WaPo's Shear Ignores Obama Pledge-breaking on Lobbyists

Photo of Ken Shepherd.
  • Bookmark and Share

The "Obama Team Moves to Keep Its Distance From Lobbyists," the page A4 Washington Post headline insisted. Yet as the article made clear, the spatial separation is walking, if not throwing distance.

The November 12 story by staffer Michael Shear began by noting that Obama "campaigned as an anti-Washington candidate" and that his transition team "made it clear" that the president-elect "would seek to build on that theme over the next two months."

As evidence of that, Shear explained the transition team's rules "that restrict how federal lobbyists can participate" in the Obama transition. Yet Shear failed to note how the standard has shifted over the course of Obama's campaign (emphasis mine):

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Barack Obama campaigned as an anti-Washington candidate, and the leader of his presidential transition team made it clear that the president-elect would seek to build on that theme over the next two months.

His transition chief, John D. Podesta, announced a set of broad regulations yesterday that restrict how federal lobbyists can participate in Obama's transition, saying the move is designed to ensure "that the undue influence of Washington lobbyists and the revolving door of Washington ceases to exist."

The transition team will not allow lobbyists to work in the subject areas in which they have previously lobbied, Podesta said. And if someone becomes a lobbyist after working on the transition, that person will be prohibited from lobbying the administration for 12 months on matters on which he or she worked.

"I've heard the other complaint, which is we're leaving all these experts on the side. . . . We're leaving all the people who know everything out in the cold," Podesta said. "And so be it." He said a similar ban was likely to be in effect for the actual administration, including an extension of the lobbyist ban to two years.

Although Podesta's fuzzy statement on the lobbyist ban -- "likely to be in effect" -- suggested a step or two back away from Obama's prior campaign pledge, Shear turned in paragraph five to how Obama will "remain largely absent" from the nation's capital as "part of a conscious effort to maintain a low profile during the final weeks of the Bush administration."

As Carrie Budoff Brown of Politico reported in her Dec. 15, 2007 article, "Obama tweaks lobbyist pledge," the candidate had backpedaled a bit on his initial promise about lobbyists to clarify that they could serve in his administration, just not in the area of their expertise for two years (emphasis mine):

The tempered language underscored a pitfall for candidates who boil down complex policy proposals into bite-sized nuggets that leave one impression on the campaign trail, but could look differently once implemented in Washington.

Lobbyists can work in an Obama administration — just not for two years in an area related to their work as lobbyists, according to the candidate’s proposal released earlier this year.

For example, a Sierra Club lobbyist could not move directly into the Environmental Protection Agency, but might be able to do so after two years of working elsewhere in the administration.

Obama casts himself as a break from the usual Washington politicians, highlighting his refusal to take donations from lobbyists, his pledge to make government more transparent, and his intention to close the revolving door between the White House and lobbying firms.

—Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

hogwash

Obama "campaigned as an anti-Washington candidate"

Too bad we know he is of the Chicago mold.

Vote early...and often!

Have fun at the Inaugural Ball, Daley (you POS!)

Chicago thug

To pledge and follow it through one has to be honest. Chicago thugs are not honest. Barry is a Chicago thug. Barry is not honest.

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

Old news: Obama "likely" to accept public campaign financing

Two year lobbyist ban "likely to be in effect"...

What a typical WaPo load. Lord Obama, please spare us, just nationalize the MSM as your first official act (FOCA can wait a few hours).

The old Pravda really was a model of efficiency and unambiguity. One party, one voice, one message.

I've run out

I've run out of fingers and toes to count the number of lies Obama has told. 

SickofLibs

You are so right. The  media shoved Barry Obama down American's throats. They abandoned any pretense of objectivity and irresponsibly used the power bestowed upon them by the Constituion. Now millions of thinking citizens deeply resent what they've done. It was un-American to the core. "Jounalists" adopted the behavior of the press which has caused so many horrors throughout the world, throughout history. Their fanatic, illogical hatred of President Bush, combined with "liberal" ideology, took hold of them like an addictive drug. And we are only beginning to see the results. They've pushed Western freedom into the realm of  the mindless following one can find only in dictatorships and fascist states. Western, free, thoughtful "journalism" died in the election and it looks as though what it has morphed into will continue for some time. With the partisan thugs who are now in charge of our government, it may be generations before freedom of the press returns in America and around the world, if ever.

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

IVE...

...we have to revisit the lemming myth, cause right now lemmings are looking more and more like rugged individualists compared to what's happened here.

Obama's Lies

It is almost impossible to keep up with all the of the back pedalling he is doing right now. As I was reading this I had Neil Cavuto on in the background. He was interviewing some "democrat strategist" who suggested that Obama would probably allow the Bush Tax cuts to expire 'naturally' in 2010 instead of reversing them as promised during the campaign. This gives me some hope that we can use the next two years to educate Voters on taxes and the ecomony outside of the current mantra MSM montra "Democrats are better on the Economy". Why do they say that despite actual History that proves otherwise? Is it because they feel like we have to give the Democrats something to be good at? It's a foregone conclusion Republicans own National Security. It's like they get Health Care, we get Terrorists. But in actuality conservative principles if applied would be successful in all major "Issues". I'm not giving them anything.....

