Finding Christian leaders concerned with global climate change is one thing, but it's hard for the secular media to find an evangelical Christian who can assent to one of the Left's most favored sacraments, abortion.
That's where Newsweek's Lisa Miller comes in finding a new challenge to the traditionally pro-life political views of evangelical Christians. Miller invites readers to meet Adam Hamilton, a Methodist pastor and pro-choice "evangelical" (pictured at right). Or as Hamilton prefers, a pro-lifer with a "heavy heart."
From Miller's article "How Would Jesus Choose?" in the April 14 issue (emphasis mine):
Adam Hamilton does not call himself "pro-choice." He prefers "pro-life with a heavy heart." What that means, as he explains in his new book "Seeing Gray in a World of Black and White," is that he believes abortion should be available and legal, that there are instances in which it might be necessary and that those instances should be very rare. Further, he says, the abortion debate has been too hot for too long, and that, as a Christian minister, his job is to try "to support people no matter what decision they make." As an evangelical megachurch pastor in Kansas, a man educated at Oral Roberts University, Hamilton speaks carefully, aware that he's staking out a controversial position.
[...]
Hamilton wants pro-choice and pro-life advocates to join forces to reduce the number of abortions and he enumerates seven areas where they could find common ground. Let both sides agree that adequate information about birth control can help prevent pregnancy, he says. And let both sides agree that the longer a pregnancy progresses, the more morally problematic an abortion becomes.
That's funny, as an evangelical Christian I must have been misreading all those times Jesus told people to "go and sin no more." He must have really meant, "I hope you don't sin, but I'll support you no matter what decision you make."
Of course, Miller is at best confused and at worst downright mistaken to call Hamilton an evangelical. Not once did Miller note that Hamilton is an ordained minister in the United Methodist Church, an increasingly liberal mainline Protestant denomination, or that he received his Master of Divinity from Southern Methodist University. Miller chose to focus instead on Hamilton's affiliation with the decidedly more fundamentalist Oral Roberts University, where he received his bachelor of arts for pastoral ministry, and to brand Hamilton as the head of an "evangelical megachurch." With 12,000 members and over 7,000 souls in attendance on any given Sunday, the megachurch tag is hard to disagree with, but does evangelical really fit the theology or temperment of Hamilton's Church of the Resurrection?
The term evangelical itself has assumed numerous definitions over its nearly 500-year history beginning with the Protestant Reformation. Evangelicals today are perhaps best noted, organizationally, by the National Association of Evangelicals (NAE). The United Methodist Church, of which Hamilton's church is a member congregation, does not belong to the NAE.
What's more, there's a marked contrast between the NAE's upfront listing of its Statement of Beliefs to that of Hamilton's Church of the Resurrection (COR) "Our Beliefs" page, which punts visitors to the UMC Web site for anything of theological substance.
The NAE Statement of Faith:
- We believe the Bible to be the inspired, the only infallible, authoritative Word of God.
- We believe that there is one God, eternally existent in three persons: Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
- We believe in the deity of our Lord Jesus Christ, in His virgin birth, in His sinless life, in His miracles, in His vicarious and atoning death through His shed blood, in His bodily resurrection, in His ascension to the right hand of the Father, and in His personal return in power and glory.
- We believe that for the salvation of lost and sinful people, regeneration by the Holy Spirit is absolutely essential.
- We believe in the present ministry of the Holy Spirit by whose indwelling the Christian is enabled to live a godly life.
- We believe in the resurrection of both the saved and the lost; they that are saved unto the resurrection of life and they that are lost unto the resurrection of damnation.
- We believe in the spiritual unity of believers in our Lord Jesus Christ.
Hamilton's church's statement of faith (emphasis mine):
United Methodists hold to the historic doctrines of the Christian faith. We are evangelical, but moderates rather than fundamentalists. We value the intellect and modern science, while at the same time looking to the Bible as the authoritative guide for faith and practice. Methodists have a passionate faith with strong convictions, but we also recognize that the world is not always black and white. We are willing to ask questions, to wrestle with difficult issues, and to do so with grace and compassion.
Methodists have been known for our emphasis on a personal faith, lived out in concrete ways in the world. We have historically valued well-informed and passionate preaching, worship that was lively, and small groups where people could grow in faith.
