Nina Burleigh Slams GOP For 'Religious Psychobabble,' Repressed Sexuality

Photo of Ken Shepherd.
  • Bookmark and Share

Liberal journalist Nina Burleigh, famous for her 1998 statement that she'd happily fellate President Clinton for "keeping abortion legal," complained in an August 30 Huffington Post blog entry that conservative Republicans are sexually repressed, homophobic, and intolerant.

The rockier the rib, the more likely you'll find pink lingerie under the trousers or a bullwhip and manacles in the bedside drawer. You can bet those Beltway dominatrices, madams and escorts (gay and straight) have been able to buy second homes -- maybe even in Sun Valley! -- with their haul during W's reign.

Oh, it gets better. According to Burleigh, gay-baiting and the Amish vote were keys to Bush's 2004 re-election victory:

...[Sen. Larry Craig's] obviously lived his whole life afflicted by the religious psychobabble and outright bigotry of people who say homosexuality is a sickness and a lifestyle decision instead of an innate state of being that has nothing to do with illness or choice.

The sickness, of course, is in the suppression, which is why closeted men seek love in rank public bathroom stalls.

The Republican Party got Bush re-elected in 2004 by playing the homophobe card. In Ohio, their minions went door-to-door in Amish country and warned the historically non-secular inhabitants that if they didn't get out and register Republican, gay marriage would be the law of the land. Tens of thousands of Amish men and women hitched horses to buggies, cracked their whips, and raced to the nearest polling place to vote to repel the Sodomites. With their unprecedented help, Ohio, that crucial state, slid ever so narrowly into the red column, sending the Bush regime back to the White House with four more years to plot how to bomb Tehran.

Of course for someone so tolerant and non-judgmental about sexual inclinations, Burleigh sure seems to fixate heavily on them.The way she writes, it's a wonder she got any work done covering the Hill in the late 1990s for all her obsession with supposedly in-the-closet gay Republicans:

When I was covering Capitol Hill just before Clinton's impeachment, every other young, spiffily manicured male staffer I met in Republican Congressional offices was at least androcentric, if not obviously gay. I don't have a sensitive gay-dar, but there was something about them. Ties never askew, hair immaculately groomed, cuffs gleaming, they usually knew more about my shoes than I did.

Bill Clinton's voracious heterosexuality had as much to do with drawing their rabid hatred as any of his other attributes. He loved women too much, and if only he'd given equal time and effort to seducing those beautiful men, he might have saved himself some trouble.

Burleigh, not one to be shy about her heterosexuality, once openly admitted her lust for the 42nd President of the United States:

Former Time White House reporter Nina Burleigh recounted in the July/August Mirabella how she was "quite willing to let myself be ravished" by Bill Clinton. The magazine’s headline touted how Burleigh "thought she was beyond being seduced by a man’s power, his status, his job. Then she played cards with the President on Air Force One."

Filling in for Time’s regular reporter on Clinton’s trip to Jasper, Arkansas last summer for a funeral, Burleigh, now a Time contributor, recalled how she was asked to join Clinton in a game of hearts. Things quickly heated up: "The President’s foot lightly, and presumably accidentally, brushed mine once under the table. His hand touched my wrist while he was dealing the cards. When I got up and shook his hand at the end of the game, his eyes wandered over to my bike-wrecked, naked legs. And slowly it dawned on me as I walked away: He found me attractive."

Burleigh revealed her feminist standard of how men can ogle her if they are powerful: "We all know when we’re being ogled. The weird thing was that I didn’t mind. There was a time when the hormones of indignant feminism raged in my veins. An open gaze like that, at least from a man of lesser stature, would have annoyed me. But that evening, I had the opposite reaction. I felt incandescent. It was riveting to know that the President had appreciated my legs, scarred as they were.

"If he had asked me to continue the game of hearts back in his room at the Jasper Holiday Inn, I would have been happy to go there and see what happened. At the time, that seemed quite possible. It took several hours and a few drinks in the steaming and now somehow romantic Arkansas night to shake the intoxicated state in which I had been quite willing to let myself be ravished by the President, should he have but asked."

Burleigh is still ready to go, telling The Washington Post’s Howard Kurtz what specific sex act she’d perform on Clinton to reward his pro-abortion stand.

—Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Very informative, Ken

How feminists think in 2007 according to Nina Burleigh

Rape = loving women too much

She'd sleep with Bill and to hell with her feminist colleague Hillary

Bush won the election because the Amish voted in Ohio

Male republican staffers were gay during the Clinton administration, and Bill liked women and that's why Bill was hated so much. But Bush won re-election because he was homophobic.

If you are pro-abortion and powerful, Nina will give you a b***job.

I am woman, hear me . . ahh . . .that is . . . - State of feminism 2007

state of abortion

With the current state of abortion, I am surprised she is able to speak at all.            ;-)

Bigger

Well, lion, you see the only thing bigger than her feet is her mouth.

This chick

"I'm in a glass case of emotion" -some will ferrel movie

 

Old Bag Burleigh

This is one of the most hillarious things I have read in a long while.......so the old bag now not having any male attention loved that a rapist was paying attention to her old bag legs......never once considering rapist Clinton was thinking, "Man those are scarred up old bag legs that is one old bag I will never attack".

Burleigh is the Archie Bunker or literal Caroll O'Connor of "knowing one when he sees one".....like the white guy he is best buddy with is really a black guy. She can see at an instant all those well groomed Republicans are queer.........but never figuring that Christians are immaculate dressers as are people with military backgrounds. To Burleigh though it all means sodomite, the complete bigot.

Burleigh though anal retentive sexually in liking rapists wincing over her and hating Amish people in psychobabble is the perfect comedy act today. Thank you Arianna Huffington for showing the completer fool you are in featuring someone again who is a new high in low.

 

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

You see

You see, Lame, we had almost forgotten the old term, "white trash". Thanks to Burleigh and the Clintons, we are once again reminded

and Henry Luce

would spin in his grave if he knew this was the level Time Magazine had stooped to for freelancers...white trash indeed!

If...

...Republicans are sexually repressed, homophobic, and intolerant.

Can we then say Democrats are amoral, perverted, and unable to control themselves?

First of all, Nina - and any of you Libs who might be trolling: Having basic standards regarding sex is not "repression."

Secondly, "homophobia" means fear of man - the application of this term to homosexuality is just a rhetorical straw man trick designed to point the finger of blame at those who would say homosexuality is "wrong" in some way, and deflect it from themselves...i.e. it's not the homos who have a problem, it's those who say they have a problem who are the ones with a problem...it's a classic bogus argument.

Thirdly, "intolerance" is a two way street, so don't bring it up, unless you don't mind demonstrating your own intolerance, and thus you own hypocrisy!

Having basic standards regarding sex is not "repression."

Your points are right on the mark.  Just agreeing, that's all.

 

tolerating of somebody or

tolerating of somebody or something: the act of putting up with somebody or something irritating or otherwise unpleasant

is this how our "tolerant" lib friends feel about gays?!?!?

and is this what they are asking conservatives to do?!

doesn't this just warm your heart GLBT people:)?

Tolerance

By virtue of the classical definition of tolerance, you have to disagree with someone's views before tolerance can even be expressed.  Otherwise, there is nothing to be tolerant about...everybody is simply in agreement.

  Be egalitarian towards people; Be elitist in ideas!

 

 

She's got a point.  You

She's got a point.  You don't hear about many democrats being caight making passes to cops in toilets, you don't hear about too many democrats soliciting hookers.  It seems to me that the republicans are the hypocrites here - they preach family values but their actions speak loudwer than their words!  

The next time a republican mentions a hummer I'm going to have to wonder if they're talking about the SUV or if they want to blow me! 

 

"No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American Public."

-H.L. Mencken

Republicando that kind of crudness may be the behavior

where you usually hang out, but I suggest you clean up your act.

Ditto!

His comments don't quite come up to the standards one expects to find on NB!

}}---> cando?

Kidding, right?

Remember Barney Frank running a Male Prostitute service out of his own apartment?

~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~

Get the facts straight: In

Get the facts straight: In 1990, the House voted to reprimand Frank when it was revealed that Steve Gobie, a male escort whom Frank had befriended after hiring him through a personal advertisement, claimed to have conducted an escort service from Frank's apartment when he was not at home.

Not the same as wanting to perform oral sex on a cop. 

"No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American Public."

-H.L. Mencken

troll débutante...wrong again

"Not the same as wanting to perform oral sex on a cop."

