AP's Probing Double Standard: Obama vs. Palin Ethics Questions

Photo of Ken Shepherd.
  • Bookmark and Share

With apologies to the creator of the famous evangelical Christian bumper sticker, "Obama said it. The media believe it. And that settles it."

Get a load of the first two grafs from AP's December 15 article, "Obama: Probe shows no contact in Illinois gov scandal.":

President-elect Barack Obama said Monday a review by his own lawyer shows he had no direct contact with Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich about the appointment of a Senate replacement, and transition aides did nothing inappropriate.

Obama pledged to make the review public, but said he decided to hold off because prosecutors asked for a delay and "I don't want to interfere with an ongoing investigation." U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald released a statement confirming the request.

By contrast, back in October when Gov. Sarah Palin (R) released her own report denying impropriety in her firing of Alaska's public safety commissioner, the AP noted that "Palin Pre-Empts State Report, Clears Self in Probe." As e-mail tipster Matt Healy observed in his e-mail:

"Equal coverage would have been something like "Obama Pre-Empts U.S. Attorney's Investigation, Clears Self in Probe".... Two headlines, both from AP, on a campaign releasing their own assessment of their innocence, treated entirely differently.

Of course in this case, it's the Obama transition, not his campaign, but it's clear the AP is loathe to do anything to cast a pall on his coronation apotheosis inauguration.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

This is nonsense.

Do you expect every AP writer to write headlines in exactly the same way? That would lead to stylistically boring journalism. Also, how is the Obama headline more favorable to him? It attributes the "no contacts" claim to him, rather than assuming it is a fact. Nor do I see how Palin's pre-emption headline is negative or innacurate.

Missing the point

I believe you have missed the point of this site.  The point is to show how our media intentionally uses bias in reporting.  You may be correct in poitning out that the headlines are not inaccurate, however, words matter.  And in this case, the words used to describe the Palin situation are not as favorable and accepting as those used to describe the Obama situation. 

 I think OJ Simpson's

 I think OJ Simpson's lawyers also cleared him of any involvement in the murders of Nicole Simpson and her boyfriend.

 

LIBERALS LIE, ALL THE TIME, ABOUT EVERYTHING.

butt, that was a really big media event

butt... do you think the arson of Palin's church will recieve anything like the coverage if it was wright's .. if they find out it was gays or soros/huffpo libs responsible it will be buried so deep the clintons will salute ..

never look a gift skunk in the tail

Allow me

"Welcome to NewsBusters, a project of the Media Research Center (MRC), the leader in documenting, exposing and neutralizing liberal media bias."

okay respectful

You think the headlines aren't enough? Let's get into the articles themselves for a little look-see.

First up, the Palin article:

  • the very first sentence calls the investigation "potentially embarrassing"
  • the entire second paragraph gives Monegan's side of the story 
  • in the third paragraph we read that Palin's campaign is denying the charges, but only after ABC makes a point of reminding us they haven't read the full report yet
  • ABC then tell us that " critics say that shows she used her office to settle family affairs"
  • another politician from AK who has nothing to do with the investigation is quoted to further criticize Palin

 

Now let's read the article on Obama:

  • the subhead directly under the headline assures us that Obama has done an "internal investigation" to find out
  • the first paragraph tells us that Obama's lawyer reviewed the information and found "nothing inappropriate"
  • the second paragraph explains that Obama really wants to share these findings with us but is held back by prosecutors
  • in the third paragraph we finally read what the investigation is about, but we are only told that "controversy has swirled" around Obama with no one on the other side to offer a quote on why they might be suspicious
  • nowhere do we read that the scandal is "potentially embarrassing" or that his critics say anything about it
  • after seven paragraphs the article moves on to talk about his cabinet appointment

 

 But you're right, a headline is a headline is just a headline...

 

I'm a typical white person.

Media a Disgrace: Obama vs. Palin treatment

The media is an absolute disgrace in how they treated Reps, particularly Palin, vs. Dems., particularly Obama.  They are 180 degrees apart between absolute respect and free PR and propaganda for Obama (note how urgent Eco-glogal warming scare story comes 1 day before he announces the Eco-appointment!  Gee not coordinated?) and an absolutely relentless attack and even smear of Palin.

It will be interesting to see if Blago "sings" on Obama.  We will see how the media will treat that...  We will know Blago "had goods" on Obama if he ends up dead with a sudden accident, "heart attack," or drug O.D. with a prostitute. 

M-B

The particularly damning

The particularly damning part though is how Palin went after corruption versus Obama's ambivalence toward it.  Obama looked the other way, while Palin sought to root it out.  This is why the MSM has to destroy Palin, her example of leadership and personal responsibility just towers over Obama's.  Compared to Palin, Obama condoned political corruption.

Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.

If Blago sings the media

If Blago sings the media will treat it like they did Bill Clintons' rape victims.

"Forget change, I want improvement!"

