If you have been watching the primary election coverage tonight you've probably seen at least one story about elderly nuns from South Bend, Indiana, who were "denied the right to vote" for lack of a photo ID.
It's a shame when the mainstream media, bear false witness. Even more so when they exploit the nun angle to carry water for left-wing groups that opposed the law all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Under Indiana's voter ID law, persons lacking proper ID can vote. The only difference is they cast a provisional ballot which is not counted until after their identity is verified within 10 days following the election.
In one of her earliest drafts, AP's Deborah Hastings did note the 10-day provisional ballot exception, but still crafted her coverage to paint the South Bend sisters as the victims of an unforgiving law:
About 12 Indiana nuns were turned away Tuesday from a polling place by a fellow bride of Christ because they didn't have state or federal identification bearing a photograph.
Sister Julie McGuire said she was forced to turn away her fellow sisters at Saint Mary's Convent in South Bend, across the street from the University of Notre Dame, because they had been told earlier that they would need such an ID to vote.
The nuns, all in their 80s or 90s, didn't get one but came to the precinct anyway.
"One came down this morning, and she was 98, and she said, 'I don't want to go do that,'" Sister McGuire said. Some showed up with outdated passports. None of them drives.
They weren't given provisional ballots because it would be impossible to get them to a motor vehicle branch and back in the 10-day time frame allotted by the law, Sister McGuire said. "You have to remember that some of these ladies don't walk well. They're in wheelchairs or on walkers or electric carts."
Nonetheless, she said, the convent will make a "very concerted effort" to get proper identification for the nuns in time for the general election. "We're going to take from now until November to get them out and get this done. You can't do this like school kids on a bus," she said. "I wish we could."
A later draft by Hastings clipped the fourth paragraph altogether.
Barring the very rare razor-thin election scenario, it's highly unlikely that the votes of these 12 nuns would be the deciding factor in changing any election outcome.
Simply put, provisional voters in most cases have little incentive and are under no obligation to show up to verify their ID after the election.
—Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Fire the poll workers
May 6, 2008 - 21:45 ET by CobraManNuns are not being "denied the right to vote" because of the ID law. That law has an exemption for religious persons like the Nuns.
"Exemptions do exist for the indigent, those with a religious objection to being photographed, and those living in state-licensed facilities that serve as their precinct's polling place."
Link
If they were truly denied the ability with out being able to cast a provincial ballot as per the law, then that's the fault of the poll worker who claimed that they MUST have a photo ID and not the law. That worker should be investigated and charged with a crime.
Well there's no "up" side
May 6, 2008 - 21:51 ET by motherbeltWell there's no "up" side to them publishing a story about nuns voting provisionally. What would be the point of that?
<sarc>
they are trying to say
May 6, 2008 - 21:55 ET by Apachethey are trying to say "See!!! it creates a problem for more than just illegals and criminals!!! Thus this is unjust!!"
I don't think catholics have
May 6, 2008 - 21:52 ET by ApacheI don't think catholics have a religious objection to being photographed so they can't use that. The Amish and maybe Muslim women could argue that. The law doesn't exempt you just for being religious.
Apparently the nuns were all
May 6, 2008 - 21:55 ET by motherbeltApparently the nuns were all elderly so they didn't have driver's licenses any more. The rest sounds to me like a poll worker who didn't know what he/she was doing. they should have let them vote anyway, provisionally; they could have tossed out the ballots in ten days if necessary.
Doesn't matter
May 6, 2008 - 22:34 ET by CobraManIt doesn't matter as they could still cast a provincial ballot. I bet that the percent where they are registered would be happy to send someone to them so that they may verify their identification without having to travel anywhere. After all, they wouldn't want the Nuns to claim they're being discriminated against because of their physical disabilities.
(sorry, this post should have been a reply to Apache)
strange turn of events for msm
May 6, 2008 - 21:47 ET by Jason AslingerCatholics are usually the oppressors in liberal media distortions. These victimized nuns are trailblazers.
Nun Voting
May 7, 2008 - 07:32 ET by GoodieSo were are the Blues Brothers when you need them?
→ Goodie
May 7, 2008 - 07:35 ET by Cool ArrowI don't know about Jake and Elwood, but there's another thread about penguins in the Arctic.
Coincidence?
♣ a seal
Artic
May 7, 2008 - 07:37 ET by GoodiePenguins wearing sunglasses? Creepy but cool.
Oh but the msm will come to
May 7, 2008 - 09:09 ET by taterOh but the msm will come to the Catholic's side if it furthers their agenda.
I'm curious who the nuns would have voted for anyway. Both dem candidates are pro-choice.
"They need to have a course in college called common sense and everyone should take it. Problem is there isn't too many people that could pass or teach it." -my grandfather