Do you have story here or just another LIE?

If conservatives are RIGHT, then liberals must be WRONG.
Thompson/Rice

Oh, someone doesn't agree

Oh, someone doesn't agree with you so you call them a troll?  No, the truth has been spoken.  You just have to pull your head out of the sand. 

 

"No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American Public."

-H.L. Mencken

Steve Gobie, a male

Steve Gobie, a male escort whom Frank had befriended after hiring him through a personal advertisement,

Oh, right, "befriended"....LMAO!

Hires a "male escort"..."befriends" him by having him move into his home. On what planet do you think a Republican would get away scot-free on this, with the alibi that they were "just friends" and that this crap was done when he "wasn't home" and he didn't know about it?

Oh, and let's not forget Gerry Studds....censured for hitting on page boys....then given a standing ovation on his return to the House.

Facts? Puh-leeze.

we don't "hear about it"

we don't "hear about it" because the "MSM" doesn't "report it"

they would need a 24/7 gay democrat news channel for this

It seems to me that the republicans are the hypocrites here

Since when do the actions of a few speak for the rest?

Oh I forgot, we live in a country now where the minority rights rule:

  • maybe 2% of the population is gay and they demand "marriage" rights
  • one athiest doesn't like "God" in The Pledge of Allegiance so all school kids can't say it
  • another minortiy claims to be above the law and has "rights" to enter our country and work illegally

typical lib-speak

"…you are entitled to your own opinion, but you are not entitled to your own facts." -the late Daniel Patrick Moynihan.

I think the point is biased press

I recall a "madame" with 12,000 phonenumbers, and the liberal press found a few republicans on it, and told us the other 11,994 numbers could have been dialing mistakes.

 LOL - Wow.

 Now they openly admit they will only "out" hypocrits. That includes "family values" or "Christian values".

 So, the news has announced along with Larry Flynt and the democrats, that they only plan on going after republicans, since it's ok, because "they're hypocrits".

 I think I know exactly why I don't hear about the democrats sexual escapades. Plus the fact that as we see above, certainly plenty of democrat "reporters" are humping them.

Nina's a Nut

Ms. Burleigh is definitely a piece of work. She met this guy 10 years younger than her in 1993, and immediately fell hard for him. Unfortunately for her, she had just married her boyfriend of 8 years.

Gee, guess what happened next?

http://query.nytimes...

LOVE??????????????

"...The sickness, of course, is in the suppression, which is why closeted men seek love in rank public bathroom stalls..."

=========================

Guess it all depends on what the definition of "love" is (to quote a former president)

A close encounter with a stranger is not exactly my definition of "love"

The sickness, of course, is

The sickness, of course, is in the suppression, which is why closeted men seek love in rank public bathroom stalls.

Nina Burleigh seems to be suggesting that the practice of trolling for anonymous sex has been forced upon closeted men…. the sexually repressed, homophobic, intolerant conservative Republicans.  It follows that the conservative Christian right and their values are responsible for sexual trolling in public places.

Before self-employment, I worked at two different jobs where there were a number of out-of-the-closet gay males.  Several of these guys openly bragged about their anonymous sexual exploits (often more than one encounter in an evening, at more than one location).  From this I took away the impression that anonymous sexual trolling was a practice enjoyed by many in the openly gay community.  These fellows were anything but repressed.

It has also been my experience that conservatives (gay or straight) keep their sexual lives private while liberals write columns about their sexual exploits.

Moyers - More repressed Washinton bathroom stories..

More "repressed" Washington bathroom stories. From the WSJ - July 20, 2005.

Only a few weeks before the 1964 election, a powerful presidential assistant, Walter Jenkins, was arrested in a men's room in Washington. Evidently, the president was concerned that Barry Goldwater would use that against him in the election. Another assistant, Bill Moyers, was tasked to direct Hoover to do an investigation of Goldwater's staff to find similar evidence of homosexual activity. Mr. Moyers' memo to the FBI was in one of the files.

When the press reported this, I received a call in my office from Mr. Moyers. Several of my assistants were with me. He was outraged; he claimed that this was another example of the Bureau salting its files with phony CIA memos. I was taken aback. I offered to conduct an investigation, which if his contention was correct, would lead me to publicly exonerate him. There was a pause on the line and then he said, "I was very young. How will I explain this to my children?" And then he rang off.

