WaPo Pats O'Malley, Dem Legislature on Back for 'Wins on Taxes'

Photo of Ken Shepherd.

Facing a budget shortfall due in large part to overspending in years past, Gov. Martin O'Malley called a special session of the Maryland General Assembly to consider a package of tax hikes and a referendum on legalizing slot machines. Now that the freshman Democratic governor has proven successful in pushing through both, the Washington Post congratulated O'Malley with a front page article replete with pats on the back and attaboys from O'Malley's fellow Democrats. The icing on the cake: a signing ceremony photograph (shown above*) of O'Malley that appears to show him pumping his fist in victory.

Staff writer John Wagner opened his November 20 article with triumphal language that painted O'Malley as a respected statesman:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Gov. Martin O'Malley emerged from a grueling special session of the Maryland General Assembly with big wins on tax and slot machine legislation, praise from lawmakers for his willingness to tackle the state's most vexing issues -- and greatly increased clout in Annapolis.

Of course, the Post anticipated that its readership, and Maryland voters in general, will not be as quick to laud the tax hikes and slot machine proposal, so Wagner moved quickly to quote a liberal Democratic state senator to remind Post readers that O'Malley is a strong leader willing to make the tough choices about how much more to tax Free State residents:

Less clear, as O'Malley (D) and bleary-eyed legislators celebrated at a bill-signing ceremony yesterday, were the wider political ramifications of pushing through $1.4 billion a year in tax increases during a frantic three-week session called to solve the state's chronic budget problems.

"How it plays politically is still up in the air," said Sen. Brian E. Frosh (D-Montgomery). "Will people recognize it as hard choices that had to be made or as government run amok? But by any measure, the governor did an incredible job pulling it together. He was buttonholing people. He was schmoozing people. I don't know if he was threatening people. At points, it was ugly, but it was certainly an impressive effort overall."

It gets worse. Wagner noted that the legislature approved $550 million in budget cuts but quickly breezed by new spending initiatives such as a plan to "expand access to government-subsidized health care and to raise an additional $400 million a year for transportation priorities."

After quoting longtime State Senate President Thomas V. "Mike" Miller gushing about O'Malley -- "This is the boldest move, the boldest action, on the part of any governor I've served with" -- Wagner dispatched with Republican opposition with two short quotes: one by strategist Kevin Igoe, the other by State Senate Minority Leader Allan H. Kittleman.

That out of the way, Wagner returned to marveling over O'Malley's legislative wrangling:

In the weeks before its start Oct. 29, Miller and Busch counseled O'Malley against calling such a broad session, saying lawmakers could wait to fix the budget until their regular 90-day session, which begins in January, rather than on a rushed schedule that presented many potential pitfalls.

The divergent views of the two presiding officers on slots alone could have resulted in a quagmire that might have jeopardized other legislation. Miller is among the legislature's most ardent slots supporters. Busch has been the most powerful foe of expanded gambling in recent years.

Of course, for all the personality squabbles in the state legislature, Miller and Busch are both liberal Democrats serving alongside a liberal Democratic governor. It's not rocket science to figure out the political wisdom of pushing through a tax hike in a non-election year that falls well before the next gubernatorial election in 2010 (when all 141 state delegates and 47 state senators will be up for reelection).

Not only did Wagner give Democrats plenty of ink to gush over O'Malley, he worked in a slam or two at the ex-local rock star's immediate predecessor in office, Bob Ehrlich (R).:

"I think the governor showed immense skill in being flexible enough to make changes," said Barbara Hoffman, an Annapolis lobbyist and former Democratic senator from Baltimore. "He didn't draw lines in the sand."

Del. Tom Hucker (D-Montgomery) said O'Malley won points for his openness to lawmakers' ideas and a work ethic that contrasted with that of Ehrlich, whose tenure Hucker derided as "four years of press conferences and golf."

Closing his article, Wagner saw fit to add one accolade for the liberal governor:

"This is a day to move Maryland forward," Busch said. "It puts all the demons behind us."

*AP photo by Gail Burton via Washington Post. Original caption: "Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller Jr., left, Gov. Martin O'Malley and House Speaker Michael E. Busch celebrate at a bill-signing."

—Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Increases

Allow the people to enjoy them.

Realize the increases if a lib takes the big office! These will seem minuscule in comparison.

JDW

Sen Clinton: Distinguished Founder of Media Matters

 

Taxes

Tax and spend. Spend and tax some more---it's the Democratic, "liberal" way. If we elect Clinton or Obama and a Dim Congress, you'll be working for them, not for yourself ( as if this isn't the case already ).

 

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

taxation without representation

I swear we have long since passed the point of 'taxation without representation'. Our Founding Fathers would be sickened by the current state of the union. Will these snake oil salesmen just keep raising taxes until it equals or exceeds 100% of our incomes?

D

Keep the ILLEGALS out, join NumbersUSA to send free faxes to your reps.

Maryland taxes

I live in Maryland. This is what happens when one party controls the state. O'Malley didn't forge a consensus among diverse views. He only got people with the same view to ignore the fury of taxpayers. The idea that O'Malley brought people together is ridiculous; those people were already eager to raise taxes. The only question was whether they could get away with it.

The local energy company recently doubled their rates, and that's hit a lot of people. Now the state is essentially raising their rates also. That's two big bills where the service hasn't improved, but they want me to pay more for it. Sometimes conservatives talk about taxes academically. When you live in a blue state, taxes get real in a hurry.

Taxes and the energy company.

Wow, KC, a tax-raising, price-raising scheme between a Democrat and an energy company. Reminds me of when I lived on Long Island. Governor Mario Cuomo and the Long Island Lighting Company did the same thing. Pretty soon energy costs and taxes were driving home owners and businesses out of the state. Cuomo was being paid off in New York; who's getting the kickbacks in Maryland? The people of Maryland are going to suffer mightily for this.

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

Tax-deaf

Well, to be clear, the energy company's raise is really unrelated and isn't coordinated with the state tax raise, but the fact that they're coincidental doesn't soften the blow. But how "compassionate" are you when your constituents just come off the hot summer, going into the heating bill season, and that's when you decide to raise taxes? There must be a word for that ignorance: I suggest "tax-deaf."

I feel your pain

I live in Riverdale. I'm particularly not looking forward to the 20% boost in the sales tax.

And what's also aggravating is how O'Malley blustered about Ehrlich on the electricity rates but he knew he couldn't do anything to remedy the situation either, under current law.

He demagogued the issue, the media knew better and didn't call him on it, and he won in part because of his populist platitudes.

Aggravating. But right now, Virginia doesn't look promising either, and D.C. is out of the question.

Exactly

That's why I curse Marc Foley, the ex-Florida congressman, to this day. When the DNC released the scandal on Foley, that triggered the avalance against Republicans in 2006, and that swept away any chance for the GOP in Maryland. Ehrlich was the only thing holding back the legislature, and even though he had over 50% approval ratings, Ehrlich got tossed in the anti-GOP wave.

I can honestly say that Foley's debauchery cost me money. Of course, I'm also a Catholic, and I can honestly say that those pedophile priests also cost me a lot of money.

Jeez ... I always thought Victorian sexual attitudes were ridiculous, but lately, they seem to make a lot more sense.

I detest this state!

We have no one to blame but the stupid sheeple here in Maryland. I simply can't believe how stupid they were to vote Governor Ehrlich out of office.

Hm....let's see.........

"Will people recognize it as hard choices that had to be made or as government run amok?"

People pay the taxes.  Government spends it.  I think the people will think the latter.  I'm just guessing.

And why do they refer to it as "hard choices"?  There's no 'choice' in paying taxes.  For the government, raising taxes is an easy choice to make!  The people never had a choice to begin with! 

Taxyland

I live in Virginia but close enough to Marlyand to get their news.  I believe that this will , among other things, raise tobacco taxes to pay for some sort of health care.

Looking at a map of Maryland it's not hard to see that people will be crossing borders into WV, PA, DC or VA to make those purchases that will be affected by the new taxes. Thus I believe they will not get the new revenue they predict.  Which will only lead to more taxes. 