 

http://www.withbias.net

Biasedgirl

Right on. Conservative principles work. Period. In the past 8 years I've had thousands of dollars I wouldn't have had had there not been the tax cuts. I used the money wisely and now am that much richer. Meantime, I, as a conservative citizen, contributed to the economy while others recklessly spent and ruined it. I and millions like me are not looking forward to the return of the welfare state. Socialism has never worked, never. History has proved this, time and again. Liberalism is simply a batch of ridiculous, disjointed ideas driven by emotional, illogical, blind ideology. 

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

Blind ideology is exactly

Blind ideology is exactly correct. Funny how the one ideology that professes to want peace and a better future around the world, has the opposite effect!

Soldiers Dissed By Obama Liberals

 

 

Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/  

CT

Right, CT. "Liberalism" ruins everything it touches: the economy, education, self-reliance, a stable society, a strong defense, homeland security, the courts and the laws, family life, marriage, a sense of human dignity and morality, children in the womb...on and on. Modern "liberalism", relativism, and political correctness have now morphed into socialism, which has the danger of becoming communism. Viewing it from the other side it has made America so weak that we most likely will be attacked by the far-right Islamo Fascists."Liberalism" is an incurable cancer.All we can do now is keep it contained, something which is becoming increasingly difficult.

 

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

What about all the people

What about all the people in obama's admin who ACCEPTED money from Lobbyists??

Oh, yeah, that would disqualify BO himself...as he took lots of $$$ from FannyMae/FreddyMac!

"WaPo's Shear Ignores Obama

"WaPo's Shear Ignores Obama Pledge-breaking on Lobbyists"

Oh cm'on NB.  You are doing it again. Giving the drive be media the benefit of the doubt.  When are you going to learn that they will print or say whatever they think will benefit their, now, president-elect.  

WaPo is a propaganda organ of the DNC.  When you view them from this point of view,  you come away with a completely different and truer sense of their mission and/or purpose.  You also then recongnize that web sites like this one are next to useless in stopping them when you take them for mistaken, miscued, forgetful, ignoring, etc.  They have not been, are not now, nor will they be in the future.  I repeat, they are propagandists not journalists.  

what the Change.gov website says

since I cant get to the WaPo website without a subscription I checked out Obama's transition website and found this blog entry "Following through on a Promise" 

Excerpt :

Before Barack Obama was President-elect -- from the very beginning of his campaign -- he pledged to change the way Washington works. That meant not accepting any financial contributions from lobbyists or political action committees.

Voters often said this was one of the major reasons they supported Barack, and they've been writing to the Transition to tell us how important they think it is that this commitment continues.

(selection of public endorsements follow)

 

and its subsequent link of promises.

Excerpt :

During a briefing today (article dated Wednesday, November 12, 2008 05:53pm EST ) at the Presidential Transition Team headquarters, Obama Transition Co-Chair John Podesta announced the strictest, and most far reaching ethics rules of any transition team in history. The rules are:

  • Federal Lobbyists cannot contribute financially to the transition.
  • Federal lobbyists are prohibited from any lobbying during their work with the transition.
  • If someone has lobbied in the last 12 months, they are prohibited from working in the fields of policy on which they lobbied.
  • If someone becomes a lobbyist after working on the Transition, they are prohibited from lobbying the Administration for 12 months on matters on which they worked.
  • A gift ban that is aggressive in reducing the influence of special interests

 

member of the Conservative Independant Witness Protection Program since Nov. 5, 2008

Here's an idea Barack...

if you're serious, really serious.

Lobbying, of any kind, is prohibited in Washington DC. Or any where else for that matter.

If anyone wishes to lobby an elected federal official it will be done in the following manner:

Any communication even remotely construed to be "lobbying" shall be submitted in person to the officials state office. It shall be submitted on paper, in triplicate and on electronic media, in triplicate. After copies have been forwarded to local newspapers and posted on offical web sites, such communication may be forwarded to the official concerned.

Any response or subsequent communication by the official or the lobbying individual shall be handled in a like manner.

In other words, Mr Lobbyist, if you want to schmooze with a Senator for 18 holes the Senators constituients will know about it.

Lobbying isn't necessarily a bad thing; it's the sleezy, underhanded, backscratching/backstabbing sh*! that goes with it that has to stop.

C'mon Senator, step up and do something big.

 

Lesson learned from Clinton:

For example, a Sierra Club lobbyist could not move directly into the Environmental Protection Agency, but might be able to do so after two years of working elsewhere in the administration.

In other words, he wants to make it through the midterm elections before he really goes left.

  MSM - shaping all the perceptions you need to believe, then confirming it with a poll.

Smoking out the hypocrisy

The media "watchdogs" ought -- yea right -- to recall how Obama's campaign lynched the MaCain campaign for employing former lobbyists as a measure for the hyporcrisy of the current change in Obama anti-lobbyist policy.

John E.

lobbyists

So the ACLU,NEA, AFL-CIO, IEWU, UAW, SEIU ASMCE, ACORN ARE NO LONGER ALLOWED? How stupid does the annointed one think we are? No NOW, National Action Network or Rainbow Coalition? Next the annointed one is going to say there ain't no Santa Claus.