Australia is and has been, through both Democratic and Republican administrations a staunch and steadfast ally of the United States. The Aussies have fought alongside American forces in World War II, Korea, Vietnam, the first Gulf War, in Afghanistan and in Iraq, and the U.S. and Australia are partners in a free-trade agreement. Given that, readers of the Washington Post should reasonably expect reporters and editors at the paper to understand the propriety of President Bush hosting former Prime Minister John Howard at Blair House in the closing days of his administration, especially since Howard was in town to receive the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
But for some reason, that's asking too much of Post staffer Manuel Roig-Franzia and his editors. Roig-Franzia opened his January 14 below-the-fold Style section front pager by calling Howard "America's most inconvenient houseguest."
The Post writer continued in his second paragraph by reminding readers of a gripe that liberal journalists have been fixated on even as President-elect Obama brushed off the "inconvenience" as no big deal:
Story Continues Below Ad ↓Former Australian prime minister John Howard accepted the nation's highest civilian honor after spending the night at Blair House, the 119-room presidential guesthouse -- edging out someone else who had hoped to crash there . . . President-elect Barack Obama.
By contrast, it took Roig-Franzia until the 16th paragraph in his 22-paragraph story to note that Howard was in Washington on September 11, 2001 and that Bush praised him as "a sturdy friend in a time of need." Even so, Roig-Franzia quickly returned to the alleged Obama snub, dismissing the notion that Howard was worthy of the accolade by citing biased journalists from the land down under:
Most recently, though, it was Howard's stay at Blair House that caused controversy, provoking ridicule here and in his home country.
Obama and his family had asked the Bush administration for permission to stay at the mansion prior to the inauguration so the Obama girls, Malia and Sasha, could start school. The Bush administration declined the request, saying the mansion was taken. It later was revealed that Howard and his wife, Janette, were the only overnight guests during the period the Obamas wanted to stay at the mansion. Needing a secure place to lay their heads, the Obamas opted to stay at the Hay-Adams Hotel until their scheduled move into Blair House on Thursday.
Howard's decision to stay at the mansion piqued the feisty Australian press. A headline in the Courier-Mail screamed: "Sleep in the park, US tells Howard." The Australian newspaper wrote of "Fury as John Howard's end upsets Barack Obama's beginning," and the Herald Sun declared, "Howard bushwhacks Obama."
—Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Ozzie/English dictionary
January 14, 2009 - 11:01 ET by Miss Cheviousnot 100% sure but I think the term I'm looking for to describe this professional URINALIST is "tosser"
The typical Obama-loving
January 14, 2009 - 11:08 ET by rbosqueThe typical Obama-loving press blocking for Obama even when the play is dead.
That says it all.
January 14, 2009 - 11:44 ET by BlondePerfectly.
Snub?
January 14, 2009 - 11:14 ET by KC MulvilleObama's wishes were not immediately fulfilled, even if it meant displacing the prime minister of one of our best allies? Lord Obama spoke, and the president and prime minister refused to obsequiously obey? The outrage!
Honestly, we can't blame Obama for this one. This is just the exuberance of a media hack. I doubt the Obama camp is secretly behind this one, because it's so silly.
I'm sure it's no outrage, just an obvious and unavoidable clash of schedules. Think about it.
This is just an innocent clash of schedules. No one made a mistake, and no one is snubbing anyone. For God's sake, adjust!
Don't you watch TV?
January 14, 2009 - 11:20 ET by Doc_NavyDon't you watch TV? When it comes to the media... it's all about the "O".
Doc
2008: The year that the great LIE died.
How we know that they know that they are Lying.
Friedrich Nietzsche summed up how I feel about the MSM in this quote:
"I'm not upset that you lied to me, I'm upset that from now on I can't believe you."
The Obamas "needed a place
January 14, 2009 - 11:24 ET by SickofLibsThe Obamas "needed a place to lay their heads"?
How childish can you get?
To his credit, Obama did brush this colossal insult off, but that's not enough to silence his self-appointed defenders... "We shall defend your honor to the end, Messiah, even if you say no biggie."
(I would humbly also add WWII to the list of Aussie/US military collaboration)
Edited to add in World War
January 14, 2009 - 11:29 ET by Ken ShepherdEdited to add in World War II.
Thanks Ken, my Dad was
January 14, 2009 - 11:37 ET by SickofLibsThanks Ken, my Dad was there, and he'd slap me in the head hard if I didn't point that out!
The WaPo is sinking pretty
January 14, 2009 - 11:34 ET by SeashellThe WaPo is sinking pretty low to call the PM of Australia "America's most inconvenient houseguest." After all, he has been one of our most supportive allies.
Well, he's a former prime
January 14, 2009 - 11:52 ET by Ken ShepherdWell, he's a former prime minister, not the current one, but still it's proper to offer Howard to stay at the Blair House. I believe Bush had invited Uribe and Tony Blair, but Uribe opted for other accomodations and Blair stayed I believe at the British embassy.
Right, I meant former, and
January 14, 2009 - 12:07 ET by SeashellRight, I meant former, and I'm sure the invitation was made long before the election. And being such an ally as Australia has been to us, he should be able to stay anywhere he wants IMO. ;-)
Well, now we know for certain
January 14, 2009 - 11:38 ET by ex buff e-dubthat he is the Messiah...there was no room for him at the inn...
But doesn't the Left complain
January 14, 2009 - 13:16 ET by katiejaneabout Pres Bush's lack of concern about world opinion?
How crass would it have been to blow off Howard, pull his accommodations, risk appearing to have no manners just because the Obama family was too cheap to get a hotel room for a couple of weeks?
Oops - silly me - the Left would throw the Pope under the bus if they thought he was inconveniencing the Chosen One.
The Left would delight in
January 14, 2009 - 13:31 ET by Ken ShepherdThe Left would delight in throwing the current pope under the bus regardless.