Methodists have open hearts, and open minds--and welcome anyone interested in learning more about the Christian faith.
Photo of Hamilton via Church of the Resurrection's Web site.
—Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
methodist - say no
April 7, 2008 - 15:18 ET by TruthMongermethodist - say no more...
i bet he's against capital punishment tho
TruthMonger, Yes, I have
April 7, 2008 - 16:15 ET by msh1973TruthMonger,
Yes, I have a friend who was raised in the Methodist church (her father was a Methodist minister) who left our church (Christian Church) when our pastor preached a sermon on the sanctity of life. She had a "fit", she just couldn't believe that a pastor would want to limit a woman's right to choose.
I'm a Methodist of 35 years
April 7, 2008 - 18:15 ET by rwesleyI'm a Methodist of 35 years and I find your statement to be as ignorant as any racist remark I've come across.
Just as an FYI - I think global warming (U.S. Warming to libs) is a sham. I think abortion is an abomination. I think that HRC and Barry Hussein would take our country into the toilet. I hold to almost every conservative principal known (although I have disagreements with the death penalty).
I sat in the same pews at First United Methodist Church with George W Bush and his family in Midland, TX. I break my back to send my kids to private school and teach them conservative principles.
What is it exactly that you have a problem with in the Methodist religion? Why do you take the exploits of one minister and apply it to the entire religion?
I'm a Methodist of 35 years
April 7, 2008 - 19:41 ET by MidAmericaI'm a Methodist of 35 years and I find your statement to be as ignorant as any racist remark I've come across.
I was raised Methodist also. But.... there is a big difference in what many individual Methodists believe and what the leaders at the top believe.
For example, from the UMC website: Last November, the United Methodist Council of Bishops called on leaders of all nations to begin an immediate withdrawal of troops from Iraq, declaring that war is "incompatible with the teachings and example of Christ."
Clearly they don't like war and the Iraq war in particular but have this to say about abortion: We recognize the tragic conflicts of life with life that may justify abortion and urge prayerful consideration by all parties involved.
But for a lot of us this statement tells us most of what we need to know about them: We endorse the United Nations and commend all who pursue world peace through law.
my wife and her family are
April 8, 2008 - 14:05 ET by TruthMongermy wife and her family are UK Methodist
her Grandmother met Wesley
her grandmother isn't into abortion or gay marriage
their church membership is down to about 13 little old ladies now
I'm the lone Christian fundie around here who constantly defends Muslims, Jews, Mormons...I can certainly find plenty of good in the Methodists - even the leadership:)...
But in my town the Council of Bishops Minneapolis 2002 was really big on same-sex unions, I remember...
TM, most christians defend
April 8, 2008 - 14:13 ET by bassndudeTM, most christians defend the Jews and the Jewish nation. But I draw the line at defending murderers and others that worship a false god.
Islam worships a false god. Their god encourages the killing of those of other religions, or those that do not convert to Islam. The do not respect the teachings of Jesus, nor do they acknowledge Jesus as the Son of God.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
How about this?
April 7, 2008 - 21:14 ET by GrannyGrump42The United Methodist Church was a founding member of the Religious Coalition for Abortion Rights. They remain a member of the re-named incarnation, Religious Coalition for Reproductive Rights or some such. This is an organization that at rallies has supplied members with signs reading, "If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament."
Why won't the denomination sever that tie? Because at least among the people with any say, abortion IS a sacrament. And that's not compatible with Christianity.
Holy Jebus...
April 7, 2008 - 16:10 ET by WhoIsJohnGaltI'm halfway between agnostic and aetheist and even I know that abortion isn't kosher in the eyes of the church. And finding a Christian leader who doesn't "just say 'no'" isn't easy. But leave it to Newsweek to try and spin it their way!
Great post, Ken ...
April 7, 2008 - 16:17 ET by Dave PierreWe almost never see such warm, glowing profiles of pro-life evangelicals. MSMers like Miller go out of their way to tag them as "controversial." You can almost sense in the article the thrill of Miller finding a pro-choicer like Hamilton.
Shame on Adam Hamilton. Has he read - for one - Amos 1:13?
+_+_+_+_
Frankenlies.com: The truth about the lies of Al Franken ...
as a Christian minister,
April 7, 2008 - 16:22 ET by motherbeltas a Christian minister, his job is to try "to support people no matter what decision they make."
