The Little Leftist Giggler...

Shrillary ought to learn from this. 

The buzz is this just didn't get out, but was produced to get a "like girly" sympathy as Crockatears Hillary soared in the polls.

If Hillary tearing gets good results, Perky figured being a foul mouthed snorting girl would be sure to please the same Oprah frumpers........and watch Perky instead of that mean ole man shows.

Just wonderful we live in a world where a woman anchor being profane does not get her fired, but publicity in how girly she is.

But this proves EXACTLY what I blogged here, if you want profane, bigotry, anti semites and racism.......just tune into an off the record cocktail gabble of liberals.

Change the S word to the F word and you have Hillary.....she though would be creeping out that N world Obama in staring daggers at him.

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

What I take from this is the amount of control of how the "news" is "told" that Couric has. She seems to choose what of the stack of reports gets airtime.... she chooses what's "important", what questions are asked to guests. 
I always kind of figured as much.. but this is very revealing.

The ones who tell us of no bias, only objective reporting of the facts are just made even stupider by some video like this.  

You just know there's an out-take of Walter Cronkite doing the same thing.

These are just some thought I posted on the subject on another forum:

Katie is not a complete lightweight in regards to HOW she appears - she did Today for years so she has more broadcast time than others combined. But if you ever saw the movie "Broadcast News" she comes across as the William Hurt character - attractive and on-camera savy but lacking the most basic knowledge of the subjects they are reporting on.

When she said, "Can't I say "dramatic" Pentagon papers? Can't we make it more "dramatic?" that was such an illuminating moment that shows the power an anchor has. A single word such as "dramatic" places a completly different emphasis on the story. I'm not even saying it is a wrong characterization - I'm just saying it illustrates the power of a word and the power of the position Couric occupies that has the last say in whether it is inserted/used or not.

I also think it is a fair expectation that the anchor goes in with a basic sense of the story they are going to cover live. The up-to-the-minute data of course she needs to be fed  but that aside I dare say (while throwing-up in my mouth) that Peter Jennings and Tom Brokaw and, yes, even Dan Rather would have been relatively up to speed on the general story.