Christianity Today Hits Media for 'Misunderstanding' Palin's Evangelical Christian Faith

Photo of Ken Shepherd.
  • Bookmark and Share

Having held their peace long enough, or perhaps being longsuffering in abuse, Christianity Today (CT) released an editorial today addressing the media's penchant for misunderstanding Gov. Sarah Palin's evangelical Christian faith.

NewsBusters has been tracking the media's cluelessness and biases on that front since at least early September.

In an October 28 posting to their Web site, Christianity Today's editors tackled how the media misconstrue evangelical views on two matters: teenage daughter Bristol Palin's unwed pregnancy and how the media insist evangelicals view the role of women in secular society, the family, and the church (emphases mine):

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

First, reactions to news of Bristol Palin's out-of-wedlock pregnancy: liberal pundits gleefully announced that this was going to seriously undermine Governor Palin's standing with the Republican Party's evangelical base. Any informed evangelical watcher or evangelical believer could have told them that this is a non-issue.

It is a non-issue because John Newton's famous line, "I once was lost but now I'm found," defines the evangelical ethos. We specialize in troubled lives. Stories of transformation from sin and degradation to righteousness and wholeness frame the way evangelicals see life. From the slave-trading Newton to the White House "hatchet man" Chuck Colson, God saves people from their slavery to sin and uses them to restore others...

[...]

The second media reaction that caught our attention was liberal puzzlement over conservatives who believe that only men should lead churches and marriages, yet who would not hesitate to have a woman a heartbeat away from the presidency.

Richard Land told Christianity Today that such concerns are asinine. The president of the Southern Baptist Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission compares the Palins to the Thatcher household: Dennis was head of the family, while Maggie ran the government. Land subscribes to the Baptist Faith and Message, which teaches that ecclesiastical and marital leadership are male territory. But Land is married to a strong woman, a professional with a Ph.D.

Are Christians like Richard Land inconsistent? We don't think so. Gender is complex and fundamental and not a mere social construction. It functions in archetypal ways. Many conservative Christians (though not all) believe these archetypes provide symbolic structure to church and marriage. God distributes gifts across gender lines, and women and men who develop their gifts do so to the Giver's glory. God created church and marriage, they say, and God wrote the user's manual for each. But God also created society, and he gifted women from the biblical Deborah to Israel's likely new Prime Minister Tzipi Livni with the gifts to govern.

—Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Just about Christianity?

The Lame Stream Media are clueless... period.

If they would bother reading

If they would bother reading the bible instead of misquoting it or taking it out of context, they would learn that some of the major biblical heroes were guilty of some major sins (Moses - murder, David - Adultery, the entirety of Israel - idol worshipping, etc). It has never been about how perfect we are. It's about how forgiving God is and how he can use us in spite of our imperfection.

conservative icons

David

David was a tabloid journalist's dream: adultery, pregnancy outside of marriage, murdering the husband of woman he was in adultery with, disobeying the king (Saul), dancing naked in front of a crowd, the list goes on and on

Actually I think David

Actually I think David danced in his underwear, so to speak. But still, enough to make his wife Michal scoff that he didn't care about his dignity as king of Israel.

Liberal Media

The media liberals don't like Christians because Christians believe in absolutes concerning truth and morals.

The media and igloos.

The media does not understand Christianity; instead it addresses, with its human secular stereotypes and prejudices of Christianity, the Christian aspects and criticism of issues.  The media has no more grasp of the profundity of Christianity than it has of Eskimos: you know, those people who live in igloos.

Impunitas semper ad deteriora invitat.

A video link from a Christian church in Harlem...

A friend sent me this in an e-mail. It's encouraging (reassuring?) to see that not all blacks in the country are so taken with Obama. This video is a bit long, but worth watching. The preacher is so correct in what he says about Obama (and in a somewhat humorous Southern Baptist-like style) it made my day.

I agree that media liberals don't like Christians

 because Christians believe in absolutes concerning truth and morals - in fact many regular liberals object to that also.

Liberals like to believe they don't judge anyone, nothing is right, nothing is wrong.  Christians make them uncomfortable because strong beliefs highlight the their own lack of them. 

Liberals gave us childrens games where "everybody wins/no one loses., no one is wrong/everyone is right"  It's all about "feeling good about themselves."

It's about time.

It's about time the church stood up for Sarah Palin,

Gabrielle

What took them so long?  Sarah Palin is fighting for us.  Fighting for American Values. 

This Sunday should be Sarah Palin Sunday.

Bible reading

1. I teach Sunday, adult Bible School and we start at the 1st word in Genesis and go all the way through. In a mega-church, we have a surprisingly if not alarmingly small group.

2. I also lead a home Bible study and we have not nearly as many of these groups as we should.

3. A few years ago, I saw an alarming study that claimed that less than 2% of people who regularly attend church have EVER read the Bible from cover to cover.

 

My point is this: Considering the aforementioned points, just venture a guess at the severity of the lack of Biblical knowledge that unchurched people have of what the Bible is about, let alone the concepts of Christianity.

 If you concede me those points then you must agree that these second guessers are about as full of heresay and baloney as they can be. Yet they demand to be held up as experts about Christians AND Sister Sarah Palin.

The mistake is if we let them go unchallenged. They are clueless that we Christians believe that we are all imperfect sinners; but we are better than we were before and having accepted Christ and recieved the gift of the Holy Spirit, we are better than we were yesterday. We know that we will never be good enough but we live under Grace by Faith and we are saved by that grace and not by works.

Thats all that I know how to say with just a few lines and also before I am viewed as a radical by those of little understanding OR have no ears to hear with.