Well, there you have it....Liberal Christianity: also known as "God just wants you to be happy."
My favorite
April 7, 2008 - 16:53 ET by doug1950His Bible must have "The 10 Suggestions" rather than the 10 Commandments. Believe it or not, his philosoply is gaining supporters. It becomes more "convenient" for the church-goers if they are not tasked too much to follow the Scriptures. (2 Timothy 4:3-4)
Quote: "as a Christian
April 8, 2008 - 08:34 ET by misterbee241Quote: "as a Christian minister, his job is to try "to support people no matter what decision they make."
No, his job is to preach AND teach the Gospel of Jesus. When Paul laid out the qualifications for a pastor there was no "support whatever decisions people make." If necessary, he is to confront the one in sin and inform him of the situation. Jesus plainly says this in Matthew 18:15-17.
And yes, Jesus really did say "Go and sin no more."
May I suggest John MacArthur's book, The Truth War? This book addresses people like "Rev" Adam Hamilton. Amazon has it but I cant get the link insert to work. http://www.amazon.com/Truth-War-Fighting-Certainty-Deception/dp/0785262636/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1207660643&sr=8-1
And I really love the part about liberals wanting abortions to be safe. Safe for whom? Certainly not the child in the womb. And with the medical technology we have available today, when is a woman's life ever in danger? How many of the close to 50 million abortions since the "right" was discovered have been done to save the life of the mother? The only reason to terminate a pregnancy today is because the child is an inconvenience. And rare? Why? If there's nothing morally wrong with it, then why not make it popular? Let's everybody get one.
I dont have much patience with liberals, especially when they're preachers. And I say that as a minister of the Gospel.
There is none so blind as they that won’t see. Jonathan Swift 1667-1745
Dont forget the Rich Young Ruler
April 8, 2008 - 13:23 ET by exLibJesus did NOT support the Rich Young Ruler's decision to not give up his wealth.
Jesus loved him but let him go.
Let's try it on for size
April 8, 2008 - 18:23 ET by GrannyGrump42>>Quote: "as a Christian minister, his job is to try "to support people no matter what decision they make." <<
JOHN: Reverend, I lost my job and I can't bring myself to tell my wife. Plus my kids are hanging out with the wrong crowd. And I'm tired of my mother nagging me. So I'm going to shoot them all in the back and start a new life.
REV: Well, I disagree personally, but I can see that you agonized over this decision, Mr. List, so I'll support you in it.
Newsweek's Lisa Miller
April 7, 2008 - 16:44 ET by TENewsweek's Lisa Miller asserts: "Hamilton wants pro-choice and pro-life advocates to join forces to reduce the number of abortions." Why do so many abortion enthusiasts falsely claim "to want to reduce the number of abortions"? They consider an abortion to be no different than getting one's hair cut. Do they also claim to want to reduce the number of hair cuts?
Good point, TE. Pro-life
April 7, 2008 - 20:01 ET by QueenMumGood point, TE. Pro-life advocates do not want to simply "reduce the number of abortions". And to say that pro-choice advocates want to "reduce the number of abortions" is to say that they have some reason to believe that abortion is not acceptable. What a tangled web they've spun for themselves.
I am the exotic Queen Mum, and I approved this message.
It's crowd control
April 7, 2008 - 21:24 ET by GrannyGrump42The abortion lobby has many factions they need to keep satisfied:
1. Hardcore feminists for whom abortion is a sacrament, a social statement about how they do as they damned well please. (Free PR, donations, legwork)
2. Abortion practitioners who need high volume to keep the doors open. (Free PR, donations)
3. Population control fanatics who want to keep the birth rate down, thus want abortion to remain readily available. (Free PR, HUGE donations)
4. Eugenicists who want to weed out people they consider undesirable. (Free PR, donations, a small but important supply of costly late-term abortion patients)
5. Racists who want to keep minorities from outbreeding white people. (Free PR, big donations)
6. Politicians who get campaign contributions based on their support for "abortion rights" (lapdogs)
7. Playboy types who want to be able to rut with impunity and never get slapped with a paternity suit. (Free PR, donations, and a steady supply of customers for Group 2)
8. By far the largest group -- queasy prochoicers who want abortion to go away, but who believe that if you criminalize it, the front lawns of America will be littered with coathanger-impaled women. (Free PR, donations, legwork)
Groups 1 through 7 are the actual movers and shakers. They have focus groups to find out how to keep Group 8 ignorant of the abortion lobby's real agenda and in constant suspicion of anybody who ever disapproves of an abortion. This is how they maintain a political base.
