Bryan at Hot Air lets loose on the New Republic's Peter Beinart for his magazine's silence on the Scott Thomas Beauchamp scandal, even as Beinart appeared on an National Review Online vlog to defend the leftist fabulist.
I’ve tried to keep all emotion out of the TNR’s Scott Thomas Beauchamp scandal, but frankly, Peter Beinart’s defense of TNR in today’s What’s Your Problem (on NRO) made my blood boil a bit.
He professes shock, shock that anyone on the right would seek ideological causes for the scandal in an ideological magazine such as The New Republic.
He calls Beauchamp a “good writer,” which is obviously untrue. The man writes with more purple than Prince.
He calls conservative criticism of TNR “cartoonish.” What has been cartoonish is the Apocalypse, Now! approach in which a soldier outs himself as so greatly stressed by war that he mocks disfigured women, when he had never even been to war when that incident is now supposed to have occurred. That’s cartoonish.
And then he says that TNR has done a good job trying to re-report the facts underlying Beauchamp’s writing?
Oh really, Peter?
Then where’s the stratified mass grave? It ought to be somewhere near FOB Falcon. Has TNR even tried to locate it, or are you all content with Beauchamp characterizing a children’s cemetery as a “mass grave,” and writing that it was never reported up the chain of command, when PAO at Falcon is fully aware of the cemetery’s existence? Are you content with that? Is that good fact-finding?
The rest of the August 16 Hot Air Beauchamp entry is available here.
—Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Rathergate redux
August 16, 2007 - 13:45 ET by LionKingThe Beauchamp scandal has the same feel as the Rathergate forged documents scandal. Just because we cannot prove it is true, that does not mean that it is not true!
In the meantime, the damage has been done...our military has been victimized with lies.
MSM Plastic Surgery
August 16, 2007 - 13:51 ET by drillanwr"Fake but accurate" ...
Yeah, so are Pam Anderson's boobs and Joan Rivers's face ...
Let me see if I have this
August 16, 2007 - 13:55 ET by BDLet me see if I have this right.
Just because the author of the article has stated before enlisting that his goal was to become a famous writer....
And just because he has admitted in a signed afadavit that the stories are bogus figments of his imagination made up of whole cloth...
And just because none of his platoon mates can confirm any of his stories and most flat out state they never happened...
And the stories seem to have been written prior to deployment to Iraq when placed on a timeline....
...does not mean that the story is bogus!!!!!
hmmm ...
August 16, 2007 - 13:57 ET by drillanwrThink he's related to that juror / writer in the Libby case?
hmmm ...
August 16, 2007 - 13:59 ET by drillanwr<DELETED - - - Duplicate post due to the Drudge traffic making the NB site a bit buggy today ...>
Reading some of the content
August 16, 2007 - 18:05 ET by Mean Gene Dr. LoveReading some of the content at Beauchamp's Blog reveals his profound immaturity. He reminds me of a gang-member wannabe.
He's getting his kicks writing the things he does. He's a narcissistic prima donna. All the attention is just feeding his ego.
"Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa! There's still plenty of meat on that bone. Now you take this home, throw it in a pot, add some broth, a potato, baby you've got a stew goin'!" -- Carl Weathers
Beau Sham
August 16, 2007 - 18:12 ET by Cool ArrowThis dude learned nothing from Mark Fuhrman's dangling screenplay.
~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~