Incredible. These nimrods just can't stand the fact that someone, somewhere is enjoying themselves.

These people who claim to be offended by the name of a sports team, or it's mascot, need to get a life. There are too many real issues in the world to get pissed off about!

I don't see why she's worried. I lived in the DC area for 12 years, and I remember going to the mall in Waldorf, just south of DC, and went into the FootLocker store there.

They had a long rack of Redskins shirts, jerseys, sweatshirts, pants, etc. Right next to that rack was an identical one that was filled with the same stuff for the nearby Baltimore Ravens. And right next to that was three identical racks of stuff for the greatest football team, the Pittsburgh Steelers. There was more Steelers stuff being sold in the DC area than Redskins and Ravens stuff combined, so rather than suing the Redskins, maybe she should join everyone else and support the Steelers, and she won't have to see the Redskins logo anymore.

When Washington Post writers have nothing to write about they bang out the old "That racist-Redskins-name-must-go" column.

It's a hardy perennial.

My guess is that none of them actually give up any of their seats to the games in protest.

Luxury suite liberals, one might call it. 

Mr. Milloy and Ms. Harjo both deserve a good old-fashioned Tomahawk Chop. (That's symbolic you lefties. It does not advocate violence.)

Is it a crime to offend someone? Is it a birthright to not be offended? What is wrong with being offended? What types of outreach to the American Indian community does the Redskins organization participate in? If they do participate in outreach, does it equal, surpass, or fail to reach the monetary amount this lawsuit would produce? I would argue that adopting the 'Native American' moniker hurt their community politically more than the name of an NFL team. The PC path will lead you to the world Bradbury writes of in 'Farenheit 451'. By having terms like 'Redskins' in the social lexicon, it sparks debate on history and reasons why it should or should not be an accepted term and displays a certain degree of progress from the ways of previous societies. Is there harm in that?

This is nothing with Redskins as North Dakota is now in a pissing against the wall contest with some whining Sioux who with the NCAAP are attacking the U over the name Fighting Sioux.

None of this has to do with Indians or as some say offensive names. It has to do with the same communist garbage Indians were raised in and liberals adore. It is not about names, but about aggitating the masses in some sort of revenge.

I wrote about a solution for this long ago. If Indians do not like Squaw Creek (squaw means the female sex organ) then change the name to Big White Man's Penis Creek. You won't have any white people filing claims on that.

The fighting Sioux can be the fighting Norskis as North Dakota was settled by Norwegians and have great fun with Ole and Lena jokes.

The Redskins change their name to the Whiteskins. No white people are going to be so miserably thin skinned to whine about that.

All of this is so hillarious that liberals actually take Indians seriously in this. Indians according to actual history, celebrated theft, rape and murder. That is what scalp dances were all about. It was their culture and quite savage and reprehensible.
The reason rapine thrived under Indians was because they had one ruler who dictated, a group of dog soldiers who enforced the law with death penalty, a slave force of women who worked themselves to death and an elite male group who were quite effeminite according to diaries from the time as they never worked and only gambled, slept, went hunting and went on rampages.

None of that is to be celebrated, but Americans have had this romance about Indians but those who study history know there never was a Fenimore Cooper Indian who ever lived.

Buffalo Bill as a boy broke his leg while his partner went for help in a blizzard. Indians he knew showed up, stole all his food and guns, left him to the wolves and cold and the only reason he survived is his partner fought through deep snow to save him.

None of this is a slam against Indians, but it is the Soviet system they grew up in and still cherish which produces idiots like Dennis Banks and the liberals WHO ARE STILL MAKING BILLIONS OFF OF INDIAN WARDS.

Check out meth production and mafia gambling some time.

In any case, change all the Indian names to white names as white people never take offense at anything, unless they are liberals uncomfortable in their own skin.

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

If we take the Indian off the helmet and put a Redskin Potato on it would that be deemed offensive to potato's ?

 What if in fact Mr. Milloy the name was in fact chosen to honor the indian's ?

How about this 2002 article from a fellow columnist at your newspaper Mr. Milloy is he wrong.

 "You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "

                   - Ben Kenobi on  Liberals, and the MSM.

Poor libs and minorites always offended about something. (or anything) and only they can be offended. So in Congress if you wanted to band together by race and be the White Caucus it would be offensive and be branded as racist. How about Ivory magazine with no blacks allowed in the pages or ads like Ebony excludes whites. How about the NAAWP ooh! so racist. We white folks, because of our race, are not allowed to be offended or band together by ethnicity.  The predominantly American Indian University of North Colorado tried to turn the tables by calling their team the "Fighting Whites" or "Fighting Whities". It backfired on them cause all the "whities" were flattered and bought T-shirts from them. I guess I should be offended but I thought it was funny.   When I was a police officer I was offended by the newspapers constant referral to cops rather than officers I thought then and still do that Cop is a denigrating term for Police. I guess they used it caused it saved space.