Just in time for the third anniversay of Pope Benedict XVI's election to the papacy, Time magazine's Tim Padgett penned a positively-intentioned yet patronizing defense of why he's "still a Roman Catholic." Suffice it to say Padgett's reasons don't ring with theological clarity or a sense of faith-filled awe at the central and essential claims of Catholicism.
No, Padgett made clear in his April 19 article that his Catholicism is one of personal preference, holding aloft not the Church as herald of the Truth, but its "quieter value" as a community in which to mark life's milestones from cradle to grave (emphasis mine):
Like everyone else, Catholics fall away from God on a regular basis and become pretty dismal human beings; and we benefit from the spiritual and moral guidance of priests and nuns....We may not impart the church's ban on premarital sex to our children, but we're glad the church is there to help us teach our kids that sex should be shared in a context of love, respect and responsibility. While many of us may object to the Vatican's blanket condemnation of stem cell research, it's still good to have powerful global voices like the Pope's warning us not to play Frankenstein.
[...]
We also know the church's profound value as a receptacle of culture — and we cherish its quieter value as a place to ponder deeper questions than our inane media consider, and to mark life from baptism to burial. Perhaps most important, it's where and how Catholics receive the redemptive tonic of the Eucharist, a sacrament that so palpably but transcendentally expresses Christianity's faith that in the end, despite life's suffering, light always defeats darkness.
Now, I myself am not a Catholic, but seriously: "redemptive tonic," "light always defeats darkness"? Those are, to say the least cartoonishly new-agey twists on any basic understanding of Catholic Church teaching on the Eucharist or of Christ and his crucifixion and resurrection. Indeed, "redemptive tonic" elicits more of a Marxian "opiate of the masses" feel than anything else.
I'm happy that Padgett, unlike many of his colleagues, can write openly about his faith, and aim to defend it. But Padgett's defense just seems to make the case of many a religious conservative about the media not getting people of faith: when it comes to the life-changing and life-governing faith and theology of practicing Christians, the media just don't get it.
—Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Well, far be it from Time
April 20, 2008 - 06:17 ET by motherbeltWell, far be it from Time to find a real Catholic...you know, one who actually believes and lives by the Church's teachings. But just as you said, Ken, they "just don't get it." This is their idea of what Catholicism (actually all religion) is. Something nice to have around, you know, for those "landmark" occasions in life, the custom and ceremony thing is kinda cool. It's good to have traditions.
but we're glad the church is there to help us teach our kids that
sex should be shared in a context of love, respect and responsibility.
Really??? A context without marriage?? The Church helps you to teach your kids that? How?
As for the rest of it: well isn't that special?
It's nice to have around, in a "nostalgia" sort of way (not that it's particularly relevant right now). You know, like those old fables, where good always triumphs.
Sheesh.
Liberals Worship Man
April 20, 2008 - 08:55 ET by Increase MatherHe makes it sound as though he decided to join some kind of faternity that would allow him a place to get buried when he died if he paid his dues.
The problem liberals, socialists, and assorted other subsets of Marxists have is that they don't choose to understand the church is a life-time commitment of centering one's life around Christ.
They think we need therapy.
Christ rose from the dead. He walked, talked, and met with people after he died. He was/is real. He's not some consumer choice.
Catholicism for Dummies?
April 20, 2008 - 09:14 ET by reasonsjesterThe nuances of Catholicism and the mysteries of faith don't usually fall within the MSM's oeuvre, and the disconnect from theology is palpable. Manicheanistic punchlines like "light always triumphs over darkness" come across as if they were uttered by a backsliding Christian trying one's hand at alleviating their guilt by paying homage to the Maya Angelou school of liberal Christianity. The quotes cited above from Padgett's article sound like a Star Wars version of Catholicism, as if The Pope was Obi Wan Kenobi, and by extension, we can assume from the bulk of Time's stories that George Bush is Darth Vader. I think I need a "redemptive tonic" to wash down this Diet of Worms.