Oh no it isn't

It's not rape unless its a Conservative. For all those (what did the media call them? trailer trash trollers?) women accusing Bill Clinton, they were just asking for it.

BTW

mccain selling out Palin as being a front runner for 2012 was typical 'maverick' .. i voted for mccain because he was better than oblanga but now, espescially after trying to pull the rug out from Saracuda, i wouldn't waste spit on the s*b ..

never look a gift skunk in the tail

these are your words from

these are your words from an earlier blog "But this is not a feature article this is an opinion column. It is misleading to simply call it an article. If we want to maintain our credibility as conservatives fighting bias we also have to maintain a consistent basis of comparison" and I fail to see how they hold up to your words now "Nor do I see how Palin's pre-emption headline is negative or innacurate"

You seem to have lost the idea of consistent comparison just as a Troll would.  Remember words have meanings and consequences.

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.

How? Here's how

"how is the Obama headline more favorable to him?"

How?  Here's how:

Obama: Probe shows no contact in Illinois gov scandal.

Palin Pre-Empts State Report, Clears Self in Probe.

Loo at the two headlines, then compare them. 

In the Obama headline, there's a claim that a "probe shows no contact" yet fails to mention that it's Obama's own "probe."  In the Palin headline, the AP noted that it was Plain's own "probe" (that "clears self" is a dead giveaway, wouldn't you agree?) which is being reported, correct?

In the Obama headline, no mention of "preempting" anything like the OFFICIAL, LEGAL, investigation which is STILL ongoing.  Note the "Pre-Empts" in the Palin headline.

So, we have the AP headline claiming that Palin "pre-empts" and ongoing investigation and that she "clears herself" but nothing in the Obama headlineshows that an investigation is sill ongoing or that Obama is trying to "clear himself."

Still think there is no evidence of bias here?

A truly unbiased headline would read: "Obama: Internal Probe shows no contact in Illinois gov scandal." Or, better yet: "Obama: Transtition Team Probe shows no contact in Illinois gov scandal."

Obama: My job is above my pay grade

left out

Don't forget, a FAIR headline would include his party affiliation which, as we all know, is left out only if its Democrat. We get "Conservative Republican Palin's Probe Clears Self at the Bewilderment of Every Sane Person" while they get "Illinois Governor Not Guilty" for same story.

We are making way too much of this...

We need to let Obama get on with the nations business and stop all these distractions. Wait a minute... He has not been sworn in yet...

Carry on.

 

"I need more cowbell!" SNL

Oh my! History repeats it's

Oh my! History repeats it's self. 

"We need to let President Clinton get on with the nations business and stop all these distractions."

"Forget change, I want improvement!"

exactly right Ken

The media will be treating Obama the same as they did throughout the campaign.  No critical analysis only adoration. Meanwhile, they are still attacking Palin and other GOP'ers who are not in power. There goes their excuse of Truth to Power.

Changing The Country Is The Goal

I queried this story and found some 50 today.

There were 0 concerning Palin's church. 

JDW

DAILY WAVE

  • GOP: A new start with a new team
  • Who will the libs attack after inauguration?

Our Marxist President elect

Himself the exalted one, who sees no evil, hears no evil and speaks no evil,unless you're a Republican. Our first half- white all Marxist President elect,who as a mentee to "Uncle Frank", the communist, absorbed nothing from that experience. Who as a student at Columbia found comradeship with the socialists and anti-Israli professors, but absorbed nothing from those experiences. As a "community organizer" sought spiritual refuge and development in a black liberation based church for 20 odd years, never absorbing any of the racial anger and Marxist social and economic philosophy that are basic tenets of black liberation theology. As a political candidate he received encouragement, and fincial support from unrepentant radicals and a "connected" political fixer, Resko, but again, he didn't absorb any of it. As a state legislator he became the mentee of the President of the Senate  completely unaware of how the "outfit" in Illinois really worked. This is a man who supposedly has unsurpassed brillance.  When he ran for the U.S.Senate, 4th in the polls  3 months before the primary, his primary opponent and his probable Republican opponent were both destroyed by the leaking of sealed divorce documents by the paper his campaign manager used to work for. How coinsidental. He's taken all the advantages of his prior associations, most mentioned in HIS WORDS in one of his books.  He's what Jake Avery used to call, "a silk-stocking candidate". To above the fray to get involved in the gritty details of Illinois politics, but willing to take advantage of all the things it can do for him. He was an advisor to the Blago campaign.  It stretches even the shread of creditability this clown has left to believe he doesn't know where at least some of the bodies are buried or that his staff, representing him didn't discuss the Senate seat.  But he can point fingers at Republican ethics, right? But don't worry he talk good and he gonna send you a check.

Ummmm......

"a review by his own lawyer shows he had no direct contact with Illinois
Gov. Rod Blagojevich about the appointment of a Senate replacement"

Ummmm.....his OWN LAWYER reviewed this?  Of course his OWN LAWYER is going to say he had no direct contact with Blago.  Have they no shame??  Palin wasn't reviewed by her own lawyer.  The sad part of all of this is that many people (sheeple) will believe this as fact.  

