"Does Palin have explaining to do," Chicago Tribune religion blogger Manya Brachear asked in her post-vice presidential debate blog post. Here's how Brachear opened her October 3 entry at her "The Seeker" blog:
Pentecostals have called on the mainstream media to stop mocking their sister Sarah Palin. But when will the Republican vice-presidential candidate answer the questions that swirl every time a new church video surfaces on YouTube? Was Thursday's prime time debate yet another missed opportunity?
By contrast, a review of Brachear's blog entries dealing with Sen. Obama's controversial former pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, show Brachear did not have similar concerns with Obama's relationship with Wright. Indeed, back in June, Brachear asked, "Can a candidate worship in peace?" The Trib staffer was referring to the fact that Obama was leaving Trinity United Church of Christ, blaming media scrutiny for ruining the worship experience for himself and his fellow parishioners:
Story Continues Below Ad ↓Sen. Barack Obama chided reporters in South Dakota on Saturday for suggesting that he joined Trinity United Church of Christ 20 years ago to fulfill his political aspirations.
He also made it clear that his recent departure from Trinity had everything to do with the controversy it added to his presidential campaign and the anxiety that his bid brought to the South Side church.
Is there a congregation that can welcome the Obama family into its pews and withstand the scrutiny that accompanies them? Is there a pastor out there who wants to give it a try?
Leaders of Trinity and its national denomination expressed regret about Obama's unexpected decision on Saturday. Rev. John Thomas, president of the Cleveland-based United Church of Christ, indicated that the denomination was caught by surprise.
Prior to Obama's announcement of his presidential bid, the Illinois senator championed a public conversation about the power of faith and the role it plays in people's lives. He was invited to address that topic during the UCC's national convention in Hartford, Conn. last June.
Near the close of her October 3 post, Brachear lectured the McCain-Palin campaign about openness on the Alaska governor's religious views (emphasis mine):
It's the pundits' tendency to pick the answers apart unfairly afterward that cause him concern. But if the campaign or Palin explained her spiritual foundation, where she goes to church now and why she believes what she does, that might not happen as often.
By contrast, a review of other Wright-related blog posts in Brachear's archive shows the Trib religion reporter was concerned that perhaps Wright was just misunderstood by the media and political pundits (emphases mine):
Just when many African-American churchgoers thought Barack Obama had squandered an opportunity to explain the bond with his longtime pastor Jeremiah Wright Jr., the Illinois senator stepped to a podium this week and did much more.
Fittingly in Philadelphia, Obama preached a message of brotherly love. By refusing to write off his Christian brother and beloved spiritual mentor, he tried to demonstrate to Americans how love and loyalty could transcend politics.
Clergy and scholars across the country predict that Obama's speech, which mentioned but did not condemn recent comments by vice presidential candidate Geraldine Ferraro, could launch a vibrant conversation about race in America. They also suggest that conversation finally could move beyond the generation of Jeremiah and Geraldine, two leaders who came of age when the language was more charged and the dialogue was quite different.
Theologians add that much of the recent tension stems from two quite different vocabularies. When Wright proposed "God Damn America" as an alternative to the song "God Bless America," religion professor Sandy Martin at the University of Georgia did not hear any anti-American sentiment.
"What came to mind was somebody who sees himself as God's servant, one who is duty bound to give God's word and sometimes that word is chastising," said Martin, an ordained Baptist minister. "Every nation including the U.S. is under the judgment of God and I think it's easy for that to be misunderstood by people who are not used to that mode of addressing the issue. Sometimes the literal words are not exactly what is being conveyed."
—Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
I have an idea...
October 6, 2008 - 11:58 ET by c5thenWhy doesn't the Chi Trib sponsor a Presidential/Vice-Presidential theology debate? We can have the McCain- Palin team against the Obama - Biden team. They each get the same questions and have to back up their answers by citing the specific scriptural verses that pertain to their answer.
Send your love letters to:
October 6, 2008 - 12:03 ET by The Distributistmbrachear@tribune.com
I particularly enjoy that when you click on the "Profiles in Faith" link to Rev. Jeremiah Wright on Brachear's bio page it jumps directly to the Tribune's official Obama Profile page!
"Modern man is staggering and losing his balance because he is being pelted with little pieces of alleged fact which are native to the newspapers; and, if they turn out not to be facts, that is still more native to newspapers." -GKC
no
October 6, 2008 - 12:24 ET by candanceLast time I checked this was still a free country where people can go to whatever kind of church they want. Palin has no obligation to explain her religious beliefs in the political arena any more than Democrat Harry Reid is asked to explain why he's Mormon or Democrat Jimmah Carter is asked to explain why such a devout Baptist is so anti-Zionist.
