We remember well the media hatchet job that was called "covering" Hurricane Katrina.

Accusation one: The feds blew up levees.

The media helped that one circulate through the ether, never commenting on the absurdity of the claim.

Accusation two: National Guard resources were tied up in Iraq.

This has been disproved on many occasions. The media never bothered to correct the misaccusation.

Accusation three: Bush did a flyover when New Orleans was under water.

His flyover happened after Katrina had passed but before the levees broke. The media knows this, but still refuses to correct the timeline.

Accusation four: Rescues were delayed by incompetence and/or ill-intent.

Rescuing people from rooftops takes time and too much air traffic would have led to crashes and other disasters. Media never investigated or reported what would be a reasonable time frame - just that it wasn't fast enough.

Accusation five: Bush& co. ignored the need for levee upgrades.

Levees were aleady in process of upgrading. Even if Bush had made a priority for New Orleans the day he took office they wouldn't have been complete by Katrina. Years of dawdling by Louisiana officials and resistance by environmental groups left NO unprepared. This is public record - a record the media never bothered to air.

Accusation six: Bush never offered help.

Bush called Gov. Banco the days prior and the day before landfall offering federal assistance. She refused help. (Perhaps that why she lost re-election). The MSM has never reported his offer.

Accusation seven: FEMA dropped the ball.

First response is left to state and local authorities. Fed help is intended as backup. In fact, feds are barred from involvement until asked by the governor. Local response was non-existant. Blanco and Nagin really f***ed up. A little investigation into government structure would have confirmed this. The media never bothered.

All of these accusations were made by partison officials and biased members of the media. The media didn't bother checking the truth or the validity of the accusations. Subsequent investigations have shifted the blame from FEMA to local officials. In three years the media has never corrected itself. Obviously, they are quite happy with the blame remaining unfairly on Bush and FEMA.

It is a standard trick for the MSM to report unsubstantiated rumors from the left, but need notorized documentation from the right. The same thing has happened with Edwards scandal. We are within our rights to be outraged. As Dee said:

Ken already addressed in the article that it wasn't written by an American. The point is that they give this type of thing free reign with no comments. Maybe you can show me where he has done so with some conservative wako. Then you would possibly have a point other than your mean spirited personal attacks.

The media likes to repeat liberal rumors until repetition makes it "fact". No they don't do that with conservative rumors. Total double standard.

               A gun in your hand beats a cop on the phone.

you have side stepped and put your head in the sand about everything I said. You do not only offer constructive criticism, you constantly insult the professionalism of bloggers here and you know it. I've never even hinted that your comments should be banned, but that doesn't make them immune from criticism. I'll always point out the hypocrisy and if you think that is inappropriate then you take it up with the mastheads.

You also show selective indignation at stereo types of liberals but never seem to be around to comment on the ones about conservatives. You may fool yourself into thinking you are some kind of moderate or non liberal but you don't fool me and I doubt you fool anyone else here.

You also constantly compare Newsbusters to the News media in order to justify the media and you never compare it to things that are actually comparable like The Daily Kos, Huffpo, DU etc... Newsbusters is a conservative website that does not profess to be non bias like the media and you just can't seem to get that through your head. You have once again avoided giving any examples of where liberals do it better. I'm not surprised.

And my statements are not based on intuition, but they are based on anecdotal evidence. Of the people I know who watch Survivor and the other Reality shows, over 80% are liberals. Of the people I know who watched Passion of the Christ, 80% are conservatives and the other 20% are religious (moderate) liberals. 95% of the people I know who saw Farenheit 911 are liberals and 95% of the people I know who saw the Ben Stien film about ID were conservatives. The schools are run by liberals and liberal unions and they are the ones trying to limit competition and make everyone a winner. At least 90% of the conservatives I know think that children should not be shielded from competition.

If you have different anecdotal evidence fine it won't change my opinion because I haven't experienced it. I don't expect mine to change yours if you haven't experienced it. Of course if you have your head in the sand you avoid experiencing it and that's okay too - if that is what gets you through being a liberal.

Nice of you to say "Good God" it really shows that liberal respect, as you have never shown yourself to be religious. As to the other part of your statement where you say "if you didn't come on and blame every little social ill on liberalism, I wouldn't have to go off like this." Nice wife beater excuse you got going there. Maybe you could show where liberals are actually trying to correct some of those social ills instead of just lashing out at me with nonsense.