"If we conservatives moved to those seven non-existent States, the government couldn’t find us and tax us to death!" 

Very well stated.

I could weep for what has become, and what is to become of this nation. I'm pretty certain our founders would be incredulous.

“I am the latte-sipping, New York Times-reading, Volvo-driving, no-gun-owning, effete, politically correct, arrogant liberal.” --Barack Obama

President-elect Barack

President-elect Barack Obama said Monday a review by his own lawyer shows he had no direct contact with Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich about the appointment of a Senate replacement

A demonstrable lie:

Screen shot of Governor’s Gazette paper with Obama and Blagojevich in huddle.
http://24ahead.com/images/blago-obama-confer-full.jpg

Exerpts of Nov 12

After congratulating President-elect Barack Obama on his Nov. 4 victory, Governor Rod Blagojevich now begins the difficult task of finding a replacement for Illinois’ Senate seat. The Governor said he would be deliberate in his decision process and plans on using a diverse senior staff to assist him in selecting a suitable replacement for Obama.

“Last night’s victory was bittersweet for Illinois - as we gain a great President, we lose a great Senator. And it goes without saying that our next Senator has big shoes to fill. Because it’s important that the best person for Illinois is selected, I want to be clear that the calendar won’t dictate our search. Instead, I want to ensure that Obama’s successor will understand and fight for the needs of average Illinoisans,” Governor Blagojevich said.

Governor Blagojevich will be looking for candidates that will support the President-Elect’s agenda for the people;

http://www.illinois.gov/PressReleases/ShowPressRelease.cfm?SubjectID=73&RecNum=7273

hat tip katainkent

Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.

dscott

Great screen shot!  No contact, huh?  

 

"If we conservatives moved to those seven non-existent States, the government couldn’t find us and tax us to death!" 

Pic of Obama & Blago together

Yes very nice.  They are talking too.  What is the date on this?  I don't think it matters because the great O made a sweeping statement  about NEVER meeting with him... what were his exact words?

 

M-B

To paraphrase a great

To paraphrase a great journalist, Mike Barnicle -- I have no doubt whatsoever that Obama has done any wrongdoing. The fact that I rely upon my instinct to take Obama at his word is fact enough for me to report that He is above board. I therefore state that He speaks the truth and his campaign is hereby exonerated from this distraction, so there is no news here. Look somewhere else. My instinct says there's more important things to look into.

→ Get it straight

The Media form an army ant phalanx insurgency into Alaska searching for proof the Governor tried to remove a corrupt, drunk, gun-threatening, child-torturing, wife-beating State Trooper.

But there's no reason to investigate whether Obama was involved in ensuring the election of politician already under investigation for corruption.

Ahh, to have the instincts of Barnacle Boy!

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE!

That was great!

So true!  Great comment on the Trooper.  They will try to make anything look bad when in fact nothing was wrong.  You cannot get any clearer than your example above.

M-B

I hate to nitpick about this double standard blog, but...

Gov. Sarah Palin is ID’ed as (R) immediately.  On the other hand, neither President-elect Barack Obama nor Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich are ID’ed [as (D)] ever.

Is this ID double standard problem contagious or what?

Impunitas semper ad deteriora invitat.

Rezko's sentence delayed...hehehee

Thank you for this blog post Ken...

I have been infuriated about all of the msm repeating just exactly as the AP stated...O clears self...over and over I have heard this now, well O has said ..or he is cleared according to attorneys and of course they include Fitz here and there to-boot...plus just look how he controls the so-called pressers just the last two days...

It has been something else...

Everyone knows he is releasing this so-called clearing of self and of course his staff ect info three days before Christmas for obvious reasons, I hope it backfires.

I have a hard time believing anything this guy says...always will, I have a real hard time believing a lot of what he says about Fitz ect and him not being able to release anything now...I think there is much more going on behind the scenes.

By the way...I just heard Rezko's sentencing is delayed now...hear he may be singing like a bird now since others may already be doing so...of course NONE of this is connected to O or has anything whatsoever to implicate him in anyway....that is the latest I've heard in the last few hours with the talking heads.

Going to be interesting.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

→ Obama exhonerated

Obama has testified on his own behalf before the highest power on earth (himself) that he is above reproach in matters of pay to play.

And the whole world wondered after the beast.

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE!

Oh this is class, Jesse

Oh this is class, Jesse Jackson Jr. was a federal informant for the last few years.  Wow, an example of one Democrat with some ethics!  One Democrat who exposed political corruption.  Where was Obama all this time???????  Chicago political corruption was so pervasive, Obama just went with the program so the MSM gave him a free pass and didn't make waves, but here we have A Democrat in the exact same environment who did just the opposite.  What more proof do you need, Obama has ZERO character.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2008/12/17/blagojevich-reportedly-denied-jackson-jrs-wife-job/

Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.