Will Bill Moyers weigh in on the Craig story?

This is why I like Gary Hall

He has a brain, and he has a memory, and thinks for himself using his own intellectual standards. Good job, sir. And if I may, I'll daydream a "Goldwater instead of what we got" fantasy now. :)
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.

sarc

sarc.. think I'll just stay out of public bathrooms.

I just hope I'm not the only one

Racking my brain, desperately-trying to recall if I was ever tapping my foot in a mens room? Or worse, if someone else was at some point tapping his foot at me, while I blithely ignored him? Every fellow male heterosexual (or lesbian trapped in an ugly man's body) I know seems to be trying to recall this exact same thing this week....
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.

tapping my foot, sarc

Well, I remember someone reaching under my stall one time -- trying to steal my briefcase -- and you can bet I tapped him with my foot! I think I broke at least one finger on his hand.

So the actions of a party

So the actions of a party back in 1964 or 1990 are relevant today?  Really?  You believe this?   

"No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American Public."

-H.L. Mencken

Repubicando

Repubicando. Of course not. Really - generally speaking - of course not. However, the media does not see it that way, do they? And this site is really about media bias. If Moyers had been a conservative and had been in the employ of a Republican president -- most US voters would be aware of that scandal. Why? Because the media would bring it up each time yet another opportunity raised it's head.

I'm seriously curious about whether Moyers will weigh in on this - does he have enough confidence in the MSM such that he knows that his and LBJ's little scandal is safe from public review - once again. 

 

This site is about liberal

This site is about liberal media bias, which I know a lot of you believe.  However the truth is that the right-wing media bias is even greater today!  Fox News, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal are someof the biggest right-wing media outlets out there!  Furthermore, even the NY Times is pretty middle of the road today.  And CBS, NBC and ABC, well, they just don't cover even 1/10th the stories and what they do cover is so superficial that it doesn't matter.

Basically, what you folsk want is not to expose and combat the perceived liberal media, but to silence it! 

And you call yourself Americans!  Shame on you!

"No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American Public."

-H.L. Mencken

Troll Revealed

Ha! Ha! Ha!

This post is nothing more than infactual, liberal propaganda. NYT 'middle of the road'?? What a moron! lol

 

Washington Post?  You must

Washington Post?  You must mean the Washington Times...

So that's one TV network, a handful of national radio shows and three newspapers, against three on air networks, plus PBS and several independents, plus ALL the local TV news stations and at least 50 major newspapers and NPR and other lib radio and internet sites.... The right has a lonnnngggg way to go to balance the Leftist bias of the media.

Besides, the outlets you cite are merely balanced...not biased, but libs see them as biased because they aren't interested in anything that doesn't support their viewpoint.

Yeah, the Washington Times--

Yeah, the Washington Times-- the paper run by the moonies who are privey to holding their bizarre rituals in the Senate House, all sactioned by the republican party.

What the heck are you

What the heck are you talking about?

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

Ceremony in a Senate office

Ceremony in a Senate office building

Moon and his wife after their 'coronation'

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Sun_Myung_Moon

In March 2004, Moon convened an extarordinary ceremony in the Dirksen Senate Office Building, ostensibly as an awards ceremony for 'peace ambassadors', in front of several dozens members of Congress and over two hundred other guests. In a speech after the awards were presented Moon pronounced "I am God's ambassador, sent to earth with His full authority. I am sent to accomplish His command to save the world's six billion people, restoring them to Heaven with the original goodness in which they were created."

"The five great saints and many other leaders in the spirit world, including even Communist leaders such as Marx and Lenin, who committed all manner of barbarity and murders on earth, and dictators such as Hitler and Stalin, have found strength in my teachings, mended their ways and been reborn as new persons. Emperors, kings and presidents who enjoyed opulence and power on earth, and even journalists who had worldwide fame, have now placed themselves at the forefront of the column of the true love revolution," he said. [9]

"They have declared to all Heaven and Earth that Reverend Sun Myung Moon is none other than humanity's Savior, Messiah, Returning Lord and True Parent. This resolution has been announced on every corner of the globe," he said. [10]

Moon's extraordinary announcement that he was the humanity's saviour went unreported, other than in the Washington Times. In June 2004, Salon writer, John Gorenfield, reported the event and that some members of Congress claimed that they did not know the "Moonie nature of the group or that they did not know the event would evolve into a messianic coronation". Its invitation, however, listed Moon's Interreligious and International Federation for World Peace as event's primary sponsor.