Evil at work.
the case for abortion
April 7, 2008 - 17:19 ET by LionKingThe only possible reason that I might find abortion acceptable would be that "medically necessary" reason. In these times of modern medicine, no one has been able to actually give me one of these medically necessary reasons; I have heard a few "medically convenient", but not necessary.
Rare, but never illegal anyway
April 7, 2008 - 21:30 ET by GrannyGrump42Cases where the mother's life really is in danger are rare, and abortion was never prosecuted in those cases. In 1961, for example, a couple of doctors decided that Erika Peterson's chances of survival would be better if they killed her unborn baby. They got permission from her husband to do the abortion, which killed the patient as well as her baby:
http://realchoice.0c...
This was perfectly legal, even though abortion itself was a criminal act.
But the abortion lobby doesn't want people to realize that good-faith efforts to preserve a woman's life wouldn't be prosecuted. They want people to think that the vast majority of abortion decisions are "between a woman and her doctor" for compelling health reasons.
granny...let's talk modern
April 8, 2008 - 15:10 ET by LionKingI imagine in 1961 they still believed in bloodletting and leaches.
You're missing the point
April 8, 2008 - 18:28 ET by GrannyGrump42The point is, abortion was illegal, but these guys were perfectly free to perform an abortion that they, for some twisted reason, thought would increase this woman's chance of survival of her health crisis. But the abortion lobby doesn't want people to realize this. They want people to think that if abortion is recriminalized, then doctors will be forced to allow women to die lest they risk prison.
There's no point in looking for a "modern" example of not being prosecuted for a "life of the mother" abortion, given that you can be doing an abortion because she doesn't want to get stretch marks and that'd be perfectly legal.
If the mothers life is
April 7, 2008 - 18:33 ET by RainsfordIf the mothers life is threatened by the pregnancy, I could understand how a docter would make the tough decision to save as many lives as possible. Outside of that scenerio, I can't see how you can justify abortion.
Here's a quick way to cut down on the number of abortions: Stop having so much sex outside of a relationship.
Alas, I have an even quicker method
April 7, 2008 - 19:52 ET by sam.i.amTo reduce abortions, make them illegal. Abortion is murder.
Short of that, at least return the power to the states to make abortion laws.
I once listened to a sermon in my church that moved me more than any have before or since. It was near Christmas a few years ago and our priest was discussing the slaughter of the innocents, where Herod killed all the male children under two years old, in and around Bethlehem. (Our church puts the number killed at 14,000. . .some estimate much lower, some higher, some question the historical veracity of the story altogether)
He rhetorically asked us if we had been alive at the time, what would we have done about it? We wouldn't allow that scale of massacre to happen, would we? Would we??? He challenged us to think about the millions of aborted babies that we have allowed to be killed while we sat idle.
There may be only so much we can do, but all like-minded pro-lifers need to do more. I need to do more.
Amen, sam. I am the
April 7, 2008 - 20:02 ET by QueenMumAmen, sam.
I am the exotic Queen Mum, and I approved this message.
I bend my head ... "Never
April 7, 2008 - 23:24 ET by bigtimerI bend my head ...
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill
Not Christian...
April 7, 2008 - 20:46 ET by heldmywYou cannot tolerate murder and be a Christian.
Dead is dead. There is no 'grey'.
There is no 'grey'.
Hamilton is not a Christian.
Nor is the Methodist Church.
Well thanks for letting me
April 8, 2008 - 13:02 ET by rwesleyWell thanks for letting me know. Here all this time I thought I was a Christian. Now that the belted earl has spoken, I need to figure out how my upbringing in the Methodist church has rendered me "not a Christian".
How Would Jesus Choose?
April 7, 2008 - 20:53 ET by GothampcHow Would Jesus Choose?
Why is that even a question and why do people think they can put words in the mouth of Jesus? Jesus was an observant Jew and was well versed in the Tanak that says things like:
"Before I formed thee in the womb, I knew thee" (Jeremiah 1:5).
