The St. Louis Post-Dispatch has issued a non-apology apology to blogger Charles Johnson for an article in which a reporter inaccurately and unfairly attributed remarks in a blog comment thread to Johnson himself. Writing at Little Green Footballs, Johnson quotes an e-mail from a Post-Dispatch editor. The editor was informing Johnson of a correction to run in the paper, but closed with a non-apology apology (emphasis Johnson's):
That is also the reason that he did not feel compelled to get a response from you for this particular story. At issue here were the comments in question, not your blog posting. No one in the article was criticizing or questioning you or your blog or holding you responsible for those comments.
Thanks for your time.
Sincerely,
Adam Goodman
Assistant Managing Editor/Metro
St. Louis Post-Dispatch
That's all well and good, perhaps, except that the Post-Dispatch was practically asking "how high" when CAIR yelled "jump," Johnson argued:
“No one was criticizing you or your blog?” I suppose you could say that, if you overlooked the fact that the entire story was published at the behest of a radical Islamic front group, seeking to damage LGF and silence critics. And if you overlook the fact that CAIR was, once again, referred to as a “civil rights group” with no acknowledgement of their well-documented connections to radical groups, or their status as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation Hamas funding case.
For more on this, read NB Executive Editor Matt Sheffield's February 20 post.
—Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
They say that no one is
February 22, 2008 - 12:56 ET by KhyrisThey say that no one is blaming him for the posting of THE COMMENTS. But wait, the story is about CAIR having the FBI investigate THE BLOG. Doesn't THE BLOG deserve a chance to respond to THAT???
Why is it such a big deal when some comment, which was quickly deleted anyway, makes a joke about dynamite? Why can't they tell it was a joke? Have these people never seen the dynamite humor in a bugs bunny cartoon? Oh wait, that's because they have their own bugs bunny, and when he uses dynamite it's to show toddlers how to kill the Jews. I can understand how they'd get confused.
At issue is the intentional misdirection of the "journalist"
February 22, 2008 - 14:25 ET by c5thenBy citing the blog and who runs it, and then quoting the comments without specifically pointing out they were comments, the author implies that they were part of the blog. This is classic misdirection and could only have been done on purpose, because if you correct the misdirection and make it clear that the offending statements were in fact comments, the headline and the whole article make no sense.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.