You are confused...

You are confused... again.

Your own link betrays your ignorant attempt at manipulation.

Like the other Liberal dumbasses you emulate, you cherry pick only Republicans from the article.  In reality, Democrats attended  and were involved in the ceremony heavily.  There is more than enough derision to be cast on both party's.

Video, transcripts and editorializing can be found here.

A special mention, though, goes out to Congressman Charlie Rangel (D-NY) who "signed a proclamation on Congressional letterhead in April 2004 recognizing Moon as the "True Parent" and "King of Peace.""  What a putz. 

You need to study your Lib talking points from Media Matters more closely.  Since I detest morons like yourself, I'll even help you gain some knowledge:  Republican John Warner's office admitted to securing the room for the event after receiving a letter requesting room G-11 in Dirksen "for a reception Christian Voice plans to host in honor of the 'Ambassadors for Peace' award recipients."  No mention of Moon.  Warner did not attend. 

Try being a mensch for a change blaster.

 

Killing them with kindness isn't working.  Time to get scrappy with the Donkeys.

So are you saying that the

So are you saying that the Washington Times is not owned by the right wing religious zealot Rev. Sun Myung Moon?

I think it's clear who the dumbass is. It is you--daisyrockman

 

Nice Try Bullwinkle

I said nothing of the sort.

Are you saying you don't beat your wife? 

"Yeah, the Washington Times-- the paper run by the moonies who are privey to holding their bizarre rituals in the Senate House, all sactioned by the republican party."

Your ideological half-truth words.

The least you could do is follow your own pitiful post threads.

Killing them with kindness isn't working.  Time to get scrappy with the Donkeys.

Rep... a little test

A little test.

I assume that you believe that you read the news, and keep abreast?

- Who said: ..."I also condemn NATO for taking action outside of the United Nations and doing precisely what Milosevic is doing. Killing civilians, destroying the infrastructures of the country." RE: KOSOVO ? And which ex-president made just about the same comment? And then, why did not every news show in America fight to get them on talking about it?

- What happened to Gen. Wes Clark's post of SACEUR  (Supreme Allied Commander Europe)?

- How large was James Riady's fine (hint: a record fine for campaign finance corruption), and how long had he been friends with Bill Clinton, and how many times was he in the White House? Oh, and just why, when the media revists past corruption and scandals, do they never mention this one?

- For that matter - How many times did Moncia do the dirty deed on Clinton?

- According to the BBC - in what conflict have the most deaths occured since WWll?

- Why were the flood gates not installed in the City's 3 main canals? And who's putting them in now?

- Why (In NOLA) was MRGO not shut down prior to Katrina?

- Why are folks in the midwest still complaining that the federal government never delivered on their promises following the historic great Mississippi floods of 1994?

- Who kept the Red Cross out of New Orleans, while all of those people sit trapped at the Superdome?

- Who ( a big wig) opposed the creation, and resisted effort to establish the cabinet level Department of Homeland Securtiy for almost a year, because it would become too bureacratic? 

- Why does Gary Trudeau believe that more Americans died in conflict in the Vietman war during Nixon's term, than LBJ (assuming that Trudeau understands that LBJ had something to do with the Vietnam war)? 

Look, you've got a lot of

Look, you've got a lot of time on your hands and you really probably are a bit too absorbed by this.  You are really anal.  And I don't mean that in a gay way. 

Furthermore, your trite questions are meaningless and pointless.

"No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American Public."

-H.L. Mencken

Repubicando - stop with the insults.

Repubicando - stop with the insults.

Are you, or are you not familiar with the questions? The answers to the questions sould be as readily known as Cheney and Saddams' meeting, Reagan's so called refusal to mention Aids in public, the Iran/Conta scandal, Abramoff, Delay, Darfur and Clinton's view of WMD's in 2003 (oops, I forgot - folks are not that aware of his view, of WMDs' after the war started - and for good reason. From the media's point of view).  

What Republicando SAYS and what he MEANS.........

