Associated Press reporter Sara Kugler pounded out a 7-paragraph article today on how McCain running mate Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R), has "[Banned] reporters from meetings with leaders" from around the world. Palin is in New York City for the open of the United Nations General Assembly. A review of media coverage from Obama's behind-closed-doors chats with European heads of state, however, shows no such complaint by the media about a lack of access.
Kugler complained that Palin "has not held a press conference in nearly four weeks of campaigning, on Tuesday banned reporters from her first meetings with world leaders, allowing access only to photographers and a television crew." The reporter noted that her news agency objected to the terms of media coverage the McCain campaign set for Palin's meetings with Afghanistan's Hamid Karzai and Colombia's Alvaro Uribe (emphases mine):
Those sessions and meetings scheduled for Wednesday are part of the Republican campaign's effort to give Palin experience in foreign affairs. She has never met a foreign head of state and first traveled outside North America just last year.
The campaign told the TV producer, print and wire reporters in the press pool that follows the Alaska governor that they would not be admitted with the photographers and camera crew taken in to photograph the meetings. At least two news organizations, including The Associated Press, objected and were told that the decision was not subject to discussion.
Yet when Sen. Barack Obama went to Europe this summer and met with past and present foreign leaders, print media were similarly on the outside looking in. Obama met with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, former and current British Prime Ministers Tony Blair and Gordon Brown (respectively), and French President Nicolas Sarkozy.
Indeed, in the July 26 Associated Press article excerpted below, it's quite clear that the AP was not invited in to watch Obama's chat with Sarkozy or Brown. Yet no complaint was registered in the article about lack of access, and Obama's European tour as a way to "burnish" his foreign policy credentials was recorded matter-of-factly:
LONDON - Presidential contender Barack Obama defended his decision to travel to Europe and the Middle East on Saturday, saying that problems encountered by Americans at home are often best dealt with by working with allies overseas.
Obama, who spoke to reporters after wrapping up talks with British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, said he wasn’t sure if there would be any immediate political impact from the trip.
“The reason that I thought this trip was important is that I am convinced that many issues that we face at home are not going to be solved as effectively unless we have strong partners abroad,” Obama said.
Obama, a first-term senator, was on a tour designed to burnish his international credentials for the general election campaign against Republican rival Sen. John McCain. The trip began with a campaign-season tour of the war zones in Iraq and Afghanistan and ended with meetings with old allies France and Britain. Obama returned to the United States late Saturday.
The Democratic hopeful seemed relaxed as he strolled down to the prime minister’s office at 10 Downing St., pausing briefly to shake the hands of two somewhat startled police officers standing near the door.
He turned to television cameras, smiled, waved and said “Hello,” before walking into Number 10. Brown greeted him just inside the door.
Pooled television images showed Brown offering Obama a chair on the Downing Street terrace before the pair settled down for two hours of talks.
The pair later took a stroll in the sunshine around Horse Guards Parade, the vast open space where military reviews are often held. Tourists snapped pictures while security guards walked ahead of the two men.
[...]
Obama arrived in London from Paris, where he met Friday with French President Nicolas Sarkozy. Obama and Sarkozy discussed Iran, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, climate change and other issues.
Speaking later Friday at a news conference, Obama said Iran should accept the proposals made by Sarkozy and other Western leaders. He urged Iran's leaders not to wait for the next U.S. president to push them "because the pressure, I think, is only going to build."
—Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters





















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
what's bad for the MSM is
Tue, 09/23/2008 - 12:09 ET by TruthMongerwhat's bad for the MSM is good for America
Journalism is the opium of the liberals
Question
Tue, 09/23/2008 - 12:10 ET by 10ksnookerWhat does private meeting mean?
It clearly means that all
Tue, 09/23/2008 - 12:16 ET by IgnatzJFahrquarIt clearly means that all the MSM is allowed to be present so as to distort whatever was said. Additionally, it also allows a reset of "Gov. Palin, who was just recently brought under suspicion of not really being the mother of Trig, but his grandmother, by credible internet sources."
"All generalizations are false, including this one.” Mark Twain
Leave 'em in the hall waiting....
Tue, 09/23/2008 - 13:18 ET by attorneygirlWhy should Palin grant those lying bastards any time at all? I refer to the Charlie Gibson "attempted murder" interview. He didn't want to interview her--he wanted to destroy her.
Screw the media.
Let Sarah Palin do her thing.
By the way, while the media is waiting in the hall while Governor Palin is doing her thing, perhaps they can do some research into Obama's ties with Bill Ayres, or examine Obama's lack of experience, or Obama's socialist/communist friends and mentors, or Obama's voting record (most liberal in the Senate), or research ACORN, the radical group that Obama worked for as a "community organizer."
Or perhaps the media can google what "fairness," "decency," "honor," "patriotism," all mean. Or they can look up "defamation," "slander," "libel," in trying to figure out why the Saturday Night Live skit about Governor Palin's husband and daughter was so out of line that it's not even mentionable here.
