Newsweek is hardly the only MSM publication that is clueless about the Christian faith. The New York Times is also reliably feckless when it comes to reporting on what makes biblically orthodox Christians tick.
Southern Baptist Theological Seminary president Albert Mohler took the Gray Lady to task last Friday for its reporting on the recnet formation of a new coalition of Anglican churches that have broken off from the liberal Episcopal Church USA over concerns of doctrinal liberalism.
In "It's About Theology, Not Territory," the Baptist theologian and pastor lamented that Laurie Goodstein's December 3 story on the formation of the Anglican Church in North America painted the dispute in a way to portray the liberal ECUSA as an aggrieved victim of dogmatic conservatives. By contrast, Mohler points to a lack of doctrinal clarity in the Anglican Communion being the fertile ground by which liberals were able to erode the boundaries of historic, orthodox Christian teaching and thus threaten the unity of the church around the Gospel of Jesus Christ (emphasis mine):
Story Continues Below Ad ↓Christian leaders formerly associated with the Episcopal Church have announced the creation of a new denomination -- the Anglican Church in North America. The announcement came Wednesday as conservative Anglican leaders met in Wheaton, Illinois to plan for a future province of the Anglican Communion -- in this case a province determined by theological conviction, not geographical designation.
As The New York Times reported:
Conservatives alienated from the Episcopal Church announced on Wednesday that they were founding their own rival denomination, the biggest challenge yet to the authority of the Episcopal Church since it ordained an openly gay bishop five years ago.
The move threatens the fragile unity of the Anglican Communion, the world’s third-largest Christian body, made up of 38 provinces around the world that trace their roots to the Church of England and its spiritual leader, the Archbishop of Canterbury.
The strange part of that account is the statement that this move "threatens the fragile unity of the Anglican Communion." That fragile unity was shattered by the actions of more liberal churches in North America to bless same-sex unions, ordain homosexual ministers, and elect an openly-homosexual bishop. The lack of unity is what has prompted the establishment of this new denomination.
Indeed, this division among the Anglicans and related national churches can be traced directly back to the Anglican Communion's failure to establish and maintain doctrinal boundaries and a clear affirmation of biblical authority. Liberals and conservatives have been increasingly at odds over a host of issues related to biblical authority.
The action of the American church, the Episcopal Church USA, to elect and consecrate an openly-homosexual man as Bishop of New Hampshire in 2003 set the stage for what now appears to be a schism in the church.
—Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Wow, Ken... <crickets>
December 9, 2008 - 19:26 ET by Indiana JoeWell, with Blago getting tagged, I guess simple leftist Christian know-nothingism takes a backseat.
But it's nice to see that someone will stand up and correct the misconceptions spouted by the unreliable leftist rag The Grey Lady has become. It's amazing the impunity shown by attempting to re-write history to shift the blame to "conservative" Christians for the long-coming split among the Anglicans. They really must think we're stupid, as well as amnesic.
Funny; so far as I know, Christ has laid down no new edicts in the last 2000 years. So, what exactly is a "liberal" Christian? I mean, what different tenets can they have found to follow, as opposed to the ones followed by "conservative" Christians?
"Meet the new boss, same as the old boss..." - The Who
Dont' you know?
December 10, 2008 - 07:37 ET by AJBReligion is not handed down from God. Oh no! We, the liberal enlightened, can VOTE on the principals that our church will teach. And if our church elders don't listen and agree, we'll just break off and form our own church.
In fact, I have broken off from my church and am looking for followers. Baptism costs $100 and with that, we'll promise, IN WRITING, that you soul is saved. Kick in another $50 and we'll even sell you a few indulgences or pardons for the sins you will commit. We also have senate seats for sale. Anyone? Anyone? Buehler?
I'm now an Anglican too
December 9, 2008 - 19:35 ET by legacyrepublicanI didn't leave the Episcopal Church. It left God. I followed Him.
My paraphrase of Reagan as to why I am now an Anglican!
Very accurate.
December 9, 2008 - 19:40 ET by Mike BrattonAs things stand, the ECUSA is as Christian a group as the Jehovah's Witnesses or Wright's TUCC.
Which is to say, it's not a Christian group at all.
--Mike
www.thebrattonreport...
Amen!
December 10, 2008 - 02:07 ET by legacyrepublicanAmen to that!
Sad to say, I watched liberals tear down a once fine denomination.
Can't wait for the Bedford, TX, meeting to finalize the structure.
Funny how things moved from Plano to Bedford in just a few short years.
And, good news, I think many of the attendees will listen to Mohler's advice about the fraility of the current structure and make some attempt to change things. He is oft quoted in the Anglican blogs.
Iron sharpens iron.
He'd know...
December 9, 2008 - 21:47 ET by Saint ZeroGiven the Ultra-Conservative take over of the SBC, he should know about rifts.
Thank goodness somebody not
December 9, 2008 - 22:56 ET by KimberlyThank goodness somebody not only had the courage to fight back against NYT's liberalism, but they had the education to school the Old Grey Senile Lady.