Republicando SAYS:  Look, you've got a lot of time on your hands and you really probably are a bit too absorbed by this.  You are really anal.  And I don't mean that in a gay way.  Furthermore, your trite questions are meaningless and pointless.

Republicando MEANS:  Your questions are spot-on correct and I haven't the source nor the means to singularly contradict everything you've just posted.

That would be the classic example of a troll.  Flame away, then hide.  

Bingo Scout!

Bingo Scout!

Republicando Your a liar

I guess I could put this in a pc way but I not going to.The msm is and has been pushing their agenda.They distort information.Do creative editing to show their view.The bottom line is you can spew all the garbage you want but because you believe it is the truth doesnt make it so.The NYT is about middle of the road as Pravda was back during the Soviet Union days.Your opinion and fifty cents will get you a cup of coffee.Save your rhetoric for kos kids.

Begging to differ

The actions of a party in 1964 and 1990 definitely ARE relevant today, IF they continue in the same behavior. 

What about 1998?  When BJ Clinton was impeached, held in contempt, disbarred and convicted of perjury- for lying in court with regard to his illicit sexual activity and sexual assault?

What about Gerry Studds or Barney Frank (who obviously falsely denied knowing a brothel was being run out of his office), or Gary Condit, or Gary Hart, etc. etc.????

These things are relevant because the Dems continue to get a pass (Clinton remained in office despite his crimes) for their aggregious behavior whereas Republicans get banished for behavior which pales in comparison.

The same double-standard that allowed Clinton to stay in office, whereas Packwoody had to quit,  is being applied today.  Therefore, the past is extremely relevant to today!

"What about 1998?  When BJ

"What about 1998?  When BJ Clinton was impeached, held in contempt, disbarred and convicted of perjury- for lying in court with regard to his illicit sexual activity and sexual assault?" 

 Bush Lied, People Died.

 Clinton did nothing more than any man who loves his wife and wants to save his marriage would have done.  Get over it.

 At least he didn't try and suck off a cop.

Oh, here's another republican hypocrite:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,289137,00.html

 

"No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American Public."

-H.L. Mencken

Planet Republicando

I agree, Republicando. I think that every man who gets a bj from a girl his daughters age should lie about it but only, only, if they love their wife.

Keep posting, Republicando, I'm guessing your home planet is Uranus.

And your point is????

Republicando:

Regarding the link you posted:

And your point is????

 

mother... It sounds to me

mother...

It sounds to me like he is saying the following..."it's ok for republicans to act this way because dems have been doing it for years. 

Get Email updates from Fred http://socialnet.imwithfred.com/email_alert_july_26.html

...

Are Libs saying that Democrat crime and corruption is OK but when Republicans do it, even if it's way less egregious, they need to be kicked out? 

I say get rid of ALL the crooks - but then that would destroy the Democrat Party, while it would merely strenthen the GOP by eliminating a few bad apples.

IF the GOP is infected with corruption, the DEMs are defined by it.

Now I know

Now I know you're just a Left-Wing nut.

Bush did not lie! Or, if he did, it was the same lie started by BJ Clinton who used Hussein's WMD threat to justify bombing Iraq... 

It's high time for the Left to consider just how many more people would be dead if we had continued the same do-nothing policies of the previous administration.  But I know they won't, because they really don't give a crap about people dying, they only care about pushing their agenda at any cost.

mattm

I can visualize that meeting. Mr. President. Here's the deal. There really isn't much proof that Saddam still has WMD's, can quickly reconstitute more, and that he is threat to the US and our allies, but for the record, that is the official line put forth by the Clinton white house which they used, and they have assured us that they will continue to support us in that view.

And actually, for the record, they did come out and support that view - although the media had little interest in reporting that last part. 

Bush did not lie! "Major

Bush did not lie!

"Major combat operations in Iraq have ended". -GW Bush

 

Blaster, what part of

"major combat operations" confuses you?

...and...they...uh...had...

...and...they...uh...had...

??

...and...they...uh...had...

...and...they...uh...had...

 ..3,078 dead Americans.

 

I put the majority, blaster, at the feet of the left,

whose behavior has encouraged the enemy to fight, just as they did in Viet Nam.

Major combat operations for

Major combat operations for the invasion of Iraq had ended.

Learn history instead of slogans.

Killing them with kindness isn't working.  Time to get scrappy with the Donkeys.