This election cycle is showing two different Americas, and a media that is so vile that I cannot even let it into my home any longer.
I believe our country is in real trouble folks.
So when I see someone like Governor Palin--who offers me a glimpse of decency, normality, honesty, and independence, I'm voting for her. Heck, I'd trust her to run the country. She'll get good advice, and she's a quick study. It's her core--her attitude--her philosophy--that I want in and around the Oval Office.
And, quite frankly, every family knows that it's the woman in the house who keeps the budget and makes things run. So let's let Governor Palin say "no" to those jerks in Washington. Let's let Governor Palin say "no" to massive spending, corruption, and greed in Washington. Any mother with five kids has experience in budgeting and making things work. That's a skill!!!
God bless America. And God help us.
I agree
Tue, 09/23/2008 - 14:48 ET by CoolShadesI agree. I'm also proud of the McCain Campaign for not giving in to those media/Democratic/Obama hacks. They've completely lost their credibility as reporters and journalists. In fact, they are redefining the entire profession:
We no longer trust what they say.
We no longer trust their objectivity.
We no longer trust their fairness.
They've completely obliterated the wall between news and commentary.
Now, thanks to the Internet, we don't need no stinking media badges.
The more the MSM continues
Tue, 09/23/2008 - 13:34 ET by celatorThe more the MSM continues to demonize Gov. Palin, the more Americans will vote for her. The loathing and distrust we have for the MSM grows exponentially every day as they continue their march to oblivion.
If the MSM reports on an issue, then we know the factual story is exactly the opposite of what they report..
The major media report only half the news. Why are they surprised they have only half the potential audience?
Well I hope Sarah can help
Tue, 09/23/2008 - 14:10 ET by Clear thinkerWell I hope Sarah can help ban the AP for good once she's the VP.
Not from reporting, but ban them from any and all news confrences with her or McCain.
A Feminist Cat Fight Over Sarah Palin
Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/
clAPtrAP crAP
Tue, 09/23/2008 - 14:58 ET by mattmclAPtrAP crAP
"Banned"? IT'S ABOUT FRIGGIN TIME!
Tue, 09/23/2008 - 15:11 ET by SickofLibsSo within the last week, AP not only refuses to assist the Feds in the Palin email-hacking investigation, they actively thwart it. So now they think they're entitled to access? How stupid are they?
And since when do other world leaders want to have a peanut gallery of these untrustworthy parasites eavesdropping on discussions?
So tough crap, AP. You'll take it and you'll like it, hear?
i do not really know what
Tue, 09/23/2008 - 15:14 ET by patmac49i do not really know what the reason was,but it sure looks like they are trying to hide her..that may not be the case,but that is how it appears..
I agree
Tue, 09/23/2008 - 19:27 ET by KrisPalin can handle the liberal media. She should invite them in, let them ask any questions that they want, and then by answering their queries, she will show them for the idiots that they are. She need not hide from them. Today's incident with the press does not make Palin look good to the American voter. It solidifies their opinion that Palin does not have lots of knowledge on foreign policy and therefore doesn't want to risk making a serious gaffe. If she's elected Vice President, she's going to have to talk to people she doesn't like, so she might as well get started now. See, I have confidence that she can make them look stupid by allowing them to fire away with their questions. I don't understand the McCain strategy on this one. It's going to backfire on them, and that's too bad.
Lock them out like Barak
Tue, 09/23/2008 - 15:20 ET by NorthCoasterLet in only those journalists who write accurately for a conference after the meeting. That way the message is accurate and they have less chance to twist what the foreign leaders have said to fit their own agenda.
The MSM needs to present the news as news or get cut off totally. Take note John and Sarah, because the Main Stream Media has turned your words into propaganda for the left by selective editing and packaging.
WTF
Tue, 09/23/2008 - 18:50 ET by DirjjPacmac, on another thread, you come off as a softhearted independent, and then you come here andd show your colors. Palin isn't hiding from anyone. Why should she give the media the time of day, after the way they're treated her the last 3 weeks? I sure as hell wouldn't.
If I were her, I'd hold a press conference, and right off the bat, announce that MSNBC and NBC had better not even bother asking for an interview, because they aren't getting one.
CNBC hasn't been that bad though, so they can have one, as long as no one from MSNBC and NBC are involved.
Media bashing aside. One of the reasons that Palin is not likely giving intereviews is so that she can study up, and therefore, be on the same page as McCain when it comes to policy, foreign and domestic. I know the Media ( and the Left ) would just love to point out the differences between the 2.
ab
The Media is Whining?
Wed, 09/24/2008 - 13:19 ET by RogerCfromSDBoo frickin hoo.
The leftists have slandered, smeared, and lied about the Palins and they have the temerity to cry about being cut out of a meeting?
They really do inhabit an alternate universe...
A nation cannot be free without a free, unbiased media. We are not free.