dirty little secret:  they don't want people to succeed.  They want everyone to be on the public dole and beholden to the left for every little "blessing". 

"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me

Even after this guy gets his

Even after this guy gets his permit, he'll get put out of business by a "shoeshine" tax that will be levied.

I'm surprised the City of

I'm surprised the City of SF didn't make this poor man pay to join a Shoe Shiners Union. 

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

Just Starting

Wait until he gets his bill for self-employed social security taxes.

Well what if this guy was an illegal immigrant

None of you guys would like this story then.  An ID should be shown to prove he is American.

-------------------------------------------

Liberal judges are the high priests of redefined marriage.  Good men want freedom, Evil men want license 

Actually, I wouldn't care

Actually, I wouldn't care all that much, personally. My main problem with illegal immigration is that those immigrants are here illegally, breaking the law. My second concern is that they are drawing social safety net benefits when that should only be for citizens and legal immigrants.

So long as a homeless illegal alien were not a drain on the taxpayer and was not a violent fugitive from justice, I think they're a low priority on the exportation list. But I'm just speaking for myself.

...

Well, that's the liberal boot on the neck of the individual spirit.  There is little that is more despicable than what these perverse self-important power-grabbing idiots in SF's liberal governance are doing to this man. This makes me so sick.     

 

"When people stop believing in God, they don't believe in nothing -- they believe in anything."
  --  GK Chesterton

`The bureaucrat should get

`The bureaucrat should get an award from the city for bringing more attention to San Francisco's fame as a deep pit of anti-human, soul crushing stupidity.

Where their "compassion"

Where their "compassion" for the homeless is so celebrated that the city makes sure they stay that way. 

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

shoeshine

His troubles have just begun. Wait 'til the IBSS (International Brotherhood of Shoe Shiners) gets wind of this scab. /off

Revealing

The liberal establishment wants people to be dependent on government. Liberals HATE free enterprise and self-sufficiency.