One more thing should be said - I am not a Catholic, and I am not a huge fan of organized religion. I think that it is odd that sex is the "original sin" and in Genesis God clearly instructs man to "go ye forth an multiply." Talk about mixed messages. Furthermore, I don't see the necessity of priests and nuns taking vows of chastity. If marriage is an acceptable way of mitigating man and woman's "sinful" need for procreation, and the behavior that leads to it, I don't see why it is beneath the leaders of the church. Maybe if the church encouraged healthy attitudes towards sex and marriage in their priests, there would be fewer scandals tarnishing the church's image in the eyes of the public.
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. - Marcus Aurelius
I think that it is odd that
April 20, 2008 - 10:01 ET by motherbeltI think that it is odd that sex is the "original sin" reasonjester
I don't know where you got the idea that sex is the original sin.
Original sin is a consequence of this first sin, the hereditary stain with which we are born on account of our origin or descent from Adam. (Catholic Encyclopedia)
The "first sin" referred to (which caused the stain) is the sin of disobedience committed by Adam and Eve...eating of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.
Regarding the vow of chastity: giving up one of the big pleasures of world is considered a sign of one's commitment to the spiritual life.
Sometimes An Apple is Just an Apple?
April 22, 2008 - 02:30 ET by reasonsjesterI always took the eating of the apple from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil to mean sex, since the nakedness of Adam and feeling ashamed, along with the role of Eve as a wicked temptress, only make sense within this context. I guess that sometimes a cigar is just a cigar and sometimes an apple is just an apple.
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. - Marcus Aurelius
Sex Not Original Sin
April 21, 2008 - 08:39 ET by misterbee241"I think that it is odd that sex is the "original sin" and in Genesis God clearly instructs man to "go ye forth an multiply."
Sex is not the original sin - disobedience is. God plainly told Adam and Eve NOT to eat of a certain tree and they did. Eve was deceived by Satan but Adam sinned willingly. Thus the fall of man is Adam's fault and responsibility not Eve's. Because we are descended from Adam we have inherited that sin nature through the tainted blood of Adam that has been passed down to us. It's all in Genesis 3.
There is none so blind as they that won’t see. Jonathan Swift 1667-1745
Religion
April 20, 2008 - 09:15 ET by totalkaosdaveTotalKaosDave
Let's face it, he only turned to religion because of his economic circumstances. He was bitter because the government hadn't provided the wealth and comfort he should have...he'll probably buy a gun if McCain wins the presidency...
Or maybe the media simply "get it" when it's convenient
April 20, 2008 - 10:01 ET by sarcasmoLike various politicians.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
Shhhhh! He's a favorite
April 20, 2008 - 10:04 ET by Free StinkerShhhhh!
He's a favorite of the RINOs and those who don't know that - despite being tough on Crime - Rudy is a RINO.
Pledge to not support RINOs ever again!
Committed Catholics don't
April 20, 2008 - 10:14 ET by motherbeltCommitted Catholics don't support Giuliani's, or Kerry's, or Pelosi's disregard for the rules regarding eligibility to receive Communion.
The fact that politicians choose to act in this manner doesn't excuse the media.
media is clueless
April 20, 2008 - 12:20 ET by jondelwicheIt is bizarre to see the media portray the Pope's visit as some
watershed moment for Catholicism. They soundbite the failings,
i.e. sexual abuse, and ignore his profound faith messages and the future.
Our media is so Americanocentric, that they forget American
Catholics comprise a mere 6% of the worldwide flock, and in backrooms
the Holy Father and others have likely LONG looked upon us as the "boil
on the butt" of the Church's worldwide faith effort. Too much me/me/me
secularism, embrace gay/abortion/greed crap....
Yes, what is said abroad, by the other 94%, of the Pelosi's, Kerry's,
Kennedy's etc, taking communion?
How about one media report that Americans, and our moral
failings, are but a speck of the total flock?
"...just people who make you feel less alone..."
April 20, 2008 - 14:30 ET by KC MulvilleHow can you argue that your loyalty to the church is because you enjoy the church's respect for reason, but you dismiss their teaching? That's simply saying that you're a Catholic because they ask questions, but you don't have to pay attention to the answers. Or, further on, he enjoys the church because of the music and art; the theology is optional. That's a profound misunderstanding of what being Catholic means.