"Thus saith the Lord, thy redeemer, and he that formed thee from the womb, I am the Lord that maketh all things" (Isaiah 44:24)
Jesus knew very well that it was a child in the womb and not just a clump of cells.
Even without getting
April 7, 2008 - 21:23 ET by CortillaenEven without getting religion involved, the only rational viewpoint is that life begins at conception, as I discussed in the links below.
My position
Further commentary and clarification in response to other people's comments: First, Second, and Third.
Abortion-supporters automatically stop listening the instant you invoke God, but punching holes in their arguments is simple even without Him.
www.rhjunior.com Great comics with a hefty dose of Christian and anti-nutjob goodness.
"With your mind as high as Mt. Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see all the forces that shape events; not just the things near to you." -Miyamoto Musashi
Cortillaen...I read your
April 7, 2008 - 23:08 ET by JerCortillaen...I read your linked commentaries--very powerful, poignant, and compelling. And sophisticated as well. In this latter regard, however, I believe you misconstrued Kate Michelman's statements: Her contention is that it is now the pro-life supporters who, in recent years, have successfully developed and delivered the more thoughtful, sophisticated arguments.
So let me adopt the straight-forward, un-sophisticated approach--and follow up on the morning after pill issue--with a couple of questions I have posed in the past. What penalty would you impose for its use? How would it be investigated and enforced? You seem to clearly assert the destruction of a one-day old fertilized egg constitutes first degree murder. Are you therefore willing to support capital punishment [or a life sentence] for a woman who deliberately takes an hours-old human life with a pill?
Jer
Hm...
April 7, 2008 - 21:31 ET by GrannyGrump42Maybe they think that when Jesus said, "Let the little children come unto me, and do not hinder them," He meant we were to dispatch them, post-haste, to the afterlife.
As a former member at COR (moved out of town 2 years ago)
April 7, 2008 - 21:28 ET by hungarianfalconI can speak w/a tad more knowledge on Hamilton. Personally, I think it's utter nonsense to define him or his church as evangelical. The key point w/his church is to bring into the Christian realm the "non-religious and nominally religious." That manifests itself with the actual church services being fairly nonjudgemental compared to the Methodist church I was raised in. Hamilton does present a fairly "squishy" front on controversial issues, which placates his "non-religious and nominally religious" target audience. That being said, I think it's a bit fairer to describe him as a non-judgemental conservative. Unfortunately, IMO, I think it's his job to pass judgement (not fire and brimstone but certainly more black and white rather than gray) to a certain extent as God's representative to us lay people.
There is a decent portion (10-20%) of the audience at any of the normal service times (not the earliest ones, those folks are hard core, grin) appear to be non- or minimally participants. Not sure if they were just easing into church life or they were there for social status.
Bottom line, the services themselves were not where COR members would go if they wanted the real traditional Christian values. Those would be found in the Sunday school classes and other small groups. Just like any large organization, there was a variety of "flavors" offered by these small groups, to fit various individual needs.
I would also add that this geographic area isn't exactly liberal and the COR congregation is definitely conservative. In fact, at least one of Dr. Tiller's greatest nemeses (sp?) is/was a Johnson county Kansas prosecutor (county containing Overland Park, Olathe, Leawood, Shawnee, and Mission).
HF
→ Pastor Hamilton
April 8, 2008 - 07:36 ET by Cool ArrowSo he's what? A hybrid?
♣ a seal
They call it moral squishiness
April 8, 2008 - 13:43 ET by greenfairieI hope nobody chooses slavery, but I'll support any decision the plantations make.
The Rev., circa 1855
So, let me phrase this in a
April 8, 2008 - 13:50 ET by bassndudeSo, let me phrase this in a way we can all understand here. This minister's job, is to support us in whatever decision we make? Let's just suppose, his wife, and a married man in his church, decide they wish to have an affair with each other. They go to him, tell him their decision, that they are going to have an affair. And he is going to support their decision. After all, its his job. Right?
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
Yup.
April 8, 2008 - 18:30 ET by GrannyGrump42And if somebody decided to rob a bank, rape a nun, burn down an orphanage, pull the legs off kittens, or shoot passing motorists as they drive down the interstate, why, it'd be the rev's job to support them in those choices as well!