I live in the People's

I live in the People's Republic of Maryland (should vote with my feet) I laugh (and cry) everytime the idiots (read Democrats) raise my taxes. No matter where you are in Maryland you probably are less than an hours drive to someplace that has the tax hiked goods cheaper. I recall when gas taxes were raised, truckers just made it a point of avoiding MD. It got so bad because of cheaper cigarette prices in Delaware and no sales tax for certain goods that that whacky former Governor, Mayor of Baltimore, and (now former) comptroller of the Treasury, William Schaeffer sent the revenuers to stalk US 13 on the border for those pesky tax evaders. They just raised cigarette prices a dollar a pack, never ending taxes in this state. My wife smokes so I guess It will be cost effective to drive to Virginia to get cigarettes. The saddest fact of all is the Democratic controlled government just doesn't care if they lose business.

every time a dum taxes, a rep gets his wings

I'm surprised the dums are openly playing with fire like this. Add Rangel's monstrosity, the Gov. in Michigan,and the candidates themselves implying more taxes are dangerous paths. They usually try to deny this. Important to talk taxes and immigration until election day. 

 

"Never go to a second location with a hippie." -Jack Donaghy (30 Rock)

Notice...

....how the article didn't say anything about the $800 million Maryland has sitting its state treasury.

Democrats cheering tax

Democrats cheering tax increases.  Good.  This is almost as bad as Islamic radicals dancing in the streets whenever 3000 infidels are murdered. But this shows what the Dems are - pickpockets. 

To them "moving forward" means taking money away from those who earn it and giving it to those who don't...so alot of gambling operators (we used to call them gangsters) are going to make out like one armed bandits, alot of politicians are going to pad their campaign bank accounts, alot of welfare recipients are going to get an extra $30 a month, and the working people of MD will have to shell out...or move out...

cruel liars

If you remember all the way back to the very beginning of the AIDs scare, you will recall that these liberal liars spread the idea that the disease was common to all groups and everyone was potentially at risk.  The liars never really admitted that the disease was pretty much confined to the gay community and the intravenous drug addicts.  To them it was ok to terrify everybody by making us think that we were likely to catch the disease if we were promiscuous.  They applied the fear tactic to us all and never intimated that gays and addicts were the only ones really at risk. 

These smug idiots keep

These smug idiots keep taxing business out of the state with phony populist platitudes that appeal to the intellectually challenged among the voters.  In California, our lying sack of a Governor has given up all fiscal responsibility and now the socialists are running Sacramento.  Arnold's plan?  Term runs out in January 2011, so he just has to paper the cracks for the short term and leave the heavy lifting to his successor.  The latest I heard was that he is thinking of selling the operating rights of the California Lottery to Goldman-Sachs to cover the $14 Billion budget deficit.  When these greedy socialists won't stop spending and the electorate won't permit further tax increases, no doubt they'll pull some other shell game because you can never ask government to tighten its belt.

Irony is so ironic

And the ironic thing is that if this kind of thing continues, soon it will be (if it's not that way already) that the state governments as well as the feds, will be debtors to the ultra-rich...the very people the politicians claim to be protecting the "little guy" from....

And these same politicians

And these same politicians are the ones who cynically stir up populist anger at businesses who "send jobs overseas".  John Kerry with his "Benedict Arnold" CEOs...John Kerry and his ilk are the cause of jobs moving elsewhere.

Gamblers are losers

"legalizing slot machines."

Isn't that special.

Taxes in Maryland

Wow he managed to raise taxes in Maryland. Not hard considering the state legislature is 70 percent Democrat. Its always raise taxes never cut spending.
span style="font-size: x-small; color: #2a364e">

 

Since government is coercion, politics is largely the exercise of deception regarding the intended use of coercion - George Orwell

the tyranny of a single party state

In fairness to former Sen Hoffman, she realized the cynicism in the exercise, noted here:
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/annapolis/2007/11/post_31.html

that industries that would be targeted for new taxes are those that didn't have a lobbying presence in Annapolis.

Over the past ten years Maryland's budget has doubled from $15 to $30 billion, which comes out to an 8% increase (compounded) every year. (Two years under Gov. Ehrlich the budget increased more than that.)

In the end, $1.4 billion was less than 6% of the budget. That's something that can be handled through belt tightening, not raising taxes.