And even if she did try to explain it, the MSM will hear whatever they want to hear.
Every time I think the
October 6, 2008 - 12:53 ET by Indiana JoeEvery time I think the MSM can't get any more schizoid, they prove me wrong. The whole bunch of them need some serious couch-time.
First, why should Palin "answer questions" about her religion, when we're such a "tolerant" society, that gives Wiccans and Druids every right of "freedom of religion" that any other religion enjoys? Why are Pentacostals such a "strange" religion that we now need to "find out" more about them? If you're curious, research it. Why is it verboten to ask any kind of penetrating questions about the Islamic faith, or even to imply that questions should be asked? And when research does answer those questions, it's either "misinterpreted," or it's "hate-speech" and "fear-mongering?" Those are just general dichotomies in this vein.
But specifically, there's this:
"Sen. Barack Obama chided reporters in South Dakota on Saturday for suggesting that he joined Trinity United Church of Christ 20 years ago to fulfill his political aspirations.
"He also made it clear that his recent departure from Trinity had everything to do with the controversy it added to his presidential campaign and the anxiety that his bid brought to the South Side church."
Brachear seems to have no problem with this obvious conflict. The idea that he'd join the church for political reasons is something to "chide" someone for, but the admission that he quit the church for the same reasons doesn't raise an eyebrow? Not even to question the "chiding?" That's more than just bias, that's blind obeisance.
The issue at the time, IIRC, was the pastor of that particular congregation, and the things he said about this country. It had nothing to do with the beliefs of the denomination, except in the explanations of the "context" of BLT, by the people trying to explain what the Reverend Wright was saying. Trying to excuse it, trying to justify it, trying to make sure none of it splashed on Obama. It was a "private matter," and Obama didn't really listen anyway. Wouldn't that make him an opportunistic hypocrite? Shh, your "racism" is showing.
Fast-forward to Palin. Now, she's supposed to "explain" Pentacostalism? She's supposed to defend and "answer the questions" about her chosen (or former) church's theological basis and justify it's existence, and her following of it? This is a purely religious issue, best informed by questioning the church elders, or by research into the principles of the denomination.
This is exactly what the questions about Obama were not, but were painted as, to defuse the Wright "eruption." They are not appropriate in a society that claims religious freedom among it's "rights." They were never asked of Obama, and there is no reason anyone should ask them of Palin or any politician. If there is real curiosity about Pentacostalism, it should be no problem to satisfy that curiosity without resorting to asking religious questions during a political debate.
To claim otherwise is dishonest, deceitful, counter to the much-vaunted "separation of church and state," and an outright lie.
"To doubt everything or to believe everything are two equally convenient solutions; both dispense with the necessity of reflection." - H. Poincaré
From one of those stories:
October 6, 2008 - 13:00 ET by The Distributist"...by all definitions, Wright did become a mentor for Obama who sought
to understand the vital role of Christianity in the lives of
African-Americans.
Wright married Barack and Michelle Obama. He baptized their
daughters. And he welcomed the candidate into his office time and again
when Obama faced major life decisions."
Also, Ms. Brachear, in response to my e-mail, suggests that if I reread her post I might understand that she is merely explaining the ceremony in Palin's church while allowing the Rev. Robeck to "call out the media for mocking her."
I think the headlines alone in this collection of headlines tell a story of bias of the sweetly subtle type, the type you might expect from Church Chat...
"Modern man is staggering and losing his balance because he is being pelted with little pieces of alleged fact which are native to the newspapers; and, if they turn out not to be facts, that is still more native to newspapers." -GKC
What some people see
October 6, 2008 - 13:06 ET by IamTinmanWhat some people see as chastizing, others see as judging. We all know the phrase "Judge not that ye be not judged". A "religion critic" seems to be an oxymoron.
For the present, Americans for 250 years or so have agreed to let the rules enshrined in the Constitution guide our secular lives. Their religion is private and no one elses business unless the observation of it violates the law.
God and I will deal with each other when the time comes. Between now and then, mind your own business.
Palin's Belief System Isn't Hidden
October 6, 2008 - 13:14 ET by GothampcWhat does Palin have to explain? The Pentecostal belief system is presented on many television shows. Tune into Trinity Broadcasting Network any day of the week and you'll see several preachers who preach the Pentecostal belief system (including John Hagee who has a daily broadcast and whom McCain threw under the bus).
The point is that the Pentecostal/Evangelicals aren't trying to hide anything. Their message is out there for all to see and judge. Do we see daily broadcasts of any of Obama's preachers?