This is the Mary Tyler Moore fallacy. Don’t get me wrong, I love MTM, but she unwittingly participated in the ultimate anti-Catholic statement. Remember at the end of the “Mary Tyler Moore Show” series (awww!), when they were all in the newsroom for the very last time (awww!). Actors were crying, America was crying (awww!). And then Mary (sweet Mary!) gave her lovely little speech to say how much she loved these people (awww!). She said:
No! A family is not “just people who make you feel less alone”! As a father, one who wiped the butts of four children, and who now drives them everywhere, and who chases them to pick up after themselves, and who pays for their education, and who disciplines them, and rewards them, and who teaches them on a day to day basis what it means to live in this world … I reject the idea that my role is to make them feel “less alone.” That’s Hollywood, but real parents will tell you that Hollywood isn’t reality.
The Catholic Church is not just an artistically stylish “culture” where bishops and the magisterium are optional. As we say, the Church ain’t beanbag. When we say that family life is crucial, and that because of what a family is, you don’t engage in sex outside of marriage, even if you really really really really really love the guy, we aren’t kidding. A family is a specific thing. A church is a specific thing. It isn’t “whatever gets you through the night.”
This guy’s church ain’t Catholic. It’s new age, it may even be scientologist … but it ain’t Catholic.
Mr. Padgett's take on his faith is...
April 20, 2008 - 18:56 ET by PrairieSkyunfortunately, not uncommon. Many Christians, Catholics included, have in the last 20 years or so, taken on a "new age" influenced view of their faith. It is a doctrinally watered down, simplistic view, to be sure. As a somewhat recent Catholic (I was raised Methodist, and converted 10 years ago), I have seen a fair amount of this. As a former Protestant, I initially found it surprising to see this kind of thinking among Catholics, whom I had always believed to be quite traditional in their beliefs and in the practice of their faith.
Overall however, most Catholics that I have known have remained "true", for lack of a better word, to the teachings and tenets of the Catholic Church. If anything, I believe that many American Catholics are experiencing a resurgence of their devotion to the more traditional aspects of their faith. I have seen this myself, and have heard in the media of many other accounts of the same thing appearing to happen around the country. A similar resurgence appears to be taking place in several other Christian denominations, also. In general, religious Americans appear to be returning to the traditional teachings of their faiths, and the fascination of the last couple of decades with "spiritualism" and "new age" human-centered beliefs seem to be waning.
† Not so fast PrairieSky
April 20, 2008 - 19:01 ET by Cool ArrowHave you no seen this video on the Church of Oprah?
♣ a seal
re:Cool arrow...
April 20, 2008 - 19:09 ET by PrairieSkyI am not saying that "new ageism" is dead. There are plenty of people who think that they have found what they are looking for in people and celebrities like Oprah, and in cults like Scientology. But I do think that there is an upsurge in the numbers of Americans who have either tried or considered such alternatives, found them lacking, and are now beginning to return to "traditional" religious teachings and denominations.
Time's "Catholic" wrote ...
April 21, 2008 - 09:26 ET by mustangsally"While many of us may object to the Vatican's blanket condemnation of stem cell research ..."
The Church has made no such 'blanket' condemnation against stem cell research. Against embryonic stem cell research: Yes, that has been condemned. Against adult stem cell research (where the most promising discoveries have been made): No, not condemned.
Is it too much for Time to at least get a real Catholic to proof read their cultural Catholic's commentary on Catholic teaching??!!
re:mustangsally...
April 21, 2008 - 14:30 ET by PrairieSky"Is it too much for Time to at least get a real catholic to proofread their cultural Catholic's commentary on Catholic teaching??!!"
Good point mustang, but of course it is, if you're a member of the MSM!! Why let a little thing like the facts get in the way when you're trying to make an unfounded, bogus point?? As far as Time and the MSM are concerned, the Catholic Church is the bogeyman, and anything, ANYTHING, that they say about it, right or wrong, is justified.