 "Major combat operations

 "Major combat operations for the invasion of Iraq had ended"--Pulled out of stratman's butt

 Go ahead with your revisionist history. 

Bush borrowed a page right out of Lenin's playbook--"Tell a lie often enough and it becomes the truth".

http://zfacts.com/p/87.html

"Major combat operations

"Major combat operations for the invasion of Iraq had ended"--Pulled out of stratman's butt"

At the risk of encouraging your gay bathroom sex fantasies, the late, great Phil Hartman once said while portraying Frank Sinatra on SNL, "I got chunks of guys like you in my stool."

I see you were finally motivated to actually include a link.  It changed nothing.

You are confusing military operations during an "invasion" with that during an "occupation".

The only one attempting to revise history is you.

Your willfull ignorance betrays you again.   

Killing them with kindness isn't working.  Time to get scrappy with the Donkeys.

Prove It

"Bush Lied, People Died."

Prove it.

Let's see your documented proof. 

No six degrees of separation concerning facts, like links to HuffPo, DKos, Rosie O'Donnell, ect..  No channeling from John Edwards dead children.  No "I heard" or "I just know" crap.

Prove it.

Killing them with kindness isn't working.  Time to get scrappy with the Donkeys.

Talk to the Moose

whenever you hear the mantra Bush lied it's time to talk to the moose

Supreme Court,  National Security,  Borders,  Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.  

Good link

A nice resource page.  I

A nice resource page.  I appreciate the corroborating links it lists.

Blaster is a feckless psuedointellectual who appears to believe that cutting and pasting someone else's word's and trite slogans makes him intelligent.  His arrival on NB has created yet another round of Whack-A-Mole - where he posts some pablum which is refuted to which he then posts the next Media Matters delusion no matter how unconnected to the original post -  which Liberals seem to delight in instead of actual constructive debate.

The village that raised this idiot should be disbanded.

Killing them with kindness isn't working.  Time to get scrappy with the Donkeys.

Strat

Perfectly articulated.

Nicely done. 

Sublime, in fact.

David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive

 

Thank you Blonde for your

Thank you Blonde for your very generous compliments.

Posters like Blaster are so simplistic and transparent that understanding them is as difficult as gathering fallen fruit.  And like the value of fallen fruit, his posts' intellectual value is often soft, spoiled and worm-ridden.

Killing them with kindness isn't working.  Time to get scrappy with the Donkeys.

Regarding her consideration

Regarding her consideration of gay Republicans: I've heard of Bush Derangement Syndrome, but this woman has gone WAY past that. I don't know what state she was born in, but she's living in the State of Confusion.

Regarding her past fascination with Bill Clinton: For this woman to think it's a compliment to be lusted after by Clinton (Bill, that is) is bad enough; to admit that she would willingly fornicate with him, (remember, this was before her comment about keeping abortion legal) and consider it a badge of honor, is disgusting.

To say all this publicly and put her name to it, is just plain sick.

Have you no dignity at all, Ms. Burhleigh?  At long last, have you no shame????

The Amish don't vote. I'm

The Amish don't vote. I'm serious.

"Congressmen who willfully take actions during wartime that damage
morale and undermine the military are saboteurs and should be arrested,
exiled, or hanged." -Abraham Lincoln

Maybe, maybe not.

Otherwise, how do you explain this?

 

Apologies for that last

Apologies for that last post. Thanks to wiki and your link I stand corrected.

http://en.wikipedia....

Some vote. While "some" is a very large umbrella of a word, I feel safe in assuming that the total Amish vote is VERY small, given that the total numbers of Amish civilians are small (~200,000 including women and children), and their view of Separation of Church and State that stems back to when they still lived in Europe (not stemming from the Constitution or all that nonsense that SoC/S Americans blather on about today). So courting the Amish vote is like courting the Persian Rug repair industry. Big Whoop.

"Congressmen who willfully take actions during wartime that damage
morale and undermine the military are saboteurs and should be arrested,
exiled, or hanged." -Abraham Lincoln

Well we go to farms to get

Well we go to farms to get votes from people that are
religious, they go to jails to get votes from people that..

These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc.
Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day

Makes sense to me

"they usually knew more about my shoes than I did."

This statement makes sense to me. Her feet are always behind her.