AP Obit for Solzhenitsyn Ignores His Christian Faith

Photo of Ken Shepherd.
  • Bookmark and Share

Alexander Solzhenitsyn via Christianity TodayDespite penning 38 paragraphs for his obituary, the closest AP's Douglas Birch came to mentioning the late Alexander Solzhenitsyn's Christian faith was by remarking how the bearded author and Soviet dissident looked like a religious icon:

In a 1978 speech at Harvard University, Solzhenitsyn - who with his beard and dour demeanor resembled a figure from an Orthodox icon - denounced the Western view that liberal democracy was fated to triumph in non-Western civilizations, which he called "worlds" unto themselves.

Yet it was in that speech -- "A World Split Apart" -- Baptist theologian Albert Mohler argues, that Solzhenitsyn famously diagnosed secularism as a disease corrupting the West and, what's more, he did so thoroughly anchored in his Orthodox Christian faith (emphasis mine):

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Edward E. Erickson, who wrote two major works on Solzhenitsyn, argues that the key to understanding Solzhenitsyn is Christianity -- the Russian Orthodox faith that framed Solzhenitsyn's worldview. Erickson argued that "in a day when secular humanism flourishes among the cultural and intellectual elite, he holds fast to traditional Christian beliefs."

Indeed, Solzhenitsyn railed against the secularism and spiritual weakness of the West, even as he took refuge in Cavendish, Vermont for the years of his exile. In his famous 1978 Harvard University commencement address, "A World Split Apart," Solzhenitsyn pointed to the moral and spiritual crisis in the West. He declared that America's experiment with democracy was being undermined by secularism:

However, in early democracies, as in the American democracy at the time of its birth, all individual human rights were granted because man is God's creature. That is, freedom was given to the individual conditionally, in the assumption of his constant religious responsibility. Such was the heritage of the preceding thousand years. Two hundred or even fifty years ago, it would have seemed quite impossible, in America, that an individual could be granted boundless freedom simply for the satisfaction of his instincts or whims. Subsequently, however, all such limitations were discarded everywhere in the West; a total liberation occurred from the moral heritage of Christian centuries with their great reserves of mercy and sacrifice. State systems were -- State systems were becoming increasingly and totally materialistic. The West ended up by truly enforcing human rights, sometimes even excessively, but man's sense of responsibility to God and society grew dimmer and dimmer.

[...]

He returned to Russia a prophet, but also a man who seemed strangely out of his times. In his case, a great life of the twentieth century lingered awkwardly into the twenty-first. Nevertheless, his great courage and his literary achievement remain a tribute to the human spirit. Even more, Solzhenitsyn's moral vision serves as a reminder that Christianity alone provides an adequate grounding for human dignity.

Photo via Christianity Today's Liveblog.

—Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters. You can follow him on Twitter here


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The Anti-Christian

The Anti-Christian Press.

"Solzhenitsyn famously diagnosed secularism as a disease corrupting the West..."  And the AP is proof he was right!

I ignored the headline

When I saw that he was a Nobel laureate, I just assumed that he was someone that believed in global warming, hated conservatives, etc. 

It's sad that the Nobel committee has become reduced to just another liberal propaganda machine that I  jump to those conclusions when I see the word Nobel. 

Thomas Jefferson once said, 'We should never judge a president by his age, only by his works.' And ever since he told me that, I stopped worrying. 

- Ronald Reagan

Is mentioning his

Is mentioning his Christianity central to what he's remembered for?

Other than being the basis

Other than being the basis for what he believed and enabled him to endure what he did, I guess the answer is no.

"Fighters are fun but bombers make policy"

considering...

That it formed the basis for his worldview, and his understanding of the truth that there is right and wrong and good and evil, I think that the correct answer to your question is not only a yes...

 

But a resounding HELL YES.  

Without knowledge of truth and light and good... what good is ANY of his viewpoints?  It's just another voice in the sea of mushiness!

I just want to reinforce,

I just want to reinforce, as you note, that the core theme behind all of Solzhenitsyn's post-Gulag writing was to demonstrate the evils that befall civilization when religious and spiritual principals are discarded.

That state of affairs was the central theme of his books, by his own admission. He resounded that same theme in many articles, comments and speeches--as in the speech he made at Harvard after he moved to the US. At that speech, he noted he was warning the US to not stray from basic religious principles or they would pay a heavy price.

I do remember that he was soundly criticized by the elite left when he made the speech at Harvard. They did not like what he said.

 

The major media report only half the news. Why are they surprised they have only half the potential audience?

the reason why

He was so roundly booed at Harvard was because, if you remember, he was a horrible, horrible anti-semite.  Like, I think his expose of the gulags was important and central to the light shed on the subject, but we should also remember that he wrote screeds that accused the Jews of controlling the world.

http://www.reason.com/news/show/29113.html

 

Resoundingly yes.

Solzhenitsyn was a Christian first and foremost as anybody familiar with his writing will attest.  It would be like remembering Mother Theresa as a Nobel laureate for her social work but not mentioning that she was also Catholic.

I hate to break it to you,

I hate to break it to you, but since one of main main goals of the communist philosophy Solzhenitsyn dedicated his life to fighting was/is the eradication of religion, his faith is central to who he was, what he did and what motivated him.  Of course, you knew this already, I have little doubt.

How the west was lost

http://www.amazon.com/How-West-Lost-Alexander-Boot/dp/1850439850/ref=pd_...

This book says it all... in our conquest to defeat communism, we forgot to preach against marxism in ALL of it's forms.  Now we have an outright Marxist running for election in the states.  

It's like Rush stated... we look around the world and see all the failed policies of Marxism.  Whether it be Europe, or in New York.  Did you guys hear that New York now has higher taxes than European countries?  And that they have unemployment rates, homeless rates, deficits that rival those countries?  And what is Mayor Gloomberg's response?

"Taxes are not yet high enough to deal with the problems."

Socialists don't have answers because they aren't versed with reality.

Socialists can't find the truth, because THERE IS NO TRUTH, in their viewpoint.  If you point out the fallacy of this argument, they'll simply change the subject.....

Christianity

This is why his death wasn't widely noted. They can't and won't take defeat. They are the enemy.

Solzenitsyn

As with all the great Russian authors, Solzenitzen knew real personal suffering, often brought on by hateful politics. He was aware of good, but knew the nature of evil firsthand. I believe that personal suffering and sacrifice make one so much more insightful and understanding than one who has not suffered it.. In his writing we find a genuine knowledge of the human condition. He warns us about the evil which is just outside our door or waiting around the corner. This is something "liberals" do not understand and never will. It, come to think of it, is the great difference between John McCain and Barack Obama. McCain has faced down evil; Obama's been pampered.

 

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

A liberal's evil

They have a view of evil, even though they would like you think they don't think in absolutes.

Its conservatives, or basically anyone else that disagrees with them.

While some conservatives view liberals as "evil" I view them more as misinformed. 

Thomas Jefferson once said, 'We should never judge a president by his age, only by his works.' And ever since he told me that, I stopped worrying. 

- Ronald Reagan

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.