Wired magazine's Sarah Lai Stirland is reporting that liberal advocacy group MoveOn.org is reversing course after it was lambasted for censorship for pushing Google to censor anti-MoveOn.org ads by Maine Senator Susan Collins' (R) campaign.:
The left-leaning political advocacy group, MoveOn.org, is backing down in a flap over the use of its name in online advertisements, permitting an influential Republican senator to criticize the organization in a reelection ad on Google's search engine.
"We don't want to support a policy that denies people freedom of expression," says Jennifer Lindenauer, MoveOn.org's communications director.
Both MoveOn.org and Google late last week faced a barrage of criticism after an internet strategist for Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine complained that Google had blocked several re-election ads from the search engine's advertising network because the ads contained the trademarked term "MoveOn.org" in the text.
"Stop Moveon.org. More MoveOn money in Maine than anywhere else. Learn how to help," read one of the banned ads, which linked to Collins' reelection campaign site.
Under Google's trademark policy, owners can request that third parties' not be allowed to use their trademarked term in the text of ads -- a policy that far exceeds the requirements of trademark law. Lindenauer says that MoveOn.org withdrew from that policy on Friday after it heard about the brewing controversy over Google's termination of Collins' text ads using the group's name.
Responding to the news, Right Side of Tech takes a swipe at Google, characterizing the company's defense of its advertising policies as a "lame response" to censorship criticism:
Google responded on their public policy blog. The response was very lawyerly and explained they allow any advertiser to restrict the use of their trademark in Adsense advertisements. This is an understandable argument. However, it does not override the fact that what they did was wrong. The use of the trademark was allowable under fair use as my understanding. This was not discussed by the lawyer in this post and I think for obvious reasons. They are working to squelch political speech of those who are trying to defend themselves from Moveon.org. At the same time Moveon.org can use Senator Collins’ name in advertisements all they want because she cannot trademark her name. The policy is arbitrary and they should work on these cases on a one by one basis rather than killing political debate.
Other blog reactions at Malkin and Reason's Hit & Run blog.
—Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Wired magazine's Sarah Lai
October 16, 2007 - 16:22 ET by TEWired magazine's Sarah Lai Stirland indentifies Moron.org as merely "left-leaning"? ROTFLMAO!
Left leaning? Bwa hahahaha!
October 16, 2007 - 16:33 ET by Army BratIf they leaned any further to the left they'd be lyin' on their side! Happy Trails...
I heard about this news on
October 16, 2007 - 16:30 ET by bigtimerI heard about this news on Fox and Friends this morning...I was glad of this and thought it is about time and all of that, still I wonder what they will try next to suppress the right side.
Thanks for the new info. here Ken S.
Lie vs. Truth
October 16, 2007 - 16:37 ET by mattmThis is MoveOn's lie:
"We don't want to support a policy that denies people freedom of expression."
This is the truth:
"We don't want people to know we support a policy that denies people freedom of expression."
or "We wouldn't have done it
October 16, 2007 - 16:50 ET by motherbeltor "We wouldn't have done it if we had known we'd get caught."
Exactly MB
October 16, 2007 - 17:00 ET by ForeverOnTheRightExactly MB. MoveOn is going to have to become better at subterfuge and treachery in order to pull off their tricks. They need to kiss the hand of their goddess Hillary and gain her "wisdom" in subterfuge and treachery.
Not the only Search Engine in town
October 16, 2007 - 16:48 ET by Solrac7Time to let Google know that they are not the only search engine available. I have already changed. I should have done it earlier because of their policy in China. If enough of us stop using them and the advertisers react, we may have something going on. Hit them in the wallet.
Solrac7
What you don't know
October 16, 2007 - 17:58 ET by celatorThe other piece of this story is that it's been reported recently that MoveOn is the largest contributor to Sen Collin's opponent in the campaign--a left-wing socialist named Tom Allen, who is currently a congressman from Maine. His people have initiated a constant, oppressive and intimidating video taping campaign with the help of MoveOn to try and "catch" Sen Collins in a "mistake". These people play dirty politics, something we don't like much in Maine. MoveOn owns Tom Allen completely, a sad state of affairs, indeed. If they tell him to frog march and quack like a duck, he will do it.
move on.
October 16, 2007 - 18:50 ET by MivvisMove on got so busted on this! I love it. Like kids busted shootin spitballs at teachers when their backs are turned.
BS
October 16, 2007 - 22:15 ET by Dave R"We don't want to support a policy that denies people freedom of expression," says Jennifer Lindenauer.
BS!
When I'm president, privatization is off the table because it's not the answer to anything.-Hillary Rodham, September 3, 2007 AARP Legislative Conference.
Dave R, You should have
October 16, 2007 - 22:29 ET by hydrodynDMDave R,
You should have left your post the way it was.
Made me laugh.
hydro,
October 16, 2007 - 22:32 ET by Dave RActually, I think I was, ahh, edited.
When I'm president, privatization is off the table because it's not the answer to anything.-Hillary Rodham, September 3, 2007 AARP Legislative Conference.
Edited
October 16, 2007 - 22:37 ET by botgwith Dave Highs initials?
"Television is where you watch people in your living room that you would not want near your house." Groucho
botg, LM*O. Hey, at least I didn't get banned.
October 16, 2007 - 22:41 ET by Dave RWhen I'm president, privatization is off the table because it's not the answer to anything.-Hillary Rodham, September 3, 2007 AARP Legislative Conference.
Sorry all....
October 16, 2007 - 22:40 ET by BlondeTold you I was a tad slow tonite...so how was it edited?
With the rest of **** taken out of BS? Or elsewise?
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
Blonde, Well, if we told
October 16, 2007 - 22:41 ET by hydrodynDMBlonde,
Well, if we told you, that would get edited too.
See the canundrum?
Gee,
October 16, 2007 - 22:44 ET by BlondeI was hoping to see "if we told you, we'd have to kill you"....that option is sounding pretty good tonite. LOL!
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
Secret Agent Blonde
October 16, 2007 - 22:46 ET by Free StinkerThere's that Secret Agent Talk again . . .
Haven't seen that in some time. ;-)
B,
October 16, 2007 - 22:47 ET by Dave RAhh, I'm getting a little worried up here.
When I'm president, privatization is off the table because it's not the answer to anything.-Hillary Rodham, September 3, 2007 AARP Legislative Conference.
Blonde, Well, if we told
October 16, 2007 - 22:48 ET by hydrodynDMBlonde,
Well, if we told you, that would get edited too.
See the conundrum?
Note: Spelling error edited. Does that count as irony?
Finerony
October 16, 2007 - 22:51 ET by BlondeA blondism...for Fine Irony, I'm thinking.
Thanks guys...you've cheered me up after a totally miserable day.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
no problem
October 16, 2007 - 22:54 ET by botgwe took the course
"Television is where you watch people in your living room that